Upgrade.Vet

USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0701104

Original file (MD0701104.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-, USMC
MD07-01104

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20070807 Characterization Received:

Narrative Reason: MISCONDUCT Authority: MARCORSEPMAN 6210.6

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
                           Narrative Reason change to:
Applicant’s Issues:       1. Did not receive a Administrative Review Board
                           2. Service Record

Decision

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall MISCONDUCT.

Date: 20 08 0124             Location: Washington D.C.         Representation :

Discussion

Issue s 1: ( ). T he Board reviews the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge individually, on a case-by-case basis. If such a review reveals an impropriety or inequity, relief is in order. Regulations permit relief on equitable grounds if the Applicant’s discharge is inconsistent with standards of discipline of the Naval service. The Applicant implies that h e requested an Administrative Board but never received a Board . The Naval Discharge Review Board found that the Applicant acknowledged the Marine Corps’ policy on illegal drug use during his enlistment process and that the Applicant submitted an official statement to the CG, 1 ^st MARDIV admitting to use of Ecstasy. Per MARCORPSEPMAN para 6210.5, Commanders shall process Marines for Administrative Separation for illegal, wrongful, or improper use of any controlled substance. The record indicates the Commanding Officer of First Reconnaissance Battalion signed a convening order for a n Administrative Discharge Review Board but no further record indicat ing the review board convened. Administrative Board proceedings shall be used unless the characterization of service is more favorable than other than honorable conditions. The Applicant was processed and received a general ( under honorable conditions) characterization of se rvice and therefore A dministrative Board was not required. The Board determined that the separation was proper.

Issue s 2 : ( ). A general ( under honorable conditions ) discharge is warranted when significant negative aspects of a member’s conduct or performance of duty outweigh the positive aspects of the member’s military record. C ertain serious offenses, even though isolated, warrant separation from the Naval service in order to maintain proper order and discipline. The Applicant’s service was marred by two nonjudicial punishments (NJP) for a violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), Article 92 (Dereliction in performance of duties) and Article 112a (Wrongful use of a controlled substance). A v iolation of Article s 92 and 112a are considered serious offense s for which a punitive discharge is authorized if adjudged by a Special or General Courts Martial. An upgrade to honorable would be inappropriate.

In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries , Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, t he Board found that

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive: USMCR (DEP)     20011010 - 20011210              Active:
Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Enlistment: 20011211               Years Contracted :                 Date of Discharge: 20051210
Length of Service : Yrs Mths 0 D ys                         Lost Time : Days UA: Days Confine d :
Education Level:         Age at Enlistment:       AFQT: 40          MOS: 3531 Highest Rank:
Proficiency/Conduct marks (# of occasions):      N/A / N/A          Fitness reports :
Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214): GCM, CAR (IRAQ), ICM, IGWOTEM, IGWOTSM, SSDR (2), PUC

Medical/Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Basis for Discharge

20011009:        Applicant acknowledges Marine Corps’ Policy on illegal use of drugs.

20050315 :        NJP -- Viol UCMJ Art. 92 - Derelict in performance of duties .
         Awarded - FOP ($ 820.00 ) for ( 1 month); RIR ( ); Restr for ( 30 days); Extra duties ( 30 days). FOP for 1 month, Restr and Extra duties for 15 days suspended for 6 months.

20050816 :         NAVDRUGLAB, , reported Applicant’s urine sample, received 20050810 , tested positive for
( ).

20050830:        Vacate FOP, Restr and Extra duties awarded at NJP dated 20050315.

20050901         NJ P -- Viol UCMJ Art. 112a - Wrongfully use cocaine, MDMA (ecstasy) and MDA.
         Awarded - FOP ($ 692.00 ) for ( 2 months); RIR ( ); Restr for ( 45 days); Extra duties ( 45 days).

20050921:        Applicant refused Medical Officer’s Evaluation. Recommend Administrative Separation.

20050915:        Applicant admits in a statement to CG, 1 ^st MARDIV that he used Ecstasy on 20050730.

2005113 0:        Administrative Board convening order signed.

Discharge Process

Date Notified:   20050901
Basis for Discharge:     DUE TO

Least Favorable Characterization:
Commanding Officer’s Intended Recommendation:

Date Applicant Responded to Notification:                 20050901
Rights Elected at Notification:
         Consult with Counsel
         Obtain Copies of Documents
         Submit Statement(s) (date)                         ( 20050915 )
         Administrative Board

Administrative Board Date :       NOT FOUND IN RECORD
Findings, by preponderance of the evidence:     NOT FOUND IN RECORD

Recommendation on Separation: NOT FOUND IN RECORD
Recommendation on Characterization:     NOT FOUND IN RECORD
Commanding Officer Recommendation (date):        ( 20050920 )
SJA review (date):
Separation Authority (date):     NOT FOUND IN RECORD
Basis for discharge directed:
Characterization directed:
Date Applicant Discharged:        20051210

Types of Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered By Board

Related to Military Service:      Service and/or Medical Record:          Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:                        Finances:                          Education:
         Health/Medical Records:                   Substance Abuse:                           Criminal Records:
         Family/Personal Status:                   Community Service:                References:

Additional Statements From Applicant:    From Representative:
Other Documentation (Describe)

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. The Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16F, effective 1 Sep tember 2001 until Present,
Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

C. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 112a.

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity , OUSD (P&R) PI-LP , The Pentagon , Washington, DC 20301-4000 . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provi ded the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years , has already been grante d a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employmen t / Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD . ” Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0701023

Original file (MD0701023.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant’s service was marred by the award of nonjudicial punishment (NJP) on four occasions for violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), Article 86 (Unauthorized Absence), Article 91 (Willfully disobey a lawful order), Article 121 (Larceny) and Article 112a (Wrongful use of controlled substance). Medical/Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Basis for Discharge 19961127: NJP -- Viol UCMJ Art. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document...
USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700963

Original file (MD0700963.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) found in the Applicant’s record of his Administrative Discharge Board that the Applicant claimed that he was given the pill by his father. Recommendation on Separation: BY Recommendation on Characterization: BY Commanding Officer Recommendation (date): (20060427) SJA review (date): Separation Authority (date): CG, 2 nd MARDIV (20060515) Basis for discharge directed: DUE TO: Characterization directed: Date Applicant Discharged: 20060525 Types of...
USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700969

Original file (MD0700969.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Certain serious offenses, even though isolated, warrant separation from the Naval service in order to maintain proper order and discipline.The Applicant’s service was marred by two retention warnings, three nonjudicial punishment for a violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), Article 86 (Unauthorized absence), Article 92 (Failure to obey lawful order), and Article 112a (Wrongful use of a controlled substance). Medical/Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of...
USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0801152

Original file (MD0801152.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

There was no evidence in the record, nor was any submitted by the Applicant, documenting he was not responsible for his actions or that the misconduct should be excused based on youth and immaturity. Again, the Board determined an upgrade would be inappropriate.After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found Pertinent Regulation/Law A. ” Additional Reviews :...
NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801037

Original file (ND0801037.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214: Service and/or Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Substance Abuse: Criminal Records: Family/Personal Status: Community Service: References: Additional Statements From Applicant: From Representation: From Member of Congress: Other Documentation (Describe): DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE...
USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700271

Original file (MD0700271.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Physical Evaluation Board has determined her condition to be fit to continue on active duty and ineligible for disability. Based on the results of your Physical Evaluation Board, you were found unable to physically perform to the standards of the Marine Corps training and therefore, are not physically qualified for further service in the United States Marine Corps. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing,...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700105

Original file (ND0700105.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

In so choosing, the record also demonstrates that the Applicant had the opportunity to review the evidence against him, discuss that evidence and his options with detailed defense counsel, and admitted guilt to the charge against him in order to avoid such a trial. 20050926 Consulted with or Waived Counsel: Acknowledged Understanding Elements: Acknowledged Guilt to: Article(s) 80 BCD/DD authorized for offense(s) Acknowledged Consequences of OTH: Type of Characterization...
USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700882

Original file (MD0700882.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

An upgrade to honorable would be inappropriate.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Summary of...
NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0601091

Original file (ND0601091.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Regarding equity, the Board found the discharge: Discussion Narrative reason change: Commander Naval Personnel directed the Applicant’s discharge by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse after reviewing the administrative discharge package forwarded by U. S. Naval Security Force, Bahrain. The record documents his administrative discharge board and commanding officer’s recommendation for separation by reason of misconduct by drug abuse with a characterization of service as under other than...
USMC | DRB | 2013_Marine | MD1301098

Original file (MD1301098.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

MD13-010938 NN .ex-Pvt, USMC CURRENT DISCHARGE AND APPLICANT’S REQUEST Application Received: 20130416 Characterization of Service Received: (per DD 214) UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS Narrative Reason for Discharge: (per DD 214) MISCONDUCT Authority for Discharge: (per DD 214) MARCORSEPMAN 6210.5 [DRUGS} Applicant’s Request: Characterization change to: GENERAL (UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS) Narrative Reason change to: NONE REQUESTED SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service: : Inactive: USMCR...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0701104

Similar Decisions