Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1201776
Original file (MD1201776.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-, USMC
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20120815
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MARCORSEPMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
         Narrative Reason change to: END OF TERM OF SERVICE

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:         USMCR (DEP)       19900608 - 19901021     Active:  

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 19901022     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Months
Date of Discharge: 19990305      H ighest Rank:
Length of Service : Y ea rs M on ths 12 D a ys
Education Level:        AFQT: 61
MOS: 3531/3534
Fitness R eports:

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      Rifle JMUA ( 2 )

Periods of UA: 19970902 - 19971216, 106 days

NJP:    SCM:              CC:

SPCM:

- 19970715 :       Art icle (Absence without leave , 2 specifications )
         Specification 1: 19970110-19970317, 67 days
         Specification 2: 19970507-19970516, 10 days
         Article ( Disrespect toward a superior commissioned officer )
         Article (Wrongful use, possession, etc. of controlled substances , to wit: cocaine )
         Sentence : 120 days (1997051 7 -19970822, 9 8 days,)

Retention Warning Counseling :

- 19921014 :       For improper conduct while posted as ADNCO , SNM violated Sqdn 1601.1A twice and was involved in an altercation.

- 19940207 :       For dereliction of duty in that you left an M970 unattended while re-circulating the fuel at about 0700 on 19940207.

- 19960821 :       For conduct during a softball game the morning of 19960802. Your conduct was totally unacceptable, un professional, and unbecoming a Sergeant of Marines. The harassment you directed toward a junior Marine went far beyond the acceptable taunting of an opponent during such a game. You were ordered by senior Sergeants to stop this harassment, yet it continued, and turned into a physical wrestling match.

- 19961212 :       For refusal to comply with TAD orders to Sergeant’s course starting 19960710. You denied training upon arrival at the school to the Director (Sergeant Major S_) Staff NCO academy.

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

 Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:            Service/ Medical Record:            Other Records:   

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:     
         Health/Medical Records:           Rehabilitation/Treatment:                  Criminal Records:       
         Personal Documentation :           Community Service:                References:     
         Department of VA letter:                  Oth er Documentation:    
                  Additional Statements :
         From Applicant:            From /To Representation:            From /To Congress m ember :        

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. Paragraph 1105, DISCHARGE ADJUDGED BY SENTENCE OF COURT-MARTIAL , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16E), effective 18 August 1995 until 31 August 2001.

 B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part IV, Para 403m(7)(a), Presumption Concerning Court-Martial Specifications .

C . Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .



DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

 1.       The Applicant seeks clemency based on in-service conduct and numerous awards.
2.       The Applicant contends his post-service conduct warrants clemency.

Decision

 Date: 20 1 3 0627            Location: Washington D.C .         R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
 By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .
Discussion

 The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the NDRB presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial case, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. In response to the Applicant’s clemency request, relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts. The Applicant’s case was considered under the pertinent standards of equity to determine if any factors in this particular case merited clemency. The Applicant’s record of service included 6105 counseling warnings and for of the UCMJ: Article (Absence without leave, 2 specifications: 67 days and 10 days ) , Article ( Disrespect toward a superior commissioned officer), and Article (Wrongful use, possession, etc. of controlled substances, to wit: cocaine) . The Applicant’s service record documents a punitive conviction and punishment, as adjudged by a Special Court-Martial, on 15 July 1997. A qualified legal defense counsel represented the Applicant throughout the trial by Special Court-Martial process. Given the facts of the case, the Special Court-Martial awarded the Applicant a Bad Conduct Discharge and confinement for 120 days. The case was submitted for review to the U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals without assignments of error; it was reviewed and the findings were affirmed. Subsequently, the Navy Marine Corps Appellate Leave Activity ordered the Bad Conduct Discharge executed.
: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant seeks clemency based on in-service conduct and numerous awards. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial case, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. In response to the Applicant’s clemency request, relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts. Due to the egregious and repetitive nature of the Applicant’s misconduct, charges were referred to a Special Court-Martial, where he was found guilty. Despite his previous service in his enlistment, the NDRB determined clemency was not warranted due to the serious nature of the misconduct. Clemency denied.

Issue 2: (Decisional) (Clemency) RELIEF NOT WARRANTED. The Applicant contends his post-service conduct warrants clemency. The NDRB considers outstanding post-service conduct to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. The Applicant provided a personal statement and four character references. The Applicant could have provided documentation as detailed in the Post-Service Conduct paragraph in the Addendum , however, completion of these items alone does not guarantee an upgrade from an unfavorable discharge as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case by case basis to determine if post-service conduct establishes that the in-service misconduct was an aberration. T he Board determined the characterization of service received was appropriate considering the length of service and UCMJ violations. Clemency denied.
Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .
The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum for additional information.


ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disable d American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 701 South Courthouse Road, Suite 1001, Arlington, VA 22204-2490 for further review.
Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

 Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

 Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.
Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1200245

    Original file (MD1200245.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The NDRB determined the Applicant’s claim of PTSD did not mitigate his misconduct.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. ” Additional...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700096

    Original file (MD0700096.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    By a vote of 5-0 the Narrative Reason shall remain FAILURE TO PARTICIPATE. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving...

  • USMC | DRB | 2013_Marine | MD1300338

    Original file (MD1300338.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities.

  • USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1200972

    Original file (MD1200972.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    With an NJP and a Special Court-Martial conviction in two years and four months of service, the NDRB determined the Applicant’s discharge Under Other Than Honorable Conditions was both proper and equitable.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant...

  • USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0901136

    Original file (MD0901136.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1002327

    Original file (ND1002327.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1101018

    Original file (ND1101018.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.Applicant seeks a discharge upgrade to reenlist in the U.S. Armed Forces.2. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, service record entries, court-martial proceedings, and the punitive discharge process, the NDRB found that clemency was not warranted and the sentence awarded the Applicant at his court-martial was...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700471

    Original file (ND0700471.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Accordingly, this misconduct substantiates the reason for his separation as well as his characterization of service under other than honorable conditions. Recommendation on Separation: BY Recommendation on Characterization: BY Commanding Officer Recommendation (date): (19940513) Separation Authority (date): BUPERS WASHINGTON DC (19940615)Reason for discharge directed: - Characterization directed: Date Applicant Discharged: 19940622 Types of Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered By...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700182

    Original file (ND0700182.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    112a (4 specs) - (1) Wrongfully possess methamphetamine, (2) Wrongfully distribute methamphetamine, (3) Wrongfully possess marijuana, (4) Wrongfully distribute marijuana.Awarded - FOP ($427.00) for (2 months); RIR (E-1); Restriction for (45 days); Extra duties (45 days) Discharge Process Date Notified: 19950907Reason for Discharge:- Least Favorable Characterization: Date Applicant Responded to Notification:19950907Rights Elected at Notification: Consult with Counsel Obtain Copies of...

  • USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1101202

    Original file (MD1101202.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT Applicant’s Issues 1.The Applicant seeks an upgrade to enhance employment opportunities. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . ” Additional Reviews :...