Upgrade.Vet

USMC | DRB | 2013_Marine | MD1300338

Original file (MD1300338.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-, USMC

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20121204

Characterization of Service Received:

Narrative Reason for Discharge:

Authority for Discharge: MARCORSEPMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
         Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:         USMCR (DEP)       19981223 - 19990119     Active:

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 19990120     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years M onth
Date of Discharge: 20010828      H ighest Rank:
Length of Service : Y ea rs M on ths 09 D a ys
Education Level:        AFQT: 36
MOS: 3043
Proficiency/Conduct M arks (# of occasions): ( ) / 2.4 ( )         Fitness R eports:

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      Rifle

I n Hands of Civilian Authorities: 20000224 - 20000228, 5 days

NJP:

- 19990325 :       Article (Larceny, on or about 19990220, 0930, wrongfully appropriate a pack of cigarettes from an unknown vehicle, of a value of $3.00)
         Awarded: Suspended:

- 19990823 :      Article ( Insubordinate conduct toward warrant officer, noncommissioned officer, or petty officer )
         Article (Failure to obey order or regulation, did violate an order issued by Sgt B_ to prepare his uniform for inspection by not shaving, shining his boots , or washing his cammies)
         Article (Larceny, did steal a CD of a value of about $12.98 the property of the Main Exchange)
         Awarded: CCU Suspended:

SCM:

- 19990928 :       Article (Failure to obey order or regulation , 2 specifications )
         Specification 1: Did disobey a lawful order by having 10 unopened beers in his barracks room and admitted to drinking underage
         Specification 2: Did disobey a lawful order given by 1stSgt C_ to prepare for a wall locker/J.O.B. inspection
         Article (False official statements, did make a false statement that he was fixing the video game machine in the 1st deck lounge and later stated he was trying to get a free game)
         Article (Larceny , 2 specifications )
         Specification 1: Did break into LCpl K_ secretary and steal his cassette player, headphones, boots, shirts, sweatshirts, 3 towels , and 2 CD’s
         Specification 2: Did steal a practice grenade and store it in his wall locker
         Article (General A rticle , 2 specifications )

         Specification 1: Did destroy government property by breaking the lock and hasp off LCpl K_’s secretary
         Specification 2: Did write worthless checks for the total amount of $321.48
         Sentence :

SPCM:

- 20000407 :       Art icle (Absence without leave, 19991122-20000224, 95 days)
         Sentence : 75 days (20000228-200004 13 , 46 days )

CIVIL ARREST:

- 20000122 :       Charges Not Found in Record

CC:

Retention Warning Counseling :

- 19990913 :       For total absence of judgment and complete disregard for lawful orders.

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:          Service/ Medical Record:          Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:
         Health/Medical Records:          Rehabilitation/Treatment:                  Criminal Records:
         Personal Documentation :          Community Service:                References:
         Department of VA letter:                  Oth er Documentation:
                  Additional Statements :
         From Applicant:          From /To Representation:          From /To Congress m ember :

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. Paragraph 1105, DISCHARGE ADJUDGED BY SENTENCE OF COURT-MARTIAL , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16E), effective 18 August 1995 until 31 August 2001.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part IV, Para 403m(7)(a), Presumption Concerning Court-Martial Specifications .

C . Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

1.       The Applicant contends his disciplinary problems were the result of stress caused by family issues and personal hardship.
2.       The Applicant contends youth , immaturity , and undiagnosed Type I juvenile diabetes were contributing factors in his misconduct .

Decision

Date : 20 1 3 0821          Location: Washington D.C .         R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .

Discussion

The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the NDRB presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial case, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. In response to the Applicant’s clemency request, relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts. The Applicant’s record of service included 6105 counseling warning , one civil arrest, for o f the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article ( Insubordinate conduct toward warrant officer, noncommissioned officer, or petty officer ), Article (Failure to obey order or regulation, did violate an order issued by Sgt B_ to prepare his uniform for inspection by not shaving, shining his boots , or washing his cammies ), and Article (Larceny , 2 specifications , wrongfully appropriate a pack of cigarettes from an unknown vehicle, of a value of $3.00 and D id steal a CD of a value of about $12.98 the property of the Main Exchange ) , Summary Court-Martial for of the UCMJ: Article (Failure to obey order or regulation , 2 specifications , Did disobey a lawful order by having 10 unopened beers in his barracks room and admitted to drinking underage and Did disobey a lawful order given by 1stSgt C_ to prepare for a wall locker/J.O.B. inspection ), Article (False official statements, did make a false statement that he was fixing the video game machine in the 1st deck lounge and later stated he was trying to get a free game ) , Article (Larceny , 2 specifications , Did break into LCpl K_ secretary and steal his cassette player, headphones, boots, shirts, sweatshirts, 3 towels , and 2 CDs and Did steal a practice grenade and store it in his wall locker ), and Article (General A rticle , 2 specifications , Did destroy government property by breaking the lock and hasp off LCpl K_’s secretary and Did write worthless checks for the total amount of $321.48 ) , and for of the UCMJ: Article (Absence without leave, 19991122-20000224, 95 days ). The Applicant’s service record documents a punitive conviction and punishment, as adjudged by a Special Court-Martial, on 07 April 2000 . A qualified legal defense counsel represented the Applicant throughout the trial by Special Court-Martial process. Given the facts of the case, the Special Court-Martial awarded the Applicant a Bad Conduct Discharge and confinement for a period of 120 days. The case was submitted for review to the U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals without assignments of error; it was reviewed and the findings were affirmed on 2 8 August 200 1 . Subsequently, the Navy Marine Corps Appellate Leave Activity ordered the Bad Conduct Discharge executed.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends his disciplinary problems were the result of stress caused by family issues and personal hardship. The NDRB recognizes that serving in the military is challenging. Most servicemembers, however, serve honorably and therefore earn their Honorable or General discharges. There is no evidence in the record, nor did the Applicant provide any documentation, to indicate he attempted to use the numerous services available for servicemembers who undergo personal and family problems during their enlistment s , such as the Navy Chaplain, Medical or Mental Health professionals, Navy Relief Society, Family Advocacy Programs, or even the Red Cross. The NDRB determined the Applicant’s personal problems were not mitigating factors in his misconduct. Clemency denied .

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends youth , immaturity , and undiagnosed Type I juvenile diabetes were contributing factors in his misconduct . While the Applicant may believe these factors were the underlying causes of his misconduct, the record clearly reflects his willful misconduct and demonstrated he was unfit for further service. The evidence of record does not demonstrate the Applicant was not responsible for his conduct or that he should not be held accountable for his actions. The NDRB recognizes that many of our servicemembers are young at the time they enlist for service, however, most still manage to serve honorably. While some members may be less mature than others, the NDRB does not view a member’s claim of immaturity to be a mitigating factor or a sufficient reason for misconduct . Clemency denied.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum for additional information.

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disable d American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 701 South Courthouse Road, Suite 1001, Arlington, VA 22204-2490 for further review.

Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0601150

Original file (MD0601150.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Elements of Discharge: [Bad Conduct Discharge] Record of Trial Complete: Date Charge(s) Preferred: 19930225 Date Charges Referred to Special Court-Martial:19930308Trial Date: 19930416Applicant requested Bad Conduct Discharge:Date Applicant to Pre-trial Confinement: 19930330 Date Applicant from Pre-trial Confinement: 19930416 Date Applicant to Confinement:19930524Date Applicant from Confinement: 19930607Date Applicant to Voluntary Appellate Leave:19930616Date Applicant to Involuntary...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002070800C070402

Original file (2002070800C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that DA Form 4697 (Department of the Army Report of Survey), dated 3 August 1999 and numbered 001-00, be corrected to reflect that he was not found financially liable in the amount of $603.16 for the loss of organizational clothing and equipment (OCIE). Additionally, the ROS approving authority states that two locked doors secured the 141st Medical Company's locker area and that the unit's full-time staff controlled the area. DISCUSSION : Considering all the...
USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0902349

Original file (MD0902349.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. The Applicant should be aware submission of these items alone does not guarantee clemency as each discharge is reviewed by the NDRB on a case-by-case basis.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall BAD...
USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00569

Original file (MD02-00569.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

MD02-00569 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020311, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable or general/under honorable conditions. It has been determined that he had this 782 gear missing for the last three months. The Applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of his service, reflects his disobedience of the orders and directives which regulate good order and discipline...
NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600598

Original file (ND0600598.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant’s service was marred by nonjudicial punishment for failing to go to his appointed place of duty due to a prior overindulgence of alcohol, attempting to steal merchandise from a vending machine, and failing to report a fellow Sailor’s theft of, and damage to, an automobile, in violation of Articles 80, 86 and 92 of the UCMJ; an administrative discharge board recommendation for separation with a characterization of service as under other than honorable conditions; his admission...
NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00440

Original file (ND02-00440.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 1910 - 142 (formerly 3630605). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).Issue 1: The Applicant believes his other than honorable discharge was very severe punishment and he would like an upgrade to his discharge so he can continue his Navy career...
NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00722

Original file (ND02-00722.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

I went A-wall for 57 days and was turned in to authorities. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:None PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USNR (DEP) 900226 - 900320 COG Active: None Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 900321 Date of Discharge: 910104 Length of Service (years, months, days):Active: 00 09 14 Inactive:...
NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1102168

Original file (ND1102168.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.The Applicant seeks an upgrade due to passage of time.2. The NDRB acknowledges the Applicant’s desire to provide a better life for himself and his family, however, this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance...
USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0501125

Original file (MD0501125.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). 040206: GCMCA, Commander, Marine Corps Recruit Depot/Eastern Recruiting Region, Parris Island, SC, directed the Applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to commission of a serious offense. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “...
NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-00424

Original file (MD04-00424.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable or general (under honorable conditions). Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :930615: Applicant briefed upon and certified understanding of Marine Corps policy concerning illegal use of drugs.941121: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86: Absence from appointed place of duty 1046, 941114, violation of UCMJ, Article 92: Having knowledge of para 3b(3)(c) and...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2013_Marine | MD1300338

Similar Decisions