Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1002327
Original file (ND1002327.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-MSSR, USN
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20100924
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:      
         Narrative Reason change to:      

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:         US N R (DEP)        19921029 - 19921124     Active:  

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 19921125     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Extension
Date of Discharge: 19951005      Highest Rank/Rate: MSSN
Length of Service : Y ear ( s ) M onth ( s ) 27 D a y ( s )
Education Level:        AFQT: 37
Evaluation M arks:         Performance: 3. 3 ( 1 )      Behavior: 3.0 ( 1 )        OTA: 3.20

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):     

Periods of UA: 19940205 - 19940207 (3 days)       19940227 - 19940429 (62 days)

Periods of CONF: Pre-trial 19940429 - 19940522 ( 24 days)        CONF 19940523 - 19940803 (7 2 days)

NJP :              S CM :

SPCM:

- 19940804 :       Art icle (Unauthorized absence, 4 specifications )
         Specification 1: Absence from unit 0500-0620, 19940202
          Specification 2: Failure to go at time prescribed to appointed place of duty 0745, 19940202
         Specification 3: Absence from unit 19940205-19940207, 3 days
        Specification 4: Absence from unit 19940227-19940429, 62 days
         Article 87: Missing ship movement through neglect 19940227
         Article 123a (Making, drawing, or uttering check, draft, or order without sufficient funds, 41 specifications )
         Specification 1: Make of a check for $29.34 upon Well s Fargo B ank on 19940306 with insufficient funds
         Specification 2: Make a check for $429.19 upon Well s Fargo B ank on 19940310 with insufficient funds Specification 3: Make a check for $50.29 upon Well s Fargo B ank on 19940310 with insufficient funds
         Specification 4: Make a check for $28.26 upon Well s Fargo B ank on 19940313 with insufficient funds
          Specification 5: Make a check for $28.75 upon Well s Fargo B ank on 19940314 with insufficient funds
         Specification 6: Make a check for $26.25 upon Well s Fargo B ank on 19940314 with insufficient funds
         Specification 7: Make a check for $26.23 upon Well s Fargo B ank on 19940314 with insufficient funds
          Specification 8: Make a check for $28.85 upon Well s Fargo B ank on 19940314 with insufficient funds
          Specification 9: Make a check for $327.23 upon Well s Fargo B ank on 19940315 with insufficient funds
          Specification 10: Make a check for $ 30 .3 9 upon Well s Fargo B ank on 199403 15 with insufficient funds
         Specification 1 1 : Make a check for $2 8 . 06 upon Well s Fargo B ank on 199403 1 6 with insufficient funds
          Specification 12: Make a check for $28.60 upon Well s Fargo B ank on 19940316 with insufficient funds
         Specification 13: Make a check for $31.67 upon Well s Fargo B ank on 19940317 with insufficient funds
         Specification 14: Make a check for $28.60 upon Well s Fargo B ank on 19940317 with insufficient funds
         Specification 15: Make a check for $39.80 upon Well s Fargo B ank on 19940319 with insufficient funds
         Specification 16: Make a check for $28.55 upon Well s Fargo Bank on 19940320 with insufficient funds
         Specification 17: Make a check for $26.00 upon Well s Fargo Bank on 19940320 with insufficient funds
         Specification 18: Make a check for $31.01 upon Well s Fargo Bank on 19940322 with insufficient funds
         Specification 19: Make a check for $178.62 upon Well s Fargo Bank on 19940322 with insufficient funds
         Specification 20: Make a check for $75.00 upon Well s Fargo Bank on 19940308 with insufficient funds
         Specification 21: Make a check for $40.00 upon Well s Fargo Bank on 19940308 with insufficient funds
         Specification 22: Make a check for $40.00 upon Well s Fargo Bank on 19940309 with insufficient funds
         Specification 23 : Make a check for $ 36 . 00 upon Well s Fargo Bank on 199403 09 with insufficient funds
         Specification 24 : Make a check for $ 154 . 29 upon Well s Fargo Bank on 199403 1 0 with insufficient funds
         Specification 25 : Make a check for $ 45 . 23 upon Well s Fargo Bank on 199403 1 0 with insufficient funds
         Specification 2 6 : Make a check for $ 132 . 64 upon Well s Fargo Bank on 199403 15 with insufficient funds
         Specification 2 7 : Make a check for $ 43 . 08 upon Well s Fargo Bank on 199403 15 with insufficient funds
          Specification 28: Make a check for $81.75 upon Wells Fargo Bank on 19940316 with insufficient funds
         Specification 29: Make a check for $100.08 upon Wells Fargo Bank on 19940316 with insufficient funds
         Specification 30: Make a check for $209.37 upon Wells Fargo Bank on 19940318 with insufficient funds
         Specification 31: Make a check for $42.11 upon Wells Fargo Bank on 19940318 with insufficient funds
         Specification 32: Make a check for $36.84 upon Wells Fargo Bank on 19940319 with insufficient funds
         Specification 33: Make a check for $27.82 upon Wells Fargo Bank on 19940319 with insufficient funds
         Specification 34: Make a check for $37.61 upon Wells Fargo Bank on 19940320 with insufficient funds
          Specification 35: Make a check for $30.05 upon Wells Fargo Bank on 19940320 with insufficient funds
         Specification 36: Make a check for $286.49 upon Wells Fargo Bank on 19940322 with insufficient funds
         Specification 37: Make a check for $44.64 upon Wells Fargo Bank on 19940322 with insufficient funds
         Specification 38: Make a check for $28.01 upon Wells Fargo Bank on 19940323 with insufficient funds
          Specification 39: Make a check for $197.05 upon Wells Fargo Bank on 19940323 with insufficient funds
          Specification 40: Make a check for $46.08 upon Wells Fargo Bank on 19940324 with insufficient funds
          Specification 41: Make a check for $71.00 upon Wells Fargo Bank on 19940317 with insufficient funds
          Sentence : RIR (to E-1) CONF 90 days (19940523-19940803, 7 2 days)
         CA: The sentence approved and, except for that part of the sentence extending to a B ad C onduct D ischarge, will be executed.

C C :

Retention Warning Counseling :

Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214

The NDRB did note administrative error(s) on the original DD Form 214:

          “ COURT-MARTIAL ”
         “ 94FEB27-94 APR 29 (62) , 94APR29-94MAY22 (24) , 94MAY23-94AUG03 (7 2 ) ”

The NDRB will recommend to the Commander, Navy Personnel Command, that the DD 214 be corrected as appropriate.
Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

 Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:            Service/ Medical Record:            Other Records:   
Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:     
         Health/Medical Records:           Rehabilitation/Treatment:                  Criminal Records:       
         Personal Documentation :           Community Service:                References:     
         Department of VA letter:                  Oth er Documentation:    
                  Additional Statements :
         From Applicant:            From /To Representation:            From /To Congress m ember :        

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 5, effective 5 March 1993 until 2 October 1996, Article 3640420, DISCHARGE OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL ADJUDGED BY SENTENCE OF COURT-MARTIAL.

 B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part IV, Para 403m(7)(a), Presumption Concerning Court-Martial Specifications .

C . Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .




DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

 1.       Applicant seeks a discharge upgrade to obtain veteran benefits.
2.       Applicant seeks a discharge upgrade to improve employment opportunities.
3 .       Applicant contends alcohol abuse and/or alcoholism led to the misconduct for which he was separated.

Decision

Date: 20 1 2 01 04             Location: Washington D.C .        R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
 By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .

Discussion

 The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharg e if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial case, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. In response to the Applicant ’ s clemency request, relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be es tablished facts. The Applicant’ s case was considered under the pertinent standards of equity to determine if any factors in this particular case merited clemency. The Applicant’s record of service did reflect one S pecial C ourt -M artial for o f the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article 86 ( Absence without leave, 4 specifications ), Article 87 ( Missing ship’s movement, through neglect ), and Article 123a ( Checks, insufficient funds, intent to deceive, checks drawn upon Wells Fargo Bank , 41 specifications: between 6 -24 Mar 1994, totaling $ 3 , 230.83 ) . The Applicant was sentenced to a B ad C onduct D ischarge, confinement for 90 days, an d a reduction in rank (to E-1).

: (Nondecisional) The Applicant seeks a discharge upgrade to obtain veteran benefits. The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits , and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
: (Nondecisional) The Applicant seeks a discharge upgrade to improve employment opportunities. The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.
: (Decisional) ( ) CLEMENCY NOT WARRANTED . The Applicant contends alcohol abuse and/or alcoholism led to the misconduct for which he was separated. The Applicant’s case was considered under the pertinent standards of equity to determine if any factors in this particular case merited clemency. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s s ummary of s ervice, m edical and s ervice r ecord e ntries, court-martial proceedings , and the punitive d ischarge p rocess , and with no evidence submitted by the Applicant to rebut the presumption of regularity or reflect post-service accomplishments , t he Board found clemency was not warranted and the sentence awarded the Applicant at his court-martial was appropriate for the offense s he committed. Clemency denied.
Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s s ummary of s ervice, r ecord e ntries and the punitive d ischarge p rocess, the Board found that clemency was not warranted. Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall DISCHARGE and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . The Applicant is directed to the Addendum for additional information.


ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disabled American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

 Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

 Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00307

    Original file (MD00-00307.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the applicant’s service. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged on 910920 with a bad conduct discharge which was the sentence adjudged by a properly constituted special court martial that was determined to...

  • AF | DRB | CY2007 | FD2006-00280

    Original file (FD2006-00280.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The records indicated the applicant received an Article 15, seven Letters of Reprimand, and a Letter of Counseling for misconduct. Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former AB) (HGH AlC) 1. (Atch 5) an order which it was your duty to obey, did at or near ------------ - 3 t - - - - - - - - - f. You, being indebted to Otero Federal Credit Union in the excess of $1300 for monthly payment of a car loan, which amount became...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0901855

    Original file (ND0901855.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    When notified of administrative separation processing using the administrative procedure, the Applicant waived his rights to consult with a qualified counsel, submit a written statement, and request an administrative board.Summary: Although the Applicant did not state any issues regarding equity or propriety for the Board to consider, the Board carefully examined his military record. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record...

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00306

    Original file (MD02-00306.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION This ended with brig time and a Bad Conduct Discharge. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was involuntarily separated on 870204 with a bad conduct discharge which was the sentence adjudged by a properly constituted special court martial that was determined to be legal and proper, affirmed in the legal chain of review and executed (A and B).

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0500762

    Original file (MD0500762.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable and that the narrative reason for separation be changed to: “RE code.” The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. My problems had to do with my off duty time. The applicant did not provide additional documentation for the Board’s consideration PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active:...

  • USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1100890

    Original file (MD1100890.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0902449

    Original file (ND0902449.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Substance Abuse: Criminal Records: Family/Personal Status: Community Service: References: Additional Statements: From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member:Other Documentation: Pertinent Regulation/Law A.Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 9,...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700471

    Original file (ND0700471.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Accordingly, this misconduct substantiates the reason for his separation as well as his characterization of service under other than honorable conditions. Recommendation on Separation: BY Recommendation on Characterization: BY Commanding Officer Recommendation (date): (19940513) Separation Authority (date): BUPERS WASHINGTON DC (19940615)Reason for discharge directed: - Characterization directed: Date Applicant Discharged: 19940622 Types of Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered By...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1000801

    Original file (ND1000801.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant’s record of service includednon-judicial punishment (NJP) for of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article 80 (Attempts, attempted to purchase items without sufficient funds in bank account), Article 86 (Unauthorized Absence, 19970314-19970317), Article 123a (Making, drawing, uttering check without sufficient funds; 3 Specifications), Article 134 (Dishonorably failing to pay debt), and Article 134 (Altering public record).When notified of administrative separation...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1001471

    Original file (ND1001471.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: Pertinent Regulation/Law A. Decision Date:...