Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1000897
Original file (ND1000897.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-MM3, USN
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20100218
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge: HOMOSEXUAL ADMISSION
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN 3630400

 Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:      
         Narrative Reason change to:      

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:         US N R (DEP)        19940819 - 1995 0717     Active:  

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 19950718     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Extension
Date of Discharge: 19970821      Highest Rank/Rate: MM3
Length of Service : Y ear ( s ) M onth ( s ) 04 D a y ( s )
Education Level:        AFQT: 69
Evaluation M arks:         Performance: 3.3 ( 3 )      Behavior: 3.0 ( 3 )        OTA: 3.30

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      SSBN D eterrent P atrol I nsignia

Periods of UA /C ONF :

NJP : S CM : SPCM: C C :

Retention Warning Counseling :

- 19970114 :       For failure to meet physical readiness standards.

Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214

The NDRB did note administrative error(s) on the original DD Form 214:

         Narrative Reason for Separation, should read: “ HOMOSEXUAL ADMISSION ”

The NDRB will recommend to the Commander, Navy Personnel Command, that the DD 214 be corrected as appropriate.
Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

 Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:            Service/ Medical Record:            Other Records:   

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:     
         Health/Medical Records:           Rehabilitation/Treatment:                  Criminal Records:       
         Personal Documentation :           Community Service:                References:     
         Department of VA letter:                  Oth er Documentation:    
                  Additional Statements :
         From Applicant:            From /To Representation:            From /To Congress m ember :        



Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C) Change 14, effective 3 October 1996 until
11 December 1997, Article 3630400, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL BY REASON OF HOMOSEXUAL CONDUCT.
B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

 1.        The Applicant seeks a narrative reason change to enhance employment opportunities .
2.       The Applicant contends he was not and is not a homosexual and his narrative reason for separation is improper .

Decision

Date : 20 1 1 0324             Location: Washington D.C .        R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
 By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall HOMOSEXUAL ADMISSION .

Discussion

 The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharg e if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. T he Board did complete a thorough review of the circumstances that led to discharge and the discharge process to ensure discharge met the pertinent sta ndards of equity and propriety. The Applicant’s record of service included NAVPERS 1070/613 (Page 13) warning and no commanding officers’ nonjudicial punishments, or trial s by courts-martial. Based on an admission of homosexuality by the Applicant, command administratively processed for separation. When notified of administrative separation processing using the procedure, the Applicant waived rights to consult with a qualified counsel, submit a written statement, and request an administrative board .

Issues 1 : (Nondecisional) The Applicant seeks a narrative reason change to enhance employment opportunities . The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.
: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends he was not and is not a homosexual and his narrative reason for separation is improper . Per the MILPERSMAN, the Applicant’s in-service statement to his chain-of-command and fellow Sailors that he was a homosexual created a rebuttable presumption that he engaged in, or had the propensity to engage in , homosexual acts. The Applicant did not submit any evidence to rebut this presumption prior to his discharge , and he waived the opportunity to appear before an administrative discharge board to contest the separation . The inquiry initiated following the Applicant’s admission determined that his statement was credible and was not made for the purpose of avoiding further training. Accordingly, the NDRB determined the Applicant’s separation by reason of homosexual admission was equitable and proper. The statement contained in the Applicant’s application that his admission was due to a smart-mouthed kid making a comment to an officer was found to be insufficient justification to warrant a change in the reason for discharge. Relief denied.
Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s s ummary of s ervice, r ecord e ntries, and d ischarge p rocess, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain HOMOSEXUAL ADMISSION .

The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum for additional information.


ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disabled American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

 Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

 Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1001278

    Original file (ND1001278.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant’s service record documents a prior period of active duty enlistment in which the Applicant received an Honorable Discharge certificate and was transferred to the U.S. Navy Reserve. Summary : After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the NDRB determined that Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall , but the narrative reason for separation shall remainHOMOSEXUAL...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1201211

    Original file (ND1201211.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: Pertinent Regulation/Law A. Narrative Reason for...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0701153

    Original file (ND0701153.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Discharge Process Date Notified: 19970801Reason for Discharge:Least Favorable Characterization: Date Applicant Responded to Notification:19970801Rights Elected at Notification: Consult with Counsel Obtain Copies of Documents Submit Statement(s) (date) Administrative Board GCMCA review Commanding Officer Recommendation (date): (19970824) Separation Authority (date): BUPERS (19970904)Reason for discharge directed: ADMISSION Characterization directed: Date Applicant Discharged: Types of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00315

    Original file (ND04-00315.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The Applicant was discharged on 20030225 with a general (under honorable conditions) by reason of homosexuality - homosexual admission (A). As of this time, the Applicant has not provided sufficient documentation for the Board to consider.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1201440

    Original file (ND1201440.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.The Applicant seeks to have his narrative reason changed to Secretarial Authority.2. Representation: By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .By a vote of 5-0, the Separation Code shall change to JFF.By a vote of the Reenlistment Code shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00107

    Original file (ND99-00107.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events : 970619: Applicant’s Voluntary Statement made to whom it may concern, concerning his homosexuality.970619: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for by reason of homosexuality as evidenced by applicant's statement that he admitted to being a homosexual. 970718: BUPERS directed the applicant's discharge with characterization as type warranted by service record by reason of homosexual conduct. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900657

    Original file (ND0900657.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USNR (DEP)19981218 - 19990624Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 19990625Age at Enlistment:Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20000510Highest Rank/Rate:FALength of Service: Year(s)Month(s)00 Day(s)Education Level:AFQT: 31EvaluationMarks:Performance:NFIRBehavior:NFIROTA: NFIRAwards and Decorations (per DD 214):NONEPeriod of UA:...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1101229

    Original file (ND1101229.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 6 Jun 2007, the Commander, Navy Personnel Command directed that the Applicant be separated from the Navy with a General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge due to Homosexual Admission. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1300483

    Original file (ND1300483.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Accordingly, the NDRB determined that relief in the form of a change to the narrative reason for separation, as requested, shall be granted; additionally, the DD Form 214 shall be amended to reflect a corrected authority for discharge and corresponding SPD code of JFF. Relief granted.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, service record entries, and the administrative separation process, the NDRB found the discharge was...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900520

    Original file (ND0900520.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USAR19940915 - 19950329Active: USNR (DEP) 19950425 - 19951228 Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 19951229Age at Enlistment:Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:19960318Highest Rank/Rate:SRLength of Service: Year(s)Month(s)20 Day(s)Education Level:AFQT: 34EvaluationMarks:Performance:NFIRBehavior:NFIROTA: NFIRAwards and Decorations (per DD...