Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900657
Original file (ND0900657.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-FA, USN
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20090127
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge: HOMOSEXUAL CONDUCT ADMISSION
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN homosexual conduct

 Applicant’s Request: Characterization change to:
                  Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:         US N R (DEP)        19981218 - 19990624     Active:  

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Enlistment: 19990625     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Extension
Date of Discharge: 20000510      Highest Rank/Rate: F A
Length of Service : Y ear ( s ) M onth ( s ) 00 D a y ( s )
Education Level:        AFQT: 31
Evaluation M arks:         Performance: NFIR         Behavior: NFIR   OTA: NFIR

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      NONE

Period of UA : 20000119-20000203 (16 DAYS)

NJP :
- 20000316 :       Art icle 86 (UA)
         Awarded : Susp ended :

S CM : SPCM: C C :

Retention Warning Counseling :
- 20000316 :       For unauthorized absence

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

 Related to Military Service:     
DD 214:         Service/ Medical Record:                  Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:  
         Employment:                        Finances:                          Education /Training :     
         Health/Medical Records:           Substance Abuse:                           Criminal Records:       
         Family/Personal Status:           Community Service:                References:              
Additional Statements :
 From Applicant:        From Representat ion :    From Congress m ember :

Oth er Documentation :






DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

 1. Seeking to reenlist and have the RE Code.
2. He was impaired due to the deaths of his family members, his youth and immaturity.
3 . Post service conduct .

Decision

Date: 20 0 9 0430             Location: Washington D.C .        R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
 By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall HOMOSEXUAL CONDUCT ADMISSION .
Discussion

 : The Applicant is seeking a change in his RE Code for reenlistment purposes. either which the Board cannot form the basis of relief for the Applicant, or the Board does not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum , specifically the paragraph concerning s, for additional information regarding .

: ( ) . In seeking a change in the characterization of service and narrative reason, the Applicant contends he was impaired due to his youth , immaturity and the death of several of his family members . In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant's discharge, will change the characterization of service and/or the reason for discharge if such a change is warranted.

The Applicant’s record of service , a Memorandum to the File of 14 February 2000 , reflects on 6 February 2000, the Applicant voluntari l y returned from a period of unauthorized absence (UA) that commenced on 19 January 2000. While at the Staff Judge Advocate’s Office, t he Applicant admitted to being homosexual and going UA as a result of being in fear fo r his physical safety after he and his significant other (another male) were yelled at and referred to as “faggots” and “queers” while in a bar. He stated the alleged threats were m ade against him by four civilians because of his sexual orientation. As noted in this Memorandum , the Applica nt’s first homosexual relationship was prior to joining the military and he underst ands the military policy of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell”. Per the Commanding Officer’ s Recommendation for Separation of 14 April 2000, the Applicant was administratively processed for homosexual conduct based on his statement admitting he was a homosexual and s ubsequently discharged with a general (under honorable conditions).

The summary of service clearly indicates there was sufficient evidence to separate the Applicant based on homosexual conduct –admission. The Board determined the Applicant’s youth, immaturity nor the evidence submitted pertaining to the death of his family member s , although unfortunate, d id not serve as a justification for his homosexual conduct . There is no other Narrative Reason for Separation that could more clearly describe why the Applicant was discharged . Furthermore, the Board determined an upgrade to honorable is not warranted in light of the misconduct committed during this enlistment as evidence by the Applicant’s NJP on 16 March 2003, for violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article 86 ( U A), 16 days and overall record of service.

: ( ) . The Applicant contends since being discharged, he is married with two stepchildren. Additionally, he has a painting contractor ’ s license, background in fabrication , management and can perform all aspects of construction. In regard to education, he has both his GED and high school diploma. The Applicant has submitted family photos, a high school diploma, and in-service documents/certificates for the Board’s consideration. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. However, there is no law or regulation, which provides an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in the civilian

life subsequent to leaving the service. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews.

Documentation to help support a post service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificate (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; and documentation of a drug free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case by case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate previous in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

While the Board applauds the Applicant’s post service efforts, the Board determined the evidence of post-service conduct was not sufficient enough to warrant an upgrade. The Applicant could have produced additional evidence as stated in the above paragraph with the full understanding completion of these items alone does not guarantee an upgrade. The Board determined the characterization of service received, “General (Under Honorable Conditions)”, was an appropriate characterization considering the length of service and the UCMJ violations involved, and based on the limited post service documentation provided an upgrade would be inappropriate. Should the Applicant obtain additional evidence or post service documentation he may wish to apply for a personal appearance. There are veteran’s organizations, such as the American Legion, willing to provide guidance to assist former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade.

After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 24, effective 20 May 99 until 23 Aug 00, Article 1910-148 (previously 3630400), Separation by Reason of Homosexual Conduct

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs, Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity.

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000 . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provi ded the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years , has already been grante d a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employmen t / Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.
Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable Discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.
Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801659

    Original file (ND0801659.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The NDRB determined the command acted within existing regulations in separating the Applicant for homosexual acts and in determining the characterization of his service; the awarded discharge characterization was appropriate, an upgrade would be inappropriate. The NDRB determined an upgrade would be inappropriate.After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900520

    Original file (ND0900520.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USAR19940915 - 19950329Active: USNR (DEP) 19950425 - 19951228 Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 19951229Age at Enlistment:Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:19960318Highest Rank/Rate:SRLength of Service: Year(s)Month(s)20 Day(s)Education Level:AFQT: 34EvaluationMarks:Performance:NFIRBehavior:NFIROTA: NFIRAwards and Decorations (per DD...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801022

    Original file (ND0801022.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214: Service and/or Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Substance Abuse: Criminal Records: Family/Personal Status: Community Service: References: Additional Statements From Applicant: From Representation: From Member of Congress: Other Documentation (Describe): DD Form 149 DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900758

    Original file (ND0900758.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant elected to have an Administrative Separation Board (ASB) and theASB, by a vote of 3-0, found the Applicant guilty of misconduct by reason of homosexual conduct, as evidenced by the Applicant’s statement and by the commission of a homosexual act; by a vote of 3-0, recommended separation from the U.S. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15...

  • USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0801550

    Original file (MD0801550.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board determined an upgrade would be inappropriate.After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found Pertinent Regulation/Law A. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. ...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900300

    Original file (ND0900300.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons.Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change. With respect to a...

  • USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0801251

    Original file (MD0801251.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request: Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of ServicePrior Service: Inactive: USMCR (DEP)20060501 - 20060515Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 20060516Period of Enlistment: Years MonthsDate of Discharge:20061218Length of Service: Yrs Mths02 DysEducation Level: Age at Enlistment:AFQT: 71MOS: 0311Highest Rank: Fitness Reports: Proficiency/Conduct Marks (# of occasions): 4.2/4.2 (NFIR)Awards and Decorations (per DD 214): Rifle:...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1201794

    Original file (ND1201794.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. Narrative Reason for Separation: In accordance with the 20 September 2011 Under Secretary of Defense (Personnel & Readiness) memorandum regarding the repeal of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell,” service discharge review boards should normally grant requests to change the narrative reason for discharge wherein Homosexual Admission was the only basis for discharge. ” Additional Reviews :...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1300561

    Original file (ND1300561.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Given the detailed documents of record, including the commanding officer’s inquiry and his statement in the administrative separation endorsement, the NDRB determined the Applicant’s separation for Homosexual Admission was proper and equitable at the time it was issued.Narrative Reason for Separation: In accordance with the 20 September 2011 Under Secretary of Defense (Personnel & Readiness) memorandum regarding the repeal of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell,” service discharge review boards should...

  • USMC | DRB | 2013_Marine | MD1301307

    Original file (MD1301307.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: Pertinent Regulation/Law A. Given the detailed documents...