Upgrade.Vet

NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1201211

Original file (ND1201211.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-OS1 (SW), USN

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20120502

Characterization of Service Received:

Narrative Reason for Discharge: HOMOSEXUAL ADMISSION
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN 3630400 [HOMOSEXUAL ADMISSION]

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
         Narrative Reason change to:       SECRETARIAL AUTHORITY
         Reentry Code change to: RE-1

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:         US N R (DEP)        19800508-19800914       Active:          19800915-19840714 HON
                                    USN      19840715-19900330 HON
                                    USN      19900331-19950309 HON
                                    USN      19950310-19960926 HON

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 19960927     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Extension
Date of Discharge: 19971027      Highest Rank/Rate: OS1 (SW)
Length of Service: Y ear( s ) M onth( s ) 01 D a y ( s )
Education Level:        AFQT: 80
Evaluation M arks:         Performance: 3. 5 ( 2 )      Behavior: 3 . 0 ( 2 )        OTA: 3. 15

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      (2) , , , (2) , , , ESWS

Periods of UA /C ONF :

NJP :     S CM :    SPCM:    C C :      Retention Warning Counseling :

Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214

The NDRB did note administrative error(s) on the original DD Form 214:

         Block 13 , Decorations, Medals, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized, should read:
“SEA SERVICE DEPLOYMENT RIBBON (2), SOUTHWEST ASIA SERVICE MEDAL, MERITORIOUS UNIT COMMENDATION (2), GOOD CONDUCT MEDAL (4), NATIONAL DEFENSE SERVICE MEDAL, KUWAIT LIBERATION MEDAL, ENLISTED SURFACE WARFARE SPECIALIST ”

The NDRB will recommend to the Commander, Navy Personnel Command, that the DD 214 be corrected as appropriate.

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:          Service/ Medical Record:          Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:
         Health/Medical Records:          Rehabilitation/Treatment:                  Criminal Records:
         Personal Documentation :          Community Service:                References:
         Department of VA letter:                  Oth er Documentation:
                  Additional Statements :
         From Applicant:          From /To Representation:          From /To Congress m ember :

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C) Change 14, effective 3 October 1996 until
11 December 1997, Article 3630400, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL BY REASON OF HOMOSEXUAL CONDUCT.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

C. Public Law 111-321, signed 22 Dec 2010 (implemented 20 Sep 2011).
D. Under Secretary of Defense (P ersonnel & R eadiness ) Memorandum (Repeal of Don’t Ask Don’t Tell), 20 Sep 2011.

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

1. The Applicant seeks a change to the N arrative R eason for S eparation and R eentry C ode , contending that his Honorable characterization indicates a record devoid of aggravating factors and , as such, warrants the change in accordance with the repeal of Don’t Ask , Don’t Tell (DADT) .
Decision

Date: 20120 710 Location: Washington D.C. Representation:

By a vote of the Characterization shall HONORABLE.
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .
By a vote of 5-0, the Reentry Code shall change to RE- 1 .

Discussion

The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the NDRB presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial, credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. T he NDRB completed a thorough review of the circumstances that led to the discharge, and the discharge process, to ensure the Applicant’s discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety. The Applicant’s record of service documents no NAVPERS 1070/613 (Page 13) retention-counseling warnings and no nonjudicial or judicial punishments for any violations of the Uniform Code of Military Justice. The record does show the Applicant made a statement of homosexual admission to his Executive Officer on 19 September 1997 , and on 25 September 1997 he requested via letter to his Commanding Officer to be administratively separated from the Navy on the advice of qualified legal defense counsel . When notified of administrative separation processing using the procedure, the Applicant elected to waive his right s to consult with a qualified legal defense counsel , submit a written statement to the Separation Authority , and request an administrative board.

: (Decisional Issue) ( ) . The Applicant seeks a change to the N arrative R eason for S eparation and R eentry C ode , contending that his Honorable characterization indicates a record devoid of aggravating factors and, as such, warrants the change in accordance with repeal of Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell. The Applicant received an Honorable characterization of service at discharge. In accordance with t he Naval Military Personnel Manual (MILPERSMAN) , (NAVPERS 15560C) Change 14, effective 3 October 1996 until 11 December 1997, Article 3630400, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL BY REASON OF HOMOSEXUAL CONDUCT , which was in effect at the time of the Applicant’s discharge, the Applicant’s in-service statement and corresponding official statement to his chain-of-command that he was a homosexual created a rebuttable presumption that he engaged in, or had the propensity to engage in, homosexual acts. The Applicant chose not to challenge or to rebut this presumption. The presumption was reinforced further by the Applicant’s written request to be discharged based on his homosexual admission . The documentation of record contains a complete copy of the supporting documents in the discharge action. At the time of discharge, processing for separation was mandatory in accordance with the MILPERSMAN. Based on the statement made by the Applicant, his decision not to rebut any presumptions thereafter, and the c ommanding o fficer’s belief that the Applicant’s statements were credible, the Applicant was processed administratively for separation. Given the detailed documents of record, including the commanding officer’s inquiry and his statement in the administrative separation endorsement, the NDRB determined that the Applicant’s separation by reason of Homosexual Admission in accordance with Article 3630400 of the MILPERSMAN was proper and equita ble at the time it was issued.

Narrative Reason for Separation: In accordance with the 20 September 2011 Under Secretary of Defense (Personnel & Readiness) memorandum regarding the repe al of Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell , service discharge review boards should normally grant requests to change the narrative reason for discharge wherein Homosexual Admission was the only basis for discharge. This memorandum further directs that the N arrative R eason for S eparation should normally change to Secretarial Authority with a corresponding Separation Code (SPD code). The Applicant’s record of service reflects that, at the time of discharge, there was no other reason for discharge other than the homosexual admission and there were no aggravating factors involved . Accordingly, the NDRB determined that relief in the form of a change to the narrative reason for discharge, as requested, shall be granted; additionally, the DD Form 214 shall be amended to reflect a corrected authority for discharge (MILPERSMAN 1910-164) and the corre sponding SPD code of JFF.

Reentry Code : The Applicant seeks a change to his assigned reentry code at discharge from RE-4 to RE-1J. In accordance with the Under Secretary of Defense (P & R) Memorandum (Repeal of Don’t Ask Don’t Tell), dated 20 September 2011, s ervice r eview b oards should normally grant requests to change the reentry code to an immediately-eligible-to-reenter category if the discharge and corresponding reentry code was: (1) based solely on DADT or a similar policy in place prior to enactment of DADT; and (2) there were no aggravating factors in the record, such as misconduct. As authorized by the Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Manpower & Reserve Affairs), the NDRB may change reentry codes as set forth in the USD (P&R) memorandum dated 20 September 2011. The USD (P&R) policy memorandum stated that , if changed, t he new RE code to apply should be 1J; however, this is an Air Force specific re-entry code. In accordance with the guidance and intent of the policy memorandum, the applicable U.S. Navy reentry code would be RE-1 (eligible for reenlistment) . The Applicant’s service record documents faithful service with no misconduct. The Applicant’s evaluations document an overall trait average of 3.15 over 2 evaluation periods. The Applicant received an RE-4 reenlistment code due to early termination of his service for Homosexual Admission. In accordance with the MILPERSMAN, the Applicant met all requirements for, and was, retention eligible prior to the Homosexual Admission. The NDRB determined that the record of service along with his assigned billet performance, specific duties, and enlisted qualifications would clearly warrant a recommendation for retention had the Applicant not been separated for his Homosexual Admission. As such, the NDRB determined that relief is warranted. The Applicant’s reentry code shall be changed to RE-1.

Summary : After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, service record entries , and the administrative separation process, the NDRB found the discharge was proper and equitable at the time of discharge. However, pursuant to Public Law 111-321 and in accordance with the guidance set forth in the Under Secretary of Defense (P & R) Memorandum (Repeal of Don’t Ask Don’t Tell), dated 20 Sep 2011, the awarded characterization of service shall remain HONORABLE , the narrative reason for separation shall change to SECRETARIAL AUTHORITY with a corresponding SPD Code of JFF , the authority for discharge shall change to MILPERSMAN 1910-164 , and the reenlistment code shall change to RE-1 .

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disabled American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 701 South Courthouse Road, Suite 1001, Arlington, VA 22204-2490 for further review.

Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reentry code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reentry codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1301548

Original file (ND1301548.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Representation: By a vote of the Characterization shall .By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .By a vote of the Reenlistment Code shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence...
USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1201309

Original file (MD1201309.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

During the Board’s review of the Applicant’s record of service and discharge process, the NDRB identified an inequity in the Applicant’s characterization of service and determined that the Applicant warrants a change to the narrative reason for separation and corresponding reentry code in accordance with repeal of the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” policy.The Applicant received a General (Under Honorable Conditions) characterization of service at discharge.Characterization of service at discharge...
NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1201794

Original file (ND1201794.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. Narrative Reason for Separation: In accordance with the 20 September 2011 Under Secretary of Defense (Personnel & Readiness) memorandum regarding the repeal of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell,” service discharge review boards should normally grant requests to change the narrative reason for discharge wherein Homosexual Admission was the only basis for discharge. ” Additional Reviews :...
NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1301880

Original file (ND1301880.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.The Applicant would like to reenlist.2. In accordance with the 20 September 2011 Under Secretary of Defense (Personnel and Readiness) memorandum regarding the repeal of the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” law, service discharge review boards should normally grant requests to change the narrative reason for discharge wherein Homosexual Admission was the only basis for discharge. ”...
NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1201440

Original file (ND1201440.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.The Applicant seeks to have his narrative reason changed to Secretarial Authority.2. Representation: By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .By a vote of 5-0, the Separation Code shall change to JFF.By a vote of the Reenlistment Code shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the...
NAVY | DRB | 2014_Navy | ND1400811

Original file (ND1400811.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

In accordance with the 20 September 2011 Under Secretary of Defense (Personnel and Readiness) memorandum regarding the repeal of the DADT law, service discharge review boards should normally grant requests to change the narrative reason for discharge wherein Homosexual Conduct was the only basis for discharge. As Homosexual Admission was the only basis for discharge, the NDRB voted to change the Narrative Reason for Separation to Secretarial Authority. ” Additional Reviews : After a...
NAVY | DRB | 2015_Navy | ND1500040

Original file (ND1500040.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

In accordance with the 20 September 2011 Under Secretary of Defense (Personnel and Readiness) memorandum regarding the repeal of the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” law, service discharge review boards should normally grant requests to change the narrative reason for discharge wherein Homosexual Admission was the only basis for discharge. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is...
NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1200627

Original file (ND1200627.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

10-81) dated 19960130] Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL...
NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1200302

Original file (ND1200302.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Narrative Reason for Discharge: In accordance with the 20 September 2011 Under Secretary of Defense (Personnel and Readiness) memorandum regarding the repeal of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell, ” service discharge review boards should normally consider granting requests to change the narrative reason for discharge wherein Homosexual Admission was the only basis for discharge and no other aggravating factors were involved. However, pursuant to Public Law 111-321, and in accordance with the guidance...
USMC | DRB | 2014_Marine | MD1400686

Original file (MD1400686.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant requests changes to his Separation Code, Re-Entry Code, and Narrative Reason for Separation. Relief granted.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, service record entries, and the administrative separation process, the NDRB found the discharge was proper and equitable at the time of discharge. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1201211

Similar Decisions