Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1100823
Original file (ND1100823.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-SN, USN
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20110209
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN 3620225 [PERSONALITY DISORDER]

 Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:      
         Narrative Reason change to:      

Summary of Service
Prior Service:
 Inactive:         US N R (DEP)        19960806 - 19960902     Active:  

Period of Service Under Review:
 Date of Current Enlistment: 19960903     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Extension
Date of Discharge: 19961028      Highest Rank/Rate: SN
Length of Service: Y ear s M onth 23 D ays
 Education Level:        AFQT: 88
Evaluation M arks:         Performance: NONE         Behavior: NONE   OTA: NONE
Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      NONE

Periods of UA /C ONF :

NJP : NONE        S CM : NONE       SPCM: NONE       C C : NONE         R etention Warning Counseling: NONE

Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214

The NDRB note d an administrative error on the original DD Form 214:

          “ MILPERSMAN 3620225 [PERSONALITY DISORDER] ”

The NDRB will recommend to the Commander, Navy Personnel Command, that the DD 214 be corrected as appropriate.
Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed
Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:           Service/Medical Record:           Other Records:  
Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:     
         Health/Medical Records:           Rehabilitation/Treatment:                 Criminal Records:       
         Personal Documentation:           Community Service:                References:     
         Department of VA letter:                  Other Documentation:    
                  Additional Statements:
         From Applicant:           From/To Representation:           From/To Congress member:        

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 14, effective 3 October 1996 until 11 December 1997, Article 3620225, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL BY REASON OF CONVENIENCE OF THE GOVERNMENT - PERSONALITY DISORDER.
B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

 1.       The Applicant seeks an upgrade and Re-entry (RE) code change so he can enlist in the National Guard.
2.       The Applicant seeks an upgrade for employment opportunities in law enforcement.
3.       The Applicant contends his discharge is inequitable , because he does not believe he has a personality disorder.
4.       The Applicant states that he has completed his bachelor ’ s degree, implying his post-service accomplishments warrant consideration for upgrading his discharge.
 5.       The Applicant states that his conduct , performance, and test results reflect that he perfo r med honorably , implying his record of service warrants consideration for upgrading his discharge.

Decision

Date: 20 1 2 0313             Location: Washington D.C .        R epresentation : NONE

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
 By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .
Discussion

 The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Applicant’s record of service did not include any NAVPERS 1070/613 (Page 13) warnings, non-judicial punishments, or trials by court-martial for violation s of the Uniform Code of Military Justice. A qualified medical officer diagnosed the Applicant with Dysthymic Disorder and recommended entry-level separation. Based o n the diagnosis and recommendation of the medical officer , his command administratively processed him for separation . When notified of administrative separation processing using the notification procedure, the Applicant waived his rights to consult with a qualified counsel , submit a written statement , and request a General Court -Martial Convening Authority review .

: (Non - decisional) The Applicant seeks an upgrade and RE code change so he can enlist in the National Guard. The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. Neither a less than fully honorable discharge nor an unfavorable RE code is, in itself, a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter. Additionally, the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces and is not authorized to change an RE code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can make changes to RE codes.

: (Non-decisional) The Applicant seeks an upgrade for employment opportunities in law enforcement. The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

 : (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends his discharge is inequitable , because he does not believe he has a personality disorder. The government enjoys a presumption of regularity in the conduct of its affairs. The Applicant bears the burden of overcoming this presumption through the presentation of substantial and credible evidence to support his claim. The Applicant provided no documentation to support his claim, and his statement was not sufficient to overcome the presumption that the Applicant was properly diagnosed with a personality disorder. Documentation found in the Applicant’s service record indicates he was diagnosed with dysthymic disorder (a personality disorder) on 17 October 1996. The evidence reviewed did not persuade the Board that this diagnosis and subsequent administrative separation were improper or inequitable. Relief denied.






Issue 4: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant states that he received a bachelor ’ s degree , implying his post-service accomplishments warrant consideration for upgrading his discharge. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the re-characterization of a discharge. However, there is no law, or regulation, that provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded or changed based solely on good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving the service. Normally, to permit relief, a procedural impropriety or inequity must have been found to exist during the period of enlistment in question. However, in this case, the Applicant was in an entry-level status (within the first 180 days of enlistment). Regulations direct that the Character of Service for members notified of intended recommendation for discharge while in an entry-level status be Uncharacterized except in circumstances where service has been so meritorious that an Honorable is clearly warranted. The Applicant’s record showed no meritorious service that would warrant an Honorable characterization of service . The NDRB determined that changing the characterization of service would be against regulations. Relief denied.

Issue 5: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends that his conduct, performance, and test results reflect that he performed honorably . Regulations direct that the Character of Service for members notified of intended recommendation for discharge while in an entry-level status be Uncharacterized except in circumstances where service has been so meritorious that an Honorable is clearly warranted. Although the Applicant believes his service was honorable, t he NDRB determined that the Applicant’s record showed no actions that were significant enough to warrant an Honorable characterization of service. Therefore, the NDRB determined that the discharge was proper and equitable, and that relief based on this issue was not warranted. Relief denied.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s s ummary of s ervice, r ecord e ntries, and d ischarge p rocess, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . Since fifteen years from the date of the Applicant’s discharge have elapsed, he is not eligible for a personal appearance hearing with the NDRB. The Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records, 701 South Courthouse Road, Suite 1001, Arlington, VA 22204-2490 for further review using DD Form 149.


ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disabled American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 701 South Courthouse Road, Suite 1001, Arlington, VA 22204-2490 for further review.

Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

 Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

 Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.
Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1101308

    Original file (ND1101308.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Narrative Reason for Discharge:Authority for Discharge:MILPERSMAN3620225 [PERSONALITY DISORDER] DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.The Applicant contends she received an improper “ RE ” code and request it be changed. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1100038

    Original file (ND1100038.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: Pertinent Regulation/Law A. This, coupled with the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900463

    Original file (ND0900463.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.In-service mental health problems warrant change in characterization and narrative reason for separation.3. Decision Date: 20091118Location: Washington D.C.Representation: By a vote of the Characterization shall .By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700467

    Original file (ND0700467.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Discussion Issue 1: either which the Board cannot form the basis of relief for the Applicant, or the Board does not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. After a thorough review of all available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, medical and service record entries, discharge process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214 The NDRB did note an administrative...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1101178

    Original file (ND1101178.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USNR (DEP)19941031 - 19951011Active:USNR (DEP)19951013 - 19960103 Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 19960104Age at Enlistment:Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:19970505Highest Rank/Rate:SALength of Service:Years Months02 DaysEducation Level:AFQT: 45EvaluationMarks:Performance:3.0(1)Behavior:1.0(1)OTA: 2.67Awards and Decorations...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1000929

    Original file (ND1000929.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After conducting a detailed review of the Applicant’s service and medical records, the Board found no evidence of impropriety or inequity regarding his separation from the Navy for Personality Disorder.Further, in consideration of the available documentation in the record, the Board noted that the Applicant could very well have been processed and separated for Fraudulent Entry for not revealing his history of severe depression and repeated use of illicit drugs to include LSD and marijuana. ...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1000620

    Original file (ND1000620.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Representation: By a vote of the Characterization shall .By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0601028

    Original file (ND0601028.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Decisional Issues : The Applicant submitted no decisional issues.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1101299

    Original file (ND1101299.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant’s service records contain the 25 July 1997 administrative separation notification form that states the Applicant was being processed for administrative separation from the Navy on the basis of personality disorder (as evidenced by mental health evaluation of 14 July 1997). Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, and medical record entries, documentation submitted by the Applicant,and the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700368

    Original file (ND0700368.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    When a service member is discharged by reason of a Personality Disorder, the characterization of service is based on conduct and performance. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214 The NDRB did note administrative error(s) on the original DD Form 214: “GENERAL (UNDER...