Upgrade.Vet

USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0902578

Original file (MD0902578.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-, USMC

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20090917

Characterization of Service Received:

Narrative Reason for Discharge:

Authority for Discharge: MARCORSEPMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
         Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:         USMCR (DEP)       19921113 - 19930713     Active:

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 19930714     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Months
Date of Discharge: 199506 06      H ighest Rank:
Length of Service : Y ea r ( s ) M on th ( s ) 18 D a y ( s )
Education Level:        AFQT: 48
MOS: 9971
Proficiency/Conduct M arks (# of occasions): 2.4 ( ) / 2.4 ( )      Fitness Reports:

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      Rifle

Periods of UA / CONF : UA: 19941216-19941218 (3 days), 19940628 (1 day) / CONF: 19941117 (1 day)
Pretrial CONF: Dates NFIR (41 days)

NJP:

- 19940224 :      Article (UA 2000-2400, 19940212)
         Awarded: Suspended:

- 19940705 :      Article (UA), 2 specifications
         Specification 1: 2400, 19940616 to 0705, 19940617
         Specification 2: 0001, 19940628 to 1825, 19940629 (1 day)
         Awarded: Suspended:

- 19940803 :      Article (Willful disobedience)
         Awarded: Suspended:

SCM:

SPCM:

- 19950301 :      Article ( UA ), 6 specifications
         Specification 1: Appointed place of duty 19941006
         Specification 2: Appointed place of duty 19941010
         Specification 3: Appointed place of duty 19941017
         Specification 4: Appointed place of duty 19941210
         Specification 5: Appointed place of duty 19950122
         Specification 6: Appointed place of duty 19950124
         Article ( General ) , 2 specifications
         Specification 1: Failing to maintain sufficient funds
         Specifications 2 : Break restriction
         Sentence : 165 days

CC:

Retention Warning Counseling:

- 19940606 :      For loss of military identification card.

- 19940613 :      For UA returning from liberty 0546-0715, 19940613. Your poor judgment, total disregard of written and oral orders given by seniors; failure to follow rules and regulations show lack of maturity, dependability, and you cannot be relied upon. Any other violation of policies or articles under the UCMJ will result in the automatic revocation of special privileges off base living, and on base driving privileges.

Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214

The NDRB did note administrative error(s) on the original DD Form 214:

         “ MISCONDUCT ”

The NDRB will recommend to the Commandant of the Marine Corps that the DD 214 be corrected as appropriate.

The NDRB did note administrative error(s) on the original DD Form 214:

         “ MISCONDUCT ”

The NDRB will recommend to the Commandant of the Marine Corps that the DD 214 be corrected as appropriate.

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:          Service/Medical Record:          Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:
         Health/Medical Records:          Rehabilitation/Treatment:                 Criminal Records:
         Personal Documentation:          Community Service:                References:
         Department of VA letter:                  Other Documentation:
                  Additional Statements:
         From Applicant:          From/To Representation:          From/To Congress member:

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. Paragraph 6210, Misconduct , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, ( MCO P1900.16D), effective 27 June 1989 until 17 August 1995.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

1. Post-service conduct warrants consideration.

Decision

Date: 20101118 Location: Washington D.C. R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .

Discussion

The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant . The Applicant’s record of service included 6105 counseling warnings and non-judicial punishments for o f the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article 86 ( Unauthorized A bsence , 4 hours; 7 hours , 5 minutes; and 1 day) and Article 92 (Willful Disobedience) . It also included one special court-martial for violation s of the UCMJ: Article 86 ( Failure to go to/from Appointed Place of Duty, 6 s pecifications), Article 134 (Breaking Restriction), and Article 134 ( F ail ure to M aintain S ufficient F unds). Based on the offenses committed by the Applicant, command administratively processed for separation. When notified of administrative separation processing, the Applicant waived rights to consult with a qualified counsel, submit a written statement, and request an administrative board .

Issue 1: (Decisional) ( ) . The A pplicant provided a statement regarding various accomplishments since leaving the Marine Corps. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the re-characterization of a discharge. However, there is no law or regulation that provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving the service. Normally, to permit relief, a procedural impropriety or inequity must have been found to exist during the period of enlistment in question. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered by the Board. The statement the Applicant submitted along with the DD Form 293 does not contain sufficient information to evaluate his post-service character and conduct. F or example, the Applicant could have also produced evidence of the following: a verifiable continuous employment record; character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; evidence of a drug-free lifestyle; and official transcripts reflecting attendance at or completion of higher education. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character. Relief denied.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .

Since fifteen years from the date of the Applicant’s discharge has elapsed, he is not eligible for a personal appearance hearing with the NDRB. The Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records, 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review using DD Form 149.

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disable d American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700373

Original file (ND0700373.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Recommendation on Separation: BY 19941011 Recommendation on Characterization: BY Commanding Officer Recommendation (date): (19941019) Separation Authority (date): COMNAVPERSCOM (19941123)Reason for discharge directed: - Characterization directed: Date Applicant Discharged: 19941215 Types of Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered By BoardRelated to Military Service: Service and/or Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period:...
USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1201225

Original file (MD1201225.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USMCR (DEP)20050926Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20050927Age at Enlistment: Period of Enlistment: Years MonthsDate of Discharge:20100926Highest Rank: Length of Service: Year(s)Month(s)00 Day(s)Education Level: AFQT:63MOS: 6821Proficiency/Conduct Marks (# of occasions):()/()Fitness Reports: Awards and Decorations (per DD 214):Rifle (2)(2)...
NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801186

Original file (ND0801186.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

However, taking into consideration the Applicant’s testimony, testimony of his brother, service record, offenses committed, length of service,and post-service conduct the Board voted unanimously to upgrade the characterization of service to General (Under Honorable Conditions), but the narrative reason shall remain Pattern of Misconduct.After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700643

Original file (ND0700643.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Absent any documentation provided by the Applicant for the Board to consider, the Board determined that the Applicant’s service record did not mitigate the misconduct that resulted in the characterization of discharge. 86 (2 Specs) – Fail to go to appointed place of duty.Awarded - FOP ($200.00) for (2months); Oral Reprimand; Restr for (30days); Extra duties (30days).19940512: Retention Warning forArticle 134 (Drunk and disorderly); Article 86 (Absent from appointed place of...
NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1100517

Original file (ND1100517.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: Pertinent Regulation/Law A. Summary: After a thorough...
NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1000389

Original file (ND1000389.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1100690

Original file (MD1100690.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT Applicant’s Issues 1. By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is...
USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0902340

Original file (MD0902340.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. ...
USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1000231

Original file (MD1000231.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214: Service/Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements: From Applicant: From/To Representation: From/To Congress member: Pertinent Regulation/Law A. Paragraph 6419,...
NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0902031

Original file (ND0902031.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

There is no requirement, or law, that grants re-characterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits. The NDRB determined that the Applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of service at discharge, reflected honest and faithful service, but that significant negative aspects of the Applicant’s conduct and performance of duties outweighed the positive aspects of his military record.By a vote of 3-2, the NDRB determined that the Applicant’s...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0902578

Similar Decisions