Upgrade.Vet

USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1201225

Original file (MD1201225.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-, USMC

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20120508

Characterization of Service Received:

Narrative Reason for Discharge:

Authority for Discharge: MARCORSEPMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
         Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:         USMCR (DEP)       20050926        Active:

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 20050927     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Months
Date of Discharge: 20100926      H ighest Rank:
Length of Service : Y ea r ( s ) M on th ( s ) 00 D a y ( s )
Education Level:        AFQT: 63
MOS: 6821
Proficiency/Conduct M arks (# of occasions): ( ) / ( )    Fitness Reports:

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      Rifle (2) (2) KDSM CoC MM LoA (5) CoA

Periods of CONF :

NJP:

- 20060303 :      Article (Failure to obey order or regulation)
         Awarded: Suspended:

- 20080917 :      Article (Absence without leave)
         Article (Failure to obey order or regulation, 2 specifications )
         Specification 1: Violated MCBJO 1050.6A by not returning to base by 2400
         Specification 2: Violated MCBJO 1050.5A by not signing out with a liberty buddy
         Awarded: Suspended:

- 20090724 :      Article (Drunken or reckless operation of vehicle, aircraft, or vessel)
         Awarded: Suspended:

SCM:     SPCM:    CIVIL ARREST:    CC:

Retention Warning Counseling:

- 20060303 :      For underage drinking. Specifically, on 20060225, you consumed alcohol while under the legal drinking age of 21 which is in direct violation of Training Command Order number 01-03. This violation is in direct conflict with the Core Values of Honor, Courage, and Commitment and are not in keeping with the high standards of the Marine Corps.

- 20070202 :      For unauthorized absence. O n 20070206, at around 0630, was UA from appointed place of duty.

- 20080917 :      For unauthorized absence and failure to obey orders. On 20080715, at 2400, violated MCBJO 1050.6A in that you did not return to base by 2400. On 20080715, at 2200, violated MCBJO 1050.5A, in that you did not sign out with a liberty buddy. On 20080715, at 2400, was unauthorized absence from appointed place of duty.

- 20090918 :       For drunken and reckless operation of a vehicle, specifically on 20090718 you were cited by civil authorities for driving while intoxicated (BAC .11) and speeding 98 mph in a 40 mph zone.

Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214

The NDRB did note administrative error(s) on the original DD Form 214:

         “ ”

The NDRB will recommend to the Commandant of the Marine Corps that the DD 214 be corrected as appropriate.

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:          Service/Medical Record:          Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:
         Health/Medical Records:          Rehabilitation/Treatment:                 Criminal Records:
         Personal Documentation:          Community Service:                References:
         Department of VA letter:                  Other Documentation:
                  Additional Statements:
         From Applicant:          From/To Representation:          From/To Congress member:

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16F), effective 1 September 2001 until Present, Paragraph 1005, DISCHARGE FOR EXPIRATION OF ENLISTMENT OR FULFILLMENT OF SERVICE OBLIGATION .

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

1.       The Applicant wants to enhance employment opportunities and to better himself as a transitional M arine.
2.       The Applicant contends his five years of honorable service should not be defined by 0.1 of a point from not having the C onduct marks to warrant an Honorable discharge.

Decision

Date: 20 1 3 0 221          Location: Washington D.C .         R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .

Discussion

The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al a ffairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Applicant’s record of service included 6105 counseling warnings, non-judicial punishments for violation o f the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article 86 ( Absence without leave, 1 specification), Article 92 (Failure to obey order or regulation, 3 specifications), and Article 111 (Drunken or reckless operation of a vehicle, 1 specification) . Although the Applicant served for the duration of his contract, his average proficiency and conduct marks on record at the time of his discharge did not meet the minimum requirement for his service to be characterized as Honorable. Standards of performance and conduct as determined by MCO P1610.7 series, Individual Records Administration Manual, and customs of the service form the primary basis for determining characterization of service. The minimum acceptable average proficiency and conduct markings during an enlistment are 3.0 and 4.0 respectively. The Applicant’s failure to achieve the standard for conduct was evidence of significant negative aspects, outweighing any meritorious military records. As a result, his service was characterized as General (Under Honorable Conditions).

: (Non - decisional) The Applicant wants t o enhance employment opportunities and to better himself as a transitional Marine. The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends his five years of honorable service should not be defined by 0.1 of a point fr om not having the C onduct marks to warrant an Honorable discharge . During the Applicant’s enlistment, he received four retention warnings and was found guilty of multiple UCMJ violations at three NJPs. Despite this repetitive misconduct, his command allowed him to continue to serve until the end of his enlistment. In accordance with Paragraph 1004 of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, an Honorable characterization of service upon the expiration of active duty is appropriate when the quality of a Marine’s service has met the standards of accepted conduct and performance of duty for military personnel. Therefore, characterization of service will be Honorable for Marines with average Proficiency marks of 3.0 or higher and average Conduct marks of 4.0 or higher. The Applicant completed his obligated service and his overall marks for proficiency and conduct were 4.2 and 3.9, respectively. The NDRB conducted a detailed review of his Pro/Con marks from his enlistment and found that they were all properly assigned. After a thorough review of the records, a reference letter from a CWO3, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the discharge action. Relief denied.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum for additional information.

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disable d American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 701 South Courthouse Road, Suite 1001, Arlington, VA 22204-2490 for further review.

Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1201698

Original file (MD1201698.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USMCR (DEP)20061216 - 20070102Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20070103Age at Enlistment: Period of Enlistment: Years MonthsDate of Discharge:20100323Highest Rank:Length of Service: Year(s)Month(s)21 Day(s)Education Level: AFQT:79MOS: 2844Proficiency/Conduct Marks (# of occasions):()/()Fitness Reports: Awards and Decorations (per DD...
USMC | DRB | 2014_Marine | MD1400154

Original file (MD1400154.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USMCR (DEP)20080620 - 20090713Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20090714Age at Enlistment: Period of Enlistment: Years MonthsDate of Discharge:20130713Highest Rank:Length of Service: Year(s)Month(s)00 Day(s)Education Level: AFQT:91MOS: 1142 / 1171Proficiency/Conduct Marks (# of occasions):(13)/(13)Fitness Reports: Awards and Decorations (per...
USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1100299

Original file (MD1100299.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Violation of Article 92 x2, in that on 20060103 at approximately 2200-0600 on 20060104, you failed to obey a lawful order or regulation. : (Decisional)() .The Applicant contends he was denied rights to counsel and to request an administrative discharge board during separation. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s...
USMC | DRB | 2014_Marine | MD1400370

Original file (MD1400370.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities.
USMC | DRB | 2015_Marine | MD1500097

Original file (MD1500097.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. Based on the Article 112a violation, processing for administrative separation is mandatory. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge.
USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1000266

Original file (MD1000266.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. misconduct was resultant from PTSD. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge.
USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1200753

Original file (MD1200753.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

In addition, the Applicant submitted a request for a conditional waiver of his administrative separation board if his discharge would be suspended for twelve months where the Applicant stated his understanding and acknowledged that any further misconduct during the suspension period on his part would cause the vacation of the suspension and execution of the discharge with a characterization Under Other Than Honorable Conditions.The NDRB determined there was no impropriety or inequity with...
USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0801542

Original file (MD0801542.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall MISCONDUCT.Discussion : either which the Board cannot form the basis of relief for the Applicant, or the Board does not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. The Board determined an upgrade would be inappropriate.After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found ADDENDUM: Information...
USMC | DRB | 2015_Marine | MD1500638

Original file (MD1500638.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall remain UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS and the narrative reason for separation shall remain MISCONDUCT. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received...
USMC | DRB | 2014_Marine | MD1401593

Original file (MD1401593.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Upon discharge, the Characterization of Service was determined to be General (Under Honorable Conditions) based on the Conduct mark of 3.9. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1201225

Similar Decisions