Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1000389
Original file (ND1000389.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-AR, USN
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20091027
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:      
         Narrative Reason change to:      

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:         US N R (DEP)        19921001 - 19921103     Active:  

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 19921104     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Extension
Date of Discharge: 19941108      Highest Rank/Rate: AN
Length of Service : Y ear ( s ) M onth ( s ) 4 D a y ( s )
Education Level:        AFQT: 54
Evaluation M arks:         Performance: 3.0 (2)      Behavior: 2.8 (2)        OTA: 2.9

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):     

Periods of UA : 19940513-19940516 (3 days), 19940628-19940711 (13 days), 19940712-19940830 (49 days) , 19940910-19940912 (2 days), 19940914-19940915 (1 day), 19940916-19940918 (2 days), 19940920-19940926 (6 days)

NJP :

- 19940415 :       Article , (Unauthorized absence)
          Awarded : Susp ended:

- 19941013 :       Article (Unauthorized absence 19940920-19940926, 6 days, surrendered)
         Article (Failure to obey an order or regulation: failing to maintain proper uniform standards)
         Awarded : Susp ended:

S CM :

- 19940928 :       Art icle (Unauthorized absence)
         Specification 1: 19940628-19940711, (13 days) surrendered
          Specification 2: 19940712-19940830, (49 days) surrendered
          Sentence :

SPCM:

C C :

- 19940516 :       Offense: Driving Under the Influence , General District Court, Newport News, VA
         Sentence : $500 fine ($450 suspended), 5 months in jail (suspended), attend VASAP, probation for 12 months, restricted license to and from work and to and from VASAP classes only.




Retention Warning Counseling :

- 19921105 :       For defective enlistment and induction due to fraudulent entry as evidenced by failure to disclose preservice civil involvement/drug abuse.

- 19940415 :       For alcohol abuse as identified by your civilian charge of driving under the influence of alcohol on 17 March 1994.

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

 Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:            Service/ Medical Record:            Other Records:   

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:     
         Health/Medical Records:           Rehabilitation/Treatment:                  Criminal Records:       
         Personal Documentation :           Community Service:                References:     
         Department of VA letter:                  Oth er Documentation:    
                  Additional Statements :
         From Applicant:            From /To Representation:            From /To Congress m ember :        

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 9, effective 22 July 1994 until 2 October 1996, Article 3630600, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT - PATTERN OF MISCONDUCT.
B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .




DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

 1.        The Applicant contends his discharge is inequitable due to unfair treatment by his command and mitigating circumstances surrounding his misconduct of record.   

Decision

Date : 20 1 1 0128             Location: Washington D.C .        R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
 By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .

Discussion

 The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharg e if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Applicant’s record of service included NAVPERS 1070/613 (Page 13) warnings, for o f the Uniform Code of Mil itary Justice (UCMJ): Article 86 ( Unauthorized absence , 2 specifications) and Article 92 (Failure to obey an order or regulation , 1 specification) , and for of the UCMJ: Article 86 (Unauthorized absence , 2 specifications). The Applicant also had a civil conviction for driving under the influence of alcohol. The Applicant did not have a pre-service drug waiver . However, the Applicant admitted to pre-service drug use upon arrival at recruit training . Based on the offenses committed by the Applicant, command administratively processed for separation. When notified of administrative separation processing using the procedure, the Applicant waived rights to consult with a qualified counsel, submit a written statement, and request an administrative board .

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends his discharge is inequitable due to unfair treatment by his command and mitigating circumstances surrounding his misconduct of record. The Applicant states his command would not allow him to attend his grandmother’s funeral, so he entered into an unauthorized absence (UA) status in order to attend the funeral . He further states that upon his return from this period of UA, he was informed he would be separated for a pattern of misconduct. This one incident did not equate to a pattern of misconduct. Rather, t he record reflects a clear pattern of misconduct with two NJPs, one summary court-martial, one civil conviction , and two retention warnings. The Applicant’s civil conviction and 49 - day UA period are both serious offenses that could have resulted in a punitive discharge and confinement if adjudicated at special court-martial. Instead, the Applicant’s command opted for the more lenient administrative discharge. Relief denied.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s s ummary of s ervice, r ecord e ntries, and d ischarge p rocess, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .

The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum, specifically the paragraphs titled Additional Reviews, Automatic Upgrades, and Post-Service Conduct .


ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disabled American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

 Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

 Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0800618

    Original file (ND0800618.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found Pertinent Regulation/Law A. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0800568

    Original file (ND0800568.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Issue 2 (): The Applicant is requesting an upgrade of his characterization of service on the basis of his post service good conduct. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 87, 92 and 128. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application...

  • USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0800951

    Original file (MD0800951.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214: Service and/or Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Substance Abuse: Criminal Records: Family/Personal Status: Community Service: References: Additional Statements From Applicant: From Representation: From Member of Congress: Other Documentation (Describe) DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE...

  • USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0801656

    Original file (MD0801656.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT Applicant’s Issues 1. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case by case basis to determine if post service conduct mitigates the reason for the characterization of discharge. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a...

  • USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0900833

    Original file (MD0900833.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Record of service. The NDRB determined clemency founded upon the Applicant’s record of service would be inappropriate.After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found Pertinent Regulation/Law A. Paragraph 1105, DISCHARGE ADJUDGED BY SENTENCE OF COURT-MARTIAL , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16E), effective 18 August 1995 until...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700026

    Original file (ND0700026.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In the Applicant’s case, the Board could discern no impropriety or inequity in the Applicant’s discharge based merely on the fact that Applicant was not diagnosed until three years following his discharge and the fact that the applicant was unable to produce medical evaluation from the time the applicant claimed he was treated in 1998 until May of 2007. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries,...

  • USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1000231

    Original file (MD1000231.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214: Service/Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements: From Applicant: From/To Representation: From/To Congress member: Pertinent Regulation/Law A. Paragraph 6419,...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801754

    Original file (ND0801754.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In the absence of statements from witnesses and based on the documented evidence in the performance evaluation report the Board determined the Applicant’s claim was without merit and the awarded discharge characterization was appropriate, an upgrade based on not receiving financial counseling by the command would be inappropriate. Since the Applicant did not provide any post service documentation, the Board determined an upgrade at this time is not warranted based on post service...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0601141

    Original file (ND0601141.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    C. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 85 (Desertion). Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a...

  • USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1000411

    Original file (MD1000411.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    This behavior will not be tolerated.- 19951122:For your misconduct, specifically driving with a suspended license on 16 Sep and 25 Sep 1995.- 19960813:For your misconduct, specifically receiving NJP on or about 19960813 for violating Articles 86 and 92 of the UCMJ. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and administrative separation process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded...