Upgrade.Vet

USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0900996

Original file (MD0900996.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-, USMC

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20090310

Characterization of Service Received:

Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MARCORSEPMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
         Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:         USMCR (DEP)       20050831 - 20050911     Active:

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 20050912     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Months
Date of Discharge: 20060405      H ighest Rank:
Length of Service : Y ea r ( s ) M on th ( s ) 24 D a y ( s )
Education Level:        AFQT: 25
MOS: 9971
Proficiency/Conduct M arks (# of occasions): ( ) / ( )    Fitness R eports:

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      Rifle

Periods of UA / CONF :

NJP:

SCM:

SPCM:

CC:

Retention Warning Counseling :

- 20060126 :       For your condition (sleepwalking disorder), which interferes with your duties, specifically, the inability to participate in rigorous exercises, conditioning hikes, and field duty.

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

Related to Military Service:
                  DD 214:          Service / Medical Record:          Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education /Training :
         Health/Medical Records:          Substance Abuse:                  Criminal Records:
         Family/Personal Status:                   Community Service:                References:
         Additional Statements :
                  From Applicant:          From Representat ion :               From Congress member :

         Other Documentation :

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. The Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, MCO P1900.16F), effective 1 September 2001 until Present,
paragraph 6204, DEFECTIVE ENLISTMENT AND INDUCTION.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

1. Nondecisional issue. Would like to re enlist in the Armed Services.
Decision

Date: 20 0 9 1022 Location: Washington D.C . R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall FRAUDULENT ENTRY IN SERVICE.

Discussion

The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al a ffairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Applicant did not identify any decisional issues to the Board. However, the Board did complete a thorough review of the circumstances which led to discharge and the discharge process to ensure discharge met the pertinent sta ndards of equity and propriety . The Applicant’s record of service included 6105 counseling warning . Bas ed on the Applicant ’s failure to disclose his previous history of sleepwalking, his command administratively processed for separation based on fraudulent entry . He waived his rights to speak with counsel and did not include a statement.

: (Nondecisional) The Applicant was given an UNCHARACTERIZED entry level separation based on a pre-existing condition, s leep w alking. He claims he never had a problem with sleepwalking prior to entering the USMC , had no behavioral issues in boot camp , and believed that a sergeant with whom he was having difficulty “ made up ” the reported sleepwalking incident s . He states he would like to reenlist in the a rmed forces. A r eview of his service record disclose d a statement written by the Applicant dated March 8, 2006 in which he states “I slept walked three times between 9 ^th grade and boot camp…s lept walked about six times in boot camp … slept walked three times at S.O. I. (School of Infantry)”. Additionally, his record contains a medical report dated February 24 , 2006 which revealed that he cut himself with a small knife while sleep walking. This documentation contradicts his statement provided in the DD 293 that he never had a problem with sleep walking before enlisting and while at boot camp , and it supports the fraudulent enlistment determination.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found the discharge was proper and equitable. Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .

The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge , April 5, 2006 . The Applicant is directed to the Addendum, specifically the paragraphs titled Additional Reviews, Automatic Upgrades, and Post-Service Conduct .]

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Association of Service Disable Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500812

Original file (ND0500812.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant requests that his characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. “Propriety or Equity Issue(s): The Applicant was instructed to lie on his entrance physical by his recruiter.Statement: In accordance with 32 CFR § 724, and SECNAVINST 5420.174D, the Veterans of Foreign Wars submits to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) the above issue and following statement in supplement to the Applicant’s petitionThe Applicant in this case is a...
USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0801650

Original file (MD0801650.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Self-admission of a pre-existing condition is grounds for a fraudulent enlistment discharge.Despite the fact the Applicant is now recanting his admission, medical professionals at boot camp felt there was sufficient evidence to support his claim of alcohol dependency.The Applicant does not provide any additional documentation to support his claim that he was not alcohol dependent aside from his and his mother’s statements saying he lied. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document...
NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00406

Original file (ND02-00406.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

I felt that there was no one to whom I could report this harassment without getting myself into trouble for reporting it. I believe that I have every reason to expect an honorable discharge and to receive the educational benefits under the GI Bill into which I contributed.Submitted by DAV:After a review of the Former Service Members (FSM) DD Form 293 Application for the Review of Discharge or Dismissal from the Armed Forces of the United States and all of the evidence assembled for review,...
USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0800067

Original file (MD0800067.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request: Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USMCR (DEP)19980516 - 19990414 Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 19990415Period of enlistment: Years MonthsDate of Discharge: 19990504Length of Service: 00 Yrs 00Mths20 DysEducation Level: Age at Enlistment:19AFQT: 39MOS: 9900 Highest Rank: PVT Proficiency/Conduct marks (# of occasions): NONEAwards and Decorations (per DD 214):NONEPeriods of UA/CONF:...
USMC | DRB | 2015_Marine | MD1500254

Original file (MD1500254.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant’s record of service included an entry level administrative discharge from the Marine Corps for reason of a Fraudulent Entry into Military Service. Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall remain UNCHARACTERIZED and the narrative reason for separation shall remain FRAUDULENT ENTRY INTO MILITARY SERVICE....
NAVY | DRB | 2014_Navy | ND1400435

Original file (ND1400435.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to:SECRETARIAL AUTHORITY or CONDITION, NOT A DISABILITY Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USNR (DEP)20120314 - 20120923Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20120924Age at Enlistment:Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20121108Highest Rank/Rate:SNLength of Service:Year(s)Month(s) 16 Day(s)Education Level:AFQT: 94EvaluationMarks:Performance:N/ABehavior:N/AOTA:...
USMC | DRB | 2014_Marine | MD1400213

Original file (MD1400213.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or...
USMC | DRB | 2015_Marine | MD1500760

Original file (MD1500760.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214: Service/Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements: From Applicant: From/To Representation: From/To Congress member: Pertinent Regulation/Law A. ” Additional Reviews :...
USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0801850

Original file (MD0801850.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant should understand neither the “Uncharacterized” characterization nor the “ Erroneous Enlistment ” narrative reason for separation convey any negative meaning. The NDRB determined the awarded discharge characterization was appropriate and a change to the characterization of service or the narrative reason for separation would be inappropriate.After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record, Discharge Process and evidence...
NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1201321

Original file (ND1201321.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:UNCHARACTERIZED or GENERAL (UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS)Narrative Reason change to: GENERAL SEPARATION Summary of ServicePrior Service: Inactive:USNR (DEP)20031014 - 20040426Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20040427Age at Enlistment:Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20040511Highest Rank/Rate:SNLength of Service:Years Months15 DaysEducation Level:AFQT:...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0900996

Similar Decisions