Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2015_Marine | MD1500254
Original file (MD1500254.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-, USMC
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20141117
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MARCORSEPMAN

Applicant’s Request:     Characterization change to:
         Narrative Reason change to: ENTRY LEVEL SEPARATION
        
Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:        USMCR (DEP)      20101005 - 20110717     Active: 

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 20110718    Age at Enlistment:
Period of Enlistment: Years Months
Date of Discharge: 20110826     Highest Rank:
Length of Service: Year(s) Month(s) 09 Day(s)
Education Level:        AFQT: 63
MOS: 8011
Proficiency/Conduct Marks (# of occasions): () / ()   Fitness Reports:

Awards and Decorations (per DD 214):     NONE

Periods of UA/CONF:

NJP:

SCM:

SPCM:

CIVIL ARREST:

CC:

Retention Warning Counseling:

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:           Service/Medical Record:           Other Records:  

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:     
         Health/Medical Records:           Rehabilitation/Treatment:                 Criminal Records:       
         Personal Documentation:           Community Service:                References:     
         Department of VA letter:                  Other Documentation:    
                  Additional Statements:
         From Applicant:           From/To Representation:           From/To Congress member:        

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. The Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, MCO P1900.16F), effective 1 September 2001 until Present, paragraph 6204, DEFECTIVE ENLISTMENT AND INDUCTION.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .





DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

1.       The Applicant contends his discharge for Fraudulent Entry is inequitable because he was not aware of his mother’s history of seizure disorder, and did not fraudulently conceal her medical history at the time of his enlistment.

Decision


Date: 20150212           Location: Washington D.C.        Representation:

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
 By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .
Discussion

The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Board did complete a thorough review of the circumstances that led to discharge and the discharge process to ensure discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety. The Applicant’s record of service included an entry level administrative discharge from the Marine Corps for reason of a Fraudulent Entry into Military Service. While assigned to boot camp for entry level training, the Applicant was discovered to have Epilepsy that existed prior to his entry into military service and which was not disclosed during the enlistment process. The Applicant had less than 180 days active service; therefore his characterization of service at discharge was Uncharacterized. The Applicant was not entitled to an administrative board hearing.

: (Decisional) () . The Applicant contends his discharge for Fraudulent Entry is inequitable because he was not aware of his mother’s history of seizure disorder, and did not fraudulently conceal her medical history at the time of his enlistment. The Applicant’s record shows that he voluntarily admitted on a written medical statement on 20 July 2011 while at Marine Corps boot camp that he did not disclose to MEPS doctors his medical history of Epilepsy, for which he was taking medication, and that the Applicant voluntarily used that same medication in June 2011 before entering active service. The Applicant’s record, and voluntary medical statement, refutes his contention that he did not, by omission, purposefully conceal his history of Epilepsy and therefore enter into military service by fraudulent entry. Relief denied.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall remain UNCHARACTERIZED and the narrative reason for separation shall remain FRAUDULENT ENTRY INTO MILITARY SERVICE.

The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum for additional information.



ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disable d American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 701 South Courthouse Road, Suite 1001, Arlington, VA 22204-2490 for further review.
Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

 Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

 Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.
Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001054817C070420

    Original file (2001054817C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 1-35, at the time stated that when the medical treatment facility commander or attending medical officer determined that a soldier being processed for administrative separation under chapters 7 (section V), 14 or 15, with an authorized characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions, did not meet the medical fitness standards for retention, he or she would refer the soldier to a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) The applicant’s commander...

  • USMC | DRB | 2015_Marine | MD1500131

    Original file (MD1500131.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. The Applicant’s service and medical record document that the epilepsy existed prior to service, and the Applicant’s failure to disclose it could have resulted in charges for Article 83 (Fraudulent enlistment, appointment, or separation). ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided...

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-01235

    Original file (MD02-01235.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The factual basis for this recommendation was Applicant disclosed at Moment of Truth a history of epilepsy since age 13. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The Applicant was discharged on 010517 with uncharacterized service by reason of defective enlistment and induction due to a fraudulent entry (A). The Applicant’s service record did not contain any unusual circumstances during his less than one month in the military to warrant a change of discharge.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1101230

    Original file (ND1101230.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to:MEDICAL DISCHARGE Summary of ServicePrior Service: Inactive:USNR (DEP)20080114 - 20080414Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20080415Age at Enlistment:Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20080515Highest Rank/Rate:SRLength of Service:Years Month01 DayEducation Level:AFQT: 35EvaluationMarks:Performance:NONEBehavior:NONEOTA: NONEAwards and Decorations (per DD...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0800002

    Original file (ND0800002.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request: Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USNR (DEP) 19961115 - 19970909 Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 19970910Period of enlistment: Years Months Date of Discharge:19980521Length of Service: Yrs Mths12DysEducation Level: Age at Enlistment:18AFQT: unreadableHighest Rank/Rate:RMSREvaluation marks:Performance: NA Behavior:NA OTA: NA Awards and Decorations (per DD 214): Types of Documents...

  • USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1200026

    Original file (MD1200026.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Based on the fraudulent enlistment, command administratively processed for separation. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons.

  • USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1000769

    Original file (MD1000769.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USMCR (DEP)20041122 - 20050119Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20050120Age at Enlistment: Period of Enlistment: Years MonthsDate of Discharge:20060415Highest Rank:Length of Service:Year(s)Month(s)26Day(s)Education Level: AFQT:51MOS: 0311Proficiency/Conduct Marks (# of occasions):()/()Fitness Reports: Awards and Decorations (per DD...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2014_Navy | ND1400418

    Original file (ND1400418.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USNR (DEP)20120807 - 20130326Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20130327Age at Enlistment: Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20130617Highest Rank/Rate: SRLength of Service: Year(s) Month(s) 21 Day(s)Education Level:AFQT: 57EvaluationMarks:Performance:NOBBehavior:NOBOTA: NOBAwards and Decorations (per DD 214):NONEPeriods of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2015_Navy | ND1500927

    Original file (ND1500927.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall remain UNCHARACTERIZED and the narrative reason for separation shall remain FRAUDULENT ENTRY. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB...

  • USMC | DRB | 2013_Marine | MD1300657

    Original file (MD1300657.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to: HONORABLENarrative Reason change to:MEDICAL Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USMCR (DEP)20060628 - 20060709Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20060710Age at Enlistment: Period of Enlistment: Years MonthsDate of Discharge:20060802Highest Rank:Length of Service: Year(s)Month(s)23 Day(s)Education Level: AFQT:74MOS: 9900Proficiency/Conduct Marks (# of occasions):NOB/NOBFitness Reports: Awards and...