Upgrade.Vet

USMC | DRB | 2014_Marine | MD1400213

Original file (MD1400213.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-, USMC

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20131115

Characterization of Service Received:

Narrative Reason for Discharge:

Authority for Discharge: MARCORSEPMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
         Narrative Reason change to: Remove Fraudulent Entry into Military Service

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:         USMCR (DEP)       20120314 - 20121021     Active:

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 20121022     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Months
Date of Discharge: 20121108      H ighest Rank:
Length of Service : Y ea r ( s ) M on th ( s ) 17 D a y ( s )
Education Level:        AFQT: 70
MOS: 8011
Proficiency/Conduct M arks (# of occasions): NA / NA      Fitness R eports:

Awards and Decorations (per DD 214):      NONE

Periods of UA / CONF :

NJP:    SCM:    SPCM:          CC:     Retention Warning Counseling :

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:          Service/ Medical Record:          Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:
         Health/Medical Records:          Rehabilitation/Treatment:                  Criminal Records:
         Personal Documentation :          Community Service:                References:
         Department of VA letter:                  Oth er Documentation:
                  Additional Statements :
         From Applicant:          From /To Representation:          From /To Congress m ember :

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. The Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, ( MCO P1900.16F), effective 1 September 2001 until Present, paragraph 6204, DEFECTIVE ENLISTMENT AND INDUCTION.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

1. The Applicant contends his narrative reason for separation of Fraudulent Entry is improper and inequitable .

Decision

Date: 20140605 Location: Washington D.C . R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .

Discussion

The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al a ffairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Applicant’s record of service included no 6105 counseling warnings and no misconduct resulting in nonjudicial punishment or court-martial. Based on the Applicant ’s failure to disclose his previous suicidal ideations , command administratively processed for separation. When notified of a dministrative separation processing using the procedure, the Applicant rights to consult with a qualified counsel and submit a written statement .

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends his narrative reason for separation of Fraudulent Entry is improper and inequitable. T he Applicant states that he lied about having suicidal thoughts at boot camp and falsely checked “No” to having any medical problems that require d treatment when he filled out his Medical Scre ening f or Release f rom Active Duty form. The crux of the Applicant’s argument is that he contends that he did not materially misrepresent or con ceal pertinent facts. The Applicant’s statements now contending that he lied about having suicidal thoughts at boot camp and falsely fill ing out his Medical Screening f or Release f rom Active Duty form do not provide justification or form a basis for relief. Although the Applicant contends he did not material ly mis represent himself, the record clearly shows that he answered “No” when asked, “Have you ever considered or attempted suicide?” on his Medical History Provider Interview form dated 14 March 2012. The Applicant’s medical record dated 26 October 2012 states, “[the Applicant] revealed a history of previously undisclosed suicidal ideations. ” In addition, the Applicant signed a Voluntary Medical Statement on 26 October 2012 declaring that he did not disclose his suicidal thoughts to the MEPS d octor. The NDRB presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs in the absence of persuasive evidence to the contrary. Other than the Applicant’s own statements that included his admission to lying and falsifying official documents, he provided no proof to overcome the presumption of regularity.

The Applicant contends that although he had parental consent, he enlisted when he was 17 years-old and had no experience with military processing. While the Applicant may feel his youth and inexperience were the underlying causes of his misconduct, the record clearly reflects his willful misrepresentation and demonstrated he was unfit for further service. The evidence of record does not demonstrate the Applicant was not responsible for his conduct or that he should not be held accountable for his actions. The NDRB determined the Applicant’s discharge was proper and equitable for Fraudulent Entry into Military Service. Relief denied.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum for additional information.

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disable d American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 701 South Courthouse Road, Suite 1001, Arlington, VA 22204-2490 for further review.

Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1100152

Original file (ND1100152.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

” On 9 Oct 2001, the Branch Head for the Mental Health Department, Naval Hospital, Jacksonville FL sent a memo to the Applicant’s Commanding Officer that included the following: “AXIS II - Personality Disorder NOS with Borderline features, severe, EPTE (existed prior to entry)…unsuitable for continued military service…considered potentially dangerous based on past history of suicide ideation and suicide attempt requiring hospitalization…recommend expeditious administrative separation. ...
USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700269

Original file (MD0700269.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Discharge Process Date Notified: 20050727 Basis for Discharge: DUE TO Least Favorable Characterization: Commanding Officer’s Intended Recommendation: Date Applicant Responded to Notification:20050802Rights Elected at Notification: Consult with Counsel Obtain Copies of Documents Submit Statement(s) (date) Administrative Board NOT APPLICABLECommanding Officer Recommendation (date): (20050802) SJA review (date): (20050823) Separation Authority (date): COMMANDING GENERAL, 3D MARINE DIVISION...
NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1101860

Original file (ND1101860.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.Applicant seeks an RE code and discharge upgrade to re-enlist in the U.S. Armed Forces.2. Therefore, an Uncharacterized discharge is considered the most appropriate characterization of service.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and the administrative separation process, the Board found...
USMC | DRB | 2013_Marine | MD1300278

Original file (MD1300278.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are...
NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900619

Original file (ND0900619.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT Applicant’s Issues 1. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record Entries, and Discharge Process, the Board found ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700927

Original file (ND0700927.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Discharge Process Date Notified: NOT FOUND IN RECORDReason for Discharge:Least Favorable Characterization: Date Applicant Responded to Notification:NOT FOUND IN RECORD Rights Elected at Notification: NOT FOUND IN RECORDCommanding Officer Recommendation (date): NOT FOUND IN RECORD Separation Authority (date): NOT FOUND IN RECORDReason for discharge directed: NOT FOUND IN RECORD Characterization directed: NOT FOUND IN RECORD Date Applicant Discharged: 20021001 Types of Documents Submitted by...
USMC | DRB | 2014_Marine | MD1400012

Original file (MD1400012.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to: REMOVE THE DETRIMENTAL NARRATIVE REASON OF “PRE-SERVICE SUICIDE ATTEMPTS UNDISCLOSED ” Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USMCR (DEP)20001012 - 20001112Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20001113Age at Enlistment: Period of Enlistment: Years MonthsDate of Discharge:20001201Highest Rank:Length of Service: Year(s)Month(s)19 Day(s)Education Level: AFQT:95MOS:...
NAVY | DRB | 2012_Navy | ND1201450

Original file (ND1201450.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: Pertinent Regulation/Law A. DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL...
USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0900726

Original file (MD0900726.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Substance Abuse: Criminal Records: Family/Personal Status: Community Service: References: Additional Statements:From Applicant:From Representation: From Congress member: Other Documentation: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL...
USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0901973

Original file (MD0901973.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant should contact the Naval Inspector General's Office ( www.ig.navy.mil ).Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. ” Additional...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2014_Marine | MD1400213

Similar Decisions