Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0800535
Original file (MD0800535.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

ex-LCPL, USMC
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20080213
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge: CONVENIENCE OF THE SERVICE
Authority for Discharge: MARCORSEPMAN

Applicant’s Request:     Characterization change to:
                           Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
 Inactive: USMCR (DEP) 20050412 - 20050619                       
Period of Service Under Review:
 Date of Enlistment: 20050620      Period of enlistment : 5 Years Months   Date of Discharge: 20060428
Length of Service : 00 Yrs 10 Mths   08 D ys          Education Level:         Age at Enlistment: 26     AFQT: 81
MOS: 0231        Highest Rank: LCPL
Proficiency/Conduct marks (# of occasions):      4.2(2) / 4.3(2)
Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214): NDSM

Periods of UA / CONF :

NJPs :    

6105 Counseling :


Types of Documents Submitted

 Related to Military Service:      DD 214:          Service and/or Medical Record:            Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:  
         Employment:                        Finances:                          Education /Training :     
         Health/Medical Records:           Substance Abuse:                           Criminal Records:       
         Family/Personal Status:                   Community Service:                References:              
        
Additional Statements From Applicant:             From Representat ion :              From Member of Congress:
Other Documentation (Describe)

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

 1. Commanding Officer’s notification was for an honorable discharge.
2. Record of service.

Decision

Date: 20 08 0324             Location: Washington D.C         R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall PERSONALITY DISORDER .
Discussion

 Issue 1 (Propriety). The Applicant contends that he was discharged with a characterization worse than what he was notified and recommended for. There is evidence in the record that the Applicant was notified of separation proceedings whereby the least favorable characterization would be honorable. The Applicant elected his rights based upon that least favorable outcome. The Separation Authority determines whether the allegations in the notification of the basis for separation are substantiated by the evidence. If there was evidence of conduct deserving of a general (under honorable conditions) discharge, they would have to re-notify the Applicant that the least favorable outcome would now be general. The NDRB concluded that the Applicant’s discharge action was improper , is convinced that this was prejudicial to the Applicant, and therefore the discharge was improper .

Issue 2 (Equity): The Board reviews the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge individually, on a case-by-case basis. If such a review reveals an impropriety or inequity, relief is in order. Regulations permit relief on equitable grounds if the Applicant’s discharge is inconsistent with standards of discipline of the Naval service. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant . The NDRB review ed all of the available records , supporting documents, facts, e lements of d ischarge , evidence submitted by the Applicant , and circumstances unique to this case . A particular circumstance of interest was the lack of any negative information in the 10 months of service of the Applicant which would prevent a characterization of service as honorable. The NDRB concluded that there was an i nequity in the Applicant’s discharge action, is convinced that this was prejudicial to the Applicant, and therefore an i nequity in the characterization did occur.

In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that the discharge was both improper and not equitable.

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. Paragraph 6203, CONVENIENCE OF THE GOVERNMENT, of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16F), effective 1 September 2001 until Present.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .


Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214

The NDRB did note administrative error(s) on the original DD Form 214:

         “ PERSONALITY DISORDER ”
        
The NDRB will recommend to the Commandant of the Marine Corps that the DD 214 be corrected as appropriate.

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000 . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provi ded the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years , has already been grante d a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employmen t / Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD . ” Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0701102

    Original file (MD0701102.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall PERSONALITY DISORDER.Discussion Issue 1 (Equity): The Board reviews the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge individually, on a case-by-case basis. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and...

  • USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0800799

    Original file (MD0800799.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Record of service. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Pertinent Regulation/Law A. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge.

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0701256

    Original file (MD0701256.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall PERSONALITY DISORDER.Discussion : either which the Board cannot form the basis of relief for the Applicant, or the Board does not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. Additionally, the Board has no...

  • USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0800476

    Original file (MD0800476.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Pertinent Regulation/Law A. Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16E), effective 01 September 2001 until Present).B. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance...

  • USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0800162

    Original file (MD0800162.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Pertinent Regulation/Law A. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0701059

    Original file (MD0701059.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Summary of ServicePrior Service: Inactive: USMCR (DEP) 20030205 - 20031118 Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 20031119Years Contracted:5; Extension: Date of Discharge: 20050225Length of Service: 01 Yrs 09 Mths06 DysLost Time:Days UA: Days Confined: Education Level:...

  • USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0800815

    Original file (MD0800815.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request: Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: POST TRAUMATIC STRESS DISORDER Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USMCR (DEP)20020607 - 20020723Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 20020724Period of enlistment: Years MonthsDate of Discharge:20040226Length of Service: Yrs Mths02 DysEducation Level: Age at Enlistment:AFQT: 91MOS: 2311Highest Rank: Fitness reports: Proficiency/Conduct marks (# of occasions): ()/()Awards and...

  • USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0800218

    Original file (MD0800218.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall IN LIEU OF TRIAL BY COURT-MARTIAL.Discussion : either which the Board cannot form the basis of relief for the Applicant, or the Board does not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. If a former member has...

  • USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0800534

    Original file (MD0800534.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request: Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USMCR (DEP)19900326– 19900626Active: 19900627 – 19941031 HON Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 19941101Period of enlistment:3 Years MonthsDate of Discharge:19960410Length of Service: 01 Yrs 05 Mths10 DysEducation Level: Age at Enlistment:22AFQT: 67MOS: 0351Highest Rank: CPLProficiency/Conduct marks (# of occasions): 4.8(2) / 4.8(2)Awards and Decorations...

  • USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0800065

    Original file (MD0800065.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Discussion : either which the Board cannot form the basis of relief for the Applicant, or the Board does not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Pertinent Regulation/Law A. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative...