Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0701059
Original file (MD0701059.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
ex-LCPL, USMC
MD07-01059    
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20070724        Characterization Received:
Narrative Reason: CONDITION NOT A DISABILITY Authority: MARCORSEPMAN 6203.2      

 Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
                           Narrative Reason change to:
Applicant’s Issues:       1. Veteran’s benefits.
                           2. Discharge not representative of record of service.

Decision

 By a vote of the Characterization shall .
 By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall CONDITION NOT A DISABILITY.      

Date: 20 08 0110                  Location: Washington D.C.         Representation :

Discussion

 : either which the Board cannot form the basis of relief for the Applicant, or the Board does not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum regarding .

Issue 2 (Equity): The Board reviews the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge individually, on a case-by-case basis. If such a review reveals an impropriety or inequity, relief is in order. Regulations permit relief on equitable grounds if the Applicant’s discharge is inconsistent with standards of discipline of the Naval service. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant . The NDRB review ed all of the available records , supporting documents, facts, e lements of d ischarge , evidence submitted by the Applicant , and circumstances unique to this case . A particular circumstance of interest was the lack of any negative information in the 21 months of service of the Applicant which would prevent a characterization of service as honorable . The NDRB concluded that there was an i nequity in the Applicant’s discharge action, is convinced that this was prejudicial to the Applicant, and therefore an i nequity in the characterization did occur.

In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries , Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, t he Board found that


Summary of Service

 Prior Service:
 Inactive: USMCR (DEP) 20030205 - 20031118                    
Period of Service Under Review:
 Date of Enlistment: 20031119      Years Contracted : 5 ; Extension:          Date of Discharge: 20050225      
Length of Service :   01 Yrs   09 Mths   06 D ys          Lost Time : Days UA: Days Confine d :
Education Level: 12       Age at Enlistment: 18     AFQT: 79          MOS: 6311      Highest Rank: PFC
Proficiency/Conduct marks (# of occasions):      4.1 ( 2 ) / 4.3 ( 2 )  
Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214): NDSM, LOA



Medical/Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Basis for Discharge

20040831 :        Naval Hospital Pensacola. Follow up from pulmon ary exam.      
         Diagnosis: Exercise induced bronchospasm.      
         Recommendation: Administrative separation.      

20041004 :        Naval Hospital Pensacola. Follow up from pulmonary episodes and treatment.      
         Diagnosis: Exercise induced bronchospasm.      
         Recommendation: Administrative separation.      

20041008:         MARCORSEPMAN 6105 counseling for inability to continue military service due to being diagnosed with having exercise induced bronchospasm.

20041022:         MARCORSEPMAN 6105 counseling for inability to continue military service due to being diagnosed with having exercise induced bronchospasm . Recommended for expeditious administrative discharge.


Discharge Process

 Date Notified:   20041022
Basis for Discharge:      DUE TO:
        
Least Favorable Characterization:       
Commanding Officer’s Intended Recommendation:   

Date Applicant Responded to Notification:                  20041025
Rights Elected at Notification:
         Consult with Counsel                      
         Obtain Copies of Documents               
         Submit Statement(s) (date)                        
         Administrative Board                      

Commanding Officer Recommendation (date):        ( 20041129 )
SJA review (date):      
Separation Authority (date):     COMMANDER, MARINE CORPS BASES WESTERN AREA       ( 20050210 )
Basis for discharge directed:   DUE TO CONDITION NOT A DISABILITY
Characterization directed:     
Date Applicant Discharged:       20050225      


Types of Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered By Board

 Related to Military Service:      Service and/or Medical Record:            Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:         
         Employment:                        Finances:                          Education:               
         Health/Medical Records:                   Substance Abuse:                           Criminal Records:       
         Family/Personal Status:                   Community Service:                References:              
        
Additional Statements From Applicant:    From Representative:
Other Documentation (Describe)      



Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16F, effective 1 September 2001 and Present), paragraph 6203, CONVENIENCE OF THE GOVERNMENT .
B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .





















































ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity , OUSD (P&R) PI-LP , The Pentagon , Washington, DC 20301-4000 . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provi ded the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years , has already been grante d a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employmen t / Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD . ” Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0901935

    Original file (ND0901935.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Representation: By a vote of the Characterization shall .By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include...

  • USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0800815

    Original file (MD0800815.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request: Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: POST TRAUMATIC STRESS DISORDER Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USMCR (DEP)20020607 - 20020723Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 20020724Period of enlistment: Years MonthsDate of Discharge:20040226Length of Service: Yrs Mths02 DysEducation Level: Age at Enlistment:AFQT: 91MOS: 2311Highest Rank: Fitness reports: Proficiency/Conduct marks (# of occasions): ()/()Awards and...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700790

    Original file (MD0700790.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Recommendation on Separation: BY Recommendation on Characterization: BY Commanding Officer Recommendation (date): (20050315) SJA review (date): (20050802) Separation Authority (date): COMMANDER, 2D MARINE AIRCRAFT WING (20050802) Basis for discharge directed: Characterization directed: Date Applicant Discharged: 20050812 Types of Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered By BoardRelated to Military Service: Service and/or Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period:...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00034

    Original file (PD-2014-00034.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The CI made no appeals and was medically separated. The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. At a VA clinic examination on 12 October 2007, 4 months after separation, there was no weakness, muscle atrophy, with normal gait but persistent muscle pain.At the...

  • USMC | DRB | 2015_Marine | MD1500247

    Original file (MD1500247.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant’s record of service included 6105 counseling warnings for medical diagnosis of Exercise-induced asthma, and administrative separation for reason of Condition, Not a Disability. Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall change to HONORABLE and the narrative reason for separation shall remain CONDITION...

  • USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0800263

    Original file (MD0800263.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall CONDITION NOT A DISABILITY.Discussion Issue 1: ().The Board reviews the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge individually, on a case-by-case basis. The NDRB concluded that there was an inequity in the Applicant’s characterization of discharge and determined that an upgrade to honorable is appropriate.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700904

    Original file (MD0700904.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Although not an excuse for misconduct, the NDRB noted that there was an inequity in the Applicant’s discharge action in that the punishment was too severe for the misconduct. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades...

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0601107

    Original file (MD0601107.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Medical Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Narrative Reason for Separation 20010108: Applicant on light duty for 30 days. Elements of Discharge: [INVOLUNTARY] Discharge Process: Notification ProcedureDate Notified:20010410Basis for Discharge: PHYSICAL CONDITION NOT A DISABILITY Least Favorable Characterization: UNCHARACTERIZED Commanding Officer’s Intended Recommendation: UNCHARACTERIZEDRecord Supports Narrative Reason: YESDate Applicant Responded to...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0701102

    Original file (MD0701102.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall PERSONALITY DISORDER.Discussion Issue 1 (Equity): The Board reviews the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge individually, on a case-by-case basis. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and...

  • USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0800799

    Original file (MD0800799.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Record of service. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Pertinent Regulation/Law A. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge.