Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700500
Original file (ND0700500.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
ex-MM2, USN
ND07-00500
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20070305                              Characterization Received:
Narrative Reason: CONDITION, NOT A DISABILITY    Authority: MILPERSMAN 1910-120

 Applicant’s Request: Narrative Reason change to:

Applicant’s Issues:       1. Request not to be held liable for repayment of reenlistment bonus.
                           2. Was not allowed sufficient time to prepare for separation.
                           3 . Narrative reason should be changed because VA awarded a 10% disability.
                           4 . Was never presented before a medical board .


Decision

 By a vote of the Characterization shall .
 By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall CONDITION, NOT A DISABILITY .
Date: 20 071108                                       Location: Washington D.C.


Discussion

 Issue 1 and 2 : either which the Board cannot form the basis of relief for the Applicant, or the Board does not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum regarding .

Issue 3 ( ): For the edification of the Applicant, t he Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits. This process is completely separate and unrelated to the NDRB’s responsibility to determine the propriety and equity of a discharge. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits or based upon a disability ruling by the Veterans Administration .

With regard to the Applicant’s request to have his narrative reason for discharge changed the NDRB will change the reason for discharge if such a change is warranted. The MILPERSMAN designates specific phraseology to be used in block 28 of the DD-214. In the Applicant’s case the separation process was in strict compliance with the Naval Military Personnel Manual. The Applicant was properly processed for separation by reason of convenience of the government due to non availability for world wide assignment due to medical limitations . The Applicant’s record clearly documents his 22 months of medical treatment following his shoulder surgery . The Applicant was found not physically qualified by the Department of the Navy Bureau of Medicine and Surgery and subsequently properly processed for separation in accordance with MILPERSMAN 1910-120; t he separation authority directed that that Applicant be discharged under Honorable conditions . The Naval Mi litary Personnel Manual 1910-120 for the period in question direct s that Block 28 contain the phrase “CONDITION, NOT A DISABILITY ” when separating under these conditions. To change the Narrative Reason Separation would be inappropriate.
Issue 4 ( ): The Applicant states that he d id not go before a medical board. Per regulations the initiation and submission of medical boards are at the discretion of the individual physician. There is no indication in the evidence of record or in the documentation submitted by the Applicant that the Applicant was recommended for or processed for a medical board. Further the evidence of record does not indicate that proper authority erred by not initiating a medical board for the Applicant. Therefore, the Board found the Applicant’s iss ue without merit.

In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence (to include evidence submitted by the Applicant) to rebut the presumption. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, medical and service record entries, discharge process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that


Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214

 The NDRB did note an administrative error on the original DD Form 214 :

         “ CONTINUOUS HONORABLE ACTIVE SERVICE FROM 20001040 UNTIL 20030318 ”
        
The NDRB will recommend to the C ommander, Navy Personnel Command, that the DD 214 be corrected as appropriate.


Summary of Service

Prior Service:
 Inactive: US N R (DEP)      20000307 - 20001003              Active:          20001004 - 20030318
Period of Service Under Review:
 Date of Enlistment: 20030319               Years Contracted :                 Date of Discharge: 20060113
Length of Service : 02 Yrs 09 Mths 25 D ys                                     Lost Time :
Education Level:         Age at Enlistment:       AFQT: 85          Highest Rank /Rate : MM2
Evaluation marks (# of occasions):       Performance: 3.7                   Behavior: 3.3     OTA: 3.50 (3)
Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214): NATIONAL DEFENSE SERVICE MEDAL, FIRST GOOD CONDUCT MEDAL FOR THE PERIOD ENDING 031003, SEA SERVICE DEPLOYMENT RIBBON, GLOBAL WAR ON TERRORISM SERVICE MEDAL, ENLISTED SUBMARINE WARFARE SPECIALIST BREAST INSIGNIA


Medical/Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Basis for Discharge

 20040209:        Applicant place on limited duty for 8 months.

20040316:        Surgery to Applicant ’s right shoulder.

20040810:        A pplicant found fit for duty.

20051107 :        Department of the Navy Bureau of Medicine and Surgery advised Commander, Naval Personnel of the Applicant ’s physical disqualification from submarine and nuclear field duty due to a history of chronic right shoulder pain and psychotropic medication use.

20060103:        BUPERS directed Commanding Officer, Naval Intermediate Maintenance Facility, Pacific Northwest to process applicant for administrative separation due to notice of unsuitability for operational duty.

20060104:        Retention Warning for being diagnosed with right shoulder instability and chronic right shoulder pain, and have been screened an unsuitable for submarine and sea duty, rendering you unavailable for worldwide assignment .

Discharge Process

 Date Notified:                                       20060104
Reason for Discharge:     - MEDICAL LIMITATIONS
Least Favorable Characterization:       

Date Applicant Responded to Notification:                  20060104
Rights Elected at Notification:
         Consult with Counsel                      
         Obtain Copies of Documents               
         Submit Statement(s) (date)                        
         GCMCA review                               

Commanding Officer Recommendation (date):       
Separation Authority (date):     COMMANDING OFFICER, NAVAL INTERMEDIATE MAINTENANCE FACILITY, PACIFIC NORTHWEST ( 20060105 )
 Reason for discharge directed: 
Characterization directed:     
Date Applicant Discharged:       20060113


Types of Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered By Board

 Related to Military Service:      Service and/or Medical Record:            Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:         
         Employment:                        Finances:                          Education:               
         Health/Medical Records:                   Substance Abuse:                           Criminal Records:       
         Family/Personal Status:                   Community Service:                References:              
        
Additional Statements From Applicant:    From Representative:
Other Documentation (Describe)


Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), effective 25 May 2005 until Present, Article 1910-120, SEPARATION BY REASON OF CONVENIENCE OF THE GOVERNMENT - PHYSICAL OR MENTAL CONDITIONS.

 B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .


ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity , OUSD (P&R) PI-LP , The Pentagon , Washington, DC 20301-4000 . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provi ded the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years , has already been grante d a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employmen t / Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD . ” Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0902320

    Original file (ND0902320.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall INTO MILITARY.Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant.The...

  • USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1100858

    Original file (MD1100858.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    : (Decisional) (Clemency) . Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0901177

    Original file (ND0901177.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Representation: By a vote of the Characterization shall .By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include...

  • USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1101378

    Original file (MD1101378.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT Applicant’s Issues 1. The Applicant submitted no documentation or evidence to support a post-service conduct review. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700181

    Original file (ND0700181.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    (Incident occurring May-July 2004)Awarded - Written Reprimand.20041222: LTR of Reprimand issued to Applicant. Officer administrative separationDischarge Process Report of Misconduct: 20050121 Show Cause Recommendation: Applicant Response: ELECTECTED TO NOT SUBMIT COMMENTS Endorsing Recommendation: CONCUR WITH COMMANDING OFFICERdate: 20050308 Show Cause Decision: CNPCdate: 20050502 Applicant Notified: NOT FOUND IN RECORD Applicant Election: NOT FOUND IN RECORD Board of Inquiry: NONE CNPC...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801973

    Original file (ND0801973.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The NDRB determined the awarded discharge was appropriate and an upgrade founded upon the former service member’s record of service would be inappropriate. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review. Additionally, the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700837

    Original file (ND0700837.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Issue 2 ().The Applicant claims that the negative result returned from the urinalysis he underwent upon termination of his unauthorized absence (UA) demonstrates that he did not use illegal drugs. Further, the Board determined that even if credible, the Applicant’s claim to not having used illegal drugs did not mitigate the Applicant’s lengthy UA period, which constituted a serious offense for which a punitive discharge is authorized upon conviction at special or general court-martial, and...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700135

    Original file (ND0700135.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    To be administratively discharged via MILPERSMAN 1910-152 (alcohol rehabilitation failure) a member must first attend an intensive alcohol treatment program and subsequently be involved in a serious alcohol incident or violate his aftercare treatment plan. Date Applicant Responded to Notification:20030602 Rights Elected at Notification: Consult with Counsel Obtain Copies of Documents Submit Statement(s) (date) Administrative Board GCMCA review Separation Authority (date): COMMANDING...

  • USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0901913

    Original file (MD0901913.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Substance Abuse: Criminal Records: Family/Personal Status: Community Service: References: Additional Statements:From Applicant:From Representation:From Congress member:Other Documentation: Pertinent Regulation/Law A. Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT of the Marine Corps Separation and...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0601062

    Original file (ND0601062.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Elements of Discharge: [INVOLUNTARY] Discharge Process: Date Notified:20050502Reason for Discharge Least Favorable Characterization: Record Supports Narrative Reason: Date Applicant Responded to Notification: 20050502Rights Elected at Notification:Consult with Counsel Administrative Board Obtain Copies Submit Statement(s) (date)GCMCA Review Administrative Board Date: NOT APPLICABLERecommendation of Commanding Officer (date): Discharge directed by (date):COMMANDER, SUBMARINE SQUADRON 15...