Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0601062
Original file (ND0601062.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-ETSN, USN
ND06-01062

 Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request :

Application Received:                               20 060814
Narrative Reason for Separation:                          
Character of Service:                               
Discharge Authority :                                MILPERSMAN 1910-142
Last Duty Assignment/ Command at Discharge:       uss san francisco

Applicant’s Request:
          Narrative Reason change to:                not applicable
         Characterization chang e to:               
         Review Requested :                          
Representation:                                             


Decision:

Date of Decision:                                             20 070712
The Discharge shall :                      
                                                     
Regarding p ropriety , the Board found the discharge :      
Regarding e quity , the Board found the discharge :         
Vot e (characterization/reason)                      /
Location of Board:                                  Washington D.C.
Complete Service Record:                                   
Complete Medical Record:                          
Complete Discharge Package:                       


Applicant’s Issue as Summarized by the Board:
Should be honorable because of Service connected disability



Summary of Service :

Prior Service:
 Inactive: USNR (DEP)                                20020531-20021104
Active:                                          NONE
Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment:                                 20021105      
Years Contracted :                                   ;      
Date of Discharge:                                  20050525
Length of Service:                                  02 Yrs 06 Mos 21 Days Does not exclude lost time, if any.
Time Lost During This Period:                      NONE
Days Unauthorized Absence:                         NONE      
Days Confinement:                                   NONE      

Education Level:                                   
Age at this Enlistment:                                    
AFQT:                                                 63
Highest Rate/Rank:                                   ETSN

Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):
 Performance :                                         2.5 (2)
Behavior :                                            2.5 (2)
OTA :                                                   2.50
Extracted from:
Applicant’s Supporting Documents Other:      

Awards and Decorations (as listed on the DD Form 214):
NATIONAL DEFENSE SERVICE MEDAL



Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Narrative Reason for Separation

20050106 :        NJP for violation(s) of UCMJ:
         Article 86: (3 specifications) Unauthorized absence.
         Article 92: (3 specifications) Failure to obey order.
          Award: Forfeiture of $250 for 2 months, oral reprimand, reduction to E-2 (suspended for 6 months) .
          No indication of appeal in the record.
20050205:        Page 13 / Administrative Remarks: Determined Physically “NOT QUALIFIED” by reason of history of adjustment disorder with depressed mood and submarine environmental unadaptability. The enlisted submarine designator (SU)/( SS ) is hereby removed. ETSN Lucas is entitled to wear the submarine breast insignia (if applicable). He may reapply to the Naval Personnel Command (PERS 403) via bureau of Medicine and Surgery (BUMED 21) for restoration of the (SU)/ (SS) designator when he once again satisfies the physical requirements of the Manual of the Medicine Department for submarine duty. Auth: COMSUBPAC ltr 1306 Ser N1/033 of 14 Feb 05.
20050429 :        NJP for violation(s) of UCMJ:
         Article 86 : Unauthorized absence from appointed place of duty (Quarterdeck Watch) .
         Award: R estriction and extra duty for 20 days , reduction in rate (suspended for 6 months) .
         No indic ation of appeal in the record.

Elements of Discharge: [ IN VOLUNTARY]

Discharge Process :                                 
Date Notified :                                        20050502
Reason for Discharge                               
                                                     
Least Favorable Characterization:                         
Record Supports Narrative Reason :                         
Date Applicant R esponded to N otification:                 20050502
Rights E lected at N otification :
Consult with Counsel                      
Administrative Board                      
Obtain Copies                             
Submit Statement(s) (date)                               
GCMCA Review                               

Administrative Board Date:                         NOT APPLICABLE
                                                     
Recommendation of Commanding Officer (date):    
Discharge directed by (date):                       COMMANDER, SUBMARINE SQUADRON 15 20050504
Narrative reason directed :                                  
Characterization directed:                                 
Date Applicant Discharged:                         20050525



Additional Information Considered by Board

 Type of d ocumentation submitted by t he Applicant and considered by the Board
        Document Type                                        #Pages
 Related to Period of Service Under Review :
          Service/Medical Record :                              2
         Other Period of Service:                                    0
Related to Post-Service Period:
          Community Service :                                   0
         Education :                                           0
         Employment :                                          0
         Health /Medical :                                       0
         Character Statements:                               0
         Criminal Records Checks:                                    0
         Additional Statements from Applicant:             0
Other Documentation      (Describe Below)                 4

Total Number of Pages:                              6

D escription of Other Documentation:
        Rating Decision from Department of Veterans Affairs



Applicant’s Issue as Summarized by the Board:
Should be honorable because of Service connected disability

The Applicant contends that his discharge should be characterized as Honorable because he has a service connected disability for which he is receiving benefits from the Department of Veterans Affairs . When the service of a member of the U.S. Navy has been honest and faithful, it is appropriate to characterize that service as honorable. A general discharge is warranted when significant negative aspects of a member’s conduct or performance of duty outweigh the positive aspects of the member’s military record. The Applicant’s service was marred by two non - judicial punishment proceedings for violations of UCMJ Articles 86 (unauthorized absence) and 92 (failure to obey a lawful order). Violations of UCMJ Article 92 are considered serious offenses for which a punitive discharge is authorized at courts martial. The Applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of his service, reflects his willful failure to meet the requirements of his contract with the U.S. Navy and falls far short of that required for an upgrade of his characterization of service. Relief is not warranted.

In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Service Record Entries, Medical Record Entries, Elements of Discharge and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found the Applicant’s discharge proper and equitable.

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 11, effective
26 April 2005 until Present, Article 1910-142, SEPARATION BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT - COMMISSION OF A SERIOUS OFFENSE .
B . Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II , Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity.
C. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 92 (failure to obey lawful order) .

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil ” .

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provi ded the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years , has already been grante d a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employment / Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/ RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD . ” Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                                    Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
                                     Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                                     720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                                    Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600013

    Original file (ND0600013.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). Violation of UCMJ, Article 92:Specification: In that ET3 H_ E. O_ Jr, (Applicant), USN, Naval Submarine School, having knowledge of a lawful order issued by the Commanding Officer, to wit: Naval Submarine School listing of Off-Limits establishments, an order which it was his duty to obey, did, at or near Hartford, Connecticut on diverse...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0901299

    Original file (ND0901299.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT Applicant’s Issues 1. The NDRB reviewed the Applicant’s service record and determined these issues are without merit. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700088

    Original file (ND0700088.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    RE code change and reenlistment opportunity 2. Elements of Discharge: [INVOLUNTARY] Date Notified:NOT FOUND IN RECORDReason for Discharge - Least Favorable Characterization Authorized: Date Applicant Responded to Notification: NOT FOUND IN RECORDRights Elected at Notification:Consult with Counsel Obtain Copies of DocumentsSubmit Statement(s) (date)Administrative Board GCMCA Review Commanding Officer Recommendation (date): Separation Authority (date):NOT FOUND IN RECORDReason for discharge...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-01324

    Original file (ND04-01324.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. (XXX) XXX-XXXX EXT XXXX.” Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214 (Member 4) Applicant’s DD Form 214 (Member 1) PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):Inactive: USNR (DEP) 010509 - 010518 ELS (DRUG) Inactive:...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900556

    Original file (ND0900556.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The NDRB determined the awarded discharge was appropriate and an upgrade based on his record of service would be inappropriate.After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700181

    Original file (ND0700181.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    (Incident occurring May-July 2004)Awarded - Written Reprimand.20041222: LTR of Reprimand issued to Applicant. Officer administrative separationDischarge Process Report of Misconduct: 20050121 Show Cause Recommendation: Applicant Response: ELECTECTED TO NOT SUBMIT COMMENTS Endorsing Recommendation: CONCUR WITH COMMANDING OFFICERdate: 20050308 Show Cause Decision: CNPCdate: 20050502 Applicant Notified: NOT FOUND IN RECORD Applicant Election: NOT FOUND IN RECORD Board of Inquiry: NONE CNPC...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0601090

    Original file (ND0601090.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Service Record Entries, Medical Record Entries, Elements of Discharge and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found the Applicant’s discharge proper and equitable. Medical Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Narrative Reason for Separation 20050513: Medical evaluation by Substance Abuse counselor, LT MSC, USNR. Elements of Discharge: Discharge Process: Date...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0501254

    Original file (ND0501254.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION As the representative, we ask that consideration be given to equitable relief, as this is a matter that involves a determination whether a discharge should be changed under the equity standards, to include any issue upon which the Applicant submits to the Board’s discretionary authority, under SECNAVIST 5420.174D. No indication of appeal in the record.031028: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge with the least favorable...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600989

    Original file (ND0600989.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Elements of Discharge: [INVOLUNTARY] Discharge Process: NOTIFICATION PROCEDUREDate Notified:20050825Narrative Reason(s): MISCONDUCT - alcohol abuse rehabilitation failureLeast Favorable Characterization: Date Applicant Responded to Notification: 20050825Rights Elected at Notification:Consult with Counsel Administrative Board NOT APPLICABLEObtain Copies Submit Statement(s) GCMCA Review Recommendation of Commanding Officer (date): NOT APPLICABLESeparation Authority (date):COMMANDING OFFICER,...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0601145

    Original file (ND0601145.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Narrative Reason for Separation 19890828: Applicant ordered to active duty for 36 months.19910613: NJP for violation(s) of UCMJ: Article 92: Violation of a lawful general regulation, to wit: SECNAVINST 1700.11C by wrongfully possessing and consuming alcohol while being a minor. Record of service - Equity Decisional Issues: Issue 1 ().When the service of a member of the U.S. Navy has been honest and faithful, it is appropriate...