Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700963
Original file (MD0700963.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
ex-, USMC
MD07-00963
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20070702   Characterization Received:
Narrative Reason: MISCONDUCT     Authority: MARCORSEPMAN 6210.5

 Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
                           Narrative Reason change to:
Applicant’s Issues:       1. Medicine he took was left over from a prescription
                           2. Post service

Decision

 By a vote of the Characterization shall .
 By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall MISCONDUCT

Date: 20 080103                   Location: Washington D.C.         Representation :

Discussion

 Issue 1: ( ). The Applicant contends that some time after he had been prescribed medicine, he took a left over prescription pill for a pain where he had been originally injured. The Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) found in the Applicant’s record of his Administrative Discharge Board that the Applicant claimed that he was given t he pill by his father. Because of the disparity in statements, the Board discounted the Applicant’s claim on his DD-293.

Issue 2: ( ). The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. However, there is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge, may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, good conduct, or favorable endorsements in the civilian life subsequent to leaving the service. Normally, to permit relief, a procedural impropriety or inequity must have been found to have existed during the period of enlistment in question. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered. The Applicant claims he has not been drug free, has a steady job, and has given his father one of his kidneys as proof of his post service accomplishments. The Applicant's efforts need to be more encompassing. For example, the Applicant could have produced evidence of a verifiable employment record, documentation of educational pursuits, documentation of community service, certification of non-involvement with civil authorities , and verification of living a drug-free life style . The Board found that the Applicant's undocumented claims of good post service conduct did not mitigate the circumstances that resulted in the characterization of discharge.

In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries , Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, t he Board found that













Summary of Service

 Prior Service:
 Inactive: USMCR (DEP)     20021029 - 20030914              Active:         
Period of Service Under Review:
 Date of Enlistment: 20030915      Years Contracted : ; Extension:   Date of Discharge: 20060525
Length of Service : 2 Yrs 8 Mths 11 D ys    Lost Time : Days UA: Days Confine d :
Education Level: Age at Enlistment: AFQT: 74 MOS: 0352
Highest Rank:
Proficiency/Conduct marks (# of occasions):      4.2 ( 6 ) / 4.0 ( 6 )     Fitness reports :
Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214): Rifle , Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal, Humanitarian Service Medal, Global War on Terrorism Service Medal, National Defense Service Medal.

Medical/Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Basis for Discharge

 20050315:        MARCORSEPMAN 6105 counseling for Use of cell phone while operating a motor vehicle .

20050 504 :        MARCORSEPMAN 6105 counseling for lack of self discipline and judgement .

20051012 :         NAVDRUGLAB, Jacksonville, FL, reported Applicant’s urine sample, received 20051103 , tested positive for ( OXCOD and OXMOR ).
20051208 :        NJP -- Viol UCMJ Art. 112a – Wrongful use of controlled substance (OXYCODONE) .
          Awarded - FOP ($ 692.00 ) for ( 2 months); RIR ( E-2 ); Restr for ( 45 days) .

20051208 :        MARCORSEPMAN 6105 counseling for violation Article 112a .


Discharge Process

 Date Notified:   20060130
Basis for Discharge:      DUE TO:
        
Least Favorable Characterization:       
Commanding Officer’s Intended Recommendation:   

Date Applicant Responded to Notification:                  20060206
Rights Elected at Notification:
         Consult with Counsel                      
         Obtain Copies of Documents               
         Submit Statement(s) (date)                        
         Administrative Board                      
Administrative Board Date :       20060410
Findings, by preponderance of the evidence:     BY DUE TO .
                  BY SEPARATION WARRANTED.
 Recommendation on Separation:   BY
Recommendation on Characterization:     BY

Commanding Officer Recommendation (date):        ( 20060427 )
SJA review (date):      
Separation Authority (date):     CG, 2 nd MARDIV ( 20060515 )
Basis for discharge directed:   DUE TO:
Characterization directed:     
Date Applicant Discharged:       20060525
Types of Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered By Board

 Related to Military Service:      Service and/or Medical Record:            Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:         
         Employment:                        Finances:                          Education:               
         Health/Medical Records:                   Substance Abuse:                           Criminal Records:       
         Family/Personal Status:                   Community Service:                References:              
        
Additional Statements From Applicant:    From Representative:
Other Documentation (Describe)

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A . The Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16F, effective 01 Sep 2001 until Present, Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT.
B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

C. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 112a.


ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity , OUSD (P&R) PI-LP , The Pentagon , Washington, DC 20301-4000 . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provi ded the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years , has already been grante d a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employmen t / Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD . ” Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700187

    Original file (MD0700187.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In cases where no other reason for separation set forth in the Naval Military Personnel Manual or Marine Corps Separation and Retirement manual is appropriate, but where separation of a member is considered to be in the best interest of the service, the Secretary of the Navy has the authority to direct the separation of any member prior to the expiration of their term of service. Therefore, the NDRB determined that the reason for the Applicant’s discharge shall change to Secretarial...

  • USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0801773

    Original file (MD0801773.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request: Characterization change to: or Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USMCR (DEP)20021107 - 20030120Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 20030121Period of Enlistment: Years MonthsDate of Discharge:20070116Length of Service: Years Months09 DaysEducation Level: Age at Enlistment:AFQT: 33MOS: 0351Highest Rank: Fitness Reports: Proficiency/Conduct Marks (# of occasions):(NFIR)/(NFIR)Awards and Decorations (per DD 214):...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700327

    Original file (MD0700327.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Certain serious offenses, even though isolated, warrant separation from the Naval service in order to maintain proper order and discipline.The Applicant’s service was marred by one Summary Court Martial finding of guilty for a violation of UCMJ Article 112a, Wrongful use of a controlled substance. Discharge Process Date Notified: 20051130Basis for Discharge: DUE TO Least Favorable Characterization: Commanding Officer’s Intended Recommendation: Date Applicant Responded to...

  • USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0901601

    Original file (MD0901601.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. On page 4, Item 8, in the instructions for completion of DD Form 293, the Applicant is notified to submit evidence "which substantiate or relate directly to your issues in Item 6" (Issues: Why an upgrade or change is requested and...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700721

    Original file (MD0700721.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a complete review of the entire record, including the evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board determined that the discharge was appropriate and that the evidence of post-service conduct was found not to mitigate the conduct which precipitated the discharge.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. Applicant...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700686

    Original file (MD0700686.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Record of service. Certain serious offenses, even though isolated, warrant separation from the Naval service in order to maintain proper order and discipline.The Applicant’s service was marred by a finding of guilty at one Summary Court-Martial for a violation of UCMJ Article 112a. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700239

    Original file (MD0700239.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board found that Issue(s)1-2: The Board determined that these Issue(s) are not issue(s) which can form the basis for relief for the Applicant or that the Board did not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. The Applicant’s service was marred by three discharge warnings and two nonjudicial punishments for violating the UCMJ Article(s) 86 Unauthorized absence, 92 Failure to obey order, regulation, 107 False official statements, and 134 Indecent...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700710

    Original file (MD0700710.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Summary of ServicePrior Service: Inactive: USMCR (DEP) 19980811 - 19980909 Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 19980910 Years Contracted:4; Extension: Date of Discharge: 20010831Length of Service: 02 Yrs 11 Mths 22 DysLost Time:Days UA: Days Confined: Education...

  • USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1101696

    Original file (MD1101696.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT Applicant’s Issues 1.The Applicant contends there were not enough incidents of misconduct to warrant an Under Other Than Honorable Conditions characterization of service.2. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of...

  • USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0901359

    Original file (MD0901359.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT Applicant’s Issues 1. By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall MISCONDUCT.Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a...