Upgrade.Vet

USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700851

Original file (MD0700851.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-, USMC
MD07-00851

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20070608 Characterization Received:

Narrative Reason: IN LIEU OF TRIAL BY COURT-MARTIAL Authority: MARCORSEPMAN 6419

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
                           Narrative Reason change to:
Applicant’s Issues:       1. Reenlistment Opportunities
                           2. Command prolonged his discharge which resulted in more misconduct
3. Immature in Service
4. Post Service

Decision

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall IN LIEU OF TRIAL BY COURT-MARTIAL

Date: 20 071220             Location: Washington D.C.         Representation :

Discussion

Issue 1: either which the Board cannot form the basis of relief for the Applicant, or the Board does not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum regarding .

Issue 2: ( ). The Applicant implies that his command was taking too long for his administrative separation for a personality disorder for which he rebelled. The government enjoys a presumption of regularity in the conduct of its affairs. The Applicant bears the burden of overcoming this presumption through the presentation of substantial and credible evidence to support his issue. There is no evidence in the record, nor has the Applicant produced any evidence, to support the contention that the command was taking too long to administratively discharge him for a personality disorder. The Applicant’s statements alone do not overcome the government’s presumption of regularity in this case.

Issue 3: ( ) . The Board reviews the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge individually, on a case-by-case basis. If such a review reveals an impropriety or inequity, relief is in order. Regulations permit relief on equitable grounds if the Applicant’s discharge is inconsistent with standards of discipline of the Naval service. There is credible evidence in the record that the Applicant committed serious misconduct. The Applicant does not deny this misconduct. T he evidence of record does not demonstrate that the Applicant was not responsible for h is c onduct or that he should not be held accountable for h is actions. When a Marine’s service has been honest and faithful, it is appropriate to characterize that service under honorable conditions. A n under other than honorable conditions discharge is warranted when significant negative aspects of a member’s conduct or performance of duty outweigh the positive aspects of the member’s military record. The Applicant’s conduct during the current period of service, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of his service was marred by preferred charges for violation of UCMJ Article 86 (Unauthorized Absence), Article 91( Disrespect toward noncommissioned officer ), and Article 95 [ Resisting arrest ( 3 specs) ] to a Special Court Martial. Marines may be separated upon their request in lieu of trial by special or general courts-martial if charges have been preferred with respect to an offense for which a punitive discharge is authorized and it has been determined that the Marine is unqualified for future military service. The Applicant, after consultation with Defense Council, willfully signed the request. A v iolation of UCMJ Article 95 is considered a serious offense for which a punitive discharge is authorized if adjudged by a Special or General Courts Martial. An upgrade to general (under honorable conditions) would be inappropriate.

Issue 4 (Equity). The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. However, there is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge, may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in the civilian life subsequent to leaving the service. Normally, to permit relief, a procedural impropriety or inequity must have been found to have existed during the period of enlistment in question. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered. The Applicant provided reference letters, a newspaper article, employment verification and his own statement as documentation of post-service accomplishments. The Applicant's efforts need to be more encompassing than those provided. For example, the Applicant could have produced evidence of continuing educational pursuits, documentation of community service, and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities. An upgrade to honor would not be appropriate at this time

In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries , Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, t he Board found that

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive: USMCR (DEP)     19980421 - 19981115              Active:          19981116 - 19990409
Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Enlistment: 20000719      Years Contracted : ; Extension: Date of Discharge: 20011 0 11
Length of Service : 01 Yrs 02 Mths 23 D ys          Lost Time : 50 Days UA: 10 Days Confine d : 40
Education Level:         Age at Enlistment:       AFQT: 45          MOS: 0331 Highest Rank:
Proficiency/Conduct marks (# of occasions):      3.5 ( 4 ) / 3.5 ( 4 )     Fitness reports :
Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214): Rifle ,

Medical/Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Basis for Discharge

2001 0419 :        Medical Record: Reason for visit: Depressed Mood
         Diagnosis: Depression
         Recommendation: Prescribed medication

20010807 :        NJP -- Viol UCMJ Art . 86 – Unauthorized Absence .
         Awarded – NOT FOUND IN RECORD .

20010315 :        MARCORSEPMAN 6105 counseling for Failure to abide by having an authorized liberty pass when crossing the US/Mexican border on 20010310 .

20010716:        Medical Record: Reason for visit: Unknown
         Diagnosis: Personality Disorder
         Recommendation: Administrative separation for Personality Disorder

20010810 :        Medical Record: Reason for visit: Discharged from Naval Medical Center , suicidal ideation
         Diagnosis: Partner Relationship Problem, Adjustment disorder, Alcohol Abuse, A nti social Personality Disorder
         Recommendation: Prescribe psychiatric medication, no need for further psychiatric treatment at this time.

2001081 3 :        Medical Record: Reason for visit: Follow up
         Diagnosis: Adjustment disorder, Alcohol Abuse, A nti social Personality Disorder , Depressed Mood
         Recommendation: Continue to treat in Brig. Continue to take psychiatric medication. Applicant be maintained in Suicide Risk Precautions.

Discharge Process

Charge(s) Preferred: 20010831
Charge(s) and Specification(s):
         Article 86 : Unauthorized Absence
         Article 91 : Disrespect toward noncommissioned officer
         Article 95: Resisting arrest (3 specs)

Date Applicant Submitted SILT request:            0918
         Consulted with or Waived Counsel:
         Acknowledged Understanding Elements:
         Acknowledged Guilt to:                     Article(s) 86, 91and 95
                  BCD/DD authorized for offense(s)
         Acknowledged Consequences of OTH:
         Type of Characterization Requested:

Commanding Officer Recommendation (date):        ( 20011002 )
Separation Authority (date):                       CG, 1 ^ST MARDIV ( 20011002 )
         Reason for Discharge directed:
         Characterization directed:
Date Applicant Discharged :                         20011011

Types of Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered By Board

Related to Military Service:      Service and/or Medical Record:          Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:                        Finances:                          Education:
         Health/Medical Records:                   Substance Abuse:                           Criminal Records:
         Family/Personal Status:                   Community Service:                References:

Additional Statements From Applicant:    From Representative:
Other Documentation (Describe)

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. Paragraph 6419, SEPARATION IN LIEU OF TRIAL BY COURT-MARTIAL , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16F), effective 01 September 2001 until Present.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part IV , Para 403m(7)(b), Presumption Concerning Court-Martial Specifications .

C . Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

D . The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 95.

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity , OUSD (P&R) PI-LP , The Pentagon , Washington, DC 20301-4000 . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provi ded the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years , has already been grante d a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employmen t / Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD . ” Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0601046

Original file (MD0601046.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

As a result the Applicant was informed that he will be recommended for administrative separation based on his personality disorder. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review. Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD...
USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0901187

Original file (MD0901187.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Based on the documentation in his service and medical records, the Board determined his claim of an erroneous discharge is without merit.The NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. In the absence of supporting documentation or evidence, the Board determines his claims of racism and lack of support from his command are without merit.Summary: After a thorough review of the available...
USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0701163

Original file (MD0701163.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant’s service was marred by two retention warnings and the award of nonjudicial punishment (NJP) on one occasion for a violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) Article 123a (Insufficient funds). After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Summary of ServicePrior Service: Inactive: USMCR...
NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1300365

Original file (ND1300365.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Representation: By a vote of the Characterization shall .By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include...
NAVY | DRB | 2015_Navy | ND1500153

Original file (ND1500153.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214: Service/Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements: From Applicant: From/To Representation: From/To Congress member: Pertinent Regulation/Law A. Therefore, after an...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700604

Original file (ND0700604.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant’s service was marred by the award of two nonjudicial punishments (NJP) for violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), Article 92 (Dereliction of Duty), Article 92 (Failure to obey order or regulation) and Article 113 (Misbehavior of sentinel or lookout). ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge....
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700705

Original file (ND0700705.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

By regulation, the Applicant should have also been processed for that reason in addition to convenience of the government – personality disorder. After a complete review of the entire record, including the evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board determined that the discharge was appropriate and that the evidence of post-service conduct was found not to mitigate the conduct which contributed to the characterization of service. 20030909: Medical Record: Reason for visit: Separation physical.
USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700298

Original file (MD0700298.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The record clearly documents that this misconduct was the reason the Applicant was discharged. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214 The NDRB did note administrative error(s) on the original DD Form 214: “930125 ” “ UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700673

Original file (ND0700673.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Recommendation: Continue support.19960911: Medical Record: Reason for visit: Coping skills group. Diagnosis: Not currently suicidal. 20000214: Medical Record: Reason for visit: Follow up psychology clinic, reports feeling better since starting Prozac.
USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700971

Original file (MD0700971.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Service Record 4. Post Service DecisionBy a vote of the Characterization shall .By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall PERSONALITY DISORDER Date:20080103Location:Washington D.C.Representation: Discussion : either which the Board cannot form the basis of relief for the Applicant, or the Board does not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. 19980804 Rights Elected at Notification: Consult with Counsel Obtain Copies of Documents Submit Statement(s)...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700851

Similar Decisions