Upgrade.Vet

USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0701163

Original file (MD0701163.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-, USMC
MD07-01163

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20070823 Characterization Received:

Narrative Reason: PERSONALITY DISORDER Authority: MARCORSEPMAN 6203.3

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
                           Narrative Reason change to:
Applicant’s Issues:       1. VA Benefits

Decision

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall PERSONALITY DISORDER.

Date: 20 08 0117             Location: Washington D.C.         Representation :

Discussion

: either which the Board cannot form the basis of relief for the Applicant, or the Board does not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum regarding .

When reviewing a discharge, the NDRB does consider the extent to which a medical problem might affect an Applicant’s performance and ability to conform to the military’s standards of conduct and discipline. The NDRB generally does not consider the circumstances surrounding the Applicant’s stated condition to be of sufficient nature to exculpate the Applicant’s misconduct. When a Marine’s service has been honest and faithful, it is appropriate to characterize that service under honorable conditions. A general (under honorable conditions) discharge is warranted when significant negative aspects of a member’s conduct or performance of duty outweigh the positive aspects of the member’s military record. The Applicant’s service was marred by two retention warnings and the award of nonjudicial punishment (NJP) on one occasion for a violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) Article 12 3a (Insufficient funds ). Violation of UCMJ Article 123a is considered serious s offense for which a punitive discharge is authorized if adjudged by a Special or General Courts Martial. An upgrade to honorable would be inappropriate.

In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries , Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, t he Board found that

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive: USMCR (DEP)     19971115 - 19980803              Active:
Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Enlistment: 19980804               Years Contracted : ; Extension:          Date of Discharge: 20010313
Length of Service : Yrs Mths 10 D ys                        Lost Time : Days UA: Days Confine d :
Education Level:         Age at Enlistment:       AFQT: 53          MOS: 5811 Highest Rank:
Proficiency/Conduct marks (# of occasions):      4.4 ( 8 ) / 4.4 ( 8 )              Fitness reports :
Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214): Rifle , Pistol MM

Medical/Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Basis for Discharge

19991222 :        MARCORSEPMAN 6105 counseling for underage drinking .

20000105:        Medical Record: Applicant referred by command for alcohol abuse evaluation. Recommend stress management treatment.

20010119 :        NJP -- Viol UCMJ Art. 123a – insufficient funds .
         Awarded - FOP ($ 600.00 ) for ( 2 months) susp for 2 months ; Restr for ( 30 days); Extra duties ( 45 days).

20010130 :        MARCORSEPMAN 6105 counseling for misconduct-failure to obey orders and regulations .

20010130 :        MARCORSEPMAN 6105 counseling for Personality disorder and suicidal ideations .

20010130 :        Medical Record: Reason for visit: Referral
         Diagnosis: Personality Disorder NOS. Applicant not suitable for continued service. He is a continuing/ongoing danger to himself by suicide .
         Recommendation: Expeditious Administrative Separation

Discharge Process

Date Notified:   20010220
Basis for Discharge:      DUE TO

Least Favorable Characterization:
Commanding Officer’s Intended Recommendation:

Date Applicant Responded to Notification:                  20010220
Rights Elected at Notification:
         Consult with Counsel
         Obtain Copies of Documents
         Submit Statement(s) (date)
         Administrative Board

Commanding Officer Recommendation (date):        ( 20010220 )
SJA review (date):       ( 20010227 )
Separation Authority (date):     CG, MCQ Hawaii ( 20010303 )
Basis for discharge directed:   DUE TO
Characterization directed:
Date Applicant Discharged:       20010313

Types of Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered By Board

Related to Military Service:      Service and/or Medical Record:          Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:                        Finances:                          Education:
         Health/Medical Records:                   Substance Abuse:                           Criminal Records:
         Family/Personal Status:                   Community Service:                References:

Additional Statements From Applicant:    From Representative:
Other Documentation (Describe)

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A . Paragraph 6203, CONVENIENCE OF THE GOVERNMENT, of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16E), effective 18 Aug 95 until 31 August 2001.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

C. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 123a.

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity , OUSD (P&R) PI-LP , The Pentagon , Washington, DC 20301-4000 . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provi ded the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years , has already been grante d a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employmen t / Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD . ” Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0800928

Original file (MD0800928.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request: Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USMCR (DEP)19990830 - 20000130Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 20000131Period of enlistment: Years MonthsDate of Discharge:20020809Length of Service: Yrs Mths09 DysEducation Level: Age at Enlistment:AFQT: 31MOS: 1371Highest Rank: Fitness reports: Proficiency/Conduct marks (# of occasions): ()/()Awards and Decorations (per DD 214): Rifle Pistol...
USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700204

Original file (MD0700204.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Discharge Process Date Notified: 20010416Basis for Discharge: DUE TO: Least Favorable Characterization: Commanding Officer’s Intended Recommendation: Date Applicant Responded to Notification:20010420Rights Elected at Notification: Consult with Counsel Obtain Copies of Documents Submit Statement(s) (date) Administrative Board Commanding Officer Recommendation (date): (UNDATED) SJA review (date): (20010507/20010529) Separation Authority (date): COMMANDING GENERAL, MARINE CORPS BASE, QUANTICO,...
USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700323

Original file (MD0700323.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

05-1934 Applicant Discharged: 20060502 Types of Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered By BoardRelated to Military Service: Service and/or Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment:Finances:Education: Health/Medical Records: Substance Abuse: Criminal Records: Family/Personal Status: Community Service:References:Additional Statements From Applicant: ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your...
USMC | DRB | 2014_Marine | MD1400338

Original file (MD1400338.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD...
USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0900998

Original file (MD0900998.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Based on these marks, the four retention counseling warnings and the NJP within his enlistment period, the command had the justification to award the Applicant a General Under Honorable Conditions discharge.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant...
USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700294

Original file (MD0700294.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Recommendation: It is strongly recommended that member be administratively separated from the USMC. 20030718 Rights Elected at Notification: Consult with Counsel Obtain Copies of Documents Submit Statement(s) (date) Administrative Board Commanding Officer Recommendation (date): (20030721) SJA review (date): (20031007) Separation Authority (date): COMMANDING GENERAL, 2D MARINE AIRCRAFT WING (20031007) Basis for discharge directed: DUE TO: Characterization directed: Date Applicant...
USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700992

Original file (MD0700992.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Summary of ServicePrior Service: Inactive: USMCR (DEP)19990224 Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 19990225Years Contracted:4; Extension: Date of Discharge:19991210Length of Service: 00 Yrs 09 Mths16 DysLost Time:Days UA: Days Confined: Education Level: GEDAge at...
USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0800916

Original file (MD0800916.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Types of Documents Submitted/ REVIEWED Related to Military Service: DD 214: Service and/or Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Substance Abuse: Criminal Records: Family/Personal Status: Community Service: References: Additional Statements From Applicant: From Representation: From Member of Congress: Other Documentation (Describe) DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE...
USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0800804

Original file (MD0800804.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall MISCONDUCT.Discussion : either which the Board cannot form the basis of relief for the Applicant, or the Board does not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Service Record, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Pertinent Regulation/Law A. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to...
USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0701114

Original file (MD0701114.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Date:20080117Location:Washington D.C.Representation: Discussion : either which the Board cannot form the basis of relief for the Applicant, or the Board does not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Administrative Corrections to the...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0701163

Similar Decisions