Upgrade.Vet

USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700298

Original file (MD0700298.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-, USMC
MD07-00298

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20070105 Characterization Received: OTHER THAN HONORABLE

Narrative Reason: MISCONDUCT COMMISSION OF Authority: MARCORSEPMAN PAR 6210.3

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
                           Narrative Reason change to:
Applicant’s Issues:       1. Misconduct was isolated incident
                           2. Post-service conduct

Decision

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall MISCONDUCT.

Date: 20 071004                                             Location: Washington D.C.

Discussion

Issue 1 ( ). Despite a servicemember’s prior record of service, certain serious offenses, even though isolated, warrant separation from the Naval service in order to maintain proper order and discipline. The Applicant’s service record is marred by a civil conviction for the sexual assault of a child. The record clearly documents that this misconduct was the reason the Applicant was discharged. A servicemember may be discharged on the basis of commission of a serious offense for a civilian offense when a punitive discharge would be authorized for the same or closely related offense under the UCMJ, and the circumstances of the offense warrant separation. In the Applicant’s case, the same or related offenses for his behavior would be violations of Articles 125, Sodomy, and 134, Indecent assault. Both of these UCMJ offenses authorize a punitive discharge upon conviction at special or general court-martial. The circumstances of the offenses, perpetrated upon a minor in the civilian community, clearly warranted separation. When a Marine is separated for misconduct, characterization of service normally shall be under other than honorable conditions. Characterization of service as honorable is not authorized unless the Marine’s record is otherwise so meritorious that any other characterization clearly would be inappropriate. In the Applicant’s case, the Board could discern no impropriety or inequity and therefore considers his discharge proper and equitable.

Issue 2 ( ). There is no law or regulation which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving the service. The NDRB is authorized to consider outstanding post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. The Board found that the Applicant had submitted credible evidence indicative of good post-service conduct , and commends the Applicant’s apparent rehabilitative success to date. However, a fter a complete review of the entire record, including the evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board determined that the discharge was appropriate in light of the nature and seriousness of the Applicant’s misconduct, and that the evidence of post-service conduct was not sufficient to convince the Board that an upgrade was appropriate at this time .

In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries , Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, t he Board found that

Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214

The NDRB did note administrative error(s) on the original DD Form 214 :

         “ 93 01 25 ”
         “ UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS ”
         “ MARCORSEPMAN 6210.6 ”
         “ MISCONDUCT-COMMISSION OF A SERIOUS OFFENSE (ALL OTHER)(ADMINISTRATIVE DISCHARGE BOARD REQUIRED BUT WAIVED) ”

The NDRB will recommend to the Commandant of the Marine Corps that the DD 214 be corrected as appropriate.

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive: USMCR (DEP)     19890630 - 19900124 ELS                   Active:
Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Enlistment: 19930125               Years Contracted : ; Extension:          Date of Discharge: 19950327
Length of Service : 0 2 Yrs 0 2 Mths 0 3 D ys          Lost Time : Days UA / Confine d /IHCA :
Education Level:         Age at Enlistment:       AFQT: 76          MOS: 3043 Highest Rank:
Proficiency/Conduct marks (# of occasions):      4.6 ( 2 ) / 4.5 ( 2 )     Fitness reports :
Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214): NATIONAL DEFENSE SERVICE MEDAL, RIFLE SHARPSHOOTER BADGE

Medical/Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Basis for Discharge

19931115 :        Civil conviction, State of Wisconsin: 2 misdemeanor counts of sexual assault of a child who attained age 16.
         Sentence: Probation, 2 years each count (concurrent); Confinement, 3 months (1 ^st count) and 2 months (2 ^nd count) (consecutive); mandatory sexual deviancy assessment ; restitution for victim’s expenses; and costs.

19940930:        Medical Record: Reason for visit: Post incarceration for sexual assault and desired counseling.
         Diagnosis: Axis I: Conduct disorder; Axis II: Antisocial Personality Disorder.
         Recommendation: 1. Psychologically unfit for further service. 2. Administrative separation for unsuitability.

19940930 :        MARCORSEPMAN 6105 counseling for diagnosed for having a personality disorder that is so severe that it adversely affects your ability to function effectively in a military environment .

Discharge Process

Date Notified:   19950222
Basis for Discharge:      DUE TO
Least Favorable Characterization:
Commanding Officer’s Intended Recommendation:

Date Applicant Responded to Notification:                  19950223
Rights Elected at Notification:
         Consult with Counsel
         Obtain Copies of Documents
         Submit Statement(s) (date)
         Administrative Board

Commanding Officer Recommendation (date):        ( 19950223 )
SJA review (date):
Separation Authority (date):     C G , MARINE CORPS BASE, CAMP LEJUENE ( 19950317 )
Basis for discharge directed:   DUE TO:
Characterization directed:
Date Applicant Discharged:       19950327

Types of Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered By Board

Related to Military Service:      Service and/or Medical Record:          Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:                        Finances:                          Education:
         Health/Medical Records:                   Substance Abuse:                           Criminal Records:
         Family/Personal Status:                   Community Service:                References:

Additional Statements From Applicant:    From Representative: Other Documentation (Describe) Sexual Offender Assessment , License Denial Reconsideration Letter, Letter from A_ J. W_

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. Paragraph 6210, Misconduct , The Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16D), effective 27 Jun 89 until 17 Aug 95.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

C. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 125 , Sodomy ; and Article 134, Indecent assault .

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000 . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provi ded the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years , has already been grante d a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employmen t / Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD . ” Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0800855

Original file (ND0800855.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

From Representation: From Member of Congress: Other Documentation (Describe) DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT Applicant’s Issues 1. The record reflects the Applicant was administratively processed for misconduct due to the commission of as serious offense and provided the opportunity to present his case before an administrative separation board. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible...
NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0800105

Original file (ND0800105.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Pertinent Regulation/Law A.Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 9, effective 22 Jul 94 until 02 Oct 96, Article 3630600, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT - COMMISSION OF A SERIOUS OFFENSE.B. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a...
NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1100717

Original file (ND1100717.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Based on the , command administratively processed for separation. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall . ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the...
USMC | DRB | 2014_Marine | MD1400697

Original file (MD1400697.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD...
NAVY | DRB | 2014_Navy | ND1401169

Original file (ND1401169.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1.The Applicant contends his discharge is inequitable because his civilian conviction should not have affected his military record of service. Representation: By a vote of the Characterization shall .By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the...
USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0501194

Original file (MD0501194.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. when I am sick, like any other vetnan.” Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214 (Member 4) Ltr from Westmore and County Adult Probation and Parole, A_ P. U_, Director, dtd December 22, 2004 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of...
NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0901490

Original file (ND0901490.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Based on the record of evidence, the NDRB determined the awarded characterization was warranted.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, medical and service record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the...
NAVY | DRB | 2011_Navy | ND1101620

Original file (ND1101620.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Representation: By a vote of the Characterization shall .By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include...
USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1100066

Original file (MD1100066.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities.
NAVY | DRB | 2015_Navy | ND1500701

Original file (ND1500701.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall remain UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS and the narrative reason for separation shall remain MISCONDUCT (SERIOUS OFFENSE). ” Additional Reviews : After a...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700298

Similar Decisions