Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700506
Original file (MD0700506.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
, ex-, USMC
MD07-00506
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20070306   Characterization Received:
Narrative Reason: MISCONDUCT              Authority: MARCORSEPMAN 6210.5

 Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
                           Narrative Reason change to:
Applicant’s Issues:       1. Veterans Benefits
                           2. In service – Equity
                           3. Post service - Equity

Decision

 By a vote of the Characterization shall .     
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall MISCONDUCT

Date: 20 071101                                       Location: Washington D.C.

Discussion

 Issue(s) 1: either which the Board cannot form the basis of relief for the Applicant, or the Board does not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum regarding .

Issue 2 ( ) : When a Marine ’ s service has been honest and faithful, it is appropriate to characterize that service under honorable conditions. Characterization of service as general (under honorable conditions) is warranted when significant negative aspects of a member's conduct or performance of duty outweigh the positive aspects of the member's military record. The Applicant ’ s service was marred by the award of nonjudicial punishment (NJP) on 2 occasions for violations of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ). The Applicant ’ s misconduct included unauthorized absence, disrespectful language towards a noncommissioned officer, failure to obey a lawful order and wrongful use, possession of a controlled substance . Violation of UCMJ Article s 91, 92 and 112a are considered serious offense s for which a punitive discharge is authorized if adjudged by a Special or General Courts Martial. The Applicant ’ s conduct, which form the primary basis for determining the character of his service, reflect his misconduct, and fall below that required for an honorable characterization of service.

Issue 3 ( ) : There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant ’ s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that should be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities. As of this time, the Applicant has not provided any post-service documentation to consider mitigating the misconduct that resulted in the characterization of discharge.

In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries , Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, t he Board found that





Summary of Service

Prior Service:
 Inactive: USMCR (DEP)     19990813 - 19990920              Active:
Period of Service Under Review:
 Date of Enlistment: 19990921               Years Contracted :        Date of Discharge: 20030729
Length of Service : 03 Yrs 10 Mths 09 D ys          Lost Time : Days UA: Days Confine d :
Education Level:         Age at Enlistment:       AFQT: 35          MOS: 3051 Highest Rank:
Proficiency/Conduct marks (# of occasions):      4.2 ( 10 ) / 4.1 ( 10 )   Fitness reports :
Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214): GOOD CONDUCT MEDAL, RIFLE MARKSMAN BADGE, SEA SERVICE DEPLOYMENT RIBBON (3), MERITORIOUS MAST, NATIONAL DEFENSE SERVICE MEDAL

Medical/Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Basis for Discharge

 20000927:        MARCORSEPMAN 6105 counseling for having a female guest in your barracks room and failing to log a guest in the visitors log book. Your actions violate MCBJPN Policy 1-98, CO 1600.1C and is punishable under Article 92 of the UCMJ.

20020726:        MARCORSEPMAN 6105 counseling for poor judgment and lack of tact.

20021011 :        NJP -- Viol UCMJ Art. 86 - Fail to go at the time prescribed to appointed place of duty on 20020912, Art. 91 (2 specs) - (1) Disrespectful in language toward Sgt M_ on 20020912, (2) Disrespectful in language toward SS g t L_ on 20020913, Art 92 (3 specs) - (1) Fail to obey a lawful verbal order issued by Sgt M_ on 20020912 , (2) Fail to obey a lawful verbal order issued by Sgt M_ on 20020912, (3) Fail to obey a lawful verbal order issued by Sgt M_ on 20020913.
         Awarded - FOP ($ 734.00 ) for ( 1 month ); RIR ( E-3 ); Restr for ( 30 days) . FOP suspended for 6 months .
20021025:        MARCORSEPMAN 6105 counseling for failure to display sound judgment required by all Marines of your grade.

20030124 :         NAVDRUGLAB, San Diego, CA, reported Applicant’s urine sample, received 20030121, tested positive for THC.

 20030207:        Vacate suspended FOP awarded at NJP dated 20021011.

20030207 :        NJP -- Viol UCMJ Art. 112a (2 specs) - (1) Wrongfully possess THC on 20030130 , (2) Wrongfully use THC on 20030130.
         Awarded - FOP ($ 645.00 ) for ( 2 months); RIR ( E-2), Restr for ( 60 days).
20030212:        Substance Abuse Evaluation: Illicit drug use. Applicant does not reveal a pattern of drug/alcohol abuse or dependence. Recommend process for administrative separation.





Discharge Process

 Date Notified:   20030326
Basis for Discharge:      DUE TO:
         DUE TO:
Least Favorable Characterization:       
Commanding Officer’s Intended Recommendation:   

Date Applicant Responded to Notification:                  20030401
Rights Elected at Notification:
         Consult with Counsel                      
         Obtain Copies of Documents               
         Submit Statement(s) (date)                        
         Administrative Board                      

Administrative Board Date :       20030530
Findings, by preponderance of the evidence:     BY DUE TO .
         BY DUE TO .
         BY SEPARATION WARRANTED.
Recommendation on Separation:   BY
Recommendation on Characterization:     BY

Commanding Officer Recommendation (date):        ( 20030401 )
 SJA review (date):       ( 20030711 )
Separation Authority (date):     COMMANDING GENERAL, 3D MARINE DIVISION ( 20030715 )
 Basis for discharge directed:   DUE TO:
Characterization directed:     
Date Applicant Discharged:       2030729

Types of Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered By Board

 Related to Military Service:      Service and/or Medical Record:            Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:         
         Employment:                        Finances:                          Education:               
         Health/Medical Records:                   Substance Abuse:                           Criminal Records:       
         Family/Personal Status:                   Community Service:                References:              
        
Additional Statements From Applicant:    From Representative:
Other Documentation (Describe)

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. The Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16F, effective 1 September 2001 until Present,
Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT .

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

C. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 91, 92 and 112a.


ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000 . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provi ded the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years , has already been grante d a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employmen t / Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD . ” Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700930

    Original file (MD0700930.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Summary of ServicePrior Service: Inactive: USMCR (DEP)20030228 - 20030526 Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 20030527Years Contracted:5; Extension: Date of Discharge:20060427Length of Service: 02 Yrs 11 Mths01 DysLost Time:Days UA: Days Confined: Education Level:...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700714

    Original file (MD0700714.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall MISCONDUCT Date: 20071205Location:Washington D.C.Representation: Discussion Issue 1: either which the Board cannot form the basis of relief for the Applicant, or the Board does not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. 20031201 Rights Elected at Notification: Consult with Counsel Obtain Copies of Documents Submit Statement(s) (date) Administrative Board Commanding Officer Recommendation (date): (20040104) SJA...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700189

    Original file (MD0700189.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Record of service. There is credible evidence in the record that the Applicant violated the UCMJ. There is no evidence in the record, nor has the Applicant produced any evidence, to support the contention that the command unfairly singled him out for discipline.

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700795

    Original file (MD0700795.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Summary of ServicePrior Service: Inactive: USMCR (DEP)19930528 - 19930811Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 19930812Years Contracted:; Extension: Date of Discharge:19961107Length of Service: 03 Yrs 02Mths26 DysLost Time:Days UA: Days Confined: Education Level: Age at Enlistment:AFQT: 88MOS:2515Highest Rank: Proficiency/Conduct marks (# of...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700379

    Original file (MD0700379.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USMCR (DEP)20000625 - 20010605Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 20010606Years Contracted:Date of Discharge:20050317 Length of Service: 03 Yrs 09Mths12 DysLost Time:Days UA: Days Confined: Education Level: Age at...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700567

    Original file (MD0700567.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant’s service record is marred by award of nonjudicial punishment (NJP) for illegal drug use, thus substantiating the misconduct for which he was separated. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USMCR (DEP)20010213 - 20010318Active: Period of Service Under Review:...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700515

    Original file (MD0700515.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the Applicant’s record, issues submitted, and post service accomplishments, the Board determined that clemency was not warranted and that the sentence awarded the Applicant at his court-martial was appropriate for the offense that he committed. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Summary...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700156

    Original file (MD0700156.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    An upgrade to honorable would be inappropriate.. Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USMCR (DEP)19990730 - 20000820Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 20000821Years Contracted:Date of Discharge:20030210 Length of Service: 02 Yrs 05Mths10 DysLost Time:Days UA: Days Confined: Education Level: Age at Enlistment:AFQT: 31MOS:3381Highest Rank: Proficiency/Conduct marks (# of occasions): 3.8(7)/3.8(7)Fitness reports: Awards and Decorations (per DD 214):NATIONAL...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700192

    Original file (MD0700192.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant claims his medical issues contributed to his misconduct and adverse discharge. (2) Wrongfully possess some amount of marijuana Article 112a: Wrongfully use marijuana.Date Applicant Submitted SILT request: 20051109 Consulted with or Waived Counsel: Acknowledged Understanding Elements: Acknowledged Guilt to: Article(s) 86 and 112a BCD/DD authorized for offense(s) Acknowledged Consequences of OTH: Type of Characterization Requested: Commanding Officer Recommendation...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700205

    Original file (MD0700205.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Summary of ServicePrior Service: Inactive: USMCR (DEP)19900612 - 19901107Active: - Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 19901108Years Contracted:Date of Discharge:19941109Length of Service: 04 Yrs 00Mths02 DysLost Time:Days UA: Days Confined: Education Level: Age at Enlistment:AFQT: 35MOS:3531Highest Rank: Proficiency/Conduct marks (# of occasions): 4.3(10)/3.8(10)Fitness reports: Awards and Decorations (per DD 214):NATIONAL DEFENSE SERVICE MEDAL, SEA SERVICE DEPLOYMENT...