Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700930
Original file (MD0700930.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
ex-PVT, USMC
MD07-00930
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20070626   Characterization Received:
Narrative Reason: MISCONDUCT Authority: MARCORSEPMAN 6210.5

 Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
                           Narrative Reason change to:
Applicant’s Issues:       1. Veteran’s benefits.
                           2. Inequitable due to already being punished for discharge misconduct.

Decision

 By a vote of the Characterization shall .
 By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall MISCONDUCT.

Date: 20 071220             Location: Washington D.C.         Representation :

Discussion

Issue 1: either which the Board cannot form the basis of relief for the Applicant, or the Board does not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum regarding .

Issue 2 (Equity). T he Board reviews the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge individually, on a case-by-case basis. If such a review reveals an impropriety or inequity, relief is in order. Regulations permit relief on equitable grounds if the Applicant’s discharge is inconsistent with standards of discipline of the Naval service. T he Applicant contends that h e was unfairly punished as a result of his impending medical discharge. While he may feel that this was the underlying cause of the discharge, the record clearly reflects continuous and willful misconduct through drug abuse and demonstrated he was unfit for further service. When a Marine’s service has been honest and faithful, it is appropriate to characterize that service under honorable conditions. A under other than honorable conditions discharge is warranted when significant negative aspects of a member’s conduct or performance of duty outweigh the positive aspects of the member’s military record. The Applicant’s service was marred by two discharge warnings and one nonjudicial punishment for Article 92, Failure to obey order/regulation, a plea and finding of guilty at one Summary Court-Martial for a violation of Article(s) 86 and 112a, and three additional unrelated urinalysis failures for marijuana use. The Applicant could have been discharged on at least four separate occasions for his conduct. Violations of Article(s) 92 and 112a are considered serious offense s for which a punitive discharge is authorized if adjudged by a Special or General Courts Martial. An upgrade to general (under honorable conditions) would be inappropriate .
In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries , Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, t he Board found that

Summary of Service

 Prior Service:
 Inactive: USMCR (DEP)     20030228 - 20030526                   
Period of Service Under Review:
 Date of Enlistment: 20030527      Years Contracted : 5 ; Extension:          Date of Discharge: 20060427
Length of Service : 02 Yrs 11 Mths 01 D ys         Lost Time : Days UA: Days Confine d :
Education Level: 12       Age at Enlistment: 1 9     AFQT: 74          MOS: 2600 Highest Rank:
Proficiency/Conduct marks (# of occasions):      4.2 ( 5 ) / 3.8 ( 5 )  
Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214): NDSM, GWOTSM, Rifle SS

Medical/Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Basis for Discharge

20030130:        A pplicant signs Marine Corps policy concerning illegal use of drugs.
20031 103 :        NJP -- Viol UCMJ Art. 92 underage drinking
          Awarded - FOP ($ 250 ) for ( 2 months) (suspended for 6 months) ; Restr for ( 14 days); Extra duties ( 14 days).
20031209:        Suspended NJP punishment from 20031103 is vacated.

 20040806 :        MARCORSEPMAN 6105 counseling for cessation of legal action pending due to insufficient evidence regarding allegations of Articles 86 and 112a. Discharge warning issued.

20041027 :        MARCORSEPMAN 6105 counseling for lack of judgment for not informing the DNCO of whereabouts. Discharge warning issued.

20050707:        Applicant involved in a motor vehicle accident resulting in heart repair surgery.

20051123:        Line of Duty / Misconduct Investigation report: in the line of duty / no misconduct.

20051116 :        SCM -- Viol UCMJ Art icles(s) 86 (20040223) and 112a, 2 specifications.
         Awarded - FOP ( $411 ) for ( 1 month )

20051209 :         NAVDRUGLAB, Jacksonville, FL, reported Applicant’s urine sample t ested positive for THC.

20060112 :         NAVDRUGLAB, Jacksonville, FL, reported Applicant’s urine sample t ested positive for THC.

20060124 :         NAVDRUGLAB, Jacksonville, FL, reported Applicant’s urine sample t ested positive for THC.

20060131 :        MARCORSEPMAN 6105 counseling concerning illegal drug involvement and Summary Court-Martial conviction. Administ r ative S eparation processing is mandatory.


Discharge Process

 Date Notified:   20060131
Basis for Discharge:      DUE TO
        
Least Favorable Characterization:       
Commanding Officer’s Intended Recommendation:   

Date Applicant Responded to Notification:                  20060203
Rights Elected at Notification:
         Consult with Counsel                      
         Obtain Copies of Documents               
         Submit Statement(s) (date)                        
         Administrative Board                      

Commanding Officer Recommendation (date):        ( 20060206 )
SJA review (date):      
Separation Authority (date):     COMMANDING GENERAL, TRAINING AND EDUCATION COMMAND ( 20060407 )
Basis for discharge directed:   DUE TO
Characterization directed:     
Date Applicant Discharged:       20060427




Types of Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered By Board

 Related to Military Service:      Service and/or Medical Record:            Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:         
         Employment:                        Finances:                          Education:               
         Health/Medical Records:                   Substance Abuse:                           Criminal Records:       
         Family/Personal Status:                   Community Service:                References:              
        
Additional Statements From Applicant:    From Representative:
Other Documentation (Describe)

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. The Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16F ) , effective 01 Sep 2001 until Present, Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT.
B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

C. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article (s) 92 and 112a .

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity , OUSD (P&R) PI-LP , The Pentagon , Washington, DC 20301-4000 . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provi ded the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years , has already been grante d a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employmen t / Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD . ” Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-01333

    Original file (MD03-01333.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD03-01333 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20030805. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. 000814: Applicant advised of rights and having consulted with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to appear before an Administrative Discharge Board.010123: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700292

    Original file (MD0700292.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Record of service. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214 The NDRB did note administrative error(s) on the original DD Form 214: “CONTINUOUS HONORABLE ACTIVE DUTY SERVICE FROM 980318 TO 020103 ” The NDRB will recommend to the Commandant of the Marine Corps that the...

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-01238

    Original file (MD02-01238.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD02-01238 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 20020828, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable or general/under honorable conditions. I was 18 at the time of the accident, but not being able to do some of the things I used can do, had me looking at life in a different way. Relief not warranted.The Applicant is reminded that he remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is...

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00319

    Original file (MD01-00319.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    870717: NAVDRUGLAB, Jacksonville, FL, reported applicant’s urine sample, received 870706, tested positive for THC.870823: Applicant received Level I drug and alcohol counseling and placed on unit's urinalysis screening program. Not appealed.871030: NAVDRUGLAB, Jacksonville, FL, reported applicant’s urine sample, received 871019, tested positive for THC.871125: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to...

  • USMC | DRB | 1999_Marine | MD99-00880

    Original file (MD99-00880.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The next day when I got to work Sgt B____ told me I was UA yesterday. 970623: NAVDRUGLAB JACKSONVILLE FL reported applicant’s urine sample, received 970613, tested positive for [THC] [Extracted from case file].970630: Medical evaluation for drug abuse found the applicant to be drug dependent. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).In the applicant’s...

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600452

    Original file (MD0600452.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). The Board determined that the documentation provided by the Applicant did not mitigate the misconduct that resulted in the characterization of discharge. The Applicant may, however, petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100, concerning a change in the characterization of Naval service,...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0701055

    Original file (MD0701055.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PTSD was a factor in misconduct. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Summary of ServicePrior Service: Inactive: USMCR (DEP)20020920 - 20030909 Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 20030910Years Contracted:4; Extension: Date of Discharge: 20061215Length of Service: 03 Yrs 03 Mths06 DysLost Time:Days...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700101

    Original file (MD0700101.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant’s misconduct included unauthorized absence and wrongful use, possession, etc … of a controlled substance. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found the Applicant’s discharge proper and equitable. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon...

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00986

    Original file (MD01-00986.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).Issue 1. Normally, to permit relief, an error or injustice must have existed during the period of enlistment in question.

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00426

    Original file (MD01-00426.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD01-00426 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 010213, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the applicant’s service at the time of issue. Change 2 not applicable to SPD Codes or Narrative Reason for...