Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700205
Original file (MD0700205.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
ex-, USMC
MD07-00205
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20061204   Characterization Received:
Narrative Reason: MISCONDUCT - DRUG ABUSE (WITH ADMINISTRATIVE DISCHARGE BOARD)
Authority: MARCORSEPMAN 6210.5

 Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
                           Narrative Reason change to:
Applicant’s Issues:       1. Requests Medical Records
                           2. Inequitable Discharge based on one time event

Decision

 By a vote of the Characterization shall .     
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall Secretarial Authority .

Date: 200709 20      Location: Washington D.C. The Board found that

Discussion

 Issue 1: either which the Board cannot form the basis of relief for the Applicant, or the Board does not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. The Applicant is directed to write to the National Personnel Records Center (Military Personnel Records), 9700 Page Avenue, St. Louis, MO 63132-5100 .

Issue 2: ( ). T he Board reviews the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge individually, on a case-by-case basis. If such a review reveals an impropriety or inequity, relief is in order. Regulations permit relief on equitable grounds if the Applicant’s discharge is inconsistent with standards of discipline of the Naval service. There is credible evidence in the record that the Applicant used illegal drugs. The evidence of record does not demonstrate that the Applicant was not responsible for h is conduct or that he should not be held accountable for h is actions. When a Marine’s service has been honest and faithful, it is appropriate to characterize that service under honorable conditions. A under other than honorable conditions discharge is warranted when significant negative aspects of a member’s conduct or performance of duty outweigh the positive aspects of the member’s military record. C ertain serious offenses, even though isolated, warrant separation from the Naval service in order to maintain proper order and discipline. The Applicant’s service was marred by one discharge warning and two nonjudicial punishment for a violation of UCMJ Article 86 (Failure to go place of duty), Article 112a, ( Wrongful use of a controlled substance ), and Article 113 (Misbehavior of Sentinel or Lookout) . Additionally, the Applicant received a pre- service drug waiver for THC use. A v iolation of Article s 112a and 113 are considered serious offense s for which a punitive discharge is authorized if adjudged by a Special or General Courts Martial. A n upgrade to General ( U nder Honorable Conditions) would have been inappropriate .

Issue 2: ( ). T he Board found an inconsistency in the record. By definition, a n a dministrative s eparation is a discharge or release from active duty upon or prior to expiration of enlistment. The applicant was discharged after his enlistment contract. Therefore, the Board determined that the Applicant discharge should be based on the Marine’s performance at the time of his discharge. A n honorable discharge upon EAS should be awarded for Marines with average conduct marks above 4.0 and average proficiency marks above 3 .0. T he Board determined that the characterization of the Applicant’s service to be characterized by an honorable discharge and a Narrative Reason of Secretarial Authority .

Summary of Service

 Prior Service:
 Inactive: USMCR (DEP)     19900612 - 19901107              Active:                -      
Period of Service Under Review:
 Date of Enlistment: 19901108               Years Contracted :                 Date of Discharge: 19941109
Length of Service : 04 Yrs 00 Mths 02 D ys          Lost Time : Days UA: Days Confine d :
Education Level:         Age at Enlistment:       AFQT: 35          MOS: 3531 Highest Rank:
Proficiency/Conduct marks (# of occasions):      4.3 ( 10 ) / 3.8 ( 10 )   Fitness reports :
Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214): NATIONAL DEFENSE SERVICE MEDAL, SEA SERVICE DEPLOYMENT RIBBON, SOUTHWEST ASIA SERVICE MEDAL W/1 STAR

Medical/Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Basis for Discharge

 19910 509:         MARCORSEPMAN 6105 counseling for failing to have a proper shave on 19910506 and 19910509.
19930610:        CO's NJP -- Viol UCMJ Art. 86 (2 specs) - (1) Fail to show up for remedial PT on 0530, 19930520, (2) Fail to show up for Battalion Guard on 2400, 19930524, found sleeping in his rack, Art. 113 - Found sleeping on his rack while posted as Battery Guard on 0207, 19930525.
         Awarded - - FOP ($233.00) for (7 days); Restr for (14 days); Extra duties (14 days). FOP of $117.00, restr and extra duties suspended for 6 months.

 19930817:        MARCORSEPMAN 6105 counseling for failure to maintain proper hygiene standards for my BEQ room as directed by my Chain of Command and the Barracks SOP (BnO P 11101.1C).
19931117:        MARCORSEPMAN 6105 counseling for lack of regard for military rules and regulations and poor judgment. Specifically, being 45 minutes late on 19931026 from morning formation and work and failing to call the Duty NCO or work and failing to call the Duty NCO or work section.
19940715 :         NAVDRUGLAB, Jacksonville, FL, reported Applicant’s urine sample, received 19940707, tested positive for THC.

 19940727:        Substance Abuse Evaluation:
          Diagnosis: Drug abuse.
         Recommendation: Administratively processed for separation.

19940729 :        CO's NJP -- Viol UCMJ Art. 112a - Wrongfully use THC.
         Awarded - - FOP ( $ 350.00 ) for ( 2 months); RIR ( E-2 ); Restr for ( 60 days).
Discharge Process

 Date Notified:   19940914
Basis for Discharge:      DUE TO:
Least Favorable Characterization:       
Commanding Officer’s Intended Recommendation:   

Date Applicant Responded to Notification:                  19940914
Rights Elected at Notification:
         Consult with Counsel                      
         Obtain Copies of Documents               
         Submit Statement(s) (date)                        
         Administrative Board                      

Administrative Board Date :       19941019
Findings, by preponderance of the evidence:     BY DUE TO .
         BY SEPARATION WARRANTED.
 Recommendation on Separation:   BY
Recommendation on Characterization:     BY

Commanding Officer Recommendation (date):        ( 19940914 )
 SJA review (date):      
Separation Authority (date):     COMMANDING GENERAL, 2D MARINE DIVISION, MARFORLANT ( 19941104 )
 Basis for discharge directed:   DUE TO:
Characterization directed:     
Date Applicant Discharged:       19941109

Types of Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered By Board

 Related to Military Service:      Service and/or Medical Record:            Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:         
         Employment:                        Finances:                          Education:               
         Health/Medical Records:                   Substance Abuse:                           Criminal Records:       
         Family/Personal Status:                   Community Service:                References:              
        
Additional Statements From Applicant:    From Representative:
Other Documentation (Describe)      

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. Paragraph 6210, Misconduct , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16D), effective
27 Jun e 19 89 until 17 Aug ust 19 95.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

C. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 112a and 113 .


ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity , OUSD (P&R) PI-LP , The Pentagon , Washington, DC 20301-4000 . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provi ded the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years , has already been grante d a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employmen t / Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD . ” Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700192

    Original file (MD0700192.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant claims his medical issues contributed to his misconduct and adverse discharge. (2) Wrongfully possess some amount of marijuana Article 112a: Wrongfully use marijuana.Date Applicant Submitted SILT request: 20051109 Consulted with or Waived Counsel: Acknowledged Understanding Elements: Acknowledged Guilt to: Article(s) 86 and 112a BCD/DD authorized for offense(s) Acknowledged Consequences of OTH: Type of Characterization Requested: Commanding Officer Recommendation...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700506

    Original file (MD0700506.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Recommendation on Separation: BY Recommendation on Characterization: BY Commanding Officer Recommendation (date): (20030401)SJA review (date): (20030711) Separation Authority (date): COMMANDING GENERAL, 3D MARINE DIVISION (20030715) Basis for discharge directed: DUE TO: Characterization directed: Date Applicant Discharged: 2030729 Types of Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered By BoardRelated to Military Service: Service and/or Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0701142

    Original file (MD0701142.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Young and immature DecisionBy a vote of the Characterization shall .By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall MISCONDUCT Date:20080117Location:Washington D.C.Representation: Discussion : either which the Board cannot form the basis of relief for the Applicant, or the Board does not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. Medical/Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Basis for Discharge 19960510: MARCORSEPMAN 6105 counseling for...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700769

    Original file (MD0700769.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Certain serious offenses, even though isolated, warrant separation from the Naval service in order to maintain proper order and discipline.The Applicant’s service was marred by two nonjudicial punishment for a violation of UCMJ Article 86 (Unauthorized Absence) and Article 92 (Failure to obey an order or regulation) andone Summary Court Martial finding of guilty for Article 112a (Wrongful use of a controlled substance). After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0701118

    Original file (MD0701118.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the Applicant’s record, issues submitted, the standards of discipline, post service accomplishments, and time passed since the BCD, the Board determined that some degree of clemency was warranted. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Summary of ServicePrior Service: Inactive: USMCR...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700969

    Original file (MD0700969.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Certain serious offenses, even though isolated, warrant separation from the Naval service in order to maintain proper order and discipline.The Applicant’s service was marred by two retention warnings, three nonjudicial punishment for a violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), Article 86 (Unauthorized absence), Article 92 (Failure to obey lawful order), and Article 112a (Wrongful use of a controlled substance). Medical/Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700403

    Original file (MD0700403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    20050128 Rights Elected at Notification: Consult with Counsel Obtain Copies of Documents Submit Statement(s) (date) (20050128) Administrative Board Commanding Officer Recommendation (date): (20050128) SJA review (date): (20050330) Separation Authority (date): COMMANDING GENERAL, 1 ST MARINE DIVISION (20050404) Basis for discharge directed: DUE TO: Characterization directed: Date Applicant Discharged: 20050408 Types of Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered By BoardRelated to...

  • USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1100118

    Original file (MD1100118.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant wants his discharge upgraded so he can reenlist in the military.2. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. ”...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700292

    Original file (MD0700292.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Record of service. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214 The NDRB did note administrative error(s) on the original DD Form 214: “CONTINUOUS HONORABLE ACTIVE DUTY SERVICE FROM 980318 TO 020103 ” The NDRB will recommend to the Commandant of the Marine Corps that the...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700709

    Original file (MD0700709.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board determined that the Applicant’s undocumented claims of good post service conduct did not mitigate the misconduct that resulted in the characterization of discharge.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and...