Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700433
Original file (MD0700433.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
ex-, USMC
MD07-00433
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20070215   Characterization Received:
Narrative Reason: MISCONDUCT                                         Authority: MARCORSEPMAN 6210.5

 Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
                           Narrative Reason change to:
Applicant’s Issues:       1. Enhance employment opportunities
                           2. Re-enlist

Decision

 By a vote of the Characterization shall .     
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall MISCONDUCT.

Date: 20 071101                             Location: Washington D.C.

Discussion

Issue(s) 1 - 2 : either which the Board cannot form the basis of relief for the Applicant, or the Board does not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum regarding .

There is credible evidence in the record to support the factual conclusion that the Applicant did attempt to illegally purchase, introduce, and use steroids in violation of the UCMJ, Article 112a. The record clearly establishes that all of the Applicant’s procedural rights were scrupulously provided. There is further credible evidence that the Applicant committed further misconduct during the period his discharge was suspended. The allegation was thoroughly investigated and, despite the Applicant’s denial at the time, substantiated by a preponderance of the evidence. The Applicant does not deny this misconduct to this Board, and there is no evidence to indicate that the initial determination was in error. In addition to the Article 112a offense, for which an under than honorable characterization of service is warranted, the Applicant’s service was also marred by NJP for wrongfully possessing a fraudulent ID card. The Board found no impropriety or inequity in the Applicant’s discharge.

In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries , Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, t he Board found that

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
 Inactive: USMCR (DEP)     20030826 - 20031214              Active:
Period of Service Under Review:
 Date of Enlistment: 20031215               Years Contracted :        Date of Discharge: 20060216
Length of Service : 02 Yrs 02 Mths 02 D ys          Lost Time : Days UA: Days Confine d :
Education Level:         Age at Enlistment:       AFQT: 42          MOS: 0121 Highest Rank:
Proficiency/Conduct marks (# of occasions):      4.5 / 4.2   Fitness reports :
Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214): HUMANITARIAN SERVICE MEDAL, SEA SERVICE DEPLOYMENT RIBBON, GLOBAL WAR ON TERRORISM SERVICE MEDAL, NATIONAL DEFENSE SERVICE MEDAL, LETTER OF APPRECIATION, RIFLE EXPERT BADGE

Medical/Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Basis for Discharge

 20050121 :        NJP -- Viol UCMJ Art. 134 - Possession of a fraudulent military identification card .
         Awarded - FOP ($ 339.00 ) for ( 1 month); Restr for ( 14 days); Extra duties ( 14 days).
20050526:        Substance Abuse evaluation: No pattern of abuse or dependence. No need for treatment.

 20050613 :        NJP -- Viol UCMJ Art. 80 - Attempted to use “Sustanon” oil based injectable steroid ; Art. 92 - Wrongfully purchased “Sustanon ; ” Art. 112a - Wrongfully imported 3 ampoules of “Sustanon ; ” Art. 134 - Conduct prejudicial to the good order and discipline of the Armed Forces .
          Awarded - FOP ($ 728 .00 ) for ( 2 months); RIR ( E-2 ); Restr for ( 45 days); Extra duties ( 45 days).
Discharge Process

 Date Notified:            20050615
Basis for Discharge:               DUE TO
Least Favorable Characterization:                 
Commanding Officer’s Intended Recommendation:   
                                                      SUSPEN DED ONE YEAR

Date Applicant Responded to Notification:                  20050706
Rights Elected at Notification:
         Consult with Counsel                       
         Obtain Copies of Documents               
         Submit Statement(s) (date)                        
         Administrative Board                      

Commanding Officer Recommendation (date):         ( 20050623 )                                                            SUSPENDED ONE YEAR
 Administrative Board Date :                         20051103
         F indings, by preponderance of the evidence:       BY 3-0 VOTE DUE TO
                                                      BY 3-0 VOTE SEPARATION WARRANTED
         Re commendation on Separation:             BY 3-0 VOTE
         Recommendation on Characterization:      BY 3-0 VOTE

Separation Authority (date):                       COMMANDING GENERAL, 3D MARINE DIVISION ( 20051110 )
Basis for discharge directed:            DUE TO:
Characterization directed:                       
                                                      SUSPENDED FOR ONE YEAR

 Date Notified of Vacation :                                  20060120
         Basis for Vacation :                        VIOLATION ART 92, UCMJ: UNDERAGE DRINKING

Date Applicant Responded to Vacation Notice :      20050120
Rights Elected at Notification:
         Consult with Counsel                      
         Submit Statement(s) (date)                         ( 20060130 )

Commanding Officer Recommendation (date):        VACATE ( 20060125 )
SJA review (date):                                  ( 20060131 )
 Separation Authority (date):                       COMMANDING GENERAL , 3D MARINE DIVISION ( 20060131 )
         Finding:                                             PREPONDERANCE OF EVIDENCE SUPPORTS MISCONDUCT
         Action:                                      SUSPENDED DISCHARGE VACATED
 Date Applicant Discharged:                          20060216

Types of Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered By Board

 Related to Military Service:      Service and/or Medical Record:            Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:         
         Employment:                        Finances:                          Education:               
         Health/Medical Records:                   Substance Abuse:                           Criminal Records:       
         Family/Personal Status:                   Community Service:                References:              
        
Additional Statements From Applicant:    From Representative:             Other Documentation (Describe)

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. The Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16F, effective 1 September 2001 until Present, Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT .

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .



ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000 . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provi ded the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years , has already been grante d a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employmen t / Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD . ” Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700930

    Original file (MD0700930.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Summary of ServicePrior Service: Inactive: USMCR (DEP)20030228 - 20030526 Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 20030527Years Contracted:5; Extension: Date of Discharge:20060427Length of Service: 02 Yrs 11 Mths01 DysLost Time:Days UA: Days Confined: Education Level:...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700265

    Original file (MD0700265.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    19930423: NJP imposed and suspended on 19930409 for a period of 6 months vacated.19930803: CO's NJP -- Viol UCMJ Art. 19930824 Rights Elected at Notification: Consult with Counsel Obtain Copies of Documents Submit Statement(s) (date) Administrative Board Commanding Officer Recommendation (date): (19930823) SJA review (date): (19930830) Separation Authority (date): COMMANDING GENERAL, 1 ST Marine Division (19930910) Basis for discharge directed: DUE TO: Characterization directed: Date...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700569

    Original file (MD0700569.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USMCR (DEP)20000712 - 20000729Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 20000730Years Contracted:; Extension: Date of Discharge:20020612Length of Service: 01 Yrs 10Mths13 DysLost Time:Days UA: 22 Days Confined: Education...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700581

    Original file (MD0700581.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Summary of ServicePrior Service: Inactive: USMCR (DEP)20021122 - 20030907Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 20030908Years Contracted:; Extension: Date of Discharge:20060214Length of Service: 02 Yrs 05Mths07 DysLost Time:Days UA: Days Confined: 24Education...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0701093

    Original file (MD0701093.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board determined that the documentation provided by the Applicant did not mitigate the circumstances that resulted in the characterization of discharge.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. 20050318: Vacate FOP for 1 month, Restr and Extra duties for 45 days awarded at NJP dated 20050116.20050331: MARCORSEPMAN 6105...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700769

    Original file (MD0700769.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Certain serious offenses, even though isolated, warrant separation from the Naval service in order to maintain proper order and discipline.The Applicant’s service was marred by two nonjudicial punishment for a violation of UCMJ Article 86 (Unauthorized Absence) and Article 92 (Failure to obey an order or regulation) andone Summary Court Martial finding of guilty for Article 112a (Wrongful use of a controlled substance). After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700243

    Original file (ND0700243.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to: Applicant’s Issues:1. Date Applicant Responded to Notification:20020226 Rights Elected at Notification: Consult with Counsel Obtain Copies of Documents Submit Statement(s) (date) Administrative Board GCMCA review Commanding Officer Recommendation (date): (20020328) Separation Authority (date): COMNAVPERSCOM MILLINGTON TN (20020404)Reason for discharge directed: - Characterization directed: Date Applicant...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700416

    Original file (ND0700416.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USNR (DEP)20050408 - 20050728Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 20050729Years Contracted:; Extension: Date of Discharge:20060310Length of Service: 00 Yrs 07Mths12 DysLost Time:Days UA: Days Confined: Education...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700859

    Original file (ND0700859.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Date: 20080103Location: Washington D.C Representation: Discussion Issue 1: which the Board cannot form the basis of relief for the Applicant, or the Board does not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. Whenever a member is being processed...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700515

    Original file (MD0700515.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the Applicant’s record, issues submitted, and post service accomplishments, the Board determined that clemency was not warranted and that the sentence awarded the Applicant at his court-martial was appropriate for the offense that he committed. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Summary...