Upgrade.Vet

USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0701118

Original file (MD0701118.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-PVT, USMC
MD07-01118

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20070810 Characterization Received: BAD-CONDUCT DISCHARGE

Narrative Reason: COURT-MARTIAL Authority: MARCORSEPMAN 1105

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
                           Narrative Reason change to:
Applicant’s Issues:       1. Employment opportunities.
2. Clemency.
                           3 . Post service.

Decision

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall COURT-MARTIAL.

Date: 20 08 0117             Location: Washington D.C.         Representation :

Discussion
: either which the Board cannot form the basis of relief for the Applicant, or the Board does not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum regarding .

Issue 2 (Equity). With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial case, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency (leniency). In response to the Applicant’s clemency request, relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts . The Applicant’s case was considered under the pertinent standards of equity to determine if any factors in this particular case merited clemency. The re ason for discharge, convicted by special court-martial, is absolutely appropriate. However, t he NDRB also found the evidence of record did contain sufficient mitigating or extenuating factors to offset the seriousness of the offenses for which the discharge was awarded. After a thorough review of the Applicant’s record , issues submitted, the standards of discipline, post service accomplishments, and time passed since the BCD, the Board determined that some degree of clemency was warranted. While the Applicant’s request for an general (under honorable conditions) discharge was considered inappropriate due to the nature of his in-service conduct, the board did find that an upgrade from Bad-Conduct Discharge to an Under Other Than Honorable Conditions discharge to be most appropriate.

Issue 3 (Equity). The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. However, there is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge, may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in the civilian life subsequent to leaving the service. Normally, to permit relief, a procedural impropriety or inequity must have been found to have existed during the period of enlistment in question. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered. The Applicant provided two certificates of achievement as documentation of post service accomplishments. The Applicant's efforts need to be more encompassing. For example, the Applicant could have produced evidence of a verifiable and continuous employment record, documentation of community service, a nd certification of non-involvement with civil authorities , and evidence of a drug free lifestyle. The Board determined that the documentation provided by the Applicant did not mitigate the misconduct that resulted in the characterization of discharge.

In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries , Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, t he Board found that

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive: USMCR (DEP)     19981130 - 19990711
Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Enlistment: 19990712               Years Contracted : ; Extension:          Date of Discharge: 20030404
Length of Service : Yrs Mths 21 D ys                        Lost Time : Days UA: 4 Days Confine d : 28
Education Level:         Age at Enlistment:       AFQT: 44          MOS: 0311 Highest Rank: LCPL
Proficiency/Conduct marks (# of occasions):      4.2 ( 7 ) / 4.1 ( 7 )
Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214): SSDR, MM, RIFLE SS

Medical/Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Basis for Discharge

19981129:        Applicant signed Marine Corps policy concerning illegal use of rugs. Applicant receives pre-service waiver for THC use.

20000718 :        NJP -- Viol UCMJ Art. 86 (4 days).
         Awarded - FOP ($ 263 ) for ( 1 month);Restr for ( 14 days); Extra duties ( 14 days).

20010323 :        MARCORSEPMAN 6105 counseling for underage consumption of alcohol. Discharge warning issued.

20010328 :        NJP -- Viol UCMJ Art. 92 , underage drinking.
         Awarded -Restr for ( 7 days); Extra duties ( 7 days).

20010716 :         NAVDRUGLAB, , reported Applicant’s urine sample, received 20010710 , tested positive for ( ).

20010725 :        MARCORSEPMAN 6105 counseling for use of illegal drugs (THC). Being administratively discharged.

20010725 :        NJP -- Viol UCMJ Art. 112a.
         Awarded - FOP ($ 584 ) for ( 2 month s ); RIR ( E-2 ); Restr for ( 45 days); Extra duties ( 45 days).

20011016 :        NJP -- Viol UCMJ Art. 91, 92, 107, 134.
         Awarded - FOP ($ 521 ) for ( 2 month s ); RIR ( E-1 ); Restr for ( 45 days); Extra duties ( 45 days).

Discharge Process

Date Notified:   20010726
Basis for Discharge:     DUE TO

Least Favorable Characterization:
Commanding Officer’s Intended Recommendation:

Date Applicant Responded to Notification:                 20 0 10726
Rights Elected at Notification:
         Consult with Counsel
         Obtain Copies of Documents
         Submit Statement(s) (date)
         Administrative Board

Commanding Officer Recommendation (date):        ( 20010725 )
SJA review (date):       ( 20011002 )
Separation Authority (date):     COMMANDING GENERAL, 1 ^ST MARINE DIVISION ( 20011002 )
Basis for discharge directed:   DUE TO
Characterization directed:
Date Applicant Discharged:

Bad Conduct Discharge

Discharge Process

Charge(s) and Specification(s): Article 112a .
Preferred: 20011106       Court-martial: 20011129 Findings: Guilty of Article 112a
Sentence: BCD; Conf 60 days ; FOP ($695) for (2 months).                 CA action: 20020703
NC&PB Action: NONE       Appellate Review Complete: 20021025      BCD ordered executed: 20030324 SSPCMCO No. 112-02
Applicant Discharged: 20030404

Types of Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered By Board

Related to Military Service:      Service and/or Medical Record:          Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:                        Finances:                          Education:
         Health/Medical Records:                   Substance Abuse:                           Criminal Records:
         Family/Personal Status:                   Community Service:                References:

Additional Statements From Applicant:    From Representative:
Other Documentation (Describe)

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. Paragraph 1105, DISCHARGE ADJUDGED BY SENTENCE OF COURT-MARTIAL , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16F), effective 01 September 2001 until Present.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part IV , Para 403m(7)(a), Presumption Concerning Court-Martial Specifications .

C. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article(s) 91, 92, 107 and 112a.

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity , OUSD (P&R) PI-LP , The Pentagon , Washington, DC 20301-4000 . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provi ded the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years , has already been grante d a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employmen t / Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD . ” Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700498

Original file (ND0700498.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USNR (DEP)19990812 - 19990822Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 19990823Years Contracted:Date of Discharge:20011012Length of Service: 02 Yrs 01Mths18 DysLost Time:Days UA: 02 Days Confined: Education Level: Age at...
USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700768

Original file (MD0700768.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant’s conduct during the current period of service, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of his service was marred by the award of three retention warnings, four nonjudicial punishments (NJP) for violations of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), Article 86 (Unauthorized absence), Article 91 (Insubordinate conduct toward a noncommissioned officer), Article 92 (Violation, Failure to obey other order), and Article 112 (Drunk on duty). Medical/Service...
USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700265

Original file (MD0700265.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

19930423: NJP imposed and suspended on 19930409 for a period of 6 months vacated.19930803: CO's NJP -- Viol UCMJ Art. 19930824 Rights Elected at Notification: Consult with Counsel Obtain Copies of Documents Submit Statement(s) (date) Administrative Board Commanding Officer Recommendation (date): (19930823) SJA review (date): (19930830) Separation Authority (date): COMMANDING GENERAL, 1 ST Marine Division (19930910) Basis for discharge directed: DUE TO: Characterization directed: Date...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700340

Original file (ND0700340.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214 The NDRB did note administrative error(s) on the original DD Form 214: “COURT-MARTIAL ” The NDRB will recommend to the Commander, Navy Personnel Command, that the DD 214 be corrected as appropriate. ADDENDUM: Information for the...
NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700367

Original file (ND0700367.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant’s service was marred by 2 retention warnings, 6 nonjudicial punishment proceedings for violations of Articles 86 (unauthorized absence), 90 (willfully disobeying a superior commissioned officer), 91 (insubordinate conduct towards a master chief petty officer), 92 (failure to obey written regulation), 95 (resistance), 112 (drunk on duty), 112a (wrongful use of a controlled substance) and 134 (unlawful entry) of the UCMJ. The Applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis...
USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0701023

Original file (MD0701023.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant’s service was marred by the award of nonjudicial punishment (NJP) on four occasions for violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), Article 86 (Unauthorized Absence), Article 91 (Willfully disobey a lawful order), Article 121 (Larceny) and Article 112a (Wrongful use of controlled substance). Medical/Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Basis for Discharge 19961127: NJP -- Viol UCMJ Art. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document...
USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700400

Original file (MD0700400.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Discussion Issue 1 (Clemency). After a thorough review of the Applicant’s record, issues submitted, and post service accomplishments, the Board determined t that the sentence awarded the Applicant at his court-martial was appropriate for the offenses he committed and that clemency was not warranted.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted...
USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700969

Original file (MD0700969.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Certain serious offenses, even though isolated, warrant separation from the Naval service in order to maintain proper order and discipline.The Applicant’s service was marred by two retention warnings, three nonjudicial punishment for a violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), Article 86 (Unauthorized absence), Article 92 (Failure to obey lawful order), and Article 112a (Wrongful use of a controlled substance). Medical/Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of...
USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0800941

Original file (MD0800941.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Susp - None.SCMs: SPCMs: 1 20011012: Article 112a (Wrongful use of marijuana), Article 134 (Breaking restriction), 2 specifications.Sentence - BCD, 60 days confinement, FOP ($650 for 4 months).CC:6105 Counseling: Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214: Service and/or Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Substance Abuse: Criminal Records: Family/Personal...
USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700769

Original file (MD0700769.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Certain serious offenses, even though isolated, warrant separation from the Naval service in order to maintain proper order and discipline.The Applicant’s service was marred by two nonjudicial punishment for a violation of UCMJ Article 86 (Unauthorized Absence) and Article 92 (Failure to obey an order or regulation) andone Summary Court Martial finding of guilty for Article 112a (Wrongful use of a controlled substance). After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0701118

Similar Decisions