Upgrade.Vet

USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700102

Original file (MD0700102.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-, USMC
MD07-00102

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20061030 Characterization Received:
Narrative Reason: MISCONDUCT Authority: MARCORSEPMAN 6210.5

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
                           Narrative Reason change to:
Applicant’s Issues:       1. Equity – Veterans Benefits
                           2. Equity – In Service

Decision

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall MISCONDUCT .

Date: 20 070823 Location: Washington D.C. The Board found that

Discussion

Issue(s) 1 – (Equity) : either which the Board cannot form the basis of relief for the Applicant, or the Board does not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum regarding .

Issue 2 ( ). When a Marine ’ s service has been honest and faithful, it is appropriate to characterize that service under honorable conditions. Characterization of service as general (under honorable conditions) is warranted when significant negative aspects of a member's conduct or performance of duty outweigh the positive aspects of the member's military record. The Applicant ’ s service was marred by the award of nonjudicial punishment (NJP) on one occasion for violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ). The Applicant ’ s misconduct included wrongful use of a controlled substance. (Violation of UCMJ Article ( 112a ) is considered a serious offense for which a punitive discharge is authorized if adjudged by a Special or General Courts Martial. The Applicant ’ s conduct and proficiency markings, which form the primary basis for determining the character of his service, reflect his misconduct, and fall below that required for an honorable characterization of service. An upgrade to honorable would be inappropriate.

In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries , Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found the Applicant’s discharge proper and equitable.

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive: USMCR (DEP)     20020730 - 20020826
Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Enlistment: 2002082 7      Years Contracted : ; Extension:          Date of Discharge: 20050408
Length of Service : 02 Yrs 07 Mths 12 D ys          Lost Time : Days UA: Days Confine d :
Education Level:         Age at Enlistment:       AFQT: 53          MOS: 2311 Highest Rank:
Proficiency/Conduct marks (# of occasions):      3.9 ( 8 ) / 3.9 ( 8 )     Fitness reports :
Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214): GLOBAL WAR ON TERRORISM SERVICE MEDAL, GLOBAL WAR ON TERRORISM EXPEDITIONARY MEDAL (KUWAIT), SEA SERVICE DEPLOYMENT RIBBON, NATIONAL DEFENSE SERVICE MEDAL, NAVY UNIT COMMENDATION, MERITORIOUS MAST, RIFLE EXPERT BADGE

Medical/Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Basis for Discharge

20041105 :         NAVDRUGLAB, Jacksonville, FL, reported Applicant’s urine sample, received 20041102, tested positive for THC.

20041109 :        MARCORSEPMAN 6105 counseling for my illegal drug involvement, THC usage identified through urinalysis confirmed by NAVDRUGLAB JAXFL message 052341Z Nov 04. Violations of this type will not be tolerated and will result in auto processing for Administrative Separation from service.

20041110 :        CO's NJP -- Viol UCMJ Art. 112a: Wrongful use of THC. . Awarded - FOP ( $668.00) for ( 2 m onths); RIR ( E-2 ); Restr for ( 45 days); Extra duties ( 45 d ays) .

20050110 :        Applicant refused treatment for substance abuse .

Discharge Process

Date Notified:   20050303
Basis for Discharge:      DUE TO:
Least Favorable Characterization:
Commanding Officer’s Intended Recommendation:

Date Applicant Responded to Notification:                  20050225
Rights Elected at Notification:
         Consult with Counsel
         Obtain Copies of Documents
         Submit Statement(s) (date)
         Administrative Board

Commanding Officer Recommendation (date):        ( 20050220 )
SJA review (date):       ( 20050318 )
Separation Authority (date):     COMMANDING GENERAL, 2D FORCE SERVICE SUPPORT GROUP ( 20050323 )
Basis for discharge directed: DUE TO:
Characterization directed:
Date Applicant Discharged:       20050408

Types of Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered By Board

Related to Military Service:      Service and/or Medical Record:          Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:                        Finances:                          Education:
         Health/Medical Records:                   Substance Abuse:                           Criminal Records:
         Family/Personal Status:                   Community Service:                References:

Additional Statements From Applicant:    From Representative:
Other Documentation (Describe)

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. The Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16F, effective 01 September 2001 until Present, Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

C. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 112a , (Wrongful use, possession, etc… of a controlled substance . )

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000 . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provi ded the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years , has already been grante d a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employmen t / Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD . ” Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700403

Original file (MD0700403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

20050128 Rights Elected at Notification: Consult with Counsel Obtain Copies of Documents Submit Statement(s) (date) (20050128) Administrative Board Commanding Officer Recommendation (date): (20050128) SJA review (date): (20050330) Separation Authority (date): COMMANDING GENERAL, 1 ST MARINE DIVISION (20050404) Basis for discharge directed: DUE TO: Characterization directed: Date Applicant Discharged: 20050408 Types of Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered By BoardRelated to...
USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0601002

Original file (MD0601002.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Elements of Discharge: [INVOLUNTARY] Discharge Process: Date Notified:20050321Narrative Reason(s): MISCONDUCTLeast Favorable Characterization: Commanding Officer’s Intended Recommendation: Record Supports Narrative Reason: YESDate Applicant Responded to Notification: 20050321Rights Elected at Notification:Consult with Counsel Administrative Board Obtain Copies Submit Statement(s) Recommendation of Commanding Officer (date): (20050321) SJA review (date):(20050408)Discharge directed by...
USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700743

Original file (MD0700743.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to: Applicant’s Issues:1. Date:20071115Location:Washington D.C.Representation: Discussion Issue 1 (Equity): With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial case, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency (leniency). After a thorough review of the Applicant’s record, issues submitted, and the standards of discipline, the Board determined that clemency was not warranted.
USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0801198

Original file (MD0801198.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214: Service and/or Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Substance Abuse: Criminal Records: Family/Personal Status: Community Service: References: Additional Statements From Applicant: From Representation: From Member of Congress: Other Documentation (Describe) DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE...
USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700267

Original file (MD0700267.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

20010608 Rights Elected at Notification: Consult with Counsel Obtain Copies of Documents Submit Statement(s) (date) Administrative Board Commanding Officer Recommendation (date): (20010608) SJA review (date): (20010702) Separation Authority (date): COMMANDING GENERAL, 2D MARINE AIRCRAFT WING (20010702) Basis for discharge directed: DUE TO: Characterization directed: Date Applicant Discharged: 20010720 Types of Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered By BoardRelated to Military...
USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0900032

Original file (MD0900032.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Board determined the awarded discharge characterization was appropriate and an upgrade would be inappropriate.The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. The Board determined the characterization of service received, “Under Other Than Honorable Conditions”, was an appropriate characterization considering the length of service and the UCMJ violations involved, and based on the lack of post service documentation provided an upgrade...
NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0601180

Original file (ND0601180.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant requests upgrade of her service based on her performance while in service. Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Narrative Reason for Separation 19940628: NJP for violation(s) of UCMJ: Article 92: On 19940611 Article 128: On 19940611 Award: Reduction to E-2. Medical Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Narrative Reason for Separation None Elements of Discharge: Discharge Process: Date Notified: 19970724Reason for Discharge Least...
USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700884

Original file (MD0700884.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

After a thorough review of the Applicant’s record, issues submitted, and post service accomplishments, the Board determined that clemency was not warranted and that the sentence awarded the Applicant at his court-martial was appropriate for the offenses he committed.In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. Medical/Service...
USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700682

Original file (MD0700682.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Record of service. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Summary of ServicePrior Service: Inactive: USMCR (DEP) 20011023 - 20020121 Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 20020122Years Contracted:4; Extension: Date of Discharge:20060109Length of Service: 03 Yrs 11Mths18 DysLost Time:Days UA: Days...
USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0902418

Original file (MD0902418.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant submitted one non-decisional issue and one decisional issue for the Board’s consideration.The Board completed a thorough review of the circumstances that led to discharge and the discharge process to ensure discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety. Based on his career PRO/CON evaluation average, the failure to maintain Marine Corps body composition standards, and the NJP guilty finding for illegal drug use (a serious offense that is eligible for a punitive...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700102

Similar Decisions