Upgrade.Vet

USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0902418

Original file (MD0902418.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-, USMC

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20090826

Characterization of Service Received:

Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MARCORSEPMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
         Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:         USMCR (DEP)       19980819 - 1999072 0     Active:          19990721 - 19990901
USMCR (DEP)      20010829 - 20011202

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 20011203     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Months     MOS: 6114
Date of Discharge: 20061202      H ighest Rank:
Length of Service : Y ea r ( s ) M on th ( s ) 00 D a y ( s )
Education Level:        AFQT: 45/51
Proficiency/Conduct M arks (# of occasions): ( 14 ) / ( 14 )        Fitness Reports:

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      Rifle (3) CoC NDSM

Periods of UA / CONF :

NJP:

- 20061025 :      Article (Wrongful use, possession, etc., of controlled substances – marijuana , 20060921 , THC 28 )
         A warded: Suspended:

SCM:     SPCM:    CC:

Retention Warning Counseling:

- 20030522 :      For violation of A rticle 86, being 1 hour and 10 minutes late to muster on 20030507.

- 20060804 :      For failure to maintain body composition standards.

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

Related to Military Service:
                  DD 214:          Service / Medical Record:          Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education /Training :
         Health/Medical Records:          Substance Abuse:                  Criminal Records:
         Family/Personal Status:                   Community Service:                References:
         Additional Statements :
                  From Applicant:          From Representat ion :               From Congress member :

         Other Documentation :

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

1.       The Applicant desires upgrade to utilize GI Bill benefits in furthering his education and to better the lives of his family.
2.       The Applicant contends that he completed his enlistment contract and deserves an honorable discharge.

Decision

Date: 20 10 0902          Location: Washington D.C .         R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .

Discussion

The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al a ffairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidenc e submitted by the Applicant. The Applicant submitted one non-decisional issue and o ne decisional issue for the Board ’s consideration . The Board complete d a thorough review of the circumstances that led to discharge and the discharge process to ensure discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety. The Applicant’s record of service included 6105 counseling warning s and for o f the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article 112a ( Wrongful use, possession, etc. of controlled substance , illegal marijuana use confirmed by NAVDRUGLAB urinalysis positive test result on 11 Oct 2006, THC 28 ) . The Applicant had a pre-service drug waiver for using marijuana prior to entering the Marine Corps and acknowledged complete understanding of the Marine Corps Policy Concerning Illegal Use of Drugs on 19 Jul 1999 (prior to first enlistment attempt) and again on 28 Aug 2001 (prior to second attempt at first enlistment). The Board also noted the Applicant was officially counseled (via SRB pg 11 entries) for violation of UCMJ Art 86 (Absence without leave, arriving 70 minutes late for duty) and violation of Marine Corps regulations (exceeding body composition standards for being overweight). Based on the Article 112a violation , processing for administrative separation is mandatory. When notified of a dministrative separation processing using the procedure, the Applicant exercised his right to consult with counsel, but waived rights to submit a written statement of rebuttal and to request a n administrative separation board .

: (Nondecisional) The Applicant desires upgrade to utilize GI Bill benefits in furthering his education and to better the lives of his family . The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge. Additionally, t he U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits , and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends that he completed his enlistment contract and deserves an honorable discharge. Per MCO P1900.16F ( Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual ) , a discharge or separation takes effect at 2359 on the date of discharge or separation. Additionally, it states that a Marine may be awarded a General Under Honorable Conditions discharge if a member’s service has been honest and faithful, but significant negative aspects of the member’s conduct or performance outweigh positive aspects of the member’s military record. The s tandards of performance and conduct , as determined by MCO P1610.7 series ( Performance Evaluation System ) , MCO P1070.12 series ( Individual Records Administration Manual), and customs of the service , form the primary basis for determining characterization of service. Upon separation, if a member’s average proficiency marks are below 3 .0 and /or average conduct marks below 4.0, the Marine can be awarded a General Under Honorable Conditions discharge , regardless of the amount of time served within the enlistment . The Applicant’s five- year enlistment PRO/CON averages were 3.9 and 3.8 , respectively. Based on his career PRO/CON evaluation average, the failure to maintain Marine Corps body composition standards, and the NJP guilty finding for illegal drug use ( a serious offense that is eligible for a punitive discharge) of which the Applicant was well aware of the ramifications after having twice signed the Marine Corps policy for illegal drug use and being separated during his first enlistment for a positive urinalysis result for THC at MCRD Parris Island, SC , the command was justifi ed in award ing the Applicant a General Under Honorable Conditions discharge. In consideration of the facts and circumstances surrounding the Applicant’s administrative separation , the Board foun d the discharge and resultant characterization of service to be in accordance with applicable orde rs and regulations .

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries and administrative discharge process documentation , the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .

The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum, specifically the paragraphs titled Additional Reviews, Automatic Upgrades, and Post-Service Conduct .

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. The Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16F), effective 1 September 2001 until Present, Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT .

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disable d American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0801612

Original file (MD0801612.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT Applicant’s Issues 1. The Board determined the awarded discharge characterization was appropriate and an upgrade would be inappropriate.After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the...
USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1102000

Original file (MD1102000.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: Pertinent Regulation/Law A. Paragraph 6206,...
USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1201109

Original file (MD1201109.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214: Service/Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements: From Applicant: From/To Representation: From/To Congress member: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD...
USMC | DRB | 2014_Marine | MD1401249

Original file (MD1401249.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall remain GENERAL (UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS) and the narrative reason for separation shall remain UNSATISFACTORY PERFORMANCE. ” Additional Reviews...
USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1201652

Original file (MD1201652.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USMCR (DEP)20060620 - 20070610Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20070611Age at Enlistment: Period of Enlistment: Years MonthsDate of Discharge:20110809Highest Rank:Length of Service: Year(s)Month(s)29 Day(s)Education Level: AFQT:53MOS: 5811Proficiency/Conduct Marks (# of occasions):()/()Fitness Reports: Awards and Decorations (per DD...
USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0901860

Original file (MD0901860.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. Relief granted.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of...
USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1101825

Original file (MD1101825.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Based on his failure to meet Marine Corps weight standards, his command administratively processed him for separation. Therefore, this issue will not be addressed.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance...
USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1200191

Original file (MD1200191.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DD Form 256 is issued by Marine Corps Mobilization Command four years after discharge to indicate the Applicant successfully completed the remainder of his obligated service in the Individual Ready Reserve after the completion of his required active service in the Marine Corps. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s...
USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0901414

Original file (MD0901414.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:NONE Active:NONE Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20030917Age at Enlistment: Period of Enlistment: Years MonthsDate of Discharge:20080806Highest Rank:Length of Service:Inactive: Year(s)Month(s) 04 Day(s)active: Year(s)Month(s)16 Day(s)Education Level: AFQT:85MOS: 0311Proficiency/Conduct Marks (# of occasions):4.3/4.3Fitness Reports: Awards and...
USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1201316

Original file (MD1201316.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: Pertinent Regulation/Law A. Paragraph 6215, WEIGHT...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0902418

Similar Decisions