Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700267
Original file (MD0700267.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
ex-, USMC
MD07-00267
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20061220   Characterization Received:
Narrative Reason: MISCONDUCT              Authority: MARCORSEPMAN PAR 6210.5

 Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
                           Narrative Reason change to:
Applicant’s Issues:       1. Employment enhancement
                           2. Post service – Equity
                           3. Command did not consider him for retention

Decision

 By a vote of the Characterization shall .     
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall MISCONDUCT

Date: 20 070927 Location: Washington D.C. The Board found that

Discussion

 Issue(s) 1 - Equity : either which the Board cannot form the basis of relief for the Applicant, or the Board does not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum regarding .

Issue 2 ( ) : There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant ’ s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that should be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities. As of this time, the Applicant has not provided sufficient post-service documentation to consider mitigating the misconduct that resulted in the characterization of discharge.

Issue 3 ( ) : The Applicant implies that his command did not consider him for retention . The Applicant ’ s service was marred by the award of nonjudicial punishment (NJP) on 2 occasions for violation s of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ). The Applicant ’ s misconduct included : A rt. 111 – Operat ing a vehicle while impaired and 112a –Wrongful use of a controlled substance . (Violation of UCMJ Article s ( 111 and 112a ) is considered a serious offense for which a punitive discharge is authorized if adjudged by a Special or General Courts Martial. The Applicant ’ s misconduct was clearly the reason for retention not being recommended .

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
 Inactive: USMCR (DEP)     19990311 - 19990328              Active:         
Period of Service Under Review:
 Date of Enlistment: 19990329      Years Contracted : ; Extension:                   Date of Discharge: 20010720
Length of Service : 02 Yrs 03 Mths 22 D ys          Lost Time : Days UA: Days Confine d :
Education Level:         Age at Enlistment:       AFQT: 56          MOS: 6482 Highest Rank:
Proficiency/Conduct marks (# of occasions):      4.3 ( 5 ) / 3.9 ( 5 )     Fitness reports :
Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214): LETTER OF APPRECIATION, RIFLE EXPERT MARKSMANSHIP BADGE (1 ST AWARD)


Medical/Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Basis for Discharge

20000804:        CO's NJP -- Viol UCMJ Art. 111 – Operated vehicle while impaired (BAC .08) on 20000714. Awarded - RIR (E-2) suspended for 2 months ; Restr for (45 days); Extra duties (45 days).
20001102:        MARCORSEPMAN 6105 counseling for (Alcohol related incident, specifically on 20000714, DWI on board MCAS Cherry Point, BAC .08).
20010328:        MARCORSEPMAN 6105 counseling for (Illegal drug involvement, THC usage confirmed by NAVDRUGLAB JAXFL MSG 191625Z MAR 01 LAB NO J0103145035).
20010405:        CO's NJP -- Viol UCMJ Art. 112a – Wrongfully use marijuana, a controlled substance between 20010124 and 20010313. Awarded - FOP ($584.00) for (2months) suspended for 6 months; RIR (E-2).
Discharge Process

 Date Notified:   20010608
Basis for Discharge:      DUE TO:
        
Least Favorable Characterization:       
Commanding Officer’s Intended Recommendation:   

Date Applicant Responded to Notification:                  20010608
Rights Elected at Notification:
         Consult with Counsel                      
         Obtain Copies of Documents               
         Submit Statement(s) (date)                        
         Administrative Board                      

Commanding Officer Recommendation (date):        ( 20010608 )
SJA review (date):       ( 20010702 )
Separation Authority (date):     COMMANDING GENERAL, 2D MARINE AIRCRAFT WING ( 20010702 )
Basis for discharge directed:   DUE TO:
Characterization directed:     
Date Applicant Discharged:       20010720

Types of Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered By Board

 Related to Military Service:      Service and/or Medical Record:            Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:         
         Employment:                        Finances:                          Education:               
         Health/Medical Records:                   Substance Abuse:                           Criminal Records:       
         Family/Personal Status:                   Community Service:                References:              
        
Additional Statements From Applicant:    From Representative:
Other Documentation (Describe)      









Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16E), effective 31 Jan 97 until 31 August 2001.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

C. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article A rt. 111 – Operat ing a vehicle while impaired and 112a –Wrongful use of a controlled substance .

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employment/Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD.” Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0801489

    Original file (MD0801489.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214: Service and/or Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Substance Abuse: Criminal Records: Family/Personal Status: Community Service: References: Additional Statements From Applicant: From Representation: From Member of Congress: Other Documentation (Describe): - Photographs DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2008_Navy | ND0801026

    Original file (ND0801026.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700551

    Original file (ND0700551.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Summary of ServicePrior Service: Inactive: USNR (DEP)19961127 - 19970729Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 19970730Years Contracted:Date of Discharge:20010720 Length of Service: 03 Yrs 11Mths21 DysLost Time:Days UA: Days Confined: Education Level: Age at...

  • USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0900404

    Original file (MD0900404.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, the Applicant is advised completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service conduct warrants clemency. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record, Discharge Process and DD Form 293 submitted by the Applicant, the Board found ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant Complaint Procedures :...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0701003

    Original file (ND0701003.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Discharge Process Date Notified: 20010720Reason for Discharge:--Least Favorable Characterization: Date Applicant Responded to Notification:20010720Rights Elected at Notification: Consult with Counsel Obtain Copies of Documents Submit Statement(s) (date) Administrative Board Administrative Board Date : NONE Findings, by preponderance of the evidence: Recommendation on Separation: Recommendation on Characterization: Commanding Officer Recommendation (date): (20010825) Separation Authority...

  • USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0900329

    Original file (MD0900329.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board determined the characterization of service received, “Under Other Than Honorable Conditions”, was an appropriate characterization considering the length of service and the UCMJ violations involved, and based on the lack of post service documentation provided an upgrade would be inappropriate. The NDRB determined the awarded discharge was appropriate and an upgrade would be inappropriate.After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of...

  • USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0800253

    Original file (MD0800253.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall MISCONDUCT.Discussion Issue 1: The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment...

  • USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0801153

    Original file (MD0801153.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant should be aware completion of these items alone does not guarantee an upgrade from an unfavorable discharge as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post service conduct mitigates the reason for the characterization of discharge. Again, the Board determined an upgrade would be inappropriate.After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record, Discharge Process and evidence submitted...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900112

    Original file (ND0900112.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT Applicant’s Issues 1. The Board determined the characterization of service received, “Under Other Than Honorable Conditions”, was an appropriate characterization considering the length of service, the UCMJ violations involved, and lack of post service documentation.After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Record Entries, Discharge Process...

  • USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0800400

    Original file (MD0800400.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall MISCONDUCT.Discussion Issue 1: The Board reviews the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge individually, on a case-by-case basis. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing...