Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600623
Original file (ND0600623.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

ex-ATAN, USN
Docket No. ND06-00623

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review was received on 20060406 . The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable and the Narrative Reason for Separation be changed to “Convenience of government. ” The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. The Applicant did not designate a representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20070110 . After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge and reason for discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain Under Other Than Honorable Conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.





The NDRB did note administrative error(s) on the original DD Form 214. Block 29 , Dates of Time Lost During This Period , should read : “ 040512 – 040513, 040714 - 040730 .” The Commander, Navy Personnel Command, Millington, TN, will be notified, recommending the DD Form 214 be corrected or reissued, as appropriate.

PART I - ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION


Decisional Issue :

Propriety – Coerced into waiving his rights
Propriety – Denied defense counsel
Equity – Family problems


Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
Applicant’s DD Form 214 (Service 7)
Applicant’s DD Form 293, Block 6 Continuation Sheet, (2 pages)
Applicant’s DD Form 293, Block 8 Continuation Sheet
Report of Medical Examination, dtd September 27, 2001
Prisoner/Detainee Special Request/Authorization, dtd June 4, 2004
Naval Station Norfolk Brig, Medical Disposition form, not dated
 Prisoner/Detainee Special Request/Authorization, dtd July 10, 2004
Statement of I_ S_ (Applicant’s grandmother), not dated
 Applicant’s change of address, not dated






PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
                                                       Inactive: USNR (DEP)     20010928 - 20011017       COG
          Active: None
Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 20011018              Date of Discharge: 20040730

Length of Service (years, months, days):

          Active: 0 2 0 8 24 (Does not exclude lost time.)
         Inactive: None

 Time Lost During This Period (days):
         Unauthorized absence: 17 day s
         Confinement:              None

Age at Entry: 1 9

Years Contracted: 4

Education Level: 9                                   AFQT: 64

Highest Rate: ATAN

Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: 2.5 ( 4 )     Behavior: 2.0 ( 5 )        OTA: 2.40

Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized, (as listed on the DD Form 214 ): National Defense Service Medal, Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal, Sea Service Deployment Ribbon .




Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/ MISCONDUCT, authority: MILPERSMAN, Article 1910-146, formerly Article 3630620 .
Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

0109 13 :  Pre-service enlistment waiver for failure to meet physical standard requirement by CO NRD San Antonio granted.

010918:  Pre-service enlistment waiver granted for two non-minor misdemeanors (crimin a l mischief x 1/probation violation x 1).
01 0 928:  Pre-service enlistment waiver granted for drug abuse (cocaine x 1).
040217:  Ap plicant to UA this date at 0600.

040219:  Applicant from UA (surrendered) this date at 0600 (2 day).

040318:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86: Unauthorized absence (040217).
         Award: Forfeiture of $301.00 per month for 1 month, extra duty for 14 days, reduction to E-2. Reduction to E-2 suspended for 6 months. No indication of appeal in the record.
040318:  Retention Warning: Advised of deficiency (Violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), Article 86 – Absence without leave.), notified of corrective actions and assistance available, advised of consequences of further deficiencies, and issued discharge warning.
040512:  Applicant to UA this date at 0600.

040513:  Applicant from UA (surrendered) this date at 0915 (1 day).

040714:  Applicant to UA this date at 1000.

040715:  Letter from FITWINGLANT to COMNAVAIRLANT, request for the Applicant’s administrative separation. [Entry extracted as “REF/A/” from COMNAVAIRLANT message dated 161626Z Jul 04].
040716 :  CNPC, directed the Applicant's discharge with an under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct, separation code HKK.



040730:  Applicant from UA (surrendered) this date at 0800 (16 days). Amplifying Remarks on Record of Unauthorized Absence NAVPERS 1070/606: Delivered to civilian authorities on charges and conviction in Juvenile and Domestic Relations District Court, Virginia Beach, Virginia. Assault and Battery (2 charges), disturbing the peace; violation of protection order. Ordered to serve 4 months in jail for each charge to run concurrent (12 months with 8 months suspended)(credited time served in brig). Member discharged in absentia this date. Authority COMNAVAIRLANT 161626ZJ UL 04.

Service Record did not contain the Administrative Discharge package.
Service Record was missing elements of the Summary of Service.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion
The Applicant was discharged on 20040730 by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (A and B) with a service characterization of under other than honorable conditions. After a thorough review of the available records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (E).
Propriety – Coerced into waiving his rights and denied counsel: The Applicant contends that his discharge should be upgraded because he was coerced into waiving his rights and that he was denied counsel . In the Applicant’s case, the Board could discern no impropriety or inequity and therefore considered the Applicant’s discharge proper and equitable. The available records contain no evidence of any wrongdoing by anyone involved in the discharge process. The Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs in the absence of persuasive evidence to the contrary. The statements and documents provided by the Applicant do not refute the presumption of regularity in this case. As such, this Board presumed that Applicant’s discharge was regular in all respects. Relief denied.

Equity – Family problems: The Applicant contends that his problems are due to a “toxic relationship” with his alcoholic wife. While he may feel that marital problems were the underlying cause of his misconduct, the record clearly reflects his willful misconduct and demonstrated he was unfit for further service. The evidence of record did not show that the Applicant was either not responsible for his conduct or that he should not be held accountable for his actions. Relief denied.

Mandatory processing for separation is required for Sailors who abuse illegal drugs. Separation under these conditions generally results in characterization of service under other than honorable conditions. The evidence of record does not demonstrate that the Applicant was not responsible for his conduct or that he should not be held accountable for his actions. Relief denied.

When the service of a member of the U.S. Navy has been honest and faithful, it is appropriate to characterize that service as honorable. An under other than honorable conditions discharge is warranted when significant negative aspects of a member’s conduct or performance of duty outweigh the positive aspects of the member’s military record. In addition to violating UCMJ Article 112a (wrongful use, possession, etc., of controlled substances), the Applicant’s service was marred by a retention warning and a nonjudicial punishment proceedings for violation of Article 86 (unauthorized absence) of the UCMJ. Violation of UCMJ Article 112a is considered a serious offense for which a punitive discharge is authorized if adjudged by special or general court martial. The Applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of his service, reflects his willful failure to meet the requirements of his contract with the U.S. Navy and falls far short of that required for an upgrade of his characterization of service. Relief is not warranted.

The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.
Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A . The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), re-issued October 2002, effective 22 Aug 2002 until 28 April 2005, Article 1910-146 (formerly 3630620), Separation by Reason of Misconduct - Drug Abuse .
B. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 112a (Wrongful use, possession, etc, of controlled substances).

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 502, Propriety .

 D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 503, Equity .

 E. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs .

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil ” .
The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
                   Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                   720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500828

    Original file (ND0500828.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests his characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. There is credible evidence in the record that the Applicant used illegal drugs. The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-01236

    Original file (MD04-01236.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The Applicant was discharged on 20040323 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct (A and B).

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600589

    Original file (ND0600589.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    040209: Pretrial agreement approved.Applicant from pretrial confinement (56 days).040210: Special Court Martial Charge I: violation of the UCMJ, Article 86: Specification: Did, on or about 030905, without authority, absent himself from his unit, to wit: VF-101, located at Virginia Beach, Virginia, and did remain so absent until he was apprehended on or about 031216. Sentence: Confinement for 75 days.040217: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge with the least favorable...

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0501084

    Original file (MD0501084.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). The factual basis for this recommendation was NAVDRUGLAB msg dated 040211 and Applicant’s conviction by summary court-martial conducted on 040512 for wrongful use of a controlled substance.040707: Applicant advised of rights and having elected not to consult with counsel, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500834

    Original file (ND0500834.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. “Propriety or Equity Issue(s): Commander never certified Administrative Separation Processing Notice as required by regulation.Statement: In accordance with 32 CFR § 724, and SECNAVINST 5420.174D, the Veterans of Foreign Wars submits to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) the above issue and following statement in supplement to the Applicant’s petitionMr. The...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0501465

    Original file (ND0501465.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USNR (DEP) 20000511 – 20001102 COG Active: None Period of Service Under Review :Date...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1001126

    Original file (ND1001126.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of service, reflects the Applicant’s willful failure to meet the requirements of conduct expected of all Sailors, especially one of his length of service, and falls short of what is required for an upgrade.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries and the administrative separation process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500706

    Original file (ND0500706.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND05-00706 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20050321. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). Always on time to work and respectful to all people.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500523

    Original file (ND0500523.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEWDECISIONAL DOCUMENT ex-SA, USN Docket No. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION Applicant notified that if separation is approved the least favorable characterization of service possible is under other than honorable conditions.040302: Applicant advised of rights and having consulted with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27(b), elected all rights, including administrative board.040302: Commanding...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700619

    Original file (ND0700619.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive: USNR (DEP) 19960111 - 19660324 Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 19960325 Years Contracted:; Extension: Date of Discharge: 19981203Length of Service: 2 Yrs 8Mths9 Dys Lost Time: Days UA: 89 Days...