Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500828
Original file (ND0500828.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

ex-ATAN, USN
Docket No. ND05-00828

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review was received on 20050413. The Applicant requests his characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. The Applicant did not list a representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20050811. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 1910-146, formerly Article 3630620.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as stated

Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application:

“My discharge was inequitable based solely on one incident in 39 months of service with no adverse action. The reason for requesting this change is because I now have a child. I would really love to provide a good life for her and further my education by receiving my MGI Bill.”
Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
Letter from Applicant dtd April 6, 2005 (2 pgs)
Reference Letter from Mr. J__ R. L__
Reference Letter from M___ T. T___ dtd March 1, 2005
Reference Letter from S__ A. B___ dtd April 3, 2005 (unsigned)

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Inactive: USNR (DEP)     000110 – 000203  ELS
         Inactive: USNR (DEP)     001211 – 001219  COG

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 001220               Date of Discharge: 040526

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 03 05 07
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 19                          Years Contracted: 4 (3 months extension)

 Education Level: 11                        AFQT: 58

 Highest Rate: AT3

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: 3.66 (3)             Behavior: 3.00 (3)                OTA: 3.33

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: Battle “E” Ribbon, National Defense Service Medal

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 1910-146, formerly 3630620.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

001211:  Waiver granted for prior DEP attrition (drugs).
040423:  NAVDRUGLAB, Jacksonville, FL, reported Applicant’s urine sample, received 040419, tested positive for THC.

040428:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 112a: Wrongful use of a controlled substance on 040414.
Award: Reduction to E-3. No indication of appeal in the record.

 040512:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge with the least favorable characterization of service under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.
040512:  Applicant advised of rights and having elected not to consult with qualified counsel, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation.
040512:  Commanding Officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (use).

040518:  COMNAVAIRLANT Norfolk, VA directed the Applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (use).

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 20040526 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (A). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (B and C).

 Normally, to permit relief, a procedural impropriety or inequity must have occurred during the discharge process for the period of enlistment in question. After a thorough review of Applicant’s records the Board discovered no impropriety or inequity. When the service of a member of the U.S. Navy has been honest and faithful, it is appropriate to characterize that service as honorable. A under other than honorable conditions discharge is warranted when significant negative aspects of a member's conduct or performance of duty outweigh the positive aspects of the member's military record. Despite a servicemember’s prior record of service, certain serious offenses, even though isolated, warrant separation from the naval service in order to maintain proper order and discipline. Nonjudicial punishment (NJP) for a violation of UCMJ Article 112a (wrongful use of a controlled substance) marred the Applicant’s service record, thus substantiating the misconduct for which he was separated. There is credible evidence in the record that the Applicant used illegal drugs. The evidence of record does not demonstrate that the Applicant was not responsible for his conduct or that he should not be held accountable for his actions. Mandatory processing for separation is required for sailors who abuse illegal drugs. Separation under these conditions generally results in characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Relief denied.

The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination on the propriety and equity of the discharge. The Applicant’s issue is without merit. Relief denied.

There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded, based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that should be provided to the Board include credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle, proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities. The Applicant stated, “I HAVE NOT used nor do I intend to ever again use illicit drugs”. He also provided three letters documenting his expertise and reliability while on active duty. Based on insufficient evidence and lack of sufficient post service factors, relief denied.

The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any other evidence related to his discharge at that time. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.


Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A . The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), re-issued October 2002, effective 22 Aug 2002 until Present, Article 1910-146 (formerly 3630620), Separation by Reason of Misconduct - Drug Abuse.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 502, Propriety .

 C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 503, Equity .

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT


If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil ” .

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
                   Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                   720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00209

    Original file (ND02-00209.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND02-00209 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020108, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at " afls10.jag.af.mil ".The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500706

    Original file (ND0500706.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND05-00706 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20050321. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). Always on time to work and respectful to all people.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00230

    Original file (ND02-00230.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Decision A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 020731. Appeal denied 010129.001211: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (use), misconduct due to commission of a serious offense, and misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct.001211: Applicant advised of his rights and having consulted with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to appear before an...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00213

    Original file (ND01-00213.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Two pages from applicant's service record PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: None Inactive: USNR (DEP) 971125 - 980126 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 980127 Date of Discharge: 981119 Length of Service (years, months, days):Active: 00 09 24 Inactive: None The applicant...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-01091

    Original file (ND02-01091.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:None PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USNR (DEP) 961209 - 970811 COG Active: None Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 970812 Date of Discharge: 010112 Length of Service (years, months, days):Active: 03 05 01 Inactive: None No indication of appeal in the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00283

    Original file (ND02-00283.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND02-00283 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020123, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions and the reason for the discharge be changed to RE-3 or RE-2. 001214: DD Form 214: Discharged Applicant under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (use), authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 1910-146.Note: The Applicant’s separation package is missing from the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0501104

    Original file (ND0501104.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable or general (under honorable conditions). 040622: DD Form 214: Applicant discharged under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse, authority: MILPERSMAN, Article 1910-146. The record contained evidence that he was properly notified for separation by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse with a least favorable characterization of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-01170

    Original file (ND02-01170.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Five pages from Applicant's service record Applicant's DD Form 214 Statement from Applicant, dated January 17. 010724: An Administrative Discharge Board, based upon a preponderance of the evidence and by unanimous vote, found that the Applicant had committed misconduct due to drug abuse, that the misconduct warranted separation, and recommended discharge under...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00210

    Original file (ND01-00210.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND01-00210 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 001211, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to Honorable. The Board determined, by the applicant’s own admission, he did not follow existing Navy directives, when going to Mexico. The applicant states he realizes he should have reported his friend for using steroids.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600623

    Original file (ND0600623.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Decisional Issue: Propriety – Coerced into waiving his rights Propriety – Denied defense counsel Equity – Family problems Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214 (Service 7)Applicant’s DD Form 293, Block 6 Continuation Sheet, (2 pages) Applicant’s DD Form 293, Block 8 Continuation Sheet Report of Medical Examination, dtd September 27, 2001 Prisoner/Detainee Special...