Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0601189
Original file (MD0601189.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
FOR
ex-, USMC
MD06-01189
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request:

 Application Received:                               20 060907
Characterization of Service:                      
Narrative Reason for Separation:                           INVOLUNTARY SEPARATION, MISCONDUCT
Discharge Authority :                                MARCORSEPMAN 6210.5 AND 6210.6
Last Duty Assignment/ Command at Discharge:       hqbn hqmc hh arlva

Applicant’s Request:    
         Characterization change to:              
         Narrative Reason change to:              
         Review Requested:                         
Representation:                                             

Applicant’s Issues :
 1.       Reenlistment code change
2.       Improper discharge
3.       Unfair discharge characterization due to record of service
Decision:

 By a vote of 5-0 the Characterization shall remain UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS .      
By a vote of 5-0 the Narrative Reason shall remain MISCONDUCT.

Date of Decision:                                            20 070809      
Location of Board:                                  Washington D.C.
Complete Service Record:                                    YES
Complete Medical Record:                           NO
Complete Discharge Package :                        YES

Regarding propriety, the Board found the discharge:      pROPER
Regarding equity, the Board found the discharge:         EQUITABLE

Issue 1: The Board does not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum regarding this issue.      

Issue 2 (Propriety ) : In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. Commission of a serious offense does not require adjudication by nonjudicial or judicial proceedings, or a civilian conviction; however, the offense must be substantiated by a preponderance of evidence. The statements and documents provided by the Applicant do not refute the presumption of regularity in this case. The evidence of record does not demonstrate that the Applicant was not responsible for his conduct or that he should not be held accountable for his action. The Applicant was provided the opportunity to present his case before an administrative board, but waived that right, thus accepting the discharge recommended in the letter of notification.

Issue 3 (Equity): There is credible evidence in th e record that the Applicant was involved with illegal drugs. Separation for involvement with illegal drugs generally results in characterization of service under other than honorable condition s. The record indicates that the Applicant admitted to purchasing illegal drugs with intent to distribute them . The evidence of record does not demonstrate that the Applicant was not responsible for his conduct , or that he should not be held accountable for his actions. When a Marine’s service has been honest and faithful, it is appropriate to characterize that service under honorable conditions. An under other than honorable conditions discharge is warranted when the reason for separation is behavior that constitutes a significant departure from conduct expected of a Marine, or negative aspects of a member’s conduct outweigh the positive aspects of the member’s military record . The Applicant’s conduct during the current period of service, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of his service was marred by involvement with illegal drugs and his commission of a serious offense in the civilian community fell within the criteria for discharge under other than honorable conditions. An upgrade to honorable would be inappropriate.

After a thorough review of the available evidence , to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Service Record Entries, Elements of Discharge and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found the Applicant’s discharge both proper and equitable . The Board did note some minor administrative corrections that should be made to the Applicant’s DD214 as listed below:


Summary of Service:

Prior Service:
 Inactive: USMCR (DEP)                               19941222 - 19950911      
Active:                                             19950912 - 19981021     

Period of Service Under Review:
 Date of Enlistment:                                 19981022
Years Contracted :                                   ; Extension:
Date of Discharge:                                  2000630
Length of Service
         Active:                                      01 Yrs 8 Mths 09 D ys (Does not exclude lost time)
Time Lost During This Period:                             
Education Level:                                   
Age at this Enlistment:                                    
AFQT:                                                 39
MOS:                                                  0121
Highest Rank:                                       
Proficiency/Conduct marks (# of occasions):               4.7 (11) / 4.6 (11)

Awards and Decorations (as listed on the DD Form 214):   (NASA) DISTINGUISHED SERVICE MEDAL, MERITORIOUS UNIT COMMENDATION, GOOD CONDUCT MEDAL, CERTIFICATE OF COMMENDATION (6 TH AWARD), LETTER OF APPRECIATION (2 ND AWARD), MERITORIOUS MAST

Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Narrative Reason for Separation

 19941221:        A pplicant signed Marine Corps policy concerning illegal drugs.
20000330:        Applicant arrested and charge d with possession of ecstasy with intent to distribute. Applicant admitted to the Baltimore Police that he purchased $2,100.00 of ecstasy with the intent to sell. Applicant is awaiting a court date from Baltimore County. [Extracted from Commanding Officer’s letter dated 20000523.]

 2000 0606:        Applicant evaluated as a result of a command referral for a drug related incident. Applicant does not appear to meet DSM-IV criteria for drug/alcohol abuse or dependency at this time. Recommend applicant be held strictly accountable for his actions and processed for administrative separation.

Elements of Discharge: [INVOLUNTARY]

 Date Notified:                                       20000426
Basis for Discharge:                                DUE TO
                                                      DUE TO
Least Favorable Characterization:                         
Commanding Officer’s Intended Recommendation:   

Date Applicant Responded to Notification:                 20000428
Rights Elected at Notification:
          Consult with Counsel                      
         Obtain Copies of Documents                
         Submit Statement(s) (date)                        
         Administrative Board                      

Commanding Officer Recommendation (date):        ( 20000523 )
SJA review (date):                                  ( 20000620 )
 Separation Authority (date):     COMMANDING GENERAL, MARINE CORPS BASE, QUANTICO, VA ( 20000620 )
 Narrative Reason directed:                                  MISCONDUCT DUE TO
Characterization directed:                                 
Date Applicant Discharged:                         20000630

Additional Information Considered by Board

 Type of d ocumentation submitted by t he Applicant and considered by the Board
        Document Type                                        #Pages
 Related to Period of Service Under Review :
         Service/Medical Record :                              18
         Other Period of Service:                                    0
Related to Post-Service Period:
          Community Service :                                   0
         Education :                                           0
         Employment :                                          0
         Health /Medical :                                       0
         Character Statements:                               0
         Criminal Records Checks:                                    0
         Additional Statements from Applicant:             4
Other Documentation (Describe Below)                      4

Total Number of Pages:                              26

D escription of Other Documentation:
        Circuit Court for Baltimore City, Order for Expungement of Records
          Circuit Court for Baltimore City, Criminal Division, General Waiver and Release
         Circuit Court for Baltimore City, Criminal Division, Certificate of Compliance
          Baltimore Police Department, Certificate of Compliance


Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16E), effective
31 January 1997 until 31 August 2001.

B . Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II , Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .
C. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 112a , Wrongful use, possession, etc., of controlled substances.

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant
Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provi ded the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years , has already been grante d a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.
Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employmen t / Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD . ” Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed .

Board Membership: The names and votes of the me mbers of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                                     Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
                                     Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                                     720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                                    Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0601133

    Original file (ND0601133.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Elements of Discharge: [INVOLUNTARY] Date Notified:20000620Reason for Discharge due to: Least Favorable Characterization: Date Applicant Responded to Notification: 20000620Rights Elected at Notification:Consult with Counsel Administrative Board Obtain Copies Submit Statement(s) (date)Recommendation of Commanding Officer (date): (20000627)Separation Authority (date):COMMANDER, NAVAL TRAINING CENTER, GREAT LAKES (20000705)Narrative reason directed:Characterization directed: Date Applicant...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0701254

    Original file (MD0701254.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall HOMOSEXUAL ACT.Discussion : either which the Board cannot form the basis of relief for the Applicant, or the Board does not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. Additionally, the Board has no authority to...

  • USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1000793

    Original file (MD1000793.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen...

  • USMC | DRB | 2013_Marine | MD1301752

    Original file (MD1301752.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2007_Navy | ND0700095

    Original file (ND0700095.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to: Applicant’s Issues:1. NOT FOUND IN RECORD Rights Elected at Notification: Consult with Counsel Obtain Copies of Documents Submit Statement(s) (date) Administrative Board GCMCA review Commanding Officer Recommendation (date): Separation Authority (date): NOT FOUND IN RECORDReason for discharge directed: Characterization directed: Date Applicant Discharged: 20000523 Types of Documents Submitted by Applicant and...

  • USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1100204

    Original file (MD1100204.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a...

  • USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0900402

    Original file (MD0900402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Reenlistment/RE-code : Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0601095

    Original file (ND0601095.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Elements of Discharge: [INVOLUNTARY] Discharge Process: NOT FOUND IN RECORDDate Notified:NOT FOUND IN RECORDReason for Discharge Least Favorable Characterization: Date Applicant Responded to Notification: NOT FOUND IN RECORDRights Elected at Notification:Consult with Counsel Administrative Board Obtain Copies Submit Statement(s) (date)GCMCA Review Recommendation of Commanding Officer (date): Discharge directed by (date):NOT FOUND IN RECORDNarrative reason directed:Characterization...

  • USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0801733

    Original file (MD0801733.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case by case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate previous in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.To warrant an upgrade based on clemency the Applicant’s post service efforts need to be more encompassing. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent...

  • USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1001924

    Original file (MD1001924.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Therefore, based on an administrative impropriety, the Board determined that the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain COMPLETION OF REQUIRED ACTIVE SERVICE. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. If a former member has been discharged for...