Upgrade.Vet

USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1001924

Original file (MD1001924.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-, USMC

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20100727

Characterization of Service Received:

Narrative Reason for Discharge:

Authority for Discharge: MARCORSEPMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
         Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service
Prior Service:
Inactive:         USMCR (DEP)       20000513 - 20000522     Active:

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 20000523     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Months
Date of Discharge: 20040522      H ighest Rank:
Length of Service : Y ea rs M on ths 00 D a ys
Education Level:        AFQT: 80
MOS: 0351
Proficiency/Conduct M arks (# of occasions): ( ) / ( )    Fitness Reports:

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      Rifle MM Pistol SS CAR SSDR (2) NDSM PUC

Periods of UA / CONF :

NJP: 2

- 20020225:      Article 111 (Drunken or reckless operation of motor vehicle, BAC 0.096 onboard MCB Camp Pendleton)
         Awarded: RIR FOP RESTR EPD Suspended: RIR (Vacated on 20020405)

- 20030121 :      Article 112a (Wrongful use of controlled substance, PCP, 72 ng/ml )
         Awarded: FOP RESTR EPD Suspended:

SCM: NONE        SPCM:    CC:

Retention Warning Counseling: 2

- 20020227 :      For driving under the influence of alcohol onboard MCB Camp Pendleton with a BAC of 0.096

- 20020405 :      For failing to check in for restriction with the battalion OOD on two occasions

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:          Service/Medical Record:          Other Records:
Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:
         Health/Medical Records:          Rehabilitation/Treatment:                 Criminal Records:
         Personal Documentation:          Community Service:                References:
         Department of VA letter:                  Other Documentation:
                  Additional Statements:
         From Applicant:          From/To Representation:          From/To Congress member:

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

1. Applicant contends he d eserves an upgrade , because he finished his eight-year contract with “honorable-like” actions .
2. Record of service warrants consideration for upgrade to Honorable.

Decision

Date: 20 1 1 1005 Location: Washington D.C . R epresentation : none

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .

Discussion

The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al a ffairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Board complete d a thorough review of the circumstances that led to his discharge and the discharge process to ensure his discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety. The Applicant’s record of service included 6105 counseling warnings and non-judicial punishments for o f the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article 111 (Drunken or reckless operation of motor vehicle, BAC 0.096 onboard MCB Camp Pendleton) and A rticle 112a (Wrongful use of controlled substance, PCP, 72 ng/ml) . The Applicant also had a pre-service drug waiver for using marijuana prior to entering the Marine Corps, and acknowledged his complete understanding of the Marine Corps Policy Concerning Illegal Use of Drugs on 1 May 2000 . The Applicant was allowed to complete his service contract, but because the average of his Proficiency and Conduct marks did not meet the requirements for his service to be characterized as Honorable, he was discharged with a G eneral ( U nder H onorable C onditions ) characterization of service.

: (Decisional) ( ). The NDRB discerned an impropriety in the discharge process (see summary) that warranted full relief; therefore, these Issues will not be addressed.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found The NDRB discerned impropriety in the assignment of 0.0 C onduct mark s on 20020407 and 20020819 for reductions in rank (RD) . According to Marine Corps regulations, a single reduction in rank does not warrant less than 2.0 C onduct marks. Two punitive reductions in rank can warrant 0.0 C onduct marks , h owever, there was no information found in the Applicant’s service record indicating he received two punitive reductions in rank. Although the Applicant received NJP on two occasions, he was only awarded a reduction in rank from one of them . Due to the improper assignment of 0.0 Conduct marking s , the Applicant’s average C onduct marks in service f e ll below the minimum required to receive an Honorable characterization. The NDRB recalculated the Applicant’s Conduct markings, and they rose to above the minimum level to receive an Honorable discharge at completion of required active service. Therefore, based on an administrative impropriety, the Board determined that the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain COMPLETION OF REQUIRED ACTIVE SERVICE.

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16F), effective 1 September 2001 until Present, Paragraph 1005, DISCHARGE FOR EXPIRATION OF ENLISTMENT OR FULFILLMENT OF SERVICE OBLIGATION .

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disable d American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1100326

Original file (MD1100326.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Based on the significant misconduct of record, and without the Applicant’s Pro/Con mark history, the NDRB determined that the Applicant’s command was justified in awarding him a General (Under Honorable Conditions) characterization of service upon separation.Issues 1-2: (Nondecisional) The Applicant seeks a discharge upgrade to increase employment opportunities and to obtain veteran education benefits. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the...
USMC | DRB | 2013_Marine | MD1301740

Original file (MD1301740.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD...
USMC | DRB | 2013_Marine | MD1300542

Original file (MD1300542.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Participation in the VEERP program does not exempt a Marine’s characterization of service from this requirement.Characterization of service at discharge is the recognition of a service member’s performance and conduct during a period of enlistment and is not necessarily dependent upon the narrative reason for separation. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at...
USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1002168

Original file (MD1002168.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT Applicant’s Issues 1. Due to the Applicant’s Pro/Con marks of 3.7/3.3, he received a General (Under Honorable Conditions) characterization of service upon completion of his required active service. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the...
USMC | DRB | 2013_Marine | MD1300410

Original file (MD1300410.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities.
USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1200542

Original file (MD1200542.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Although the Applicant completed his service obligation, his record of service included evidence of significant negative aspects, and his average Conduct marks did not meet the requirement to issue him an Honorable characterization. Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for...
USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0902572

Original file (MD0902572.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to...
USMC | DRB | 2014_Marine | MD1400139

Original file (MD1400139.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USMCR (DEP)20060119 - 20060124Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20060125Age at Enlistment: Period of Enlistment: Years MonthsDate of Discharge:20110730Highest Rank:Length of Service: Year(s)Month(s)06 Day(s)Education Level: AFQT:52MOS: 0311Proficiency/Conduct Marks (# of occasions):/Fitness Reports: Awards and Decorations (per DD 214):Rifle...
USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1100854

Original file (MD1100854.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. The Applicant’s statements alone do not overcome the government’s presumption of regularity in this case.Per the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, an Honorable characterization upon expiration of active service is appropriate when the quality of the Marine’s service has met the standards of accepted conduct and performance of duty for military personnel. ”...
USMC | DRB | 2013_Marine | MD1301470

Original file (MD1301470.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Relief denied.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain .The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1001924

Similar Decisions