Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0701254
Original file (MD0701254.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-LCPL, USMC
Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request
Application Received: 20070918
Characterization of Service Received:
Narrative Reason for Discharge: HOMOSEXUAL ACT
Authority for Discharge: MARCORSEPMAN 6207

Applicant’s Request:     Characterization change to:
                           Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
 Inactive: USMCR (DEP)     20000523 - 20000620             
Period of Service Under Review:
 Date of Enlistment: 20000621               Period of enlistment : 4 Years Months            Date of Discharge: 20020221
Length of Service : 01 Yrs 08 Mths   01 D ys         Education Level: 12      Age at Enlistment: 19     AFQT: 53
MOS: 0622             Highest Rank: LCPL                                
Proficiency/Conduct marks (# of occasions):      4.2 ( 2 ) / 4.2 ( 2 )
 Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214): SSDR, RIFLE EX

Periods of UA /Confinement :

NJPs :    

Retention Warnings: .


Types of Documents Submitted

 Related to Military Service:      DD 214:          Service and/or Medical Record:            Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:  
         Employment:                        Finances:                          Education /Training :     
         Health/Medical Records:           Substance Abuse:                           Criminal Records:       
         Family/Personal Status:                   Community Service:                References:              
        
Additional Statements From Applicant:             From Representat ion :              From Member of Congress:
Other Documentation (Describe)



DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

 1. Better career opportunities.

Decision

Date: 20 08 0131                      Location: Washington D.C         R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall HOMOSEXUAL ACT .
Discussion

 : either which the Board cannot form the basis of relief for the Applicant, or the Board does not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum regarding .

The Board reviews the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge individually, on a case-by-case basis. If such a review reveals an impropriety or inequity, relief is in order. Regulations permit relief on equitable grounds if the Applicant’s discharge is inconsistent with standards of discipline of the Naval service. There is credible evidence in the record that the Applicant committed or engaged in homosexual conduct. Federal law states that homosexual conduct is incompatible with military service. Any Marine who engages in homosexual conduct will be processed for separation from the Marine Corps. T he evidence of record does not demonstrate that the Applicant was not responsible for h is c onduct or that he should not be held accountable for h is actions. When a Marine’s service has been honest and faithful, it is appropriate to characterize that service under honorable conditions. A general (under honorable conditions ) discharge is warranted when significant negative aspects of a member’s conduct or performance of duty outweigh the positive aspects of the member’s military record. Engaging in or actively practicing homosexuality is incompatible with military service and is considered a negative mark on service. An upgrade or change would be inappropriate.
In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. The Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual (MCO P1900.16F), effective 1 Sep 2001 until Present, Paragraph 6207, HOMOSEXUAL CONDUCT.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .


ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

 Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000 . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provi ded the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years , has already been grante d a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

 Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.
Employmen t / Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD . ” Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

 Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
 Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0701261

    Original file (MD0701261.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    From Representation: From Member of Congress: Other Documentation (Describe) -Two statements from military immediate supervisors DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT Applicant’s Issues 1. There is credible evidence in the record that the Applicant committed homosexual acts and engaged in homosexual conduct. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record,...

  • USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0801251

    Original file (MD0801251.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s Request: Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Summary of ServicePrior Service: Inactive: USMCR (DEP)20060501 - 20060515Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 20060516Period of Enlistment: Years MonthsDate of Discharge:20061218Length of Service: Yrs Mths02 DysEducation Level: Age at Enlistment:AFQT: 71MOS: 0311Highest Rank: Fitness Reports: Proficiency/Conduct Marks (# of occasions): 4.2/4.2 (NFIR)Awards and Decorations (per DD 214): Rifle:...

  • USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0800298

    Original file (MD0800298.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is credible evidence in the record that the Applicant committed homosexual acts and engaged in homosexual conduct. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-00796

    Original file (MD04-00796.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant reported that he has and would engage in homosexual acts on his personal and private time away from the base and military personnel. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214 Memorandum from the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Personnel and Readiness), undated DoD Policy on Homosexual Conduct, Training Plan (20 pages) PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service...

  • USMC | DRB | 2008_Marine | MD0800822

    Original file (MD0800822.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Awarded - ,, Susp - 6105 Counseling: 20000301: For anterior cruciate ligament tear/failure to improve and follow prescribed medical treatment.. Types of Documents SubmittedRelated to Military Service: DD 214: Service and/or Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Substance Abuse: Criminal Records: Family/Personal Status: Community Service: References: Additional Statements From Applicant: From...

  • USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0701260

    Original file (MD0701260.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Pertinent Regulation/Law A. ” Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. Additionally, the Board has no authority to...

  • USMC | DRB | 2013_Marine | MD1301307

    Original file (MD1301307.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: Pertinent Regulation/Law A. Given the detailed documents...

  • USMC | DRB | 2012_Marine | MD1201128

    Original file (MD1201128.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    By a vote of the Reentry Code shall RE-1A.Discussion The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted.In reviewing discharges, the NDRB presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. Given the detailed...

  • USMC | DRB | 2013_Marine | MD1301296

    Original file (MD1301296.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Therefore, the NDRB determined the Applicant’s separation code of HRB1, reenlistment code, and narrative reason of Homosexual Admission were proper at the time of discharge. The NDRB presumed that the Applicant’s separation by reason of Homosexual Admission in accordance with paragraph 6207 of the MARCORSEPMAN was proper and equitable at the time it was issued.In accordance with the 20 September 2011 Under Secretary of Defense (Personnel & Readiness) memorandum regarding the repeal of the...

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-01017

    Original file (MD03-01017.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Applicant also advised that the command was recommending a General (Under Honorable Conditions) but that the least favorable characterization of service could be Under Other Than Honorable Conditions. 020514: Applicant requests for a conditional waiver to an Administrative Board provided she receives a General characterization of service.