Upgrade.Vet

USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0601157

Original file (MD0601157.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-, USMC
MD06-01157

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request:

Application Received:                               20 060829
Characterization of Service:
Narrative Reason for Separation:
Discharge Authority :                                MARCORSEPMAN 6210.5
Last Duty Assignment/ Command at Discharge:       hqbn 2dmardiv camlej nc

Applicant’s Request:
         Characterization change to:
         Narrative Reason change to:
         Review Requested:
Representation:                                              STATE VETERAN’S AFFAIRS REP

Applicant’s issues:
1. Processed for separation after my original EAS date.
2. Unjust punishment and unfair discharge characterization due to record of service.
3. Post service.

Decision:

By a vote of the Characterization shall change to GENERAL ( UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS )
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall MISCONDUCT

Date of Decision:                                            200707 0802
Location of Board:                                  Washington D.C.
Complete Service Record:                                    YES
Complete Medical Record:                           YES
Complete Discharge Package:                        YES
Regarding propriety, the Board found the discharge:      IM PROPER
Regarding equity, the Board found the discharge:         EQUITABLE

Issue 1 ( Propriety ). The Board reviews the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge individually, on a case-by-case basis. If such a review reveals an impropriety or inequity, relief is in order. Regulations permit relief on equitable grounds if the Applicant’s discharge is inconsistent with standards of discipline of the Naval service. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant . The NDRB review ed all of the available records , supporting documents, facts, e lements of d ischarge , evidence submitted by the Applicant , and circumstances unique to this case . A particular circumstance was the administrative discharge procedure that was completed after the Applicant’s end of obligated service date. A general discharge upon EAS should be awarded for Marines with average proficiency marks below 3.0 and average conduct marks
below 4.0. An honorable characterization of service may be granted if the Marine’s service is otherwise so meritorious that any other characterization would clearly be inappropriate. The NDRB noted that th ere was an impropriet y in the Applicant’s discharge action and is convinced that this procedural error was prejudicial to the Applicant . T herefore an inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service did occur.

Issue 2 (Equity). There is credible evidence in the record that the Applicant used illegal drugs. Mandatory processing for separation is required for Marines who abuse illegal drugs. Separation under these conditions generally results in characterization of service under other than honorable conditions. The record indicates that he did not dispute his drug use. The evidence of record does not demonstrate that the Applicant was not responsible for his conduct or that he should not be
held accountable for his actions. When a Marine’s service has been honest and faithful, it is appropriate to characterize that service under honorable conditions. An under other than honorable conditions discharge is warranted when significant negative aspects of a member’s conduct or performance of duty outweigh the positive aspects of the member’s military record. Despite a Marine’s prior record of service, certain serious offenses, even though isolated, warrant separation from the Naval service in order to maintain proper order and discipline. The Applicant’s service was marred by two retention warnings and violations of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), Article 86, 92, and 112a. Violation of UCMJ Article s 92, Failure to obey order, regulation and Article 1 12a are considered serious offense s for which a punitive discharge is authorized if adjudged by a Special or General Courts Martial. An upgrade to honorable would be inappropriate.

Issue 3 (Equity). The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. However, there is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge, may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in the civilian life subsequent to leaving the service. Normally, to permit relief, a procedural impropriety or inequity must have been found to have existed during the period of enlistment in question. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered. The Applicant provided three character references and one letter from his current employer as documentation of post-service accomplishments. The Applicant's efforts need to be more encompassing. For example, the Applicant could have produced evidence of continuing educational pursuits, a verifiable employment record, documentation of community service, evidence of drug free existence, and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities. The Board determined that the documentation provided by the Applicant did not mitigate the misconduct that resulted in the characterization of discharge.

In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Service Record Entries, Medical Record Entries, Elements of Discharge and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found the Applicant’s discharge proper and equitable.

Summary of Service:

Prior Service:
Inactive: USMCR (DEP)              20010324 - 20010923

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Enlistment:                                 20010924
Years Contracted :                                   ; Extension:
Date of Discharge:                                  20051028
Length of Service
         Active:                                     04 Yrs 01 Mths 0 4 D ys (Does not exclude lost time)

Time Lost During This Period:                      55
Days UA:                                             25
Days Confinement:                                   30

Education Level:
Age at this Enlistment:
AFQT:                                                 38
MOS:                                                  3531
Highest Rank:

Proficiency/Conduct marks (# of occasions):               4.0 (1) / 2.9 (1)

Awards and Decorations (as listed on the DD Form 214):   MARINE CORPS GOOD CONDUCT MEDAL , COMBAT ACTION RIBBON (2nd AWARD, IRAQ CAMPAIGN MEDAL, GLOBAL WAR ON TERRORISM MEDAL, SEA SERVICE DEPLOYMENT RIBBON (3 ^rd AWARD), GLOBAL WAR ON TERRORISM EXPEDITIONARY MEDAL, NATIONAL DEFENSE SERVICE MEDAL, PRESIDENTIAL UNIT CITATION, RIFLE QUALIFICATION BADGE.

Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Narrative Reason for Separation

20010322:         Applicant briefed on and certified understanding of Marine Corps policy concerning illegal use of drugs.

20020826 :        NJP for violation(s) of UCMJ:
         Article 86 : On or about 0730, 20020726 became absent from his appointed place of duty until on or about 1030, 20020819 (25 days) .
         Article 92 : On or about 1200, 20020728 fail to obey a lawful order via telephone by SSgt to return immediately.
         Award: Forfeiture of $ 289 .00 for 1 month , restriction and extra duty for 14 days. Forfeiture of $289.00 and restriction for 14 days suspended for 3 months.
         Not appealed.

20020904:        Counseling: Advised of deficiencies in performance and conduct c oncerning my violation of Article 86 of t he UCMJ. Specifically my period of unauthorized absence from 0730 on 20020726 until 1030 on 20020819. I proceeded UA due to family problems with my parents at home. I did not make it known to my chain of command that these personal problems existed prior to going into UA status . N ecessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.

20021002:        Counseling: Advised of deficiencies in performance and conduct . M y failure to return from special liberty at the directed time of accountability muster. Specifically on 0800 20021012. The Columbus Day special liberty period commenced with a company formation during which the Company Commander directed all personnel to ensure that they were present at return accountability muster at 1630 on 20021015. I failed to do so. I offered nothing which was accepted as a matter of mitigation or extenuation and was found to be in violation of Article 92 of the UCMJ. N ecessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.

20050602 :         NAVDRUGLAB, Jacksonville, FL, reported Applicant’s urine sample, received 20050527, tested positive for THC.

20050920:        Charges preferred for violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) Article 112a: On or about 20050621, wrongfully use marijuana.

20050920:        Charges referred to summary court-martial.

20050921:        Applicant refused treatment from Substance Abuse Rehabilitation Program, Naval hospital Camp Lejeune .

200 5 092 3 :        Summary Court-Martial .
         Charge: V iolation of the UCMJ, Article 112a:
         Specification: On or about 20050721, wrongfully use marijuana .
         Finding: To Charge and the specification thereunder, guilty.
         Sentence: Forfeiture of $823.00, confinement for 30 days, reduction to E-1.
         CA action 20050923: Sentence approved and ordered executed.

20050923:        Applicant to confinement at the Camp Lejeune Base Brig.

20051025:        Counseling: Advised of deficiencies in performance and conduct concerning your wrongful use of controlled substance, THC, per NAVDRUGLAB JACKSONVILLE FL MSG DTD 021813z June 2005. Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, and advised being processed for administrative discharge action.

Elements of Discharge: [INVOLUNTARY]

Date Notified:                                       20051005
Basis for Discharge:     DUE TO

Least Favorable Characterization:
Commanding Officer’s Intended Recommendation:

Date Applicant Responded to Notification:                 20051005
Rights Elected at Notification:
         Consult with Counsel
         Obtain Copies of Documents
         Submit Statement(s) (date)                         ( 20050920 )
         Administrative Board                       WAIVED

Commanding Officer Recommendation (date):        ( 2005 10 11 )
SJA review (date):                                  ( 20051020 )
Separation Authority (date):     COMMANDING GENERAL, 2D MARINE DIVISION (REAR) II MARINE EXPEDITIONARY FORCE ( 200 510 25 )
Narrative Reason directed:                                  MISCONDUCT DUE TO
Characterization directed:
Date Applicant Discharged:                         20051028

Additional Information Considered by Board

Type of d ocumentation submitted by t he Applicant and considered by the Board

        Document Type                                        #Pages
Related to Period of Service Under Review :
         Service/Medical Record :                            8
         Other Period of Service:                                    0
Related to Post-Service Period:
         Community Service :                                   0
         Education :                                           0
         Employment :                                          1
         Health /Medical :                                     0
         Character Statements:                               5
         Criminal Records Checks:                                    0
         Additional Statements from Applicant:             2
Other Documentation (Describe Below)                      0

Total Number of Pages:                            16

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. The Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16F), effective 01 Sep 2001 until Present, Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs, Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity.

C. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, .Article 112a, Wrongful use, possession, etc., of a controlled substance.

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employmen t / Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD.” Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                                    Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
                                    Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                                    720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                                    Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0601043

Original file (MD0601043.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-PFC, USMCMD006-01043Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request: Application Received: 20060807Narrative Reason for Separation: Character of Service: Discharge Authority: MARCORSEPMAN 6419Last Duty Assignment/Command at Discharge: 2DTSBN 2DFSSG USMARFORLANTApplicant’s Request:Narrative Reason change to: NONE REQUESTEDCharacterization change to:Review Requested:Representation: NONE Decision: Date of Decision: 20070614Location of Board: Washington D.C.Complete Service Record: YESComplete...
USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0601131

Original file (MD0601131.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Commanding Officer’s Intended Recommendation: Record Supports Narrative Reason: YESDate Applicant Responded to Notification: 20050405Rights Elected at Notification: Consult with Counsel Obtain Copies Submit Statement(s) (date) Administrative Board Administrative Board Date : 20050805 Findings, by preponderance of the evidence: BYMAJORITY VOTE: DUE TO A PATTERN OF MISCONDUCT BYMAJORITY VOTE: SEPARATION IS WARRANTED Recommendation on Separation: BYMAJORITY VOTE: Recommendation on...
USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0601024

Original file (MD0601024.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-PFC, USMCMD06-01024Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request: Application Received: 20060728Narrative Reason for Separation: MISCONDUCT Character of Service:Discharge Authority: MARCORSEPMAN 6210.3Last Duty Assignment/Command at Discharge: HEADQUARTERS AND HEADQUARTERS SQUADRON, MCAS CHERRY POINTApplicant’s Request:Narrative Reason change to: NONE REQUESTEDCharacterization change to:Review Requested:Representation: Decision: Date of Decision: 20070628 Location of Board: Washington...
USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0601128

Original file (MD0601128.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Summary of Service: Inactive: USMCR (DEP) 20010817 - 20010916 Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 20010917Years Contracted:; Extension: Date of Discharge: 20040416Length of Service Active: 02 Yrs 07Mths00 Dys (Does not exclude lost time) Time Lost During This Period: Education Level: Age at this Enlistment: AFQT: 43 MOS: 3043Highest Rank: Proficiency/Conduct marks (# of occasions): NONE FOUND IN RECORDAwards and Decorations (as listed on the DD Form 214):RIFLE...
USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0601122

Original file (MD0601122.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-PVT, USMC MD06-01122Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request: Application Received: 20060822Characterization of Service: UNDER Narrative Reason for Separation: Discharge Authority: MARCORSEPMAN PAR 6210.3Last Duty Assignment/Command at Discharge: VMGR-252 MAG-14 2DMAWApplicant’s Request: Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Review Requested: Representation: Decision: Date of Decision: 20070706 Location of Board: Washington D.C.Complete Service Record: YES Complete...
USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700038

Original file (MD0700038.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Record of service. (2005001219) SJA review (date): (20060309)Separation Authority (date): COMMANDING GENERAL, 1 ST MARINE DIVISION (REIN) (20060313) Basis for discharge directed: due to: Characterization directed: Date Applicant Discharged: 20060317 Additional Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered By BoardTotal Number of Pages: 5 Related to Period of Service Under Review: From Service and/or Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Other Period(s) of Service: From Service and/or...
USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0601075

Original file (MD0601075.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-PFC, USMCMD06-01075Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request: Application Received: 20060808Narrative Reason for Separation: MISCONDUCTCharacter of Service:Discharge Authority: MARCORSEPMAN 6210.3Last Duty Assignment/Command at Discharge: mwss 172 mwsg 17 1stmaw okinawa jaApplicant’s Request:Narrative Reason change to: NONE REQUESTEDCharacterization change to:Review Requested:Representation: Decision: Date of Decision:20070628Location of Board: Washington D.C.Complete Service...
USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0601155

Original file (MD0601155.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Suspended for 6months.Not appealed.19991101: Administrative separation under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct was approved by CG, 2dFSSG. 20000209: NJP for violation(s) of UCMJ: Article 86: UA (AWOL) from 1301, 20000121 to 0945, 20000202 (11 days). 20000214: Vacation of suspended administrative separation under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct.
USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600251

Original file (MD0600251.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable.The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. When the service of a member of the U.S. Marine Corps has been honest and faithful, it is appropriate to characterize that service as honorable. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil ” .The names, and votes of the members of the Board...
USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0601151

Original file (MD0601151.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

You have four months from this date to reduce your weight to 214 lbs, or below and/or reduce your body fat to 18% or below; however you may also raise your PFT to a first class score while maintaining 22% or less body fat percentage within the time period to be removed from the program. Elements of Discharge: [INVOLUNTARY] Date Notified: 20050615Basis for Discharge:WEIGHT CONTROL FAILURELeast Favorable Characterization: Commanding Officer’s Intended Recommendation: Record Supports Narrative...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0601157

Similar Decisions