Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0601024
Original file (MD0601024.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-PFC, USMC
MD06-01024

 Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request :

Application Received:                               20 060728
Narrative Reason for Separation:                           MISCONDUCT
Character of Service:                               
Discharge Authority :                                MARCORSEPMAN 6210.3
Last Duty Assignment/ Command at Discharge:       HEADQUARTERS AND HEADQUARTERS SQUADRON , MCAS CHERRY POINT

Applicant’s Request:
          Narrative Reason change to:               NONE REQUESTED      
         Characterization chang e to:               
         Review Requested :                          
Representation:                                             


Decision:

Date of Decision:                                            200706 28
Location of Board:                                  Washington D.C.
 Complete Service Record:                                    YES
Complete Medical Record:                           YES
Complete Discharge Package:                        YES
Regarding propriety, the Board found the discharge:      IM
Regarding equity, the Board found the discharge:         IN EQUITABLE

 By a vote of 4-1 the Characterization shall change to HONORABLE
By a vote of 4-1 the Narrative Reason shall change to COMPLETION OF REQUIRED ACTIVE SERVICE
                                                     


Summary of Service :

Prior Service:
 Inactive: USMC R (DEP)                               19991228 - 20000820
Active: NONE
Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment:                                 20000821
Years Contracted :                                   ; 1 MONTH EXTENSION
Date of Discharge:                                  20050920
Length of Service:                                  05 Yrs 01 Mos 00 Days Does not exclude lost time, if any.
Time Lost During This Period:                     


Education Level:                                   
Age at this Enlistment:                                    
AFQT:                                                 65
MOS:                                                   6336
Highest Rate/Rank:                                   SGT

Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):
 P roficiency :                                         4. 4 (11)
Conduct :                                              4.2 (11)

Fitness reports were available to the board for review for service as E-5/Sergeant or higher:

Awards and Decorations (as listed on the DD Form 214):
MARINE CORPS GOOD CONDUCT MEDAL, SEA SERVICE DEPLOYMENT RIBBON (2 ND AWARD), GLOBAL WAR ON TERRORISM SERVICE MEDAL, NATIONAL DEFENSE SERVICE MEDAL, NAVY UNIT COMMENDATION, RIFLE EXPERT BADGE (4 TH AWARD), PISTOL SHARPSHOOTER BADGE AND LETTER OF APPRECIATION


Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Narrative Reason for Separation

20031230 :        NJP for violation(s) of UCMJ:
          Article 86 : Absence without leave.
          Article 92 : Failure to obey order or regulation.
         Article 134: Drunkenness incapacitation for the performance of duties.
          Award: Forfeiture of $ 832 for 2 months, restriction and extra duty for 45 days , reduction to E-4. Forfeiture, restriction and extra duty suspended.
         Not appealed.
20031230:        Counseling: Advised of deficiencies in performance and conduct . Your nonjudicial punishment awarded 20031230. N ecessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.

 20040402:        Forfeiture of pay , re striction and extra duty award ed at NJP on 20031203 vacated due to violation of Article 107 on or about 20040317.

20040901:        Counseling: Advised of deficiencies in performance and conduct . Your failure to follow an order and malingering on 20040717. N ecessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.

20041103 :        NJP for violation(s) of UCMJ:
          Article 92 : Failure to obey an order on 20041006.
         Article 86 : Unauthorized absence on 20041026.
         Award: Forfeiture of $ 703 for 2 months, restriction for 30 days , reduction to E-3. Forfeiture for 1 month suspended.
         Appealed: 20041109. Appeal denied: 20041202.

20041103:        Counseling: Advised of deficiencies in performance and conduct . Y our nonjudicial punishment held on 20041103 for violations of the UCMJ, Article 86 and Article 92. N ecessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.
20050108:        Forfeiture of pay awarded at NJP on 20041103 vacated.

20050203 :        NJP for violation(s) of UCMJ:
          Article 92 (3 specs) :
         Specification 1: Departed barracks 431 without signing the Liberty Log Book on 20050107.
         Specification 2: Departed MCAS Futenma without a Liberty Buddy at Okinawa Japan on 20050107.
         Specification 3: Wrongfully remained on off base liberty between the hours of 2400 and 0500 on 20050107.
          Award: Forfeiture of $ 692 for 2 month s , restriction and extra duty for 45 days , reduction to E-2. Forfeiture suspended for 6 months.
         Not a ppealed.
20050203:        Counseling: Advised of deficiencies in performance and conduct . Your nonjudicial punishment held on 20050203. N ecessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, and advised being processed for administrative discharge action.


Elements of Discharge: [ IN VOLUNTARY]

FIRST Package
Discharge Process :                                 
Date Notified:                                       20050102
Basis for Discharge:                                MISCONDUCT DUE TO A PATTERN OF MISCONDUCT

Least Favorable Characterization:                         
Commanding Officer’s Intended Recommendation:   
Record Supports Narrative Reason:                          YES
Date Applicant Responded to Notification:                 20050104
Rights Elected at Notification:
 Consult with Counsel                      
Administrative Board                      
Obtain Copies                             
Submit Statement(s)                       
Recommendation of Commanding Officer (date)      GENERAL (UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS) 20050127

SECOND Package
 Date Notified :                                        20050422
Basis for Discharge :                                MISCONDUCT DUE TO A PATTERN OF MISCONDUCT

Least Favorable Characterization:                         
Commanding Officer’s Intended Recommendation :    UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE C ONDITIONS
Record Supports Narrative Reason :                          YES
Date Applicant R esponded to N otification:                 2005042 6
Rights E lected at N otification :
Consult with Counsel                      
Administrative Board                      
Obtain Copies                             
Submit Statement(s)                       

Administrative Board Date:                         20050630
Findings and Recommendations :                     
Basis for Discharge Supported:                     ; ; Vote: 3 TO 0
Separation Warranted:                               ; Vote: 3 TO 0
Recommend ation Regarding Separation:              ;
Recommendation Regarding Characterization:       ; V ote: 3 TO 0

Recommendation of Commanding Officer (date):     UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS ( 20050506 )
SJA review (date):                                   ( 20050806 )
Discharge directed by (date):                       COMMANDING GENERAL ( 20060806 )
Narrative reason directed :                                   MISCONDUCT DUE TO A PATTERN OF MISCONDUCT
Characterization directed:                                  (UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS)
Date Applicant Discharged:                         200509 2 0


Additional Information Considered by Board

 Type of d ocumentation submitted by t he Applicant and considered by the Board
        Document Type                                        #Pages
 Related to Period of Service Under Review :
          Service/Medical Record :                              3
         Other Period of Service:                                    6
Related to Post-Service Period:
          Community Service :                                   0
         Education :                                           8
         Employment :                                          0
         Health /Medical :                                       0
         Character Statements:                               1
         Criminal Records Checks:                                    0
         Additional Statements from Applicant:             9
Other Documentation      (Describe Below)                 3

Total Number of Pages:                              30

D escription of Other Documentation:
Stars and Stripes newspaper articles on sporting event participation

Applicant’s Issues, as summarized by the Board:
 1. Im proper discipline and improper administrative separation procedures.

Decisional Issues:
 The Board accepted Issue 1 f or consideration.
Issue 1 ( Propriety /Equity ). The Applicant implies that h e was improperly disciplined for an offense. The government enjoys a presumption of regularity in the conduct of its affairs. The Applicant bears the burden of overcoming this presumption through the presentation of substantial and credible evidence to support his issue. There is no evidence in the record, nor has the Applicant produced any evidence, to support the contention that the command unfairly singled him out for discipline . The Applicant’s statements alone do not overcome the government’s presumption of regularity in this case.

The Board reviews the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge individually, on a case-by-case basis. If such a review reveals an impropriety or inequity, relief is in order. Regulations permit relief on equitable grounds if the Applicant’s discharge is inconsistent with standards of discipline of the Naval service. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant . The NDRB review ed all of the available records , supporting documents, facts, e lements of d ischarge , evidence submitted by the Applicant , and circumstances unique to this case . A particular circumstance of interest was the apparent enlistment extension for one month. This extension was clearly initiated by the command to allow for further time for administrative discharge proceedings. The NDRB noted that there w ere impropriet ies in the Applicant’s discharge action , is convinced that this procedural error was prejudicial to the Applicant, and therefore an inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service did occur. R elief approved


Minority Opinion

 None

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. The Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16F), effective 01 Sep 2001 until Present, Paragraph 10 04 , CHARACTERIZATION OF SERVICE .
B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs, Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity.


ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant
Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil ” .

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment / Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/ RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD.” Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                                    Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
                                     Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                                     720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                                    Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0601075

    Original file (MD0601075.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ex-PFC, USMCMD06-01075Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request: Application Received: 20060808Narrative Reason for Separation: MISCONDUCTCharacter of Service:Discharge Authority: MARCORSEPMAN 6210.3Last Duty Assignment/Command at Discharge: mwss 172 mwsg 17 1stmaw okinawa jaApplicant’s Request:Narrative Reason change to: NONE REQUESTEDCharacterization change to:Review Requested:Representation: Decision: Date of Decision:20070628Location of Board: Washington D.C.Complete Service...

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0601155

    Original file (MD0601155.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Suspended for 6months.Not appealed.19991101: Administrative separation under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct was approved by CG, 2dFSSG. 20000209: NJP for violation(s) of UCMJ: Article 86: UA (AWOL) from 1301, 20000121 to 0945, 20000202 (11 days). 20000214: Vacation of suspended administrative separation under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct.

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0601122

    Original file (MD0601122.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ex-PVT, USMC MD06-01122Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request: Application Received: 20060822Characterization of Service: UNDER Narrative Reason for Separation: Discharge Authority: MARCORSEPMAN PAR 6210.3Last Duty Assignment/Command at Discharge: VMGR-252 MAG-14 2DMAWApplicant’s Request: Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to: Review Requested: Representation: Decision: Date of Decision: 20070706 Location of Board: Washington D.C.Complete Service Record: YES Complete...

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0601128

    Original file (MD0601128.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Summary of Service: Inactive: USMCR (DEP) 20010817 - 20010916 Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 20010917Years Contracted:; Extension: Date of Discharge: 20040416Length of Service Active: 02 Yrs 07Mths00 Dys (Does not exclude lost time) Time Lost During This Period: Education Level: Age at this Enlistment: AFQT: 43 MOS: 3043Highest Rank: Proficiency/Conduct marks (# of occasions): NONE FOUND IN RECORDAwards and Decorations (as listed on the DD Form 214):RIFLE...

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0601073

    Original file (MD0601073.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Elements of Discharge: [REQUESTED BY MEMBER] Discharge Process:Date Member Requested Separation:20010807Member Requested Separation Due To: Characterization Requested: member Recognized Least Favorable:Recommendation of Commanding Officer (date): , (UNDATED) SJA review (date): (20010813)Discharge directed by (date): COMMANDER, 2D MARINE AIRCRAFT WING, CHERRY POINT, NC (20010813)Narrative reason directed:IN LIEU OF TRIAL BY COURT MARTIALCharacterization directed: Date Applicant...

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0601151

    Original file (MD0601151.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    You have four months from this date to reduce your weight to 214 lbs, or below and/or reduce your body fat to 18% or below; however you may also raise your PFT to a first class score while maintaining 22% or less body fat percentage within the time period to be removed from the program. Elements of Discharge: [INVOLUNTARY] Date Notified: 20050615Basis for Discharge:WEIGHT CONTROL FAILURELeast Favorable Characterization: Commanding Officer’s Intended Recommendation: Record Supports Narrative...

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0601125

    Original file (MD0601125.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    20010501: Applicant from unauthorized absence 0800 (surrendered).20010806: NJP for violation(s) of UCMJ: Article 86: UA (AWOL) from 0730, 20010301 to 0123, 20010502, Award: Forfeiture of $584.00 for 2 months, extra duty for 45 days. UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS (20020808) SJA review (date): (20020814)Separation Authority (date): COMMANDING GENERAL, 2D FORCE SERVICE SUPPORT GROUP (20020816)Narrative Reason directed: MISCONDUCT DUE TO A Characterization directed: Date Applicant...

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600251

    Original file (MD0600251.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable.The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. When the service of a member of the U.S. Marine Corps has been honest and faithful, it is appropriate to characterize that service as honorable. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil ” .The names, and votes of the members of the Board...

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0601157

    Original file (MD0601157.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Narrative Reason for Separation 20010322:Applicant briefed on and certified understanding of Marine Corps policy concerning illegal use of drugs.20020826: NJP for violation(s) of UCMJ: Article 86: On or about 0730, 20020726 became absent from his appointed place of duty until on or about 1030, 20020819 (25 days). (20051011) SJA review (date): (20051020)Separation Authority (date): COMMANDING GENERAL, 2D MARINE DIVISION (REAR)...

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600684

    Original file (MD0600684.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Appeal denied 950906.970725: Counseling: Advised of deficiencies in performance and conduct (Failure to obey a lawful order when told to send his wife a child support payment on 970715. Appeal denied 970910.970929: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86: UA from a BN muster at 2145, 970922.Violation of UCMJ, Article 92 (8 specifications): Failure to obey order,...