Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0601128
Original file (MD0601128.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-, USMC
MD06-01128

 Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request :

Application Received:                               20 060823
Characterization of Service:                      
Narrative Reason for Separation:                          
Discharge Authority :                                MARCORSEPMAN 6210.3
Last Duty Assignment/ Command at Discharge:       hqbn, 2dma R div camplej, nc

Applicant’s Request:    
         Characterization change to:              
         Narrative Reason change to:              
         Review Requested:                         
Representation:                                             


Decision:

 Date of Decision:                                            20070712      
Location of Board:                                  Washington D.C.
Complete Service Record:                                    YES
Complete Medical Record:                           YES
Complete Discharge Package:                        YES
Regarding propriety, the Board found the discharge:      PROPER
Regarding equity, the Board found the discharge:         EQUITABLE

By a vote of the Characterization shall UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall MISCONDUCT

Applicant’s Issues, as summarized by the Board:
 1. Improve employment opportunities.
2. Reenlistment opportunity.
 3. Troubles have resolved since leaving the military.
 4 . Post service.


Summary of Service:

Prior Service:
 Inactive: USMCR (DEP)                               20010817 - 20010916               
Active:

Period of Service Under Review:
 Date of Enlistment:                                 20010917
Years Contracted :                                   ; Extension:
Date of Discharge:                                  20040416
Length of Service
          Active:                                      02 Yrs 07 Mths 00 D ys (Does not exclude lost time)
         
Time Lost During This Period:                     

Education Level:                                   
Age at this Enlistment:                                    
AFQT:                                                 43
MOS:                                                  3043
Highest Rank:                                       

Proficiency/Conduct marks (# of occasions):               NONE FOUND IN RECORD

Awards and Decorations (as listed on the DD Form 214): RIFLE QUALIFICATION BADGE (MARKSMAN)




Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Narrative Reason for Separation

20030521 :        NJP for violation(s) of UCMJ:
          Article 123a ( 6 specs) :
          Specification 1: On or about 20021203, wrongfully utter a certain check in the amount of $121.57 and did not have sufficient funds in the account for payment.
         Specification 2: On or about 20021203, wrongfully utter a certain check in the amount of $5.23 and did not have sufficient funds in the account for payment.
         Specification 3: On or about 20030418, wrongfully utter a certain check in the amount of $200.00 and did not have sufficient funds in the account for payment.
         Specification 4: On or about 20030418, wrongfully utter a certain check in the amount of $200.00 and did not have sufficient funds in the account for payment.
         Specification 5: On or about 20030419, wrongfully utter a certain check in the amount of $200.00 and did not have sufficient funds in the account for payment.
         Specification 6: On or about 20030421, wrongfully utter a certain check in the amount of $200.00 and did not have sufficient funds in the account for payment.
         Article 89: On or about 20030517 disrespect toward Captain B_ and 2Lt K_ by saying “Why are you guys being hard ass’s” and Why are you trying to be all up on me.
          Award: Forfeiture of $ 645 .00 for 2 months ($645.00 for one month suspended for six months) , restriction and extra duty for 45 days, reduction to E- 2 .
          Not appealed.

 20030530:        Counseling: Advised of deficiencies in performance and conduct . Y our violations of the Uniform Code of Military Justice. Specifically , Article 89 and 123a (s ix specifications) for which you were found guilty of violating during Battalion Commander nonjudicial punishment on 20030521 The behavior is counter to good order and discipline and has brought discredit to yourself and the United States Marine Corps. N ecessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.

20030609:        Counseling: Advised of deficiencies in performance and conduct . Your unauthorized and inappropriate use of a government computer. Specifically, you used your assigned government computer to view offensive , pornographic material. This conduct is unacceptable and will not be tolerated. N ecessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.

 20031217:        Counseling: Advised of deficiencies in performance and conduct . Your assignment to the Marine Corps Body Composition Program. Specifically, you failed to maintain your body standards as required by MCO P5100.12. Your actions are unsatisfactory and not in accordance with the high state of readiness required by the Marine Corps. N ecessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.
20031222 :        NJP for violation(s) of UCMJ:
         Article 86: On or about 0730 20031210 fail to report back in to this unit from annual leave and did so remain absent until on or about 1300 20031212.
         Award: Forfeiture of $645.00 for 2 months, restriction and extra duty for 45 days.
         Not appealed.

 20031222:        Counseling: Advised of deficiencies in performance and conduct . Violation of Article 86 of the UCMJ. Specifically, on 20031222 you were found guilty during Company Commanders nonjudicial punishment for violating Article 86 of the UCMJ. N ecessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.


20040322 :        NJP for violation(s) of UCMJ:
          Article 128 : On or about 1145, 20040227, assault Cpl K_ with his closed fists twice.
         Award: Forfeiture of $ 596 .00 for 2 month s , restriction and extra duty for 45 days , reduction to E- 1 .
         Not a ppealed.
20040323:        Counseling: Advised of deficiencies in performance and conduct . Y our failure adherence to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. This behavior is counter to good order and discipline and has brought discredit to yourself and the United States Marine Corps. N ecessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided.

Elements of Discharge: [ IN VOLUNTARY]

Date Notified:                                       20040406
Basis for Discharge:                                DUE TO

Least Favorable Characterization:                         
Commanding Officer’s Intended Recommendation:   
Record Supports Narrative Reason:                          YES

Date Applicant Responded to Notification:                 20040406
Rights Elected at Notification:
Consult with Counsel                               
Obtain Copies                                      
Submit Statement(s) (date)                                 
Administrative Board                               

Commanding Officer Recommendation (date):        UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS ( 20040406 )
SJA review (date):                                  ( 20040408 )
 Separation Authority (date):              COMMANDING GENERAL, 2D MARINE DIVISION ( 20040413 )
 Narrative Reason directed:                                  MISCONDUCT DUE TO A
Characterization directed:                                 
Date Applicant Discharged:                         20040416


Additional Information Considered by Board

 Type of d ocumentation submitted by t he Applicant and considered by the Board
        Document Type                                        #Pages
 Related to Period of Service Under Review :
          Service/Medical Record :                              1
         Other Period of Service:                                    0
Related to Post-Service Period:
          Community Service :                                   0
         Education :                                           0
         Employment :                                          0
         Health /Medical :                                       0
         Character Statements:                               0
         Criminal Records Checks:                                    0
         Additional Statements from Applicant:             0
Other Documentation (Describe Below)                      0

Total Number of Pages:                              1

Applicant’s Issues, as summarized by the Board:
 1. Improve employment opportunities.
2. Reenlistment opportunity.
 3. Troubles have resolved since leaving the military.
4 . Post service.

Issues 1-2: The Board determined that these Issues are not issues which can form the basis for relief for the Applicant or that the Board did not have the authority to grant the relief for which the Applicant petitioned. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum regarding this issue.

Decisional Issues:
 The Board accepted Issue s 3 -4 for consideration.

Issue 3 (Equity). When a Marine’s service has been honest and faithful, it is appropriate to characterize that service under honorable conditions. An under other than honorable conditions discharge is warranted when significant negative aspects of a member’s conduct or performance of duty outweigh the positive aspects of the member’s military record. The Applicant’s service was marred by the award of four retention warnings, three nonjudicial punishments (NJP) for violations of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) Articles 86 , 89, 123a, and 128 . Violations of UCMJ Article s 89, 123a, and Article 128 are considered serious offenses for which a punitive discharge is authorized if adjudged by a Special or General Courts Martial. An upgrade to general (under honorable conditions) would be inappropriate. Relief denied
Issue 4 (Equity). The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. However, there is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge, may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in the civilian life subsequent to leaving the service. Normally, to permit relief, a procedural impropriety or inequity must have been found to have existed during the period of enlistment in question. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered. The Applicant provided no documents for review. The Applicant's efforts need to be more encompassing than those provided. For example, the Applicant could have produced evidence of continuing educational pursuits, a verifiable employment record, documentation of community service, and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities. The Board determined that the documentation provided by the Applicant did not mitigate the misconduct that resulted in the characterization of discharge. Relief denied.

In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Service Record Entries, Medical Record Entries, Elements of Discharge and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found the Applicant’s discharge proper and equitable.

Minority Opinion

 None

Pertinent Regulation/Law

 A. The Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16F), effective 1 September 2001 - present, Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT.
B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs, Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity.

 C. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violations of the UCMJ, Article 8 9, Disrespect toward a commissioned officer, Article 123a, Checks insufficient funds, and Article 128, Assault upon a noncommissioned .


ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant
Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment / Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD.” Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                                    Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
                                     Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                                     720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                                    Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00158

    Original file (MD01-00158.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD01-00158 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 001121, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to Honorable. 940830: Applicant's counsel submitted a letter to the commanding general requesting that the applicant's request for separation in lieu of trial by courts-martial be approved and that characterization of service be under Honorable conditions (General). You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting...

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600071

    Original file (MD0600071.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). Not appealed.031030: Charges preferred against Applicant: Charge I: Violation of the UCMJ, Article 92, Specification 1: In that Private L_ H. W_(Applicant), U.S. Marine Corps Reserve, Marine Aircraft Group 49 Det B, 4th Marine Aircraft Wing, Marine Forces Reserve, Newburgh, New York, on active duty having knowledge of a lawful order issued by...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600214

    Original file (ND0600214.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions) and that the Narrative Reason for Separation be changed. The separation authority directed that the Applicant be discharge by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500675

    Original file (ND0500675.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. No indication of appeal in the record.031124: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge with the least favorable characterization of service under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct and misconduct commission of a serious offense.031124: Applicant advised of rights and having elected not to consult with counsel...

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00306

    Original file (MD02-00306.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION This ended with brig time and a Bad Conduct Discharge. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was involuntarily separated on 870204 with a bad conduct discharge which was the sentence adjudged by a properly constituted special court martial that was determined to be legal and proper, affirmed in the legal chain of review and executed (A and B).

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600165

    Original file (ND0600165.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND06-00165 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20051103. After returning from treatment, the member states she did not gamble at all for nearly 9 months, and then in July 01, she began to gamble excessively again. Relief denied.The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1000801

    Original file (ND1000801.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant’s record of service includednon-judicial punishment (NJP) for of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article 80 (Attempts, attempted to purchase items without sufficient funds in bank account), Article 86 (Unauthorized Absence, 19970314-19970317), Article 123a (Making, drawing, uttering check without sufficient funds; 3 Specifications), Article 134 (Dishonorably failing to pay debt), and Article 134 (Altering public record).When notified of administrative separation...

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600850

    Original file (MD0600850.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214 (Service 2) (2)Letter from Applicant, dtd March 27, 2006 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USMCR (DEP) 19891219 - 19900204 COG Active: None Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 19900205 Date of Discharge: 19960701 Length of Service (years, months,...

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600805

    Original file (MD0600805.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of his service, falls well below that required for an honorable characterization of service. If further review is desired, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100, concerning a change in the characterization of service. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600693

    Original file (ND0600693.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Articles 123a, Making, drawing, or uttering check, draft, or order without sufficient funds, and 128, Assault.C. You may view DoD 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going...