Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600971
Original file (MD0600971.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-LCpl, USMC
MD06-00971

 Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request :

Application Received:                               20 060713
 Narrative Reason for Separation:                          
Character of Service:                               
Discharge Authority :                                MARCORSEPMAN PAR 6419
Last Duty Assignment/ Command at Discharge:       1 ST MARINE CORP DISTRICT GARDEN CITY NY      

Applicant’s Request:
          Narrative Reason change to:               NONE REQUESTED      
         Characterization chang e to:               
         Review Requested :                          
Representation:                                             


Decision:

 Date of Decision:                                            20 070517
Location of Board:                                  Washington D.C.
Complete Service Record:                                   
Complete Medical Record:                          
Complete Discharge Package:                       

Regarding propriety, the Board found the discharge:     
Regarding equity, the Board found the discharge:        
(BCD only) The Board found that clemency was:  

By a vote of the Characterization shall .     
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .


Summary of Service :

Prior Service:
 Inactive: USMC R (DEP)                               19980529 - 19981109       COG
Active:                                          19981110 - 20021003       HON
Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Ree nlistment:                               20021004
Years Contracted :                                   ;      
Date of Discharge:                                  20031212
Length of Service:                                  01 Yrs 02 Mos 08 Days Does not exclude lost time, if any.
Time Lost During This Period:                      1 (per DD 214)
                                                                                
Education Level:                                   
Age at this Enlistment:                                    
AFQT:                                                 43
MOS:                                                   0811
Highest Rate/Rank:                                   SGT

Fitness reports were available to the board for review for service as E-5/Sergeant or higher:

Awards and Decorations (as listed on the DD Form 214): NAVY AND MARINE CORPS ACHIEVEMENT MEDAL, NATIONAL DEFENSE SERVICE MEDAL, SEA SERVICE DEPLOYMENT RIBBON (2D AWD), MARINE CORPS GOOD CONDUCT MEDAL, CERTIFICATE OF COMMENDATION, MERITORIOUS MAST ( 5 th AWD ), LETTER OF APPRECIATION, RIFLE SHARPSHOOTER BADGE

Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Narrative Reason for Separation

20030 7?? :        Applicant ’s spouse complains to command of inadequate financial support. Substantiated and corrected by command administrative action.
         [Extracted from Commanding Officer , Recruit Station New Jersey, letter dated 20031021.]

200308??         Applicant arrested by civil authorities in Tampa, Florida for alleged assault on Ms. C_ A_. C harge dismissed; however incident revealed to military authorities Applicant’s adulterous relationship with Ms. C_ A_.
         [Extracted from Commanding Officer, Recruit Station New Jersey, letter dated 20031021.]

20030903 :        NJP for violation(s) of UCMJ:
          Article 107: On or about 030725, did make an official verbal statement to the Commanding Officer, Recruit Station New Jersey, and the Sergeant Major, Recruiting Station New Jersey, regarding the legitimacy of his current marital status, which statement was false and was then known by the said Marine to be so false. Charge withdrawn (not guilty).
          Article 134 (Adultery) : On or about 030825, did make an official statement to the Sergeant Major, Recruiting Station New Jersey when questioned about his relationship with C_ A_, a woman not his wife, admitting to having sexual intercourse. Award: Forfeiture of $951 for 2 months (1 month suspended for 6 months).
        Not appealed.

20030923:        Commanding Officer, Marine Corps R ecruiting S tation New Jersey, ordered Applicant to return to his appointed place of duty and execute his duties as a Marine Corps recruiter.

 20030923:        Sergeant Major, Recruiting Station New Jersey, statement witnessing the Applicant’s refusal to recruit.

 20031002:        Charge preferred for violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) Article 90: Willfully disobey a lawful order from superior commissioned officer.

 20031021:        C ommanding O fficer, Recruiting Station New Jersey letter to Commandant of the Marine Corps, requesting approval of Applicant’s Relief for Cause for refusal to recruit.

 20031104:        C ommanding O fficer, 1 st Marine Corps District endorsing letter to Commandant of the Marine Corps, recommending approval of Applicant’s relief for cause for refusal to recruit.

 20031117:        Applicant, having consulted with counsel certified under UCMJ Art 27b, requested admin inistrative separation in lieu of trial by court- martial. Applicant acknowlged that his counsel had fully explained the elements of the offense for which he was charged and that he understood the elements of the offense. He completely underst ood that least favorable characterization of service would be under other than honorable conditions. The Applicant admitted guilt to violation of the UCMJ, Article 9 2 , violation of a lawful order.

20031209:        Commanding G eneral, Marine Corps Recruit Depot/Eastern Recruiting Region approved Applicant’s relief for cause .

Elements of Discha rge [REQUESTED BY MEMBER]

 Date Member Requested Separation :                           20031117
Member Requested Separation Due To:                        IN LIEU OF TRIAL BY COURT-MARTIAL
Characterization Requested:                                 
m ember Recognized Least Favorable:                          UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS
Charged with violation of UCMJ:                             ARTICLE 90
Acknowledged guilt to violation of UCMJ:                           ARTICLE 92

 Recommendation of Commanding Officer (date):              ( 20031126 )      
Judge Advocate review (date):                               SUFFICIENT IN LAW AND FACT ( not dated)
Separation Authority (date):                                COMMANDING GENERAL , MCRD/ERD, PISC ( 20031205 )
Narrative reason directed:                                           IN LIEU OF TRIAL BY COURT-MARTIAL
Characterization of directed:                               under other than honorable conditions
Date discharged:                                                      20031212

Additional Information Considered by Board

 Type of d ocumentation submitted by t he Applicant and considered by the Board
        Document Type                                        #Pages
 Related to Period of Service:
          Service/Medical Record :                              19
         Other Period of Service:                                         
Related to Post-Service Period:
          Community Service :                                        
         Education :                                                
         Employment :                                          3
         Health /Medical :                                            
         Character Statements:                               4
         Criminal Records Checks:                                         
         Additional Statements from Applicant:                  
Other Documentation      (Describe Below)                      

Total Number of Pages:                              26

D escription of Other Documentation:
     

Applicant’s Issues:
1. Quality of service
2. Post Service
3. Superiors “forced me out of the Corps.”
Decisional Issues:
 The Board accepted Issue(s) 1- 3 for consideration.

Issue 1 ( Equity ). Quality of Service: The Appl icant claims his record show that his quality of service should outweigh his misconduct. When a Marine’s service has been honest and faithful, it is appropriate to characterize that service under honorable conditions. An under other than honorable conditions discharge is warranted when significant negative aspects of the member’s conduct or performance of duty outweigh the positive aspect’s of the member’s military record. The A pplicant’s service record was marred by failure to provide adequate financial support to his spouse, nonjudicial punishment for violation of Article 134 ( Adultery ) of the UCMJ , relief for cause, and an acknowledgement of guilt to violation of Article 92 of the UCMJ in furtherance of his request for separation in lieu of trial by court-martial . The Applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of his service, reflect s his misconduct, and fall s below that required of an honorable characterization of service. Additionally, the Applicant requested a separation in lieu of trial by court-martial knowing the likelihood and the consequences receiving an other than honorable discharge An upgrade to honorable would be inappropriate. Relief is therefore denied.

Issue 2 (Equity). Post Service: The Applicant s tates “since leaving the service I’ve attend ed school and bettered myself, and furthered my education. ” Normally, to permit relief, a procedural impropriety or inequity must have occurred during the discharge process for the period of enlistment in question. The Board discovered no impropriety or inequity after a review of the Applicant’s case. There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that should be provided to the board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities. As of this time the Applicant has not provided sufficient post-service documentation to consider mitigating the misconduct that resulted in the characterization of discharge. Relief is denied.

Issue 3 (Propriety). The Applicant implies that his superiors behaved in some sort of inappropriate manner to “force” him out of the Marine Corps. There is no evidence in the record to suggest any wrongdoing on the part of anyone other than the Applicant himself. In addition, it was the Applicant’s voluntary decision to request administrative separation that led to his discharge. The Applicant acknowledged his understanding of the negative impact that a characterization of service as under other than honorable conditions would have on him, yet voluntarily requested separation rather than attempt to defend himself at court-martial. Relief denied.

In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of Government affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Service Record Entries, Medical Record Entries, Elements of Discharge and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found the Applicant’s discharge proper and equitable.
Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. Paragraph 6419, SEPARATION IN LIEU OF TRIAL BY COURT-MARTIAL , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16F), effective 01 September 2001 until Present.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs, Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity

C. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial fo r violation of the UCMJ, Article 134 (Adultery).

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant
Complaint Procedures : If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : Subsequent to a document review, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted his opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 2 Navy Annex, Washington, DC 20370-5100 for further review.

Service Benefits: The Veterans Administration determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the Naval Discharge Review Board. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining Veterans' benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment / Educational Opportunities : The Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.
Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and subsequently is processed for an administrative involuntary separation for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended. The Physical Evaluation Board case remains in suspense pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or “PTSD.” Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that may be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ) – Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                                    Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
                                     Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                                     720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                                    Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0500548

    Original file (MD0500548.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD05-00548 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20050209. On review of the documentation provided the record the Applicant submitted for review several character and a personal statement regarding his service and the circumstances to justify the change in discharge has he has requested. As the representative, we ask that consideration be given to equitable relief, as this is a matter that involves a determination whether a discharge should be changed...

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600330

    Original file (MD0600330.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. ]950128: Counseling: Advised of deficiencies in performance and conduct (Found guilty at NJP on 950106 for Article 128. The Applicant admitted guilt to the following violations of the UCMJ, Article 134: Disobeying order to wit: soliciting a money pyramid.960507: SJA review determined the proceedings sufficient in law and fact.960510: GCMCA, Commanding General, 3d...

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0500953

    Original file (MD0500953.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    941230: DD Form 214: Applicant discharged with a under other than honorable conditions by reason of conduct trial by courts martial (request for discharge for the good of the service). There is no evidence in the record, nor has the Applicant produced any evidence, to support the contention that he was not afforded proper legal representation. The Applicant’s statements alone do not overcome the government’s presumption of regularity in this case.

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00177

    Original file (MD03-00177.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD03-00177 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 20021106, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. Although Major L_ (Applicant) requests that he be separated with an Honorable or General (Under Honorable Conditions) characterization of service, he acknowledges that he may be separated with an Other Than Honorable characterization of service. The NDRB respects the fact the Applicant had...

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00848

    Original file (MD03-00848.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. In the acknowledgement letter, the Applicant was informed the Board first conducts a record review prior to any personal appearance hearing. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB.

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00849

    Original file (MD03-00849.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable or entry level separation or uncharacterized and the reason for the discharge be changed to SECRETARY AUTHORITY. I was in the Marine Corps for five years and nine months and in only four week’s as a drill instructor in platoon 2082 that was all thrown all away. Since my separation from the Marine Corps I have obtained a job and I have put all the knowledge and discipline that I...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00642

    Original file (ND04-00642.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ In accordance with 32 C.F.R., section 724.166; SECNAVINST 5420.174C, enclosure (1), paragraph 1.16, The American Legion submits to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB or Board) the above issue in supplement to the Applicant’s petition. Specification 4: Wrongfully harassing and using abusive language toward prospect T_ F_ on or about Jul 94.Specification 5: Wrongfully engaging in physical contact with prospect T_ F_ by...

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0500701

    Original file (MD0500701.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD05-00701 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20050308. The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). As of this time, the Applicant has not provided any post-service documentation for the Board to consider.

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0501125

    Original file (MD0501125.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). 040206: GCMCA, Commander, Marine Corps Recruit Depot/Eastern Recruiting Region, Parris Island, SC, directed the Applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to commission of a serious offense. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “...

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600198

    Original file (MD0600198.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). 980305: SJA review determined the case sufficient in law and fact.980306: GCMCA, Commanding General, MCRD/WRR San Diego,approved the Applicant's request for discharge and directed his discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of separation in lieu of trial by court-martial. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other...