Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00848
Original file (MD03-00848.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-Capt, USMC
Docket No. MD03-00848

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review was received on 20030407. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. The Applicant requests a personal appearance hearing before the Board in the Washington Capital Region. The Applicant did not designate a representative on the DD Form 293. In the acknowledgement letter, the Applicant was informed the Board first conducts a record review prior to any personal appearance hearing.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20040312. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/UNACCEPTABLE CONDUCT, authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par. 4102 & SECNAVINST 1920.6A.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION


 Issues, as stated

 Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application:

“1. MY DISCHARGE WAS INEQUITAB LE BECAUSE IT WAS BASED ON A SINGLE INCIDENT OF FRATERNIZATION IN OVER 6 YEARS OF LOYAL AND HONORABLE SERVICE AS A MARINE INFANTRY OFFICER WITH NO OTHER ADVERSE ACTION”

“2. THE LIKELIHOOD OF REINSTATING ME TO ACTIVE DUTY AT MY PREVIOUS RANK WITH AN ACTIVE DUTY MARINE INFANTRY UNIT IN IRAQ, OR AT THE CHOOSING OF HQMC”

“3. CONTACTING C_ W_, SECRETARY OF NAVY’S OFFICE, TO CORROBORATED MY CLAIMS AS AN HONROABLE AND PROFESSIONAL OFFICER OF MARINES” (Please note: Upon discharge from the Marine Corps in 1998, Col S_ was assigned to that office in the Pentagon. It is unknown to me now whether he is still on active duty and/or his current duty station)”

 Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
Applicant’s letter of explanation to BCNR dtd Mar 12, 2003
Applicant’s additional letter of explanation to NDRB dtd Mar 31, 2003

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: U.S. Navy Academy        880706 - 920526  Accept Commission
         Inactive: None

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Commission: 920527               Date of Discharge: 980706

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 06 01 10
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 23                          Years Contracted: 6

 Education Level: 16              

Highest Rank: Capt

 Final Officer Performance Evaluation Averages : All officer performance reports were available to the Board for review.

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: NDSM, SSDR, AFEM, JMUA, HSM, Navy “E” Ribbon, NCM, MUC, NMCOSR

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/UNACCEPTABLE CONDUCT, authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par. 4102 & SECNAVINST 1920.6A.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

980202:  Applicant notified of rights under Article 31, UCMJ concerning allegation/charges of fraternization/adultery.

980203:  Applicant’s statements.

980204:  Preliminary Inquiry concerning allegation of fraternization and adultery against Applicant.

980320:  Applicant notified of intention to conduct an Article 15, UCMJ hearing for violation of Article 133 of the UCMJ and advised of rights.
980415:  Applicant acknowledged his rights and understanding and elected to waive right to remain silent, elected to make a statement, and elected no lawyer present during the interview.
980417:  Applicant notified of Article 15, UCMJ hearing and accepted punishment under Article 15, UCMJ in lieu of trial by court-martial.
980417:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 133: During the period of 8 Nov 97 to 3 Feb 98, established and maintained an unlawful, unduly familiar relationship with LCpl C_ G_-H_, USMC; committed adultery with LCpl C_ G_-H_; and impeded an investigation by making a false statement to the investigating officers. Such acts are conduct unbecoming an officer and gentlemen and have brought disgrace to the Armed Forces.
Awarded forfeiture of $1500.00 base pay per month for 2 months, Punitive Letter of Reprimand. Not appealed.
980417:  Punitive Letter of Reprimand issued to Applicant.

980417:  Acknowledged the Letter of Reprimand.

 980417:  Applicant requested resignation in lieu of further processing for administrative separation.

980417:  Commander, U.S. Marine Corps Forces, Atlantic, advised the Commandant, U.S. Marine Corps of Applicant’s NJP and recommended the Applicant’s letter of resignation be accepted and the characterization of service be under other than honorable conditions, further recommended that Applicant not be required to appear before a Board of Inquiry, unless he withdraws his resignation request.
[SEPARATION AUTHORITY NOT CONTAINED IN SERVICE RECORD]

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

 Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 19980706 under other than honorable conditions by reason of unacceptable conduct (A and B). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (C). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).

Issues 1-3. A characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions is warranted when the member's conduct constitutes a significant departure from that expected of a Marine. T he Applicant’s service was marred by award of nonjudicial punishment (NJP) for adultery and fraternization and initially providing false statements about his actions during a preliminary inquiry.

The NDRB has no authority to change reenlistment codes or make recommendations to permit reentry or reinstatement into the Naval Service or any other branch of the Armed Forces. The Applicant’s discharge characterization accurately reflects his service to his country. Normally, to permit relief, an error or inequity must have existed during the period of service in question. No such error or inequity is evident during the Applicant’service. Additionally, there is no law, or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in civilian life, subsequent to leaving the service. Relief not warranted.

The Applicant is reminded that he remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received at the NDRB within 15 years from the date of his discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.

Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Chapter 4, Paragraph 4102 of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16E, effective 18 Aug 1995), PROCESSING FOR SEPARATION.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 1920.6A (ADMINISTRATIVE SEPARATION OF OFFICERS) effective 21 Nov 1983 until 12 Dec 1999 establishes policies, standards and procedures for the administrative separation of Navy and Marine Corps officers from the naval service in accordance with Title 10, United States Code and DoD Directive 1332.30 of 15 Oct 81.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

E. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ afls14.jag.af.mil ”.

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      


Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00809

    Original file (MD00-00809.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD00-00809 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 000608, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable and the reason for the discharge be changed to SECRETARIAL AUTHORITY. In the acknowledgement letter to the applicant, he was informed that the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing. A.The Secretary of the Navy Instruction 1920.6A of 21 Nov 1983...

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0500419

    Original file (MD0500419.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    By unanimous vote, the BOI recommended that that Applicant be separated from the naval service for the reasons listed above and the service be characterized as other than honorable.020211: Applicant’s request denied. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (B and C).The Applicant contends that his discharge was improper because the Board of Inquiry (BOI), which...

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00823

    Original file (MD01-00823.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD01-00823 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 010530, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. My military counsel advised me that I could just resign my commission and receive all benefits with either an Honorable Discharge or a General Discharge (under honorable conditions). The applicant can provide additional documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments at that time.

  • USMC | DRB | 1999_Marine | MD99-01030

    Original file (MD99-01030.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In the acknowledgement letter to the applicant, he was informed that the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).The applicant introduced no decisional issues for consideration by the Board. The applicant is reminded that he is eligible for a...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00080

    Original file (ND02-00080.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    910814: CO, NAVHOSP Portsmouth, reported Applicant's NJP to BUPERS.910719: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge by reason of substandard performance of duty and misconduct due to the commission of serious offenses as evidenced by CO's NJP on 18 Jun 91 and the characterization of service may be under other than honorable conditions.910722: Applicant advised of her rights and having elected having consulted with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected the right...

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00177

    Original file (MD03-00177.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD03-00177 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 20021106, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. Although Major L_ (Applicant) requests that he be separated with an Honorable or General (Under Honorable Conditions) characterization of service, he acknowledges that he may be separated with an Other Than Honorable characterization of service. The NDRB respects the fact the Applicant had...

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00220

    Original file (MD02-00220.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD02-00220 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020108, requested that the reason for the discharge be changed to RESIGN. 991221: Punitive Letter of Reprimand issued to applicant.991222: Applicant voluntarily tendered his unqualified resignation for cause in lieu of processing for administrative separation for cause.991223: CO, 1 st MCD, Garden City, NJ forwarded applicant's resignation for cause letter to the Secretary of the Navy recommending...

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-01127

    Original file (MD03-01127.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. 990512: DD Form 215 issued to Applicant correcting the characterization of service as “under other than honorable conditions.” 990621: Applicant’s Attorney advised the Commanding Officer, Headquarters & Service Company, U.S. Marine Corps Forces, Atlantic, that Applicant was issued a DD Form 214 reflecting a “general (under honorable conditions)” and a...

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0501120

    Original file (MD0501120.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. This letter and supporting documentation is my personal request for a review of my discharge issued by the United States Marine Corps, though the Secretary of the Navy, on 15 October 2003. While there is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to...

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00751

    Original file (MD01-00751.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant's representative requested that the reason for separation be change to "Secretarial Authority". Dear members of the board: The following issues are the reasons my discharge should be upgraded from a general discharge to an honorable discharge. Additionally, advised applicant is submitting a letter of resignation and requested leave awaiting separation.990730: Applicant tendered a resignation of commission in lieu of processing for administrative separation for cause,...