Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600198
Original file (MD0600198.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

ex-LCpl, USMC
Docket No. MD06-00198

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review was received on 20051108 . The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions) . The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. The Applicant did not designate a representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20060915 . After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was d iscovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain Under Other Than Honorable Conditions by reason of separation in lieu of trial by court-martial.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as stated

 Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application:
“ I am requesting this upgrade because I feel that with my 10 yrs of service and two reenlistments and a combat tour in the Gulf War that a preponderance of my total service should be considered. I feel that I received poor legal advice in accepting my discharge and rank reduction . Had I better legal counsel I would have gone to court martial and been able to prove my innocence and would still be serving today. Thank you for your consideration. ”

Applicant’s Remarks: (Taken from the DD Form 293.):
“ Please review my case and with an open mind find within yourselves forgiveness and restore my honor. So that I my once again walk with pride among my fellow Marines.
Semper-Fi
[signed] J_ W. C_ (Applicant)
 Former SGT U SMC ”

Documentation
Only the service record book and medical record s were reviewed. The Applicant did not provide additional documentation for the Board’s consideration.

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Inactive: USMCR (DEP)    19880123 - 19880301       COG
          Active: USMC     19880302 - 1991112 7       HON
         Active: USMC     1991112 8 - 19950301      HON

Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 19950302              Date of Discharge: 19980320

Length of Service (years, months, days):

 Active: 0 3 00 1 9
         Inactive: None

 Time Lost During This Period (days):
         Unauthorized absence: none
         Confinement:              none

Age at Entry: 30

Years Contracted: 4

Education Level: 12                                 AFQT: 83

Highest Rank: SGT                                    MOS: 3043

Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks): Fitness reports were available to the Board for review.

 Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized, (as stated on the DD Form 214): Meritorious Service Medal (2 nd Awd), National Defense Service Medal, Sea Service Deployment Medal (2 nd Awd), Southwest Asia Service Medal, Kuwait Liberation Medal (Saudi Arabia), Navy Unit Commendation, Marine Corps Good Conduct Medal, Naval and Marine Corp Achievement Medal, Kuwait Liberation Medal (Kuwait) .


Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):
UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/IN LIEU OF TRIAL BY COURT-MARTIAL, authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par. 6419.
 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

950302 :  Reenlisted this date for a term of 4 years.
970220:  Extended enlistment for 6 months.

 980223 :  Charges preferred for violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice .
 Charge I, Article 92 :
Specification: In that Sergeant J_ W. C_ (Applicant), U.S. Marine Corps, on active duty, did, at Helena, Montana, on or about 24 July 1997, violate a lawful general order, to wit: Paragraph 6, MCRD/WRR San Diego Depot Order 1100.4A, dated 21 May 1992, by wrongfully engaging in, encour a ging , soliciting, and seeking a nonprofessional personal relationship with Ms J_ M. L_, who at the time of the offense was a member of the Delayed Entry Program, by committing the following acts: grabbing Ms L_’s buttocks with out her consent; attempting to kiss Ms L_ on dive r s occasions, tickling Ms L_ while holding her hands and arms; wrestling with Ms L_; drinking beer in the presence of an d offering beer to Ms L_ and Ms E_ K_, both minors; and committing other acts in furtherance of this unprofessional personal relationship .
Charge II, Article 107:
Specification 1: In that Sergeant J_ W. C_ (Applicant), U.S. Marine Corps, on active duty, at Great Falls, Montana, on or about 12 September 1997, with intent to deceive, make to Gunnery Sergeant K. J. T_, an official statement, to wit: “ I only called Ms A_ D_ to congratulate her on joining the U.S. Navy, “or words to that effect, which statement was false in that he called Ms D_, a member of the Delayed Entry Program, for the purpose of asking her to go on a date with him, he asked her to go out on a date with him, and he never congratulated her on joining the U.S Navy .
 Specification 2 : In that Sergeant J_ W. C_ (Applicant), U.S. Marine Corps, on active duty, at Great Falls, Montana, on or about 31 October 1997, with intent to deceive, sign an official statement, to wit: Sgt C_’s (Applicant) statement dated 31 October 1997, enclosed as enclosure (4) to the JAGMAN investigation of Captain M. J. M_, which statement was false in that: when he called Ms. D_, he never congratulated her on joining the U.S. Navy and, instead, he asked her to out him on a date; and on 24 July 1997, he did off er Ms L_ and Ms E_ K_ beer, he did drink beer in their presence, Ms L_ and Ms K_ were not drinking beer when they arrived, and he did make “sexual advances” toward Ms L_, and was known by Sgt C _ to be so false .
 Charge III, Article 111:
Specification 1: In that Sergeant J_ W. C_ (Applicant), U.S. Marine Corps, on active duty, at Helena, Montana, on or about 24 July 1997, operate and dr ive a motor vehicle while drunk.
 Spec ification 2: In that Sergeant J_ W. C_ (Applicant), U.S. Marine Corps, on active duty, at Helena, Montana, on or about 24 July 1997, operate a motor vehicle in a reckless manner, by drinking beer before driving the vehicle, speeding, dangerously passing another vehicle, and failing to stop at a three-way stop sign .
Charge IV, Article 134:
Spec ification 1: In that Sergeant J_ W. C_ (Applicant), U.S. Marine Corps, on active duty, at Helena, Montana, on or about 24 July 1997, commit an indecent assault upon Ms J_ M. L_, a person not his wife, by repeatedly tickling Ms L_, with the intent to gratify his lust or sexual desires.
Spec ification 2: In that Sergeant J_ W. C_ (Applicant), U.S. Marine Corps, on active duty, at Helena, Montana, on or about 24 July 1997, commit an indecent assault upon Ms J_ M. L_, a person not his wife, by attempting to kiss Ms L_ on divers occasions, with the intent to gratify his lust or sexual desires .
 Spec ification 3: In that Sergeant J_ W. C_ (Applicant), U.S. Marine Corps, on active duty, at Helena, Montana, on or about 24 July 1997, commit an indecent assault upon Ms J_ M. L_, a person not his wife, by grabbing Ms L_’s buttocks, with the intent to gratify his lust or sexual desires .

980 2 25 :  Charges referred to special court-martial.
980305 :  Applicant, having consulted with counsel certified under UCMJ Art 27b, requested discharge for the good of the service to escape trial by court- martial. In the request the Applicant voluntarily admitted guilt to violating Article 92 of the UCMJ. He recognized that an under other than honorable condit ions discharge was possible and indicated he was aware of the adverse nature of such a characterization and its consequences . The Applicant indicated he discussed the request for separation with his counsel and that he was fully satisfied with his advice. The Applicant indicated he was absolutely convinced that the request was in his best interest and included a request for reduction to Lance Corporal if the request for separation was approved.

980305 :  SJA review determined the case sufficient in law and fact.
980306 :  GCMCA, Commanding General, MCRD/WRR San Diego , approved the Applicant's request for discharge and directed his discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of separation in lieu of trial by court-martial .

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 19980320 in lieu of trial by court-martial (A and B) with a service characterization of under other than honorable conditions. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).

The Applicant implies that his discharge is inequitable because of his prior honorable service. An under other than honorable conditions discharge is warranted when significant negative aspects of a member’s conduct or performance of duty outweigh the positive aspects of the member’s military record. In the Applicant’s request for separation on 19980305, the Applicant admitted guilt to violating Article 92 of the UCMJ for wrongly engaging in, encouraging, soliciting and seeking a nonprofessional relationship with a member of the Delayed Entry Program. The Applicant’s violation of Article 92 of the UCMJ is the commission of a serious offense, which is punishable by punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction at special or general court-martial. The Applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of his service, reflects his willful failure to meet the requirements of his contract with the Marine Corps and falls far short of that required for an upgrade of his characterization of service. Relief is not warranted.

The Applicant implies that his discharge was inequitable because he received poor legal advice . There is no evidence in the record, and the Applicant did not provide any evidence to support the contention, that the Applicant was not afforded proper legal counsel. On 19980305, the Applicant admitted guilt to the commission of a serious offense and requested separation in lieu of trial. In the request, the Applicant notes that he had consulted with counsel and was fully satisfied with the his advice. The Applicant’s issue is without merit. Relief denied.

The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.



Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Paragraph 6419, SEPARATION IN LIEU OF TRIAL BY COURT-MARTIAL , of the Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16E), effective
18 Aug 95 until 31 August 2001.

 B. The Manual for Courts-Martial authorizes the award of a punitive discharge if adjudged as part of the sentence upon conviction by a special or general court-martial for violation of the UCMJ, Article 92, failure to ob ey a lawful order/regulation.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 502, Propriety .

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 503, Equity .

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil ” .
The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Secretary of the Navy    Council of Review Boards
                   Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                   720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00849

    Original file (MD03-00849.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable or entry level separation or uncharacterized and the reason for the discharge be changed to SECRETARY AUTHORITY. I was in the Marine Corps for five years and nine months and in only four week’s as a drill instructor in platoon 2082 that was all thrown all away. Since my separation from the Marine Corps I have obtained a job and I have put all the knowledge and discipline that I...

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0501389

    Original file (MD0501389.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Sep. Board. 040901: An Administrative Discharge Board, based upon a preponderance of the evidence and by unanimous vote, found that the Applicant had committed misconduct due to commission of a serious offense, that such misconduct warranted separation, and recommended discharge with a general (under honorable conditions) characterization of service.040917: Applicant from confinement. In the course of reviewing the Applicant’s service record, transcript of the administrative discharge...

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600422

    Original file (MD0600422.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD06-00422 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20060118. The discharge shall remain as a bad conduct discharge by reason of court-marital. Specification 1: Having knowledge of a lawful order issued by the Commanding Officer of the Marine Corps Communication-Electronics School, to wit: School Order 5370.4A, dated 950410, an order which it was his duty to obey, did on board Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center, Twentynine Palms, California, on or about 9...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00686

    Original file (ND99-00686.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND99-00686 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 990427, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to Honorable. The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. Specification 3: In that HN D_ L. E_ did, at the Naval Hospital Pensacola, Florida, on or about April 1995, commit an indecent assault upon K_ R. G_ a person not his wife, by sliding his hands up and down her leg, with the intent to gratify his lust or...

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00976

    Original file (MD02-00976.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The Applicant was discharged on 000403 with a bad conduct discharge which was the sentence adjudged by a properly constituted special court martial that was determined to be legal and proper, affirmed by appellate review authority and executed (A and B). Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant's performance and conduct during...

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00814

    Original file (MD03-00814.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The issue presented in this Application is whether or not my Bad Conduct Discharge from the U.S. Marine Corps, which was adjudged at a special court martial on 8 August 1990, should be upgraded to Honorable. However, at the time I requested relief, my discharge had recently been adjudged and the Board properly found that I failed to introduce new evidence of sufficient merit to extenuate, mitigate, or excuse the misconduct of my record, which was a 306 day unauthorized absence.It has how...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500083

    Original file (ND0500083.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION I recommend that HA L_ (Applicant) be separated from the United States Navy with an Other Than Honorable discharge.970103: Applicant discharged under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600330

    Original file (MD0600330.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. ]950128: Counseling: Advised of deficiencies in performance and conduct (Found guilty at NJP on 950106 for Article 128. The Applicant admitted guilt to the following violations of the UCMJ, Article 134: Disobeying order to wit: soliciting a money pyramid.960507: SJA review determined the proceedings sufficient in law and fact.960510: GCMCA, Commanding General, 3d...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-01030

    Original file (MD04-01030.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. 980723: GCMCA, Commanding General, Marine Corps Base, Camp Lejeune, North Carolina, directed the Applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense. Specifically, the applicant contends that his discharge was unjust “s ince my substantive and procedural due process rights were denied to me and my...

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600225

    Original file (MD0600225.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The incident that occurred on 1 Sep 01 was the one and only time that I have broken the law. 031028: Commandant of the Marine Corps (//s// Deputy Commandant for Manpower and Reserve Affairs) forwards Report of Nonjudicial Punishment to Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Manpower and Reserve Affairs) for review and final action, recommending approval of Captain M_’s (Applicant) qualified resignation request and that his service be characterized as General (Under Honorable Conditions) with a...