Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0501244
Original file (ND0501244.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

ex-SN, USN
Docket No. ND05-01244

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review was received on 20050714. The Applicant requested that a Board review his record and change the characterization of his service, received at the time of discharge, to honorable. The Applicant did not designate a representative on the DD Form 293. In the acknowledgement letter, the Applicant was informed that he is approaching this Board’s 15-year limit of authority. It was suggested that the Applicant consider a personal appearance hearing at the Washington Navy Yard, Washington, D.C. The Applicant did not respond.
Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20060302. After a thorough review of all available records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the characterization of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain Under Honorable Conditions (General) by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION


 Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application:

“My General discharge was inequitable because it was based on one isolated incident in 1 year 11 months 15 days. with no other adverse actions. My sea service was 1 year 7 months 23 days.”

The Applicant submitted the following additional documentation for the Board’s consideration, in addition to his service and medical records:
Applicant’s DD Form 214 (2)
Statement from Applicant, undtd
Five pages from Applicant’s service record

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Inactive: USNR (DEP)     19890508 - 19890705      ELS
                  USNR (DEP)      19890822 - 19891002      COG
          Active: None
Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 19891003             Date of Discharge: 19910917

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 01 11 15
         Inactive: None

 Time Lost During This Period (days):
         Unauthorized absence: None
         Confinement:              None

 Age at Entry: 20

 Years Contracted: 4

 Education Level: GED                       AFQT: 46

 Highest Rate: SN

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: 4.0 (2)              Behavior: 4.0 (2)                 OTA: 3.9 (2)

Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized, (as listed on the DD Form 214) : Sea Service Deployment Ribbon, National Defense Service Medal, Southwest Asia Service Medal w/Bronze Star, Navy Unit Commendation


Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

GENERAL (UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS)/ Misconduct - Drug abuse (Use), authority: MILPERSMAN, Article 3630620 .
Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events:
890508:  NAVRESCRUITCOM DET ONE determined applicant is not considered a single parent and is eligible for enlistment.

890705:  Applicant discharged from delayed enlistment program with a characterization of entry-level separation by reason of moral disqualification (fraudulent enlistment).

 890822:  The charge of burglary/attempted burglary is classified as a non-minor misdemeanor in the state of California and was considered as such in determining enlistment eligibility. Pre-service waiver for DEP discharge granted.

891004:  Applicant signed a statement of understanding regarding the Navy's policy on drug and alcohol abuse.
910424:  Medical evaluation by Medical Department, USS DURHAM (LKA 114): Drug/Alcohol dependence evaluation following arrest and possible DUI (second alcohol incident).
Diagnosis:       Alcohol abuse/dependent.
          Recommendation: Attend AA/NA meetings, CAAC counseling, appropriate disciplinary action, Family Services Center referral for martial counseling, CREDO, Chaplain.

 910610:  Medical evaluation by Fleet Mental Health Unit, Clinical Social Worker: Stress due to pending divorce and DUI.
 Assessment: Adjustment disorder with depressed mood, alcohol abuse.
 Recommendation: Return to full duty, responsible for behavior, CAAC screening - recommend Level II, CREDO, FSC for relationships and recovery group.

910613:  NJP for a violation of the UCMJ, Article 112a (wrongful use of a controlled substance, cocaine on or about 91May24).
         Award: Forfeiture of $422 per month for 2 months, restriction and extra duty for 45 days, reduction to E-2. No indication of appeal in the record.

910708:  Medical evaluation by Medical Department, USS DURHAM (LKA 114): Medical screening for Drug/Alcohol dependency following positive urinalysis for cocaine.
         Assessment: Drug abuser, alcohol dependent, requires rehabilitation
 Recommendation: Member has no potential for further useful service and is involved in first drug offense. Appropriate disciplinary action and administrative separation. VA treatment for dependence, if requested by member prior to discharge.
910827:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge with the least favorable characterization of service as general by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.
910827:  After being advised of his rights, the Applicant consulted with counsel and elected to waive all other rights with the exception of the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation and to submit a statement.
910829:  Commanding Officer, USS DURHAM recommended to Commander, Naval Military Personnel that SN G_ (Applicant) be discharged under honorable conditions (general) by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse. Commanding Officer’s comments: “I strongly recommend SN G_(Applicant) be discharged from the naval service under general conditions. Due to members involvement with drugs a general discharge would best serve the interest of the Navy and the servicememember.”

910905:  CO’s NJP of 910613 disallowed. The urinalysis used as evidence is considered unadmissible for judicial or non-judicial punishment per OPNAVINST 5350.4B, in which the sample should have been categorized as a command directed sample vice a sub unit sweep sample. Per the provisions of OPNAVINST the non-judicial punishment awarded on 910613 is set aside. All rights and privileges restored to member.

910909:  Applicant notified Commander, Bureau of Naval Personnel of his waiver of the right to submit a statement.

910911:  BUPERS directed the Applicant's discharge with type warranted by service record by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (use).

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW
Discussion
The Applicant was discharged on 19910917 by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (A) with a service characterization of under honorable conditions (general). After a thorough review of all available records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (B and C).

When the service of a member of the U.S. Navy has been honest and faithful, it is appropriate to characterize that service as honorable. Applicable regulations require that a Sailor’s characterization of service be based upon the member’s total performance of duty and conduct during the current enlistment. The Applicant’s service record documented two alcohol related incidents and cocaine use. Separations under these conditions generally result in an under other than honorable conditions characterization of service. The Board could discern no impropriety or inequity. Relief denied.

Despite a servicemember’s prior record of service, certain serious offenses warrant separation from the naval service. There are circumstances where conduct or performance of duty reflected by a single adverse incident may form the basis for administrative discharge and the characterization of a Sailor’s overall service. Processing for separation is mandatory for sailors who abuse illegal drugs, the misconduct for which that Applicant was discharged. The evidence of record clearly documents the Applicant’s blatant disregard for authority and does not demonstrate that the Applicant was not responsible for his conduct or that he should not be held accountable for his actions. The Applicant’s service prior to his drug use does not excuse him of responsibility for the misconduct that resulted in his discharge. Relief denied.
The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any other evidence related to his discharge at that time. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.

Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)
 A. Navy Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), effective 15 Aug 91 until 04 Mar 93, Article 3630620, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED MEMBERS BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT DUE TO DRUG ABUSE.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 502, Propriety .

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 503, Equity .

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil ” .
The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
                   Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                   720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-01081

    Original file (ND04-01081.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. My name is B_ E_ G_-B_ (Applicant). The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:Naval Council of Personnel Boards Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board 720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309 Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00528

    Original file (ND99-00528.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    No indication of appeal in the record.910502: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86: Unauthorized absence 0700, 23Apr91 to 2300, 29Apr91 (6 days) Award: Forfeiture of $000 per month for 0 month(s), restriction and extra duty for 00 days, reduction to E-2. No indication of appeal in the record.910503: Retention Warning from USS DURHAM (LKA-114): Advised of deficiency (Violation of the UCMJ Article 86 - Unauthorized absence without authority. After a thorough review of the records,...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00851

    Original file (ND02-00851.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    No indication of appeal in the record.920228: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of alcohol abuse rehabilitation failure as evidenced by failure to successfully complete Level III Rehabilitation Aftercare treatment; misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense as evidenced by violation UCMJ Article 134, Drunk and disorderly conduct and violation UCMJ Article 86, Unauthorized absence; and misconduct due to drug...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00102

    Original file (ND99-00102.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    No indication of appeal in the record.850831: Commanding Officer USS MOBILE (LKA 115) notified applicant of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct- pattern – frequent involvement of a discreditable nature with civil or military authorities as evidenced by five CO NJP's, misconduct due to drug abuse as evidenced by CO's NJP dated 24 Apr 85, and misconduct due to commission of a serious offense as evidenced by CO's NJP's dated 25...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00187

    Original file (ND03-00187.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/Misconduct – Drug abuse (Use), authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630620. 910829: BUPERS directed the Applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (use). Verifiable proof of any post-service accomplishments must be provided in order for the Applicant to claim post-service conduct and behavior as a reason to upgrade a less than honorable discharge.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-01009

    Original file (ND04-01009.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND04-01009 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20040608. On 910117, CAAC was notified that SNM had tested positive for THC on a urinalysis conducted prior to the screening. Applicant did not object to separation.910321: Drug and Alcohol Abuse Report: During a random drug test, the Applicant tested positive for abuse of marijuana on or about 901219 ashore-off duty.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600634

    Original file (ND0600634.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Applicant objected to separation.910516: An Administrative Discharge Board, based upon a preponderance of the evidence and by unanimous vote, found that the Applicant had committed misconduct due to drug abuse, that such misconduct warranted separation, and recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions and recommended discharge be suspended for 12...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-01326

    Original file (ND04-01326.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. This misconduct resulted in four separate nonjudicial punishment proceedings for violations of UCMJ Articles 86, 91, 92, and 112a. The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00621

    Original file (ND01-00621.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Award: Forfeiture of $376 per month for 2 months, restriction and extra duty for 45 days, reduction to SR. No indication of appeal in the record.910701: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse and misconduct due to commission of a serious offense as evidenced by Commanding Officer's nonjudicial punishment of 26Jun91 for violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, Article 112A: Wrongful...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600643

    Original file (ND0600643.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. I would like an opportunity to work for the government but I have to have an honorable to do this.” Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214 (Service 7) PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive:...