Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00187
Original file (ND03-00187.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-SR, USN
Docket No. ND03-00187

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review, received 20021114, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. The Applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. The Applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20031017. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/Misconduct – Drug abuse (Use), authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630620.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as stated:

“1. I was told by my command, that I was able to upgrade my discharge after 1 year it has been over 10 years. I would like to receive medical benefits, for say – if I break an arm – or need stitches. I’m self-employed – commecal fisherman – I run a 50 foot Sea Bass Boat and the laws & regulations have come tight. I have a wife and son who are covered and have Ins. I’ve never been hospitalized or sick or missed work. I have stayed out of trouble since my discharge has always kept a steady job and paid my taxes on time. I spent most of service time over seas on a nuclear sub “USS” Dallas in time of “Desert Storm” and was well respected and helpful to the crew – qualified submarines in six months. I hope to hear from you soon.”

 Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
None

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Inactive: USNR (DEP)     891229 - 900110  COG
         Active: None

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 900111               Date of Discharge: 910926

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 01 08 16
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 19                          Years Contracted: 4

 Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 32

 Highest Rate: SA(SU)

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: 2.40 (2)    Behavior: 2.30 (2)                OTA: 3.30

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: SSDR, NDSM

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/Misconduct – Drug abuse (Use), authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630620.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

900116:  Applicant briefed on Navy's policy of drug and alcohol abuse.
910613:  NAVDRUGLAB, Norfolk, VA, reported Applicant’s urine sample, received 9106, tested positive for THC.

910614:  Drug and Alcohol Abuse Report: Marijuana abuse, ashore off duty. Random urinalysis 910614. Commanding Officer recommended separation. Comments: 1) Job performance is average. 2) The use of a controlled substance indicates no potential for future naval service. 3) NJP Article 112A. 4) Being transferred to Group Two for separation.

910614:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 112A: Wrongful use of a controlled substance.
         Award: Forfeiture of $460.95 per month for 2 months, restriction for 30 days, reduction to SR, oral reprimand. No indication of appeal in the record.
910701:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.
910701:  Applicant advised of his rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation.
910708:  Commanding Officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (use).

910711:  Drug/Alcohol Dependency Evaluation: Applicant found not to be dependent. Recommend administrative separation.

910716:  Drug and Alcohol Abuse Report: Marijuana abuse, ashore off duty. Random urinalysis 910614. CAAC and physician found Applicant not dependent and recommended separation. Commanding Officer recommended separation. Comments: Job performance is average. The use of a controlled substance indicates no potential for further naval service.

910725:  Applicant to unauthorized absence 0730-0810, 910725.

910829:  BUPERS directed the Applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (use).

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 19910926 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (use) (A). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).

 Issue 1: In the Applicant’s case, the Board could discern no impropriety or inequity and therefore considered the Applicant’s discharge proper and equitable . A characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions is warranted when the service member’s conduct constitutes a significant departure from that expected of a Sailor. Additionally, t he Board has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing medical benefits as requested in the issue. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination on the propriety and equity of the discharge. The Applicant’s service record is marred by award of non-judicial punishment (NJP) for illegal drug use . The Applicant’s summary of service clearly reflects the Applicant’s disobedience of the orders and directives that regulate good order and discipline in the naval service, and demonstrated he was unsuitable for further service. An upgrade to general (under honorable conditions) would be inappropriate. Relief denied.
Furthermore, t here is no law, or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in civilian life, subsequent to leaving the service. However, the NDRB is authorized to consider outstanding post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Verifiable proof of any post-service accomplishments must be provided in order for the Applicant to claim post-service conduct and behavior as a reason to upgrade a less than honorable discharge. Evidence of continuing educational pursuits, a positive employment record, a drug-free lifestyle, and certification of community service and non-involvement with civil authorities are examples of verifiable proof that can be submitted. At this time, the Applicant has not provided any verifiable documentation of good character and conduct to mitigate his misconduct while on active duty. Relief is not warranted.

The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide additional documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments at that time. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.



Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Navy Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), effective 15 Aug 91 until 04 Mar 93, Article 3630620, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED MEMBERS BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT DUE TO DRUG ABUSE.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at " afls14.jag.af.mil ".

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00402

    Original file (ND00-00402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:None PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: None Inactive: None Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 881028 Date of Discharge: 910724 Length of Service (years, months, days): Active: 01 10 20 Inactive: 00 11 06 Age at Entry: 18 Years Contracted: 8 Education Level: 12 AFQT: 39/42 Highest...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01073

    Original file (ND03-01073.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Over the past 12 years not a day has passed that I have not regretted my actions. Charge I: violation of the UCMJ, Article 112A, Specification: Wrongful distribution of 1.3 grams of marijuana. Navy Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), effective 15 Aug 91 until 04 Mar 93, Article 3630620, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED MEMBERS BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT DUE TO DRUG ABUSE.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00621

    Original file (ND01-00621.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Award: Forfeiture of $376 per month for 2 months, restriction and extra duty for 45 days, reduction to SR. No indication of appeal in the record.910701: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse and misconduct due to commission of a serious offense as evidenced by Commanding Officer's nonjudicial punishment of 26Jun91 for violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, Article 112A: Wrongful...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00373

    Original file (ND00-00373.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND00-00373 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 000128, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. No indication of appeal in the record.860924: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse as evidenced by a positive random urinalysis for cocaine and misconduct due to commission of a serious...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00405

    Original file (ND02-00405.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Commanding Officer recommended separate from service.880304: Medical evaluation for drug abuse found the Applicant to be an episodic alcohol abuser and poly drug abuser, not drug dependent. 880311: An Administrative Discharge Board, based upon a preponderance of the evidence and by unanimous vote, found that the Applicant had committed misconduct due to drug abuse, that the misconduct warranted separation, and recommended discharge under honorable conditions (general). PART III – RATIONALE...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01343

    Original file (ND03-01343.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Commanding Officer recommends separation. As of this time, the Applicant has not provided any documentation for the Board to consider.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01006

    Original file (ND03-01006.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION 931230: BUPERS directed the Applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (use). Navy Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 5/93, effective 05 Mar 93 until 21 Jul 94, Article 3630620, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED MEMBERS BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT DUE TO DRUG ABUSE.

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00314

    Original file (ND99-00314.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND99-00314 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 981230, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable and the reason for the discharge be changed to reentry to a 3 or below. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged on 961202 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (use) (A). After a thorough review of the records, supporting...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00024

    Original file (ND03-00024.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The FSM served two years, seven months, and eleven days of active service until March 27, 1990, at which time he was discharged due to drug abuse. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant's DD Form 214 Shreveport Police Department record check, dated October 24, 2002 Bossier City Court record check, undated Certificate from the Office of Clerk, 26 th Judicial District, State of Louisiana,...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00216

    Original file (ND00-00216.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 (2 copies) Copy of undergraduate transcripts Graduate school (Doctoral program in Clinical Psychology) transcripts Current Vitae Certificate of Appointment by Commanding Officer, RTC, San Diego to E-1 for completing Recruit Training in top10% (2 copies) Letter of Commendation from Commanding Officer, RTC, San Diego, for attaining highest...