Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500649
Original file (ND0500649.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

ex-RP3, USN
Docket No. ND05-00649

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review was received on 20050304. The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. The Applicant did not designate a representative on the DD Form 293.

 Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20050915. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge and reason for discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain Under Other Than Honorable Conditions in lieu of a trial by court-martial .

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as stated

 Applicant’s issues, as stated on the attached document/letter:

“The undersigned Affiant, having duly sworn, deposes and states as follows:

1. That the Affiant is RP3 R_ D_ M_ (Applicant), USN.

2. That he is making this Affidavit for the purpose of furnishing a sworn statement to accompany the documents requesting an Other Than Honorable Discharge from the United States Navy, in lieu of court-martial.

3. That this Affidavit is made freely and voluntarily, and the contents hereof are true.

4. That Affiant is requesting discharge in lieu of court-martial because he feels that it is in his own best interest to do so, in light of the evidence intended to be used against him, the risk involved in any trial, and the consequences in the event that he had lost at trial.

5. Nevertheless, Affiant requests that consideration be given to granting him a General Discharge instead of an Other Than Honorable Discharge, especially in view of his desire to become a law enforcement officer in the future, and in view of his earlier service record, which he submits is more reflective of his career with the Navy than the present circumstances.

FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NAUGHT.
[signed]
R_ D_ M_ (Applicant)

Sworn to and subscribed this 6 th Day of December 1995.”
Documentation
In addition to the service and medical records, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
Applicant’s DD Form 214
Receipt for donuts from Dunkin Donuts, dated October 29, 1995
Service Record Documents (13 pages)

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Inactive: USNR (DEP)     19880229 - 19880724               COG
         Active: USN                        19880725 - 19940327               HON

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 19940328             Date of Discharge: 19960212

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 01 10 15
         Inactive: None

 Time Lost During This Period (days):
         Unauthorized absence: None
         Confinement:              None

 Age at Entry: 23

 Years Contracted: 2

 Education Level: 12                                 AFQT: 26

 Highest Rate: RP3

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: 3.8 (2)                       Behavior: 3.8 (2)        OTA: 3.9

Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized, (as listed on the DD Form 214): Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal,; M-16 Rifle Marksmanship Ribbon, Sea Service Deployment Ribbon; National Defense Service Medal; Navy & Marine Corps Overseas Medal; Artic Service Ribbon; Navy Achievement Medal; Navy Good Conduct Medal for period ending 92JUL24.


Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/ IN LIEU OF TRIAL BY COURT MARTIAL, authority: MILPERSMAN, Article 3630650.

Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

940328:  Reenlisted this date for a term of 2 years.
960212:  DD Form 214: Applicant discharged under other than honorable conditions in lieu of a trial by court-martial, authority: MILPERSMAN, Article 3630650.

Service Record did not contain the Administrative Discharge package.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion
The Applicant was discharged on 19960212 in lieu of a trial by court-martial (A) with a service characterization of under other than honorable conditions. After a thorough review of the available records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (B and C). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (D).

 In the absence of a complete discharge package, the NDRB presumed that the Applicant requested an administrative discharge under other than honorable conditions in lieu of a trial by court-martial. The Board further presumed that he consulted with counsel, was fully advised of the implications of his request, and that the Applicant understood that if discharged under other than honorable conditions, it might deprive him of virtually all veterans' benefits based upon his current enlistment. Likewise, the Board presumed the Applicant was aware that he might expect to encounter substantial prejudice in civilian life in situations wherein the type of service rendered or the character of discharge received therefrom may have a bearing, that he understood the elements of the offenses with which he was charged and admitted he was guilty of violating UCMJ Article 121: Larceny. The Applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of his service, reflects his willful failure to meet the requirements of his contract with the U.S. Navy. Such conduct falls far short of that expected of a member of the U.S. military and does not meet the requirements for an upgrade of his characterization of service. Relief is not warranted.

In a signed affidavit dated 19951206, the Applicant claims his innocence and indicates he requested separation in lieu of trial by court-martial due to the risks inherent in trial by court-martial. The government enjoys a presumption of regularity in the conduct of its affairs. The Applicant bears the burden of establishing his issues through the presentation of substantial and credible evidence. There is no evidence in the record, nor has the Applicant produced any evidence, to support his claim of innocence. Additionally, the NDRB considered the Applicant’s request for separation tantamount to an admission of guilt for the alleged misconduct. The Applicant’s statements alone do not overcome the government’s presumption of regularity in this case. Relief denied.

The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.

Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 9, effective
22 Jul 94 until 2 Oct 96, Article 3630650, PROCEDURES FOR PROCESSING ENLISTED PERSONNEL FOR SEPARATION IN LIEU OF TRIAL BY COURT-MARTIAL.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 502, Propriety .

 C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 503, Equity .

 D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.


PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil ” .
The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
                   Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                   720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600089

    Original file (ND0600089.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600814

    Original file (ND0600814.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable or general (under honorable conditions). 910611: The Commanding Officer, exercising GCMCA, approved the request for an administrative separation in lieu of a trial by court-martial, and directed Applicant’s discharge.Service Record was missing elements of the Summary of Service. The Applicant requests upgrade of his discharge in part because he was not informed by his...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600277

    Original file (ND0600277.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEWDECISIONAL DOCUMENT FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY ex-SK2, USNDocket No. ND06-00277 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20051125. The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable or general (under honorable conditions).

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0501429

    Original file (ND0501429.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board presumed that the Applicant requested an administrative discharge under other than honorable conditions in lieu of a trial by court-martial. The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge. The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:Secretary of the Navy Council...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00578

    Original file (ND99-00578.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND99-00578 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 990412, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. Decision A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 000121. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/IN LIEU OF TRIAL BY COURT MARTIAL, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630650.The NDRB did note an administrative error on the original DD Form 214.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00305

    Original file (ND03-00305.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant discharged. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).Issue 1: The Applicant states his character is demonstrated by his “military duties and performance.” Even though the Applicant had very good evaluations throughout his tenure in the Navy, his performance prior to the misconduct does not mitigate his extremely long period of unauthorized...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00107

    Original file (ND04-00107.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND04-00107 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20031024. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 29, effective 11 Jul 2000 until 21 Aug 2002, Article 1910-106 (formerly 3630650), SEPARATION IN LIEU OF TRIAL BY COURT-MARTIAL, states: _____________________________________________________ Responsible BUPERS (Pers-83) Phone: DSN 882-4438 COM (901)874-4438 FAX 822-2624 ________________________________________________________ Governing Manual...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00864

    Original file (ND99-00864.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND99-00864 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 990610, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable or general/under honorable conditions. Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events : 900425: Applicant briefed on Navy's policy on drug and alcohol abuse.910910: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86: Unauthorized absence 2400, 27 August 1991 to 0507, 28 August 1991. You should read Enclosure (5) of the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0501472

    Original file (ND0501472.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events : 040720: DD Form 214: Applicant discharge under other than honorable conditions in lieu of trial by court-martial, authority: MILPERSMAN, Article 1910-106.Service Record did not contain the Administrative Discharge package and the Service...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-01037

    Original file (ND04-01037.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION _______________________________________________________________________ In accordance with Title 32, CFR, Section 724.166 and SECNAVINST 5420.174D, Part I, Paragraph 1.20, The American Legion submits to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB or Board) the above issue and following statement in supplement...