Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600089
Original file (ND0600089.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

ex-SN, USN
Docket No. ND06-00089

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review was received on 20051020. The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. The Applicant did not designate a representative on the DD Form 293.

 Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20060808. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain Under Other Than Honorable Conditions in lieu of a trial by court-martial .

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as stated

 Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application:

“Its been long enough time being discharged under other than honorable conditions.”
Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
Applicant’s DD Form 214

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Inactive: USNR (DEP)     19880412 – 19881025               COG
         Active: None

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 19881026             Date of Discharge: 19931019

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 04 00 18 (excludes lost time)
         Inactive: None

 Time Lost During This Period (days):
         Unauthorized absence: 337 days
         Confinement:              none

 Age at Entry: 18

Years Contracted: 4

Education Level: 12                                 AFQT: 34

 Highest Rate: SN

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: 3.4 (3)              Behavior: 3.8 (3)                 OTA: 3 .47

Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized, (as listed on the DD Form 214): Battle ”E” Ribbon, Sea Service Deployment Ribbon, National Defense Service Medal, Southwest Asia Service Medal.


Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/ IN LIEU OF TRIAL BY COURT MARTIAL, authority: MILPERSMAN, Article 3630650.

Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

891227:  Applicant to unauthorized absence at 0700 on 891227.
900105:  Applicant declared a deserter.
900111:  Applicant from unauthorized absence at 1550 on 900111.
900118:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86: Unauthorized absence.
 Award: Restriction and extra duty for 30 days, reduction to E-1 (suspended for 6 months). No indication of appeal in the record.
910715:  Applicant to unauthorized absence at 0700 on 910715.
 Applicant missed sailing of USS HALSEY (CG 23) from San Diego, California.

910716:  Applicant from unauthorized absence at 1100 on 910716.

 911107:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 92: Failure to obey a lawful order or regulation.
 Award: Forfeiture of $100.00 pay per month for 2 months, restriction and extra duty for 25 days. No indication of appeal in the record.
911109:  Retention Warning: Advised of deficiency (Article 92, failure to obey lawful order), notified of corrective actions and assistance available, advised of consequences of further deficiencies, and issued discharge warning.
920131:  Recommendation for advancement to BM3 withdrawn due to total disregard for authority and Navy Regulations.

920827:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86: (2 specs), Unauthorized absence.
 Award: Forfeiture of $75.00 pay per month for 2 months, restriction and extra duty for 15 days to limits of USS HALSEY, reduction to E-2 (suspended for 6 months). No indication of appeal in the record.
920827:  Retention Warning: Advised of deficiency (Article 86, unauthorized absence), notified of corrective actions and assistance available, advised of consequences of further deficiencies, and issued discharge warning.
920923:  Applicant to unauthorized absence at 0725 on 920923.
Applicant missed sailing of USS HALSEY (CG 23) from San Diego, California. Applicant declared a deserter.
930810:  Applicant surrendered on board TPU Naval Station San Diego, CA at 1145, 930810.

930902:  Charges preferred for violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) Article 86: Unauthorized absence from 920923 to 930810.

930902:  Charges referred to special court-martial.

931001:  Applicant requested an administrative discharge under other than honorable conditions in lieu of a trial by court-martial. He consulted with counsel and was fully advised of the implications of his request. The Applicant stated he understood the elements of the offense(s)s with which he was charged, and admitted he was guilty of the charge preferred against him. Specifically, he admitted to violating UCMJ, Article 86, unauthorized absence from on or about 920923 until on or about 930810. The Applicant stated he was completely satisfied with the counsel he had received. The Applicant understood that if discharged under other than honorable conditions, it might deprive him of virtually all veterans' benefits based upon his current enlistment, and that he might expect to encounter substantial prejudice in civilian life in situations wherein the type of service rendered or the character of discharge received therefrom may have a bearing.

931007:  Commanding Officer, Transient Personnel Unit, San Diego, exercising GCMCA, approved the request for an administrative separation in lieu of a trial by court-martial, and directed Applicant’s under other than honorable conditions discharge.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion
The Applicant was discharged on 19931019 in lieu of a trial by court-martial (A and B) with a service characterization of under other than honorable conditions. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).

An under other than honorable conditions discharge is warranted when significant negative aspects of a member’s conduct or performance of duty outweigh the positive aspects of the member’s military record. The Applicant’s service was marred by two retention warnings and three nonjudicial punishment proceedings for violations of Articles 86 and 92 of the UCMJ. The Applicant was also declared a deserter on two occasions and missed movement on two occasions. Missing movement is a violation of Article 87 of the UCMJ, and the commission of a serious offense. The Applicant’s last period of unauthorized absence, which was never adjudicated, was 321 days in duration and is also the commission of a serious offense. The Applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of his service, reflects his willful failure to meet the requirements of his contract with the U.S. Navy and falls far short of that required for an upgrade of his characterization of service. Relief is not warranted.

The Applicant implies his discharge is inequitable because “it’s been long enough.” Normally, to permit relief, a procedural impropriety or inequity must have occurred during the discharge process for the period of enlistment in question. The Board discovered no impropriety after a review of Applicant’s case. There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving Naval service. The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that should be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities. As of this time, the Applicant has not provided any post-service documentation for the Board to consider. Relief denied.

The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.


Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A . Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 5, effective
05 Mar 93 until 21 Jul 94, Article 3630650, PROCEDURES FOR PROCESSING ENLISTED PERSONNEL FOR SEPARATION IN LIEU OF TRIAL BY COURT-MARTIAL.

B. A punitive bad conduct discharge may be adjudged for violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, Article 86, unauthorized absence for a period more than 30 days, Article 87, missing movement or Article 92, failure to obey order/regulation, upon conviction by a Special or General Court-Martial, in accordance with the Manual for Courts-Martial.
C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 502, Propriety .

 D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 503, Equity .

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil ” .
The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
                   Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                   720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00863

    Original file (ND99-00863.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT ex-SMSN, USN Docket No. ND99-00863 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 990611, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. Relief to a fully Honorable discharge is, however, not warranted.The applicant’s second issue states: “I have been very involved in the Children’s Ministry at my Church and in Latino Affairs at the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500534

    Original file (ND0500534.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). As the representative, we ask that consideration be given to equitable relief, as this is a matter that involves a determination whether a discharge should be changed under the equity standards, to include any issue upon which the Applicant submits to the Board’s discretionary authority, under SECNAVIST 5420.174D, to include a review of his in-service...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01510

    Original file (ND03-01510.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). “I’m writing this letter in regard to an upgrade in my discharge I received, my behavior in the military was not good but I was going through some thing, but I managed to stay clear of anything close to that behavior since getting out including no criminal record, and now I attend a good bible-based church to get my life all the way right, so...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00724

    Original file (ND01-00724.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION (DAV's Issue)After a review of the Former Service Member (FSM) DD Form 293 Application for the Review of Discharge or Dismissal from the Armed Forces of the United States and all of the evidence assembled for review, we continue to note the contentions as set forth on the application by the appellant of an upgrade of his current Bad Conduct Discharge to that of Honorable. As the representative this service requests consideration be given to...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00981

    Original file (ND99-00981.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND99-00981 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 990713, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 Applicant stated: "If requested, I will submit police records, character references, educational achievements and work history or any other...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600386

    Original file (ND0600386.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND06-00386 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20060110. The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION Issues, as stated Applicant’s issues, as stated on the attached documents:Issues submitted by Applicant’s counsel/representative (Civilian Counsel):“ PETITION FOR REVIEW BEFORE THE NAVY DISCHARGE REVIEW...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-00678

    Original file (MD04-00678.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT ex-PFC, USMC Docket No. The Applicant requested the characterization of service received at the time of discharge changed to honorable. Issues, as stated Issues presented by the Applicant’s American Legion representative supersede those listed on the original application:1 (Equity) Family problems, father’s illness and death, contributed to and mitigate misconduct.

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600678

    Original file (MD0600678.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s vote was 3-2that the discharge shall change to: GENERAL (UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS)/IN LIEU OF TRIAL BY COURT-MARTIAL, authority: MARCORSEPMAN Par. The characterization of service shall be under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct.Service Record was missing elements of the Summary of Service. Subsequent to the Applicant’s unauthorized absence, he tested positive for illegal drug use on two occasions and requested discharge in lieu of court-marital for...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00223

    Original file (ND04-00223.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND04-00223 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20031119. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review.

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00638

    Original file (MD00-00638.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    950510: Applicant advised of his rights and having consulted with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation.950621: Commanding officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the...