Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500277
Original file (ND0500277.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-SR, USN
Docket No. ND05-00277

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review was received on 20041210. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable or general (under honorable conditions). The Applicant requests a documentary record review. The Applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20050214. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/Misconduct - Pattern of Misconduct, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630600.



PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as stated

 Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application:

 1. “Dear Sir,

It was recommended by, G_ C_ of your Staten Island office, that I contact you to request your aid concerning my discharge from the United States Navy on May 11 th 1992, which was under other than honorable conditions. With the retrospect allowed by the passage of time and the acquisition of experience and the wisdom of age, I can say that while I wanted nothing more than to serve my country with honor, I should not have entered into military service at 18 years old. I was not ready for such service, and, if it were possible to reverse such a decision or correct wrongs, I would not hesitate to do so. I would much rather have waited to join the military until I was mature enough, than to have joined unready. I wanted to serve my country, but I was also charmed by recruitment: the desire for ready-money for higher education, and the immediate release from parental bonds, both things that my life at 18 sorely lacked.

I was not prepared for the training and the responsibility of a serviceman. I made rash, immature decisions that ultimately lead to my early release from service. I enjoyed the freedoms, which came with shore leave and being away from home. In the period of time since then I have yearned to correct the patterns, which lead to my discharge and to prove to myself and family that I could do better than I had.

Now at the age of 32, I feel that I have accomplished a number of things, and wish that the mistakes of my past do not hinder my future. I have attended the City University of New York, taking courses toward a degree in English Literature. During my University career, I established one of the leading literary societies in the United States dedicated to the study of the works of J.R.R. Tolkien. This group, The New York Tolkien Society http://www. herenistarion.org publishes a bimonthly journal for members, and has sponsored academic events across North America. As long as I can remember I have always wished to write and publish and share the joy of learning with others. In recent years I have contributed articles to numerous scholarly publications, including the forthcoming Encyclopedia of Children’s Literature by Oxford University Press, the recent collection of essays Translating Tolkien: Text and Film , and will be contributing to Routledge’s Tolkien Encyclopedia due in 2006. In the Spring of 2005, Holy Family University has asked my fiancé and I to conduct a series of lectures in Philadelphia. We will be discussing Tolkien and his works.

The academic career that I have sought is blossoming, but it’s still a long way before it will fully provide for my family and I. I am currently employed as a NY State Licensed Security Guard for the Mission of the Immaculate Virgin: Mount Loretto. In recent months I have sought to take Civil Service exams for various positions that have opened, such as Park Patrol and Environmental Police Officer. In researching the Civil Service exams and the positions they provide, I have realized that a requirement in order to be considered for a position would be an honorable discharge from military service.

I sincerely have regretted my actions during the course of my military service. I have sought only to correct the mistakes I have made since my discharge, and not to have them be a deciding factor in my future. I am submitting form DD 293 to The Naval Council of Personnel Boards, a copy of which is enclosed. Any aide in this matter would be most welcome and appreciated.

I thank you for your time.

Sincerely,

A_ S_ B_ ( Applicant )”

 Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
Applicant’s DD Form 214

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Inactive: USNR (DEP)     900515 - 901115  COG
         Active: None

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 901116               Date of Discharge: 920511

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 01 05 26
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 18                          Years Contracted: 4

 Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 41

 Highest Rate: SR

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: 3.00 (1)             Behavior: 2.70 (2)                OTA: 2.60

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: NDSM

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: 20

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/Misconduct – Pattern of misconduct, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630600.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

901119:  You are being retained in the Naval service, despite your defective enlistment and induction due to fraudulent entry into naval service as evidenced by your failure to disclose your pre-service civil involvement/drug abuse. 8307 Shoplifting, Staten Island, NY. No charges were filed. This decision is based on the information you provided the Recruit Quality Assurance Interviewer and if it is found that additional information has not been disclosed, this waiver is void and you could be subject to other judicial or administrative proceedings. However, any further deficiencies in performance or conduct may result in processing for administrative separation.

910807:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 92: Failure to obey a lawful order on 910804, violation of UCMJ, Article 91: Insubordinate conduct on 910804.
         Award: Restriction and extra duty for 15 days. No indication of appeal in the record.
910807:  Retention Warning from USS HALSEY (CG 23): Advised of deficiency (Failure to obey a lawful order and insubordinate conduct.), notified of corrective actions and assistance available, advised of consequences of further deficiencies, and issued discharge warning.

910910:  Substance Abuse Screening/Psychiatric Evaluation: Assessment: Shows evidence of early dependence due to blackouts, tolerance, observed behavior. Applicant would benefit from Level III. Prognosis is good. Diagnosis: AXIS I: Alcohol dependence - early. AXIS II: Schizotypal Traits.

 910914   Applicant to unauthorized absence 0530, 910914.

 910924:  Applicant missed ship’s movement.

 911003:  Applicant from unauthorized absence 2330, 911003 (20 days/surrendered).
911010:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86: Unauthorized absence, violation of UCMJ, Article 87: Missing movement.
         Award: Forfeiture of $100 per month for 1 month, restriction and extra duty for 30 days. No indication of appeal in the record.
911010:  Retention Warning from USS HALSEY (CG 23): Advised of deficiency (Unauthorized absence and missing movement), notified of corrective actions and assistance available, advised of consequences of further deficiencies, and issued discharge warning.

 911107:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86: Absence from appointed place of duty, violation of UCMJ, Article 117: Provoking speech, violation of UCMJ, Article 128: Assault, violation of UCMJ, Article 134: Drunk and disorderly.
         Award: Forfeiture of $100 per month for 2 months, restriction and extra duty for 27 days. No indication of appeal in the record.
911107:  Retention Warning from USS HALSEY (CG 23): Advised of deficiency (Assault, drunk and disorderly conduct, provoking speech, absence from appointed place of duty), notified of corrective actions and assistance available, advised of consequences of further deficiencies, and issued discharge warning.
920113:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 121: Larceny.
         Award: Forfeiture of $100 per month for 1 month, restriction and extra duty for 10 days. No indication of appeal in the record.
920125:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 109: Destruction of property other than military property of the United States.
         Award: Forfeiture of $200 per month for 1 month, restriction and extra duty for 15 days. No indication of appeal in the record.
920125:  USS HALSEY (CG 23) notified Applicant of intended recommendation for discharge by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct. Applicant notified that if discharge is approved, the least favorable characterization of service possible is under other than honorable conditions.

920125:  Applicant advised of rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27(b), elected to waive all rights.
920128:  Commanding Officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct.

920203:  BUPERS directed the Applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 19920511 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct (A). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).

Issue 1: Normally, to permit relief, an impropriety or inequity must have existed during the period of enlistment in question. No such impropriety or inequity is evident during the Applicant’s enlistment. When the service of a member of the U.S. Navy has been honest and faithful, it is appropriate to characterize that service as honorable. An under other than honorable conditions discharge is warranted when significant negative aspects of a member's conduct or performance of duty outweigh the positive aspects of the member's military record. T he Applicant’s service was marred by a variety of misconduct, including a fraudulent enlistment, unauthorized absences, orders violations, insubordinate conduct, missing movement, provoking speech, assault, drunk and disorderly conduct, larceny, and destruction of government property. This misconduct resulted in four separate written counselings/retention warnings for his repeated misconduct and five nonjudicial punishment proceedings for violations of UCMJ Articles 86, 87, 91, 92, 109, 117, 121, 128, and 134. The Applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of his service, reflects his willful failure to meet the requirements of his contract with the U.S. Navy. Such conduct falls far short of that expected of a member of the U.S. military and does not meet the requirements for an upgrade of his characterization of service. Relief is not warranted.

 The Applicant contends his disciplinary problems were the result of his relative immaturity and youth at the age of enlistment. The NDRB recognizes that serving in the U.S. Navy is challenging. Our country is fortunate to have men and women willing to endure the hardships and sacrifices required in order to serve their country. It must be noted that most members of the Navy enlist at about the same age as the Applicant. It must further be noted that, unlike the Applicant, the vast majority of these “young” servicemembers serve honorably and therefore earn their honorable discharges. In fairness to those members of the Navy, commanders and separation authorities are tasked to ensure that undeserving Sailors receive no higher characterization than is due. The NDRB found that the Applicant's service was equitably characterized. Relief denied.

There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded, based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving naval service. The NDRB is authorized, however, to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that should be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle, and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities. As of this time, the Applicant has not provided sufficient documentation for the Board to consider. Relief denied.

There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of enhancing employment opportunities and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief. Regulations limit the Board’s review to a determination on the propriety and equity of the discharge.

The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any other evidence related to his discharge at that time. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.

Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C, effective 15 Aug 91 until
04 Mar 93), Article 3630600, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT – A PATTERN OF MISCONDUCT.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 502, Propriety .

 D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 503, Equity .

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil” .

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
                   Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                   720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500628

    Original file (ND0500628.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. The Applicant contends that his military service aboard the USS AMERICA (CV 66), during which time he received numerous awards, is deserving of an honorable discharge. The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01510

    Original file (ND03-01510.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). “I’m writing this letter in regard to an upgrade in my discharge I received, my behavior in the military was not good but I was going through some thing, but I managed to stay clear of anything close to that behavior since getting out including no criminal record, and now I attend a good bible-based church to get my life all the way right, so...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00035

    Original file (ND04-00035.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. No indication of appeal in the record.881130: Vacate suspended reduction to SA awarded at CO’s NJP dated 881123 due to continued misconduct.890210: Retention Warning from USS HALSEY (CG-23): Advised of deficiency (During your first two weeks onboard USS HALSEY you failed to go to your appointed place of duty at the prescribed time on five (5) separate...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00285

    Original file (ND00-00285.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION I served my country during Operation Desert Storm proudly for 3 years, 11 months & 3 days. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).In response to applicant’s issue 1, there is no law or regulation that provides for the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01444

    Original file (ND03-01444.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND03-01444 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20030903. I WAS TOLD TO REPORT CAPTAIN MASS AND HE INFORMED ME THAT BECAUSE I HAD BEEN WRITTEN UP 3 TIMES AND THAT IT SHOWS A PATTERN OF MISCONDUCT AND HE RECOMMEND THAT I BE DISCHARGED UNDER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS. The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01323

    Original file (ND03-01323.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).The Applicant did not introduce any decisional issues for the Board’s consideration. The Applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of his service, reflect his disobedience of the orders and directives which regulate good order and discipline in the naval service, and falls...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600089

    Original file (ND0600089.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0501401

    Original file (ND0501401.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to general (under honorable conditions). Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Reference Letter from C_ B_(Applicant’s mother) dtd August 9, 2005 Reference Letter from Mr E_ P_, dtd January 17, 2005 Character Reference Letter from E_ B_ M_, dtd December 13, 2004 Letter from Applicant dtd...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00364

    Original file (ND00-00364.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Although many mistakes were made during my enlistment from 1988-1991, I feel that overall my time served in the U.S. Navy is deserving of an honorable discharge.In 1989 I attended and completed search and rescue surface swimmer training in San Diego, California. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).In the applicant’s issue 1, the Board determined this...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0501292

    Original file (ND0501292.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Relief is not warranted.The Applicant contends that his problems in the Navy can be attributed a diagnosed personality disorder (not otherwise specified) and that the command did not follow medical advice. The Applicant was evaluated by a competent medical authority who stated that the Applicant was “considered totally unfit for further shipboard/overseas duty.” Although the Applicant may have been eligible for administrative separation for a medical condition, applicable regulations...