Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00844
Original file (ND04-00844.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-MSSN, USN
Docket No. ND04-00844

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review was received on 20040427. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. The Applicant requests a documentary record review. The Applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293. In the acknowledgement letter, the Applicant was informed that he was approaching the 15 year point for review by this Board and was encouraged to attend a personal appearance hearing in the Washington D.C. area. Applicant did not respond.

Decision

A documentary review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20041008. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/Misconduct – Drug abuse (Use), authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630620.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as stated

Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application:

1. “Since Day of Separation I have Been outstanding Citizen. One mistake should not cost the Rest of my Life. ”

Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
None

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Inactive: USNR (DEP)     811217 - 820225  COG
         Active: USN                        820226 - 891030  HON

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 891031               Date of Discharge: 900829

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 08 05 03
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 26                          Years Contracted: 6

 Education Level: 11                        AFQT: 44

 Highest Rate: MS2

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: 3.8 (1)     Behavior: 3.8 (1)                 OTA: 3.8

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: GCM, NER, SSDR, NEM

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/Misconduct – Drug abuse (Use), authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630620.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :
900704:  Applicant to UA on this date.

900721:  Applicant surrendered from UA this date.

 900803:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86: Unauthorized absence, violation of UCMJ, Article 112a: Wrongful use possession, etc of controlled substance.
Award: Restriction and extra duty for 45 days, reduction to E-4. No indication of appeal in the record.
900803:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge with a least favorable characterization of under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse [Extracted from the CO’s letter].

900806:  Applicant advised of rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27(b), elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation and the right to submit a statement [Extracted from CO’s letter].

900817:  Medical evaluation for drug abuse found the Applicant to be a drug abuser, not drug dependent.
900823:  Commanding Officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.

900827:  CNMPC directed the Applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.

Complete Discharge Package Unavailable

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 19900829 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (A). After a thorough review of the available records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (B and C). The presumption of regularity of governmental affairs was applied by the Board in this case in the absence of a complete discharge package (D).

Issue 1: Normally, to permit relief, a procedural impropriety or inequity must have occurred during the discharge process for the period of enlistment in question. The Board discovered no impropriety after a review of Applicant’s case. There is credible evidence in the record that the Applicant used illegal drugs. Mandatory processing for separation is required for sailors who abuse illegal drugs. Separation under these conditions generally results in characterization of service under other than honorable conditions. The Applicant’s service was marred by nonjudicial punishment proceedings for violations of Articles 86 and 112a of the UCMJ. The Applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of his service, reflects his willful failure to meet the requirements of his contract with the U.S. Navy and falls far short of that required for an upgrade of his characterization of service. Relief denied.

The following is provided for the edification of the Applicant. Normally, to permit relief, a procedural impropriety or inequity must have occurred during the discharge process for the period of enlistment in question. The Board discovered no impropriety after a review of Applicant’s case. There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded, based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving naval service. The NDRB is authorized, however, to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that should be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, credible evidence of a substance free lifestyle, and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities. As of this time, the Applicant has not provided any documentation for the Board to consider. Relief denied.

The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any other evidence related to his discharge at that time. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.

Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Navy Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560A), Change 11, effective
14 Jun 90 until 14 Aug 91, Article 3630620, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED MEMBERS BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT DUE TO DRUG ABUSE.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.
D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at " afls14.jag.af.mil ".

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023



 .

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00066

    Original file (ND03-00066.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND03-00066 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 20021010, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable or general/under honorable conditions. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The Applicant was discharged on 880229 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (use) (A). Verifiable proof of any post-service accomplishments must be provided in order for...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00526

    Original file (ND99-00526.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Decision A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 991213. Block 24, Character of Service, should read: "UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS" vice "OTHER THAN HONORABLE", Block 25, Separation Authority, should read: "3630620" vice "3610240", and Block 28, Narrative Reason for Separation, should read: “Misconduct - Drug Abuse (Use)” vice “DISCHARGED DUE TO MISCONDUCT (DRUG USE)”, and. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00791

    Original file (ND02-00791.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND02-00791 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020513, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Letter of Recommendation from LCdr T_ P. S_ USN, dated 24Sept1997 Copy of Character Witness Statement from D_ D. A_ JOC (SW/AW), USNdated 1June1997 Copy of Character Witness Statement from...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00209

    Original file (ND02-00209.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND02-00209 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020108, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at " afls10.jag.af.mil ".The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00686

    Original file (ND00-00686.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND00-00686 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 000504, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged on 930922 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (use) (A). PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear,...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00102

    Original file (ND00-00102.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Decision A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 000727. 910215: Drug and Alcohol Abuse Report: Self-referral 22Aug90, marijuana abuse, 4-7 times per week, ashore off duty. In accordance with OPNAVINST 5350.4A, the lowest discharge characterization the applicant could receive, as a participant in the Navy’s Alcohol and Drug Abuse self-referral program, is General.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00522

    Original file (ND01-00522.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. After a thorough review of the records, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).In response to the applicant’s issue, the Board found that the applicant’s performance evaluation averages and service record were indeed outstanding, until the time that he began using illegal drugs. However, the NDRB is authorized to consider outstanding post-service...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-01043

    Original file (ND99-01043.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Treatment recommendation - CAAC out-patient treatment program (Level II) and AA meetings two times weekly.920123: NAVDRUGLAB, GLakes, IL: Urinalysis sample taken on 09Jan92, received by lab on 14Jan92, applicant positive for cocaine/marijuana.920206: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 112a(2 specs) wrongful use of cocaine on or about 06DEC91 to 06Jan92 and wrongful use of marijuana on or about 06DEC91 to 06Jan92.Award: Forfeiture of $457.50 per month for 2 months (1 months suspended for six...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00427

    Original file (ND01-00427.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I am an individual who is proud of these accomplishments never to be taken from me, however, I have taken from self the honor I should have received and at this time I am trying to gain that by requesting an upgrade to my DD214 to Honorable Discharge. 940131: Applicant to unauthorized absence 0700, 31Jan94.940204: An Administrative Discharge Board, based upon a preponderance of the evidence and by unanimous vote, found that the applicant had committed misconduct due to drug abuse, that the...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00524

    Original file (ND00-00524.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    This is technically his second incident but the first incident was never properly documented at previous command).860120: Report of Declaration of Deserter (NAVPERS 1600-3). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).The applicant’s issue states: “My discharge was inequitable because it was based on incidents which where isolated to a very small time period...