Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00526
Original file (ND99-00526.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT




ex-ENFN, USN
Docket No. ND99-00526

Applicant’s Request

The application for discharge review, received 990303, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. The applicant did not designate a representative on the DD Form 293.


Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 991213. After a thorough review of the records, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the applicant’s service. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/Misconduct – Drug abuse (Use), authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630620.

The NDRB did note an administrative error on the original DD Form 214. Block 24, Character of Service, should read: "UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS" vice "OTHER THAN HONORABLE", Block 25, Separation Authority, should read: "3630620" vice "3610240", and Block 28, Narrative Reason for Separation, should read: “Misconduct - Drug Abuse (Use)” vice “DISCHARGED DUE TO MISCONDUCT (DRUG USE)”, and. The original DD Form 214 should be corrected or reissued as appropriate. Additionally, member's NAVPERS 1070/615 (Record of Discharge From the U.S. Navy Reserve should be corrected to reflect a discharge date of "4 DEC 90" vice "24 JUN 92" for purpose of reentry U.S. Navy.


PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues

Prior to the documentary discharge review, the applicant introduced no issues as block 8 on the DD Form 293 is blank.

Documentation

Only the service and medical record was considered, as the applicant did not provide additional documentation.


PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):

         Active: USNR              870429 - 881228  RELACDU
USNR             840626 - 841005  RELACDUTRA
Inactive: USNR            841006 - 870428  To Report ACDU
                  USNR             881229 - 901204  To Enlist USN
                  USNR (DEP)      901205 - 910106  COG

Period of Service Under Review :

Date of Enlistment: 910107               Date of Discharge: 930625

Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 02 05 19
         Inactive: None

Age at Entry: 23                          Years Contracted: 4

Education Level: 10                        AFQT: 49

Highest Rate: EN3 (E-4)

Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

Performance: 3.9 (2)     Behavior: 3.8 (2)                 OTA: 3.9

Military Decorations: None

Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: NUC, CAR, KLM, NDM, SWASM (3 Bronze Stars), SSDR (3), JMUA

Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/Misconduct – Drug abuse (Use), authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630620.




Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

901204:  Applicant acknowledged understanding of the Navy's Drug & Alcohol Abuse policy.

930506:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 112A: wrongful use of controlled substance.
         Award: Forfeiture of $541 per month for 2 months, restriction and extra duty for 45 days, reduction to E-3. No indication of appeal in the record.

930507:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.

930510:  Applicant advised of his rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation. Applicant did not object to separation.

930518:  Commanding officer recommended discharge by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (use). Commanding officer’s comments (verbatim): "Although an outstanding sailor and exceptional worker, Fireman (Applicant) has been found guilty of drug abuse. He has no potential for further naval service. He is not capable of conforming to the rules and regulations of this ship and the Navy and is simply unwilling to conduct himself in a manner within the standards of good order and discipline. His conduct falls with the parameters of reference (a) (MILPERSMAN 3630620) and discharge is warranted."

930520:  Medical evaluation: Positive urinalysis for THC. Admits to one time use. Does not appear to be a problem but should b e offered CAAC screen and Level III on discharge (per VA) if desired.

930611:  BUPERS directed the applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (use).


PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT
REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The applicant was discharged on 930625 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (use) (A). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B). After a thorough review of the records, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).

The applicant introduced no decisional issues for consideration by the Board.

Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

A . Navy Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 5/93, effective 05 Mar 93 until 21 Jul 94, Article 3630620, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED MEMBERS BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT DUE TO DRUG ABUSE .

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.



PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT


If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may obtain a copy of DoD Directive 1332.28 by writing to:

                  DA Military Review Boards Agency
                  Management Information and Support Directorate
                  Armed Forces Reading Room
                  Washington, D.C. 20310-1809

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  Washington Navy Yard
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington, D.C. 20374-5023     



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00283

    Original file (ND00-00283.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND00-00283 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 000103, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. Age at Entry: 18 Years Contracted: 4 (24 months extension) Education Level: 12 AFQT: 79 Highest Rate: ET3 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks): Performance: 3.70 (2) Behavior: 3.70 (2) OTA: 3.80 Military Decorations: None...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00244

    Original file (ND00-00244.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/ Misconduct – Drug abuse (Use), authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630620.The NDRB did note an administrative error on the original DD Form 214. Commanding officer ordered reduction of forfeiture to $530.00 for 1 month.870903: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse as evidenced by NAVDRUGLAB Oakland, CA 102100Z AUG...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-01429

    Original file (ND04-01429.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:None PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: USN 881201 - 920908 HON Inactive: USNR (DEP) 880927 - 881130 COG Period of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00186

    Original file (ND00-00186.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    890624: CNMPC directed the applicant's discharge under Other Than Honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to Drug abuse (Use). PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged on 890621 under Other Than Honorable conditions for misconduct due to Drug abuse (Use) (A). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00304

    Original file (ND99-00304.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND99-00304 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 981222, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :970111: Drug and Alcohol Abuse Report: Marijuana abuse, unit sweep, less than monthly ashore off duty. Chief of Naval Operations Instruction (OPNAVINST 5350.4B) of 13 Sep 99 entitled Alcohol and Drug Abuse Prevention and Control PART IV -...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00513

    Original file (ND99-00513.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND99-00513 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 990301, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged on 980519 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (use) (A). The applicant’s first issue (equity) states the discharge authority did not consider his 33 months...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00009

    Original file (ND00-00009.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In the acknowledgement letter to the applicant, the applicant was informed that the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing. The discharge shall remain: GENERAL (UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS)/MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 1910-146, formerly Article 3630620.The NDRB did note an administrative error on the original DD Form 214. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00909

    Original file (ND99-00909.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I would like the board to review my documents to request a change in discharge. The applicant request’s the Board review his documents and change his discharge. On 6 August 1996, the Commander, Naval Training Center, Great Lakes directed the applicant be discharged with an Other Than Honorable for Pattern of misconduct, which is also reflected on the applicant’s form DD-214.

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00959

    Original file (ND99-00959.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered: Six pages from applicant's service record Copy of Leave and Earning Statement for period covering 01-28Feb97 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: None Inactive: USNR (DEP) 950919 - 960116 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 960117 Date of Discharge: 970322 Length of Service...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00076

    Original file (ND99-00076.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    For these reasons and the fact that this service member has become an administrative burden to this command, I strongly recommend MSSR (applicant) be separated from the naval Service with a General Discharge.891212: CNMPC directed the applicant's discharge under honorable conditions (general) by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (use). PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged on 891219 with a GENERAL discharge because of...