Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00522
Original file (ND01-00522.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-RMSN, USN
Docket No. ND01-00522

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review, received 010315, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. The applicant did not list any representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 010907. After a thorough review of the records, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the applicant’s service. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630620.


PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues (verbatim)

 1. My discharge is inequitable because up until that specific date my performance, appearance and service record were all outstanding. To be specific my evals were 3.8 to 4.0, I had received at least one (1) LOC from RADM M___ D. H____, LOC from Capt K. F. L____, also I received numerous LOA's from Capt H____, CDR V.G. G____(3). In all personnel inspections received 4.0's . I request that this information be highly considered in upgrading my discharge to honorable.

 Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:
None

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Active: USN                        None
         Inactive: USNR (DEP)     920702 - 920714  COG

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 920715               Date of Discharge: 951222

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 03 05 08
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 20                          Years Contracted: 4

Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 71

 Highest Rate: RM3

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: 4.00 (4)    Behavior: 4.00 (4)                OTA: 3.95

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: NDSM, OSR

Days of Unauthorized Absence: None

Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630620.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

951212:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 112a: Wrongful use, possession of controlled substance.
Award: Forfeiture of $400.00 per month for 2 months, restriction and extra duty for 45 days, reduction to E-3. No indication of appeal in the record.
951213:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse as evidenced by self-admittance on 951207.
951213:          Applicant advised of his rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation.
951214:  Commanding officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (use) as evidenced by self-admittance on 951207.

951220:  BUPERS directed the applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse (use).

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT
REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The applicant was discharged on 951222 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to drug abuse (use) (A). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (B). After a thorough review of the records, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).

In response to the applicant’s issue, the Board found that the applicant’s performance evaluation averages and service record were indeed outstanding, until the time that he began using illegal drugs. The Navy had a ‘zero tolerance’ policy towards service members who wrongfully used controlled substances. The applicant violated that policy. His excellent record does not mitigate the seriousness of his misconduct. The discharge was proper and equitable. Relief denied.

 Normally, to permit relief, an error or injustice must have existed during the period of enlistment in question. No such error or injustice occurred during the applicant’s enlistment. Additionally, there is no law, or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded based solely on the passage of time, or good conduct in civilian life, subsequent to leaving the service. However, the NDRB is authorized to consider outstanding post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge, to the extent that such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Verifiable proof of any post-service accomplishments must be provided in order for the applicant to claim post-service conduct and behavior as a reason to upgrade a less than Honorable discharge. Evidence of continuing educational pursuits, an employment record, documentation of community service, certification of non-involvement with civil authorities and proof of his not using drugs, are examples of verifiable documents that should have been provided to receive consideration for clemency, based on post-service conduct. The applicant did not provide any of these documents. He is reminded that he remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of his discharge. The applicant can provide additional documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments at that time. Legal representation at a personal appearance hearing is highly recommended but not required.

Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A . Navy Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 9/94, effective
22 Jul 94 until 02 Oct 96, Article 3630620, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED MEMBERS BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT DUE TO DRUG ABUSE
B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 2, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.2, PROPRIETY OF THE DISCHARGE.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174C of 22 August 1984 (Manual for Discharge Review, 1984), enclosure (1), Chapter 9, paragraph 9.3, EQUITY OF THE DISCHARGE.

PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at " afls10.jag.af.mil ".

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Naval Council of Personnel Boards
                  Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                  720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023      


Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01194

    Original file (ND03-01194.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEWDECISIONAL DOCUMENT ex-SR, USN Docket No. The Commander, Naval Personnel Command, Millington, TN, will be notified, recommending the DD Form 214 be corrected or reissued, as appropriate. Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :950209: NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 91: Disobey a lawful order, violation of UCMJ, Article 117: Wrongful use of provoking words, violation of UCMJ, Article 134: Communicate...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00169

    Original file (ND99-00169.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    No indication of appeal in the record.951214: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse as evidenced by all drug incidents in your current enlistment.951219: Applicant advised of his rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to waive all rights.951222: Commanding officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00190

    Original file (ND01-00190.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEWDECISIONAL DOCUMENT ex-HTFN, USN Docket No. ND01-00190 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 001205, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00436

    Original file (ND04-00436.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Applicant does not object to this separation.960521: Medical evaluation: Dr. S_ evaluated Applicant for drug abuse and found the Applicant to be drug dependent, not a drug abuser.960524: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for the least favorable characterization for service authorized in your case is general (under honorable conditions) by reason of misconduct due to...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-01062

    Original file (ND01-01062.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND01-01062 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 010813, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. The Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) also advised that the board first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Letter from...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00948

    Original file (ND99-00948.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Age at Entry: 25 Years Contracted: 4 Education Level: 12 AFQT: 66 Highest Rate: STG2 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks): Performance: 4.00 (2) Behavior: 4.00 (2) OTA: 4.00 Military Decorations: None Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: NDSM, NRSSR, GCM Days of Unauthorized Absence: 2 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630620. PART III –...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00104

    Original file (ND03-00104.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I was told if I elected admin board, I would not receive the board until after my 6 month cruise was over. Airman Apprentice (Applicant) denies use of marijuana and points to his use of various fitness supplements and an antibiotic as the possible causes for a positive urinalysis result. The summary of service clearly documents that drug abuse was the reason the Applicant was discharged.

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00784

    Original file (ND99-00784.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The discharge shall remain: GENERAL UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 1910-146, formerly Article 3630620. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copies of DD Form 214 (2) Letter from Department of Commerce PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: USN 930907 - 970213 HON Inactive: USNR (DEP) 930430 -...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-01021

    Original file (ND99-01021.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEWDECISIONAL DOCUMENT ex-AA, USN Docket No. I, (applicant), do respectfully request that you, the board, to review my discharge and consider an upgrade. PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00138

    Original file (ND00-00138.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copy of degree of Bachelor of Arts in Liberal Arts and Sciences Psychology dated December 28, 1998 Copy of transcript from San Diego University List of character references PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Active: None Inactive: USNR (DEP) 900427 - 900822 COG Period of Service Under Review :Date of...