Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00781
Original file (ND04-00781.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

ex-AR, USN
Docket No. ND04-00781

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review was received on 20040414. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. The Applicant requests a documentary record review. The Applicant did not list any the representative on the DD Form 293.

Decision

A documentary review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20041222. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, no impropriety or inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service was discovered by the NDRB. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the character of the discharge shall not change. The discharge shall remain: UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630600.

PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Issues, as stated
Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application:

1. “First off, Thank you for your time. I would like to be considered for a change of discharge, and more importantly a change of re-entry code. I believe I was just too immature at the time I was enlisted in the Navy, being my first time away from home and such. Anyway, I have straightened out since and would sincerely like to request a second chance to serve my country. This however cant be done at the moment due to my re-entry code as it is. Thank you again for taking the time to review my application.”
Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
Fax cover sheet

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Inactive: USNR (DEP)     920417 - 920421  COG
         Active:                            None

 Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 920422               Date of Discharge: 940729

 Length of Service (years, months, days):

         Active: 02 03 08 (Does not exclude lost time)
         Inactive: None

 Age at Entry: 20                          Years Contracted: 4

Education Level: 12                        AFQT: 98

 Highest Rate: AA

 Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: 3.33 (3)    Behavior: 3.40 (3)                OTA: 3.33

 Military Decorations: None

 Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: NDSM

 Days of Unauthorized Absence: 5

 Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS/MISCONDUCT, authority: NAVMILPERSMAN, Article 3630600.

 Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

920423:  Retention Warning: Advised of deficiency (defective enlistment and induction due to fraudulent entry into naval service as evidenced by the failure to disclose pre-service civil involvement), notified of corrective actions and assistance available, advised of consequences of further deficiencies, and issued discharge warning.
        
931103:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 112: Drinking in a duty status on or about 931027.
         Award: Restriction and extra duty for 45 days, reduction to E-1. No indication of appeal in the record.
931122:  Retention Warning: Advised of deficiency (Drinking while in a duty status), notified of corrective actions and assistance available, advised of consequences of further deficiencies, and issued discharge warning.

940405:  Applicant commenced a period of unauthorized absence this date.

940411:  Applicant surrendered from unauthorized absence this date.
940531:  NJP for violation of UCMJ, Article 86: Unauthorized absence on or about 940505 - 940511.
         Award: Forfeiture of $416.40 pay per month for 2 months, restriction and extra duty for 30 days (forfeiture suspended for 6 months). No indication of appeal in the record.
940606:  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge with a least favorable characterization of under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense.
940606:  Applicant advised of rights and having elected not to consult with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27(b), elected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation and to submit statements on his own behalf either verbally or in writing.
940614:  Commanding Officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense.

940703:  BUPERS directed the Applicant's discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion

The Applicant was discharged on 19940729 under other than honorable conditions for misconduct due to commission of a serious offense (A and B). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (C). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (D and E).

Issue 1: Normally, to permit relief, an impropriety or inequity must have existed during the period of enlistment in question. No such impropriety or inequity is evident during the Applicant’s enlistment. An under other than honorable conditions discharge is warranted when significant negative aspects of a member's conduct or performance of duty outweigh the positive aspects of the member's military record. The Applicant’s service was marred by nonjudicial punishment proceedings for violations of UCMJ Articles 86, unauthorized absence and 111, drunk on duty. The Applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of his service, reflects his willful failure to meet the requirements of his contract with the U.S. Navy and falls far short of that required for an upgrade of his characterization of service. Relief is not warranted.

Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter. Only the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) can make changes to reenlistment codes.

There is no law or regulation, which provides that an unfavorable discharge may be upgraded, based solely on the passage of time or good conduct in civilian life subsequent to leaving naval service. The NDRB is authorized, however, to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. Examples of documentation that should be provided to the Board include proof of educational pursuits, verifiable employment records, documentation of community service, and certification of non-involvement with civil authorities. As of this time, the Applicant has not provided any documentation for the Board to consider. Relief denied.

The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any other evidence related to his discharge at that time. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.

Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C), Change 9, effective
22 Jul 94 until 02 Oct 96, Article 3630600, SEPARATION OF ENLISTED PERSONNEL BY REASON OF MISCONDUCT – COMMISSION OF A SERIOUS OFFENSE.

B. Under the Manual for Courts-Martial, a punitive discharge is authorized for violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, Article 111, drunk on duty, if adjudged at a Special or General Court-Martial.

 C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, AUTHORITY/POLICY FOR DEPARTMENTAL DISCHARGE REVIEW.

D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 502, Propriety .

 E. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 503, Equity .




PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Directive before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Directive 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil” .

The names, and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
                   Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                   720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00158

    Original file (ND00-00158.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND00-00158 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 991109, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION The Board requested a correction to the DD214 to state “Continuous HONORABLE active service from 881108 through 920929.”

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01367

    Original file (ND03-01367.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    No indication of appeal in the record.930203: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense as evidenced by your service record.930205: Applicant advised of his rights and having consulted with counsel certified under UCMJ Article 27B, elected to appear before an Administrative Discharge Board. Evidence of continuing educational pursuits, a positive employment record,...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-00802

    Original file (ND99-00802.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND99-00802 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 990524, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. Age at Entry: 18 Years Contracted: 4 Education Level: 12 AFQT: 35 Highest Rate: HN Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks): Performance: 2.73 (3) Behavior: 2.60 (3) OTA: 3.33 Military Decorations: None Unit/Campaign/Service Awards: MUC Days of Unauthorized Absence: None Character, Narrative...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00502

    Original file (ND00-00502.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION To the review board, I appreciate your time for considering my request for a review. Charge II: violation of the UCMJ, Article 87: Specification: Missed ship's movement through neglect on 25Jan93.

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-01144

    Original file (ND99-01144.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION Charge I: violation of the UCMJ, Article 112A: Specification: Wrongfully distribute 1/8 ounce of cocaine on 7Nov90. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).Responding to the applicant’s issue, the Board found nothing in the records, nor did the applicant provide anything to indicate or to show that there...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01049

    Original file (ND03-01049.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214 (2) Letter from Department of Veterans Affairs, dated April 11, 2003 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: None Active: None Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 930604 Date of Discharge: 950221 Length of Service (years, months, days):Active: 01 08...

  • NAVY | DRB | 1999_Navy | ND99-01249

    Original file (ND99-01249.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 Letter from applicant outlining event leading to discharge (3pgs). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).The applicant’s issue states: “If more evidence is needed to verify that there was a need for me...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500049

    Original file (ND0500049.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to general/under honorable conditions. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Directive 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Directive.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00183

    Original file (ND03-00183.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    My life was robbed because T_ F_ and J_ W_ didn’t’ like Hispanics.” Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:None PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USNR (DEP) 860130 - 860223 COG Active: None Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 860224 Date of Discharge: 890301 Length of Service (years, months, days):Active: 03 00...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00952

    Original file (ND02-00952.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant's DD Form 214 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: USNR (DEP) 930619 - 930705 COG Active: None Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 930706 Date of Discharge: 951201 Length of Service (years, months, days):Active: 02 04 26 Inactive: None No further actions required in this...